The human microbiome in immunobullous disorders and lichen planus.

For several decades, there has been a significant growth in the incidence of autoimmune diseases. Studies indicate that genetic factors may not be the only trigger for disease development and that dysbiosis of the microbiome may be another mechanism involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. The role of the microbiome in the development of common skin disorders such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, acne and rosacea is increasingly well understood. However, few studies have focused on lichen planus and the rare acquired immunobullous diseases, both mucocutaneous groups of disorders linked to skin, oral and gut microbiomes. This review provides an insight into the current understanding of how the microbiome may contribute to the development of autoimmunity and to the maintenance and exacerbation of acquired immunobullous and lichenoid diseases. These mechanisms may have implications for future preventive and therapeutic approaches.

Updated S2 K guidelines for the management of bullous pemphigoid initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV).

BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes. This disease typically affects the elderly and presents with itch and localized or, most frequently, generalized bullous lesions. A subset of patients only develops excoriations, prurigo-like lesions, and eczematous and/or urticarial erythematous lesions. The disease, which is significantly associated with neurological disorders, has high morbidity and severely impacts the quality of life. OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY: The Autoimmune blistering diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology sought to update the guidelines for the management of BP based on new clinical information, and new evidence on diagnostic tools and interventions. The recommendations are either evidence-based or rely on expert opinion. The degree of consent among all task force members was included. RESULTS: Treatment depends on the severity of BP and patients' comorbidities. High-potency topical corticosteroids are recommended as the mainstay of treatment whenever possible. Oral prednisone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day is a recommended alternative. In case of contraindications or resistance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapies, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate acid, may be recommended. The use of doxycycline and dapsone is controversial. They may be recommended, in particular, in patients with contraindications to oral corticosteroids. B-cell-depleting therapy and intravenous immunoglobulins may be considered in treatment-resistant cases. Omalizumab and dupilumab have recently shown promising results. The final version of the guideline was consented to by several patient organizations. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines for the management of BP were updated. They summarize evidence- and expert-based recommendations useful in clinical practice.

S2k guidelines (consensus statement) for diagnosis and therapy of dermatitis herpetiformis initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV).

INTRODUCTION: Dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) is a chronic, pruritic, gluten-induced skin disorder characterized by subepidermal granular IgA deposition and a variable degree of enteropathy identical to that seen in coeliac disease. So far, there has been no European consensus about the management of DH. METHODS: The guidelines were created by small subgroups of a guideline committee consisting of 26 specialists from various medical fields and one patients' representative. The members of the committee then discussed the guidelines and voted for the final version at two consensus meetings. The guidelines were developed under the support of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) and in collaboration with the European Dermatology Forum (EDF). RESULTS: The guidelines summarize evidence-based and expert-based recommendations (S2 level) for the management of DH (see Appendix). CONCLUSION: These guidelines will improve the quality of management of DH and support dermatologists in their diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.

European guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part I.

This guideline on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) has been elaborated by the Task Force for Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) with a contribution of physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline encompassing a systematic review of the literature until June 2019 in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. This first part covers methodology, the clinical definition of MMP, epidemiology, MMP subtypes, immunopathological characteristics, disease assessment and outcome scores. MMP describes a group of autoimmune skin and mucous membrane blistering diseases, characterized by a chronic course and by predominant involvement of the mucous membranes, such as the oral, ocular, nasal, nasopharyngeal, anogenital, laryngeal and oesophageal mucosa. MMP patients may present with mono- or multisite involvement. Patients' autoantibodies have been shown to be predominantly directed against BP180 (also called BPAG2, type XVII collagen), BP230, laminin 332 and type VII collagen, components of junctional adhesion complexes promoting epithelial stromal attachment in stratified epithelia. Various disease assessment scores are available, including the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MMPDAI), the Autoimmune Bullous Skin disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS), the 'Cicatrising Conjunctivitis Assessment Tool' and the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS). Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including DLQI, ABQOL and TABQOL, can be used for assessment of quality of life to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and monitor disease course.

European Guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part II.

This guideline has been initiated by the task force Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, including physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline that systematically reviewed the literature on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until June 2019, with no limitations on language. While the first part of this guideline addressed methodology, as well as epidemiology, terminology, aetiology, clinical presentation and outcome measures in MMP, the second part presents the diagnostics and management of MMP. MMP should be suspected in cases with predominant mucosal lesions. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy to detect tissue-bound IgG, IgA and/or complement C3, combined with serological testing for circulating autoantibodies are recommended. In most patients, serum autoantibodies are present only in low levels and in variable proportions, depending on the clinical sites involved. Circulating autoantibodies are determined by indirect IF assays using tissue substrates, or ELISA using different recombinant forms of the target antigens or immunoblotting using different substrates. The major target antigen in MMP is type XVII collagen (BP180), although in 10-25% of patients laminin 332 is recognized. In 25-30% of MMP patients with anti-laminin 332 reactivity, malignancies have been associated. As first-line treatment of mild/moderate MMP, dapsone, methotrexate or tetracyclines and/or topical corticosteroids are recommended. For severe MMP, dapsone and oral or intravenous cyclophosphamide and/or oral corticosteroids are recommended as first-line regimens. Additional recommendations are given, tailored to treatment of single-site MMP such as oral, ocular, laryngeal, oesophageal and genital MMP, as well as the diagnosis of ocular MMP. Treatment recommendations are limited by the complete lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials.

The optimal oral biopsy site for diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Accepted 'standard practice' for the diagnosis of immunobullous disease is a perilesional sample for direct immunofluorescence (DIF). OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnostic outcomes of a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) with a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and pemphigus vulgaris (PV). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 251 DIF-positive patients with MMP and 77 DIF-positive patients with PV was undertaken. Parameters analysed included the intraoral sites of involvement and histopathological, DIF and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) findings. RESULTS: For MMP, PLB was positive in 134 of 143 (93·7%) samples, compared with 129 of 144 (89·6%) by NBPB. The diagnostic sensitivities for PLB (81%, 39 of 48) and NBPB (77%, 37 of 48) among 48 patients who underwent both techniques were not significantly different (P = 0·62). In gingival-only MMP, PLB was positive in 63 of 69 (91%) and NBPB was positive in 63 of 75 (84%). For multisite MMP, PLB was positive in 71 of 74 (96%) and NBPB was positive in 66 of 69 (96%). In gingival-only MMP, biopsies from reflected alveolar mucosa in 17 consecutive patients were positive in 17 of 17 cases (100%). For PV, PLB was positive in 42 of 43 (98%), compared with 42 of 42 (100%) by NBPB. Histopathology was diagnostic in 93 of 134 (69·4%) cases of MMP and 38 of 41 (93%) cases of PV. IIF was positive in 126 of 197 (64·0%) MMP and 68 of 74 (92%) PV patient sera. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series of combined oral DIF results in patients with MMP and PV, we have shown that NBPB is equivalent to PLB for the diagnosis of PV and multisite MMP, and is more sensitive than both histology and IIF. What's already known about this topic? The variation in sensitivity of oral biopsy sites for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) in the diagnosis of oral MMP and PV has not been studied in detail in large series of patients. Biopsy can be challenging due to difficult access and fragility of the oral mucosa. The diagnostic biopsy technique is therefore critical. What does this study add? We have shown that a normal buccal punch biopsy (NBPB) from uninvolved oral mucosa is as sensitive as a perilesional biopsy (PLB) for diagnosis of oral PV, and superior to serology and histology. For multisite MMP, NBPB is equivalent to PLB and is more sensitive than serology and histology. The oral punch biopsy technique on uninvolved buccal mucosa tissue is a simple and safe practical method for diagnosing oral PV and MMP.

Validation of an Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) tool for use in oral mucous membrane pemphigoid.

BACKGROUND: Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a rare autoimmune bullous disease predominantly affecting the oral mucosa. Optimal management relies upon thorough clinical assessment and documentation at each visit. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to validate the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) for the assessment of oral involvement in MMP. We also compared its inter- and intraobserver reliability with those of the oral parts of the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (MMPDAI), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). METHODS: Fifteen patients with mild-to-moderately severe oral MMP were scored for disease severity by 10 oral medicine clinicians from four U.K. centres using the ODSS, the oral sections of MMPDAI and ABSIS, and PGA. Two clinicians rescored all patients after 2 h. RESULTS: In terms of reliability, the interobserver ODSS total score intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0·97, MMPDAI activity 0·59 and damage 0·15, ABSIS total 0·84, and PGA 0·72. The intraobserver ICCs (two observers) for ODSS total were 0·97 and 0·93; for MMPDAI activity 0·93 and 0·70 and damage 0·93 and 0·79; for ABSIS total 0·99 and 0·94; and for PGA 0·92 and 0·94. Convergent validity between ODSS and MMPDAI was good (correlation coefficient 0·88). The mean ± SD time for completion of ODSS was 93 ± 31 s, with MMPDAI 102 ± 24 s and ABSIS involvement 71 ± 18 s. The PGA took < 5 s. CONCLUSIONS: This study has validated the ODSS for the assessment of oral MMP. It has shown superior interobserver agreement over MMPDAI, ABSIS and PGA, and superior intraobserver reliability to MMPDAI. It is quick and easy to perform. What's already known about this topic? There are no validated scoring methodologies for oral mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP). Proposed disease activity scoring tools for MMP include the Mucous Membrane Disease Area Index (MMPDAI) and the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS). The Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) has been validated for use in oral pemphigus vulgaris (PV). It has been shown to be reliable and sensitive in both lichen planus (LP) and MMP. What does this study add? The ODSS has been shown to be a thorough, sensitive and reproducible, yet quick scoring tool for the assessment of oral involvement in MMP. Its versatility for use in oral PV, MMP and LP is an added advantage over other scoring methodologies. What are the clinical implications of this work? We propose that the ODSS be used as a clinical scoring tool for monitoring activity in oral MMP in clinical practice as well as for use in multicentre studies.

Updated S2K guidelines on the management of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus initiated by the european academy of dermatology and venereology (EADV).

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus encompasses a group of life-threatening autoimmune bullous diseases characterized by blisters and erosions of the mucous membranes and skin. Before the era of immunosuppressive treatment, pemphigus was almost always fatal. Due to its rarity, only few randomized controlled therapeutic trials are available. Recently, rituximab has been approved as first-line treatment for moderate and severe pemphigus vulgaris in Europe and the United States. OBJECTIVES: The Autoimmune blistering diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) has initiated a throughout update of the guideline for the management of patients with pemphigus. RESULTS: The guidelines for the management of pemphigus were updated, and the degree of consent among all task force members was included. The final version of the guideline was consented by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and several patient organizations.

Mucous membrane pemphigoid and oral blistering diseases.

The autoimmune blistering disorders present with variable frequency in the oral cavity. Recognition of their key clinical features at presentation is important, as there are many causes of oral ulceration. Careful history-taking, clinical examination, an understanding of pathogenesis and appropriate investigations are essential. With the exception of the rare genodermatoses that may lead to blistering and oral ulceration, the majority of patients have an acquired disorder. These include the rare autoimmune blistering diseases mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), pemphigus vulgaris (PV), linear IgA disease, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and paraneoplastic pemphigus. Important clinical differential diagnoses include erythema multiforme, which may be mistaken for PV in appearance, while oral lichen planus may be indistinguishable from MMP. Angina bullosa haemorrhagica may also present with tense haemorrhagic bullae, and in the absence of diagnostic tests, requires an astute clinical diagnosis based upon the history. Newer laboratory techniques have facilitated identification of target antigens and epitopes in the autoimmune blistering diseases, particularly in MMP. Current interest is in whether these relate to clinical presentation and outcomes. There have also been recent investigations into the use of saliva as an alternative medium to serum for the diagnosis of oral vesiculobullous lesions. Assessment of disease severity and measurement of quality of life at presentation and subsequent follow-up is paramount to interpreting therapeutic response. Furthermore, combining these scores with serological and/or salivary biomarkers is valuable in the assessment of clinical response. In this paper, we discuss MMP and its important differential diagnoses.

An Oral Disease Severity Score validated for use in oral pemphigus vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a rare autoimmune bullous disease, which can present with recalcitrant oral mucosal lesions. Optimal management of PV relies upon careful clinical assessment and documentation. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to validate the Oral Disease Severity Score (ODSS) for the assessment of oral involvement in PV. A secondary aim was to compare its inter- and intraobserver variability and ease of use with the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and the oral scoring methods used in the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS) and the Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI). METHODS: Fifteen patients with mild-to-moderately severe oral PV were scored for disease severity by 10 oral medicine clinicians using the ODSS, the PGA and the oral sections of ABSIS and PDAI. Two clinicians rescored all patients after a minimum 2-h interval. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For the ODSS total score the ICC was 0·83, for PDAI (oral total activity) 0·79, ABSIS (oral total) 0·71 and PGA 0·7. Intraobserver agreement between initial scoring and rescoring of the same patient by two clinicians demonstrated an ICC for each of 0·97 and 0·96 for ODSS total score; 0·99 and 0·82 for PDAI oral activity; 0·86 and 0·45 for ABSIS total; and 0·99 and 0·64 for PGA. Convergent validity was good, with a correlation coefficient > 0·5 (P < 0·001). The mean ± SD times taken to complete each scoring method were ODSS 76 ± 37 s, PDAI 117 ± 16 s and ABSIS 75 ± 19 s. CONCLUSIONS: This study has validated the ODSS for the assessment of oral PV. It has shown superior inter- and intraobserver reliability to PDAI, ABSIS and PGA and is quick to perform.

Oral ulcers as a presentation of secondary syphilis.

The incidence of syphilis is increasing, and it typically presents in patients with known risk factors, often to genitourinary physicians. Patients presenting to a dermatologist or ophthalmologist will more likely have secondary syphilis, with the potential for having the associated complications. Early recognition is therefore vital to limit both the disease and risk of further contact spread. In this review, we include two case histories demonstrating the value of recognizing oral signs. Additionally, we review the currently accepted diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations.

Serum and salivary IgG and IgA antibodies to desmoglein 3 in mucosal pemphigus vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: The use of saliva for the diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using desmoglein (Dsg)3 antigen has not been extensively documented, nor has the detection of serum IgA antibodies to Dsg3. OBJECTIVES: (i) To establish whether whole saliva might provide a suitable alternative to serum for diagnosing and monitoring PV; (ii) to investigate whether anti-Dsg3 IgA antibodies can be detected in serum and saliva and (iii) to establish whether there is an association between serum or saliva anti-Dsg3 antibodies and disease severity. METHODS: Precoated Dsg3 ELISA plates were used to test serum and/or saliva for IgG and IgA antibodies. Matched serum and whole saliva samples were collected from 23 patients with PV, 17 healthy subjects and 19 disease controls. All patients with PV, disease controls and six healthy controls provided matched parotid saliva. RESULTS: Whole saliva IgG antibodies to Dsg3 were detected in 14 of 23 patients (61%) and serum IgG antibodies were detected in 17 of 23 (74%) with a strong positive correlation. Serum IgA antibodies were detected in 14 of 23 patients with PV (61%) with a combined positivity (IgG and/or IgA antibodies to Dsg3) of 78% (18 of 23). We were unable to show IgA anti-Dsg3 antibodies in either whole or parotid saliva of patients with PV. Sequential samples showed that changes in IgG antibody titres in whole saliva were associated with a change in disease severity scores. CONCLUSIONS: Assay of salivary IgG antibodies to Dsg3 offers a diagnostic alternative to serum in the diagnosis and monitoring of PV. The role of anti-Dsg3 IgA antibodies requires further elucidation in the pathogenesis of PV.

Salivary IgA and IgG antibodies to bullous pemphigoid 180 noncollagenous domain 16a as diagnostic biomarkers in mucous membrane pemphigoid.

BACKGROUND: Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an uncommon mucocutaneous immunobullous disorder. Use of saliva for diagnosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the noncollagenous (NC) domain 16a of bullous pemphigoid antigen II (BP180) is not well described. OBJECTIVE: To establish whether whole or parotid saliva is a suitable alternative to serum for diagnosis of MMP. METHODS: Precoated BP180-NC16a ELISA plates were used to test serum, and whole and parotid saliva for IgG, IgA and secretory IgA antibodies. Patients with MMP (n = 64) provided matched serum and whole saliva. In addition 18 of the MMP patients also provided matched parotid saliva. Healthy controls (n = 50) provided matched serum and whole saliva and 6 of these additionally provided matched parotid saliva. An additional 16 disease controls provided matched serum, and whole and parotid saliva. RESULTS: In whole saliva, IgG antibodies were detected in 11/64 (17%), IgA in 23/64 (36%) and a combined positivity in 29/64 (45%). In parotid saliva, IgA antibodies were found in 8/18 (44%). Serum IgG antibodies were detected in 27/64 (42%), serum IgA antibodies in 18/64 (28%) and a combined positivity in 33/64 (52%). Combined use of serum and saliva increased detection of specific antibodies by 30%. Control samples were all negative (positive predictive value of 100% for all tests). The negative predictive values were 62% for IgA saliva, 65% for IgG serum, 59% for IgA serum and 56% for IgG saliva. CONCLUSIONS: IgG and IgA antibodies may provide a suitable diagnostic marker in MMP. Assay of salivary IgA antibodies to NC16a offers a similar diagnostic predictive value to serum.

Crescendo response to rituximab in oral pemphigus vulgaris: a case with 7-year follow-up.

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is an autoimmune blistering disease affecting the skin and mucous membranes. Rituximab, a CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody, has efficacy in PV management. We report a case of severe oral PV that showed a progressive response to repeated courses of rituximab, culminating in a rapid response within 4 weeks following severe relapse 4 years after initial therapy. It demonstrates the progressively shorter time to achieve partial or complete remission following rituximab infusions, combined with minimal adjuvant therapy over a 7-year follow-up period.

Post-acute phase and sequelae management of epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary DELPHI-based consensus.

BACKGROUND: Long-term sequelae are frequent and often disabling after epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)). However, consensus on the modalities of management of these sequelae is lacking. OBJECTIVES: We conducted an international multicentric DELPHI exercise to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding management of SJS/TEN sequelae. METHODS: Participants were sent a survey via the online tool "Survey Monkey" consisting of 54 statements organized into 8 topics: general recommendations, professionals involved, skin, oral mucosa and teeth, eyes, genital area, mental health, and allergy workup. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Results were analyzed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: Fifty-two healthcare professionals participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 100% of 54 initially proposed statements (disagreement index < 1). Among them, 50 statements were agreed upon as 'appropriate'; four statements were considered 'uncertain', and ultimately finally discarded. CONCLUSIONS: Our DELPHI-based expert consensus should help guide physicians in conducting a prolonged multidisciplinary follow-up of sequelae in SJS-TEN.

Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in severe mucocutaneous lichen planus: a retrospective review of 10 patients.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative lichen planus is an uncommon and severe subtype of lichen planus primarily affecting the oral mucosal surfaces. It may be associated with significant morbidity and often requires immunosuppressive therapy to achieve disease control. There have been no previous reports in which objective outcome measures have been used to assess the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in severe ulcerative lichen planus. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical responses of patients with severe ulcerative oral lichen planus who were treated with MMF at a tertiary oral medicine/dermatology centre. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of oral disease severity scores performed in 10 patients with recalcitrant ulcerative oral lichen planus (vulvovaginal-gingival, n = 8; penogingival, n = 1; oral, n = 1) before and after treatment with MMF therapy. The results were analysed using the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test. RESULTS: The mean duration of MMF treatment was 3·7 (SD ± 2·4) years with a mean follow-up of 4·2 (SD ± 2·7) years. The mean baseline oral disease severity scores (39·1 ± 11·9) improved by 40% after 12-15 months (24·3 ± 11·9, n = 8, P = 0·01) and by 43% after 21-24 months of MMF treatment (22·2 ± 10·4, n = 9, P = 0·01). Of the 10 patients, six achieved remission, one had well-controlled disease and three had partially controlled disease. Two patients who achieved remission successfully discontinued treatment. MMF was well tolerated in all patients. CONCLUSION: Our case series demonstrates the efficacy and favourable side-effect profile of MMF in the treatment of severe ulcerative lichen planus.