Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 51(2): 102270, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34775128

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In case of term prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM), expectant management is a reasonable option. We aimed at assessing the frequency of spontaneous onset of labor after two days of term PROM and its associated factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women delivering at a tertiary center of a singleton in cephalic presentation, after a term PROM with an unfavorable cervix and with an expectant management period of at least two days were included during a 2-year period. Women were excluded in case of induction of labor before or at day 2(D2) or of spontaneous labor before D2. The frequency of spontaneous labor was assessed, then maternal characteristics at admission and at D2 were compared between women with a spontaneous onset of labor before D3, and women with an induced labor at D3. The maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. The factors associated with spontaneous labor in univariate analysis were tested in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Among the 11 608 women delivering at term, 933(8.4%) had a term PROM. Among them, 191 had an unfavorable cervix after D2 including 86(45%) women with a spontaneous labor onset between D2 and D3 and 105(55%) induced at D3. Maternal age below 35 years (reference ≥35years) and Bishop score of 3,4 and 5,6 at D2 (reference score 0-2) were significantly associated with spontaneous onset of labor, respectively aOR 2.62; 95%CI[1.26-5.45], aOR 2.38; 95%CI[1.18-4.78] and aOR 10.16; 95%CI[3.67-28.15]. DISCUSSION: In women with a term PROM and an unfavorable cervix, spontaneous labor still occurs in nearly half of women undelivered after two days of expectant management.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Trabalho de Parto , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Obes Surg ; 27(5): 1391, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28243858

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become one of the most popular bariatric surgeries worldwide, given good result concerning weight loss and long-term morbidity. While surgical technique is well standardized, specimen extraction is still a matter of controversy between surgeons. In this video, we present a simple, fast, safe, and reproducible technique of specimen extraction after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. METHODS: After the sleeve gastrectomy is completed with hemostasis, the specimen is introduced in a retrieval bag. Stomach specimen orientation is very important, such as the largest specimen part is removed firstly. The 2 cm of the held fundus is introduced under direct vision in the 12-mm trocar. Traction is applied to simultaneously remove the trocar, the cord of the bag, and the grasper. The stomach is held by a Kocher once it is outside the peritoneal cavity. The bag is opened and everted to protect the wound. The pneumoperitoneum is deflated to relax the abdominal wall. The specimen is removed from the abdominal cavity by traction hand-over-hand grasping with gauze. RESULTS: We have applied this technique in 200 consecutive patients with an average body mass index of 42.5. At the first postoperative visit (1 month), none of the patients experienced wound infection. Clinical incisional hernia was detected in one patient (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This hand-over-hand grasping with gauze technique is simple, safe, reproducible, and time saving.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estômago/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Gastrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA