Improved patient functioning after treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: an open-label study of fentanyl buccal tablet in patients with cancer pain.

PURPOSE: This open-label study evaluated the effects of fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) on functioning and mood in cancer patients with breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). METHODS: Opioid-tolerant patients in seven European countries with up to four BTcP episodes/day received FBT doses (100-800 µg) identified during open-label titration to treat up to eight BTcP episodes during an open-label treatment period. In countries where FBT was not commercially available, patients could enter an open-label continuation phase. Functionality and satisfaction assessments included change from baseline to the end of the treatment period in the modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-7S) seven-item interference subscale, patient's global assessment of satisfaction and ease of use, and Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 330 randomized patients, 218 completed the treatment period and 88 entered the continuation phase. Median background pain intensity was 4.0 (mild) throughout the study. After the treatment period, mean (SD) global modified BPI-7S score improved from 39.7 (15.9) at baseline to 31.6 (16.8) for a mean change of -8.6 (95% confidence interval CI -10.5, -6.7; P < 0.0001), and 74.5% of patients reported improvement in overall status (PGIC) compared with 25.5% who reported no change or worsening (P < 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events (≥2 patients) during the continuation phase were application site erythema (6.9%), application site swelling (4.6%), and vertigo (4.6%). CONCLUSIONS: FBT may improve patient functioning, mood, and overall satisfaction in the management of BTcP. Long-term data did not indicate new safety concerns with FBT doses up to 800 µg.

A review of the pharmacokinetic profile of transmucosal fentanyl formulations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transitory flare of moderate-to-severe pain that occurs in patients with stable, controlled persistent pain. Management of BTP episodes is difficult because frequency, time-to-peak intensity, and duration of episodes vary both within and between individuals. Formulations of fentanyl that use a buccal, sublingual, or nasal transmucosal route of administration have been developed for the treatment of BTP in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer. These formulations allow rapid passage into the bloodstream and avoid first-pass metabolism and, therefore, are more likely to match the time-course of BTP episodes than are oral formulations. The purposes of this analysis were to identify and review published data describing the pharmacokinetic properties of rapid-onset fentanyl formulations and to evaluate these properties in view of the temporal dynamic characteristics of BTP in order to help guide medical practice. METHODS: Relevant publications were searched in the PubMed database from 1998. The plasma drug concentration-time profile of each formulation obtained from the identified studies was adjusted to a consistent scale for comparison. RESULTS: The data revealed that the various transmucosal formulations resulted in three typical plasma fentanyl concentration profiles: (1) type 1: a very rapid rise and short duration; (2) type 2: a rapid increase and sustained intensity; and (3) type 3: a slower onset and longer duration. CONCLUSIONS: Given the substantial variability of BTP episodes experienced by patients, these pharmacokinetic differences may provide useful information for a physician who is selecting a rapid-onset opioid medication for a patient.

A large simple clinical trial prototype for assessment of OTC drug effects using patient-reported data.

PURPOSE: Innovative methods are needed to assess risks related to treatment for common medical conditions, where therapy is usually patient-directed or over-the-counter (OTC), and where tolerability, i.e. patient experienced events, may affect patterns of use. A large-scale, blinded, randomised trial was conducted to compare the tolerability of paracetamol (acetaminophen), aspirin and ibuprofen at OTC doses, with patient-reported adverse event (AE) data as the primary outcome. METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate pain were randomised to either: paracetamol up to 3 g/d, aspirin up to 3 g/d or ibuprofen up to 1200 mg/d for 7 days. Patients recorded AE and severity in a diary as the primary data source. After inclusion, contact with patients by general practitioner (GP) investigators was by telephone after 24 hours and 7-9 days, and unscheduled visits, when GPs recorded AE. The study outcome was the frequency of significant adverse event (SGAE) (serious, severe, moderate or undefined intensity, or resulting in withdrawal or an investigator visit). RESULTS: Of 8677 patients included, 44 patients were non-evaluable, leaving 8633 evaluable patients; 1347 patients reported SGAE (paracetamol: 14.5%, aspirin: 18.7%, ibuprofen: 13.7%). Completed diaries were returned by 98.5% of patients, and only 49 cases were lost to follow-up (0.6%). Almost all patients were contacted by telephone, 99.3% at the first call, and 98.5% at the second. Most SGAE were reported by patients; only 27 patients (2%) had a SGAE reported only by the GP. The tolerability rankings by treatment were consistent for all categories of SGAE: aspirin had the highest incidence of SGAE, and ibuprofen and paracetamol, lower, comparable incidences. CONCLUSIONS: A large, simple, randomised trial with patient-generated data can provide a sensitive source of information on AE, particularly in comparative safety assessments of OTC medications and other short-term therapies. This suggests reconsideration of the view that investigators are the most valid source for identifying and reporting AE.

Risk factors for adverse events in analgesic drug users: results from the PAIN study.

BACKGROUND: The relative influence of various risk factors for adverse events (AE) in analgesics users have never been precisely quantified. Advantage was taken of data generated in the paracetamol, aspirin and ibuprofen new tolerability (PAIN) study, a large randomized double-blinded trial of paracetamol, aspirin or ibuprofen for common pain in general practice to attempt this. OBJECTIVE: Identify and quantify factors associated with the occurrence of AE in users of analgesic drugs. METHOD: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of potential risk factors for all AE, clinically significant AE (SAE) and clinically significant gastro-intestinal AE (GI SAE). RESULTS: Of the 8677 patients included in the study, 8633 contributed data. The main risk factors for SAE were indication: compared to those treated for musculoskeletal pain, patients treated for menstrual pain had an odds ratio (95% Confidence Interval) of 0.4 (0.2-0.7), sore throat 0.6 (0.5-0.8), cold and flu 0.7 (0.6-0.8), headache 0.8 (0.7-1.0); concomitant use of medication contra-indicated in the drugs' labeling (OR: 2.2; 1.6-2.9); increasing number of other concomitant medications: 1: OR 1.5 (1.3-1.8); 2-3: OR 1.9 (1.6-2.3); more than 3: OR (2.7; 2.1-3.5); treatment with aspirin: OR 1.4; (1.2-1.6) but not ibuprofen: OR 0.9; (0.8-1.1) compared to paracetamol; history of previous GI disorder OR 1.4 (1.0-1.8); female gender: OR 1.3 (1.1-1.4). Age was not significantly associated with AE in the multivariate analysis. Risk factors for all AE and GI SAE were mostly the same as for significant AE, but there were fewer GI SAE with ibuprofen than with paracetamol (OR 0.8; 0.6-0.9). CONCLUSION: Apart from the analgesic used and its indication, the main risk factors identified for AE in users of first-line analgesics for common pain were the number and nature of concomitant medication.