The "purse string" technique for anterior glenohumeral instability: long-term results 7-13-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The "Purse-String Technique" (PST) is an arthroscopic horizontal mattress suture technique for recurrent anterior shoulder instability that uses a single double-loaded suture anchor at the 4-o' clock position, achieving a Bankart labral repair and an infero-superior capsular shift. In this study, we describe the long-term results of the PST. METHODS: The study included 69 individuals (70 shoulders), with a mean age of 30 years, who had recurrent post-traumatic anteroinferior instability. A purse-string suture anchor at the 4-o'clock position was used to address the Bankart lesion and capsular laxity, recreating the anterior glenoid bumper. All patients were assessed via telephone interview at a mean of 116 months after surgery (7-13-year follow-up). RESULTS: Postoperatively, the mean Constant score was 94, mean Rowe score was 93 and mean Walch-Duplay score was 89. 89% of patients resumed their preinjury sport activities, with 61% of patients achieving preinjury levels and most professional athletes returning to full activity. Seven patients had recurrent dislocation postoperatively (10% failure rate). Of these patients, three had revision arthroscopic stabilization, one patient had revision arthroscopic stabilization with remplissage, two had a Latarjet procedure, whereas one patient decided to seek no further treatment. CONCLUSION: The long-term results of PST are promising, with a low failure rate, high patient satisfaction and a high rate of return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Case series; Treatment study.

Acute versus delayed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a consecutive cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) remains controversial. Open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) can be challenging, especially in elderly patients with poor bone quality, whereas hemiarthroplasty has had unpredictable outcomes. Conservative treatment may result in severe fracture sequelae with poor outcomes, requiring late reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in many cases. The past few years have seen a shift toward the use of RTSA for the treatment of PHFs. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RTSA between patients with acute fractures and patients who underwent delayed RTSA for fracture sequelae. Our hypothesis was that the outcomes of RTSA for acute PHFs would be better than those of delayed RTSA for fracture sequelae. METHODS: We followed up 36 patients with a mean age of 79.1 years who underwent primary RTSA for acute PHFs and 56 patients with a mean age of 72.1 years who underwent RTSA in delayed fashion for fracture sequelae, including failed ORIF. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. The mean follow-up period was 39.3 months in the acute RTSA group and 56.6 months in the delayed RTSA group. Demographic data, radiographs, and surgery data were prospectively collected and analyzed. At final follow-up, range of motion and radiographic analysis findings, as well as the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and Constant score (CS), were recorded. RESULTS: The clinical results favored the group undergoing acute RTSA for acute PHFs, with a mean SSV of 8.3 of 10 and adjusted CS of 88.9% compared with a mean SSV of 8.0 of 10 and adjusted CS of 77.6% in the group undergoing late RTSA for fracture sequelae-but without statistically significant differences between the groups. Although the acute RTSA group showed slightly better range-of-motion values, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups. No intraoperative complications occurred. The time from injury to the regaining of good pain-free function was significantly shorter in the acute RTSA group. CONCLUSION: Although there were no statistically significant differences in outcomes between early RTSA for acute PHFs and late RTSA for fracture sequelae, the time from injury to the regaining of good pain-free function was significantly shorter in the acute RTSA group. Therefore, we advocate early RTSA for acute PHFs in elderly patients to provide a quicker recovery and an early return to good predictable outcomes with a much shorter period of pain and discomfort. In cases of failed conservative treatment, malunion, or failed ORIF, salvage RTSA has the potential to provide a good outcome.

Accelerated rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative rehabilitation is considered essential and indeed routine practice following rTSA. However, the optimal approach to postoperative rehabilitation is unknown, based on protocols for anatomic TSA, and published literature is sparse, as is the quantity and quality of research evidence. The aim of this study is to outline the accelerated rehabilitation protocol (with immediate activity and no immobilization at all) following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and assess its safety and effectiveness compared to the more conservative rehabilitation protocols of immobilization in a sling for 6 weeks and for 3 weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2005 and October 2017, a total of 357 consecutive rTSA in 320 patients underwent a primary rTSA and were included in the study. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on rehabilitation protocol (6 and 3 weeks' postoperative immobilization, respectively, for groups 1 and 2, and no immobilization for group 3). Patients were assessed preoperatively and reviewed at 3 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter postoperatively. Constant score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), patient satisfaction, and pain scores were used at each appointment and patients assessed both clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 76 years (range 40-93). At 1-year follow-up, the CS improved from 16.6 (adjusted 23.9) to 63.2 (adjusted 91.5) in group 1 (n = 114), from 21.5 (adjusted 30.7) to 67.7 (adjusted 98.4) in group 2 (n = 125), and from 22.6 (adjusted 31.3) to 66.6 (adjusted 94.9) in group 3 (n = 118). Pain score improved from 3.1/15 preoperatively to 12.5/15 postoperatively in group 1, from 3.5/15 to 13/15 in group 2, and from 3.7/15 to 12.5/15 in group 3. SSV improved to 8.5/10, 8.6/10, and 8.1/10 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean range of motion (ROM) improved to 142° elevation and 131° abduction in group 1, 153° elevation and 144° abduction in group 2, and 149° elevation and 146° abduction in group 3. No statistically significance differences were observed in CS, SSV, patient satisfaction, pain, and ROM between the 3 groups. Less postoperative complications were observed in group 3 (No immobilization). CONCLUSION: Accelerated rehabilitation regime post rTSA without immobilization is safe and lead to reliable good clinical results and quick return to function. This study confirms noninferiority of the accelerated rehabilitation regime with fewer postoperative complications related to falls. Accelerated rehabilitation regime post rTSA have further psychological and emotional advantage to the patient, with earlier return to normal function and regaining independence. We recommend the accelerated rehabilitation regime without immobilization following rTSA.

Software simulations of changing offsets and thus soft tissue tension when revising anatomic to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in convertible platform systems.

BACKGROUND: Revision shoulder arthroplasty may involve the need to remove a well-fixed humeral stem. To avoid this, convertible platform systems have been introduced. The biomechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) differs from anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). The different humeral osteotomy and soft tissue tension may jeopardize the optimal results of the converted rTSA. The aim was to evaluate the radiographic parameters of soft tissue distraction when converting an aTSA to rTSA in a platform system and assess the capability of conversion without "over-stuffing" the shoulder in the "best-case scenario". METHODS: Radiographic analysis of soft tissue distraction parameters: difference in acromio-humeral distance, difference in lateral humeral offset and difference in latero-inferior displacement were evaluated in aTSA and in the converted rTSA in six different implants. Image analysing software was used on 10 non-deformed osteoarthritic shoulder X-rays to simulate conversion. RESULTS: The greatest increase in arm length was found for Tornier Ascend Flex (26.8 ± 3.6 mm) while the smallest increase was observed with Lima SMR (19.3 ± 4 mm). The humerus remained most lateralized with the Zimmer Anatomical/Inverse ( - 1.4 ± 2.9 mm) while Lima SMR ( - 15.8 ± 2.7 mm) was more medialized. The greatest increase in latero-inferior distance was found in the onlay systems. A group analysis of onlay rTSA showed an increase of 46% in arm length (p < 0.0001), 83% larger humeral offset (p < 0.0001) and 144% increase in latero-inferior distraction (p < 0.0001) when compared to inlay rTSA. CONCLUSION: The conversion of aTSA to rTSA using a convertible platform system may lead to significant increase in radiographic parameters corresponding to soft tissue tension. This may alter the biomechanics, restrict the convertibility or jeopardize the optimal clinical outcome of rTSA even in the best-case scenario.

Do elderly patients gain as much benefit from arthroscopic rotator cuff repair as their younger peers?

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to ascertain whether patients aged older than 75 years achieve outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair comparable to younger patients. METHODS: Arthroscopic cuff repair was performed in 60 shoulders of 59 patients aged older than 75 years. A control group of 60 younger patients, matched for sex, tear size, and American Society of Anesthesiology Functional Classification grade were included. Surgery occurred from 2006 to 2016. Prospective outcomes were the Constant score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value, pain, satisfaction, and operative complications. Mean follow-up was 29 months. RESULTS: The elderly group was a mean age of 78 years compared with 59 years for controls. Tear sizes were 25 massive, 20 large, 12 medium, and 3 small. The CS improved by 25.1 points in elderly patients compared with 23.7 points for controls (P = .742). Pain improved by 7.5 of 15 in elderly patients vs. 6.2 of 15 in controls (P = .055). Fifty-five of 59 older patients were satisfied compared with 52 of 60 controls (P = .378). The overall complication rate did not differ between the groups (P = .509). Both groups had 1 infection and 1 stiffness. An acromioclavicular joint cyst developed in 1 younger patient, and a traumatic retear occurred in 1 patient. Subsequent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed in 4 elderly patients at a mean of 28 months after cuff repair. Massive tears had higher risk for subsequent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (P = .026). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients benefit as much from arthroscopic rotator cuff repair as their younger counterparts. Similar improvements in CS, Subjective Shoulder Value, pain, and satisfaction occurred for both elderly and control patients. Arthroscopic repair was safe and effective in both groups. Even elderly patients with massive tears showed clinically significant improvements. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair should be considered as a valuable treatment irrespective of age.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral implant without a stem: clinical and radiologic outcomes in prospective 2- to 7-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder prostheses are increasingly used in recent years for treatment of glenohumeral arthropathy with deficient rotator cuff. Bone preservation is becoming a major goal in shoulder replacement surgery. Metaphyseal humeral components without a stem were developed to minimize bone resection and preserve bone. This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic outcomes at 2 to 7 years using a novel short metaphyseal reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) prosthesis without a diaphyseal stem. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2010, 102 consecutive patients underwent rTSA with this implant, and 98 (20 men, 78 women) were available for follow-up. Mean age was 74.4 years (range, 38-93 years). Indications were cuff tear arthropathy, 65; fracture sequelae, 12; rheumatoid arthritis, 13; failed rotator cuff repair, 3; cuff deficiency with loosening of anatomic prosthesis, 3; and acute trauma, 2; with 17 of these as revisions. RESULTS: Patients' satisfaction (Subjective Shoulder Value) improved from 8 of 100 to 85 of 100. The Constant score improved from 14 to 59 (age- and sex-adjusted, 86; P < .0001). Range of motion improved from 47° to 129° in elevation, 10° to 51° in external rotation, and 21° to 65° in internal rotation. Radiographic analysis showed no lucencies, subsidence, or stress shielding around the humeral or glenoid components. Glenoid notching was found in 21 patients (18 grade 1-2; 3 grade 3). CONCLUSIONS: The short metaphyseal rTSA design without a diaphyseal stem shows encouraging short- to midterm results, with excellent pain relief and shoulder function, restoration of good active range of motion, and high patient satisfaction scores. The design of this implant seems to result in improved rotational movements, low incidence of glenoid notching, and no implant loosening, subsidence, or stress shielding.

The 'hand squeeze' test for posterior 'muscle patterning instability' of the shoulder.

Muscular patterning can be a contributor of positional posterior shoulder instability. Failure to recognize this pattern may lead to unnecessary surgical treatment with high failure rate. We analyzed the results of a new simple clinical test (hand squeeze test). The test is regarded positive, if during squeezing with the contralateral hand and elevation of the involved arm, in pronation, no posterior shoulder dislocation occurs. The test is regarded negative if posterior dislocation does occur regardless of the "hand squeeze". The patients with positive test were treated conservatively. Ten patients (12 shoulders) were treated between July 2006 and July 2010. The 'hand squeeze' test was positive in 8 patients (10 shoulders) and negative in 2 patients (2 shoulders). Both patients with a negative sign had structural lesions in the glenohumeral joint confirmed on arthro-MRI and were treated operatively.

Pattern and time phase of shoulder function and power recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: It has been our observation that early during rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair, patients may take a step back before improving. The purpose of this study is to investigate the pattern and time phase of changes in Constant score and strength recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients underwent scoring preoperatively with the Constant score. All were followed up at 3 months and 6 months after surgery. The Constant score and strength at 3 months were compared with those at the 6-month mark. RESULTS: The mean Constant score improved from 46.4 points (SD, 17.3) preoperatively to 51.8 points (SD, 13.5) 3 months postoperatively (P = .0777). At 6 months postoperatively, the mean Constant score was 69.0 points (SD, 11.1), a significant increase from both the preoperative (P < .0001) and 3-month (P < .0001) results. The mean preoperative strength result of 4.5 kg (SD, 3.2) decreased significantly to 3.3 kg (SD, 1.8) at 3 months postoperatively (P = .0154) before improving to 5.8 kg (SD, 2.6) at 6 months postoperatively. The improvement in strength at 6 months was significant compared with both the preoperative (P = .0070) and 3-month (P < .0001) results. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is highly significant improvement in overall function (Constant score) and strength 6 months postoperatively, patients appear to take a step back before improving, in fact with a drop in strength at 3 months. This may cause concern in patients and may require assurance that time and effort with physiotherapy will improve function and symptoms.

Arthroscopically assisted internal fixation of the symptomatic unstable os acromiale with absorbable screws.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic meso- type os acromiale is a common pathology with inconsistent outcomes of treatment with various surgical techniques. We report the outcome of a new technique for arthroscopic fusion of symptomatic os acromiale with absorbable screws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 8 shoulders in 8 patients with symptomatic meso- type os acromiale who were treated with the use of a new technique for arthroscopic fusion with absorbable screws. The mean age was 54 years (range, 38-67 years), and the mean time from onset of symptoms to surgery was 18 months (range, 9-25 months). No patients reported a specific traumatic event before the onset of symptoms, and all noted the insidious onset of pain with no precipitating event. RESULTS: The average length of follow-up was 22 months (range, 12-36 month). The average Constant score improved from 49 points (range, 35-57 points) to 81 points (range, 75-86 points). The average satisfaction score improved from 4.5 of 10 (range, 2-6) to 8.5 of 10 (range 7-9). All patients made a good clinical recovery at 3 to 6 months after surgery. At the last follow-up, full radiographic union was observed in 6 patients, partial union in 1 patient, and persistent radiologic nonunion in 1 patient. Anterior bulging of the absorbable screws was noted in 2 patients, and the screws were trimmed 6 months after the first procedure. CONCLUSIONS: We have found that this new arthroscopic technique of fixation of os acromiale with absorbable screws provides promising clinical, cosmetic, and radiologic results with high patient satisfaction.

"Put your 'extended' finger on the bleeder": the use of direct pressure from the shaver blade to achieve hemostasis.

Maintaining good hemostasis is vital to ensure clear vision during arthroscopic surgery. This is most commonly achieved with electrocautery or radiofrequency devices. Another technique involves temporarily increasing the arthroscopic fluid inflow pressure to tamponade the bleeding. Unfortunately, both of these methods are not without risks or limitations and may involve extra costs. Our technique involves the use of the barrel end of the shaver blade to apply direct pressure on the bleeding vessel for 3 seconds to stop the bleeding. This is a simple, time-efficient, and cost-effective method of achieving hemostasis.

Minimally invasive fixation with modified palm tree technique for proximal humerus fractures: Outcomes in a series of 132 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Various surgical techniques and implants are available for surgical treatment of significantly displaced proximal humerus fractures. We describe a minimally invasive technique using 3 curved wires, inserted in a retrograde fashion into the humeral head. These are aimed to diverge within the humeral head to provide three separate 3-point fixations to achieve good stability. We present the results of proximal humerus fractures managed with the modified palm tree technique. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively including demographics, radiographs, clinical outcomes, complications and revision surgery for patients treated with the palm tree technique was performed. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2017, 132 patients underwent fixation with this technique. Average age was 61.8 years. Fifty-Eight fractures were 2 part, 46 were three part and 28 were four part. Average follow up was 26 months. In three to four part fractures, a bone graft substitute block was used behind the humeral head fragment for structural support. There were 11 early revisions (8.3%). In 7 cases the fixation failed early and was revised to other implants like angular & locking plates (4), hemiarthroplasties (2) and reverse arthroplasty (1). In 4 cases the construct was revised to achieve better positioning of the wires. From the 125 remaining patients, 120 achieved union(96.8%). There were 3 painless fibrous non-unions and 2 painful non-unions requiring revision. The mean final Constant score was 75.5 and subjective shoulder value was 7.8/10. Nine patients (6.8%) developed avascular necrosis of the humeral head of which three patients were revised later to an arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: This technique is a simple, minimally invasive technique which can be used for two, three and four part fractures with good functional outcomes and high union rates. No metalwork remains in the proximal humerus should another procedure like arthroplasty be required in case of avascular necrosis of the humeral head or fracture sequela.

Subacromial impingement syndrome: management challenges.

The painful shoulder is the most common condition seen in specialist shoulder clinics. It is often associated with lack of range of motion and reduced shoulder function. Lack of sleep and difficulties in performing basic daily life activities are common findings. Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SAIS) has been considered as the most common cause of shoulder pain since it was described in 1852. Charles Neer, in 1972, described the presence of a "proliferative spur and ridge" on the undersurface of the acromion, which needs to be removed to improve the symptoms (acromioplasty). Neer's "impingement" hegemony was undisputed for at least 30 years. A more extensive knowledge of the pathogenesis of SAIS, however, has led authors to challenge the role of "impingement" in the shoulder pain and the role of surgical intervention. The aim of this review was to understand if there is still a role for surgical decompression in patients with SAIS. A literature review was performed in PubMed, PEDro, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using impingement, subacromial space, rotator cuff tears, tendinopathy, and tendinitis as key words. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with long-term follow-up comparing surgical intervention and conservative treatments in SAIS were preferred; however, prospective articles studying the outcome of surgical decompression and physiotherapy were also included. The majority of the studies showed no difference in the outcome between patients randomized to surgical decompression or conservative management. However, some studies reported better results after surgery, especially in the long term. Interpretation of the results is very difficult as most of the studies are of poor quality and have short follow-up. In our opinion, the type of subacromial lesion needs to be considered; this may offer an explanation to the difference in severity of symptoms and to the varying degrees of response to certain treatments, including surgery. Further studies are mandatory to better understand the role of surgery in SAIS.

The "Parachute" Technique: A Simple and Effective Single-Row Procedure to Achieve an Increased Contact Area Between the Cuff-Tendon and Its Footprint.

Many techniques of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have been described. No significant differences in clinical outcomes or rerupture rates have been observed when comparing single-row with double-row methods. Not all single- and double-row repairs are the same. The details of the technique used are crucial. It has been shown that the suture-tendon interface is the weakest point of the reconstruction. Therefore, the biomechanical properties of rotator cuff repairs might be influenced more by the suture configuration than by the number of anchors or by the number of rows involved. Techniques that secure less amount of tendon over a smaller area of the healing zone might be expected to have higher failure rates. The way the sutures of the "parachute technique" are configured represents a quadruple mattress that increases the contact and pressure between the tendon and its footprint and increases the primary load to failure of the repair. We present a simple and effective single-row technique that involves the biomechanical and biological advantages related to the increased contact area and pressure between the cuff and its footprint.

The "Purse String" Procedure for Recurrent Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Simple Technique to Achieve Bankart Repair, Capsular Shift, and a Good Labral Bumper.

Failure of arthroscopic techniques in cases of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability may result from inadequate treatment of capsular injury. The use of few anchors has been cited as a cause of failure in arthroscopic stabilization techniques. This applies to the use of the suture anchors as spot-welding points in conventional techniques. It has been shown that horizontal mattress suture techniques restore better labral height and anatomy than simple suture techniques in the repair of acute Bankart lesions. Horizontal mattress repairs, like the one achieved with the "purse-string" technique, pushes the labrum toward the humeral side of the joint, thus providing a buttress to the glenohumeral joint. We present the purse-string technique, which involves the use of only 1 suture anchor located at the 4-o'clock position. Sutures are passed through the labrum and capsule from south to north, thus allowing the incorporation of more capsular tissue involved in the raising of the anterior labral bumper. One suture anchor at the 4-o'clock position is used to ensure a purse-string effect, with tightening of the capsule in the inferosuperior plane and repair of the Bankart lesion. The repair achieved is 3-fold: Bankart repair, south-to-north capsular shift, and creation of an anterior bumper.

Arthroscopic management of the painful snapping scapula.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the arthroscopic management of the snapping scapula syndrome. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series. METHODS: Thirteen patients underwent surgery for painful scapular snapping that had not responded to adequate conservative treatment. They had no evidence of anatomic abnormalities on plain radiographs. All patients underwent bursectomy and resection of bands of fibrous tissue at the superomedial angle. Bone was resected from the superomedial angle only if it appeared to be prominent during arthroscopy. This occurred in 3 cases. The patients' outcomes were assessed subjectively by their ability to return to work and their return to leisure, as well as the Constant score. RESULTS: At the time of follow-up, 9 patients (69%) reported an improvement in their symptoms. Their median Constant score was 87 (range, 95 to 58). Four patients felt that their symptoms were unchanged or worse. Their median Constant score was 55 (range, 66 to 32). Of 9 employed patients, 8 returned to their previous careers. This group included 2 patients with physically demanding jobs. Of 9 patients who played sports regularly, 6 returned to their presymptomatic level of sporting activity. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Subscapular bursectomy is a safe procedure with a low rate of morbidity. In the absence of a definable anatomic abnormality, arthroscopic bursectomy for the painful snapping scapula can result in satisfactory outcomes in approximately 70% of patients. More clearly defined indications for and contraindications against surgery are required to avoid poor results. Complete resolution of the snapping in the subscapular bursa is not necessary to obtain a satisfactory result. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series, no control group.

Copeland surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroplasty with a stemmed prosthesis is a recognized treatment for rheumatoid arthritis of the shoulder. The humeral component of the Copeland cementless surface replacement arthroplasty consists of a cup for surface replacement with a short central peg for primary fixation to the bone. We hypothesized that surface replacement may offer some advantages over stemmed prostheses. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1998, seventy-five shoulders underwent surface replacement arthroplasty (thirty-three hemiarthroplasties and forty-two total shoulder arthroplasties) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The results of these procedures were reviewed after an average duration of follow-up of 6.5 years. Patients were assessed with use of the Constant score, a patient satisfaction score, and radiographs. RESULTS: The average Constant score was 47.9 points (age and sex-adjusted score, 71%) in the hemiarthroplasty group and 53.4 points (age and sex-adjusted score, 76%) in the total shoulder replacement group. The mean range of active flexion improved from 50 degrees in the hemiarthroplasty group and 47 degrees in the total shoulder replacement group to 101 degrees and 104 degrees, respectively. Seventy-two of the seventy-five shoulders were considered by the patients to be much better or better at the time of the review. Of the sixty-eight humeral implants that were evaluated radiographically, fifty-six (82%) showed no lucencies, eleven (16%) showed localized lucencies of <1 mm in width, and one was definitely loose. Of the thirty-nine glenoid implants that were evaluated radiographically, nineteen (49%) showed no lucencies, nineteen showed localized lucencies of <1 mm, and one was definitely loose. No lucencies were observed adjacent to the hydroxyapatite-coated implants. Thirty-nine (57%) of the sixty-eight shoulders showed some degree of superior subluxation. Three patients required a major reoperation: two required a revision because of loosening of both components, and one patient with pain at the site of a hemiarthroplasty had a revision to a total shoulder arthroplasty to provide relief. CONCLUSIONS: The indications for this surface replacement are the same as those for the conventional stemmed prostheses, but the surface replacement has the advantage of bone preservation as well as avoidance of the potential complications associated with a long humeral stem in rheumatoid bone. This procedure is not suitable for severely damaged joints in which the humeral head is insufficient or too soft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The use of a differential fluorescent staining method to detect bacteriuria.

BACKGROUND: This report describes a differential staining method which distinguishes gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria in fluorescence. Gram-positive bacteria appear yellow and gram-negative bacteria appear green. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The method is based on two fluorochromes, one acting in the wavelength of red, i.e. the acridine orange, and another acting in the wavelength of green, i.e. the fluorescein, which together form a red/ green system. In this report we compared the accuracy of the differential fluorescent staining method and the Gram stain in screening for bacteriuria, as detected by conventional cultures. RESULTS: A total of 1487 urine samples were tested. 289 cultures were positive. 237 specimens grew a single organism at 10(5) and 10(4) CFU/ml. 224 smears were detected by the differential fluorescent staining method and 162 were detected by Gram stain. 1198 samples failed to grow organisms at 10(5) and 10(4) CFU/ml. 107 smears were falsely positive by the fluorescent staining procedure and 289 were falsely positive by the Gram stain. On the basis of the culture results, the sensitivity of the differential fluorescent staining method was 94.5% and that of the Gram stain 68.3%. The specificity of the fluorescent staining procedure was 91.6% and that of the Gram stain 75.8%. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value of the fluorescent staining method were 67.6% and 98.8%, respectively. Those of the Gram stain were 35.9% and 92.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of microbiological and chemical techniques are available to identify bacteria in urine. This fluorescent staining method represents a simple, rapid, reliable method with low-running costs. The main advantage of this technique is that it enables the microbiologist to exclude the presence of bacteria in the urine within a short time after specimen receipt and to eliminate a large number of specimens for culture with significant cost saving. Another advantage of the method is that it allows to distinguish gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria in positive slides on the same day the sample is obtained. The stained smears were easily interpreted, even when the bacterial counts in the specimen were low.

Acromioclavicular joint acceleration-deceleration injury as a cause of persistent shoulder pain: Outcome after arthroscopic resection.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain in general and acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) pain specifically is common after acceleration-deceleration injury following road traffic accident (RTA). The outcome of surgical treatment in this condition is not described in the literature. The aim of the present study was to report the outcome of arthroscopic resection of the ACJ in these cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients with localized ACJ pain, resistant to nonoperative treatment were referred on an average 18 months after the injury. There were 3 male and 6 females. The right shoulder was involved in seven patients and the left in two. The average age was 38.9 years (range 29-46 years). All presented with normal X-rays but with torn acromioclavicular joint disc and effusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Arthroscopic ACJ excision arthroplasty was performed in all patients. RESULTS: At a mean followup of 18 month, all patients had marked improvement. The Constant score improved from 36 to 81, the pain score from 3/15 to 10/15 and the patient satisfaction improved from 3.5/10 to 9.3/10. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic ACJ excision arthroplasty, gives good outcomes in patients not responding to conservative management in ACJ acceleration-deceleration injury.

Management of first-time dislocations of the shoulder in patients older than 40 years: the prevalence of iatrogenic fracture.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of iatrogenic humeral neck fracture after attempted closed reduction in patients older than 40 years who present with a first-time anterior dislocation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study, evidence-based medicine level IV. PATIENTS: Ninety-two patients older than 40 years (mean 66.6 years of age) with a first-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder. INTERVENTION: Closed reductions by the emergency medicine physicians under conscious sedation, in the emergency department. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence of iatrogenic fracture on postreduction radiographs. RESULTS: Nineteen (20.7%) patients were diagnosed with a concomitant greater tuberosity fracture on initial radiograph. In the postreduction radiographs, 5 patients (5.4%) were identified with a postreduction humeral neck fracture, and all of them had a greater tuberosity fracture on initial radiographs. A highly significant association (P < 0.0001) was observed between the finding of a greater tuberosity fracture on the initial radiographs and the occurrence of iatrogenic humeral neck fracture after close reduction. DISCUSSION: Previous case reports have described an iatrogenic humeral neck fracture with reduction attempt of shoulder dislocation. In our retrospective study, 21% of the cohort of patients older than 40 years had a concomitant greater tuberosity fracture; 26% of them had an iatrogenic humeral neck fracture after reduction attempt under sedation in the emergency room. These patients ended up with poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Patients older than 40 years, presenting with a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation with an associated fracture of the greater tuberosity have a significant rate of iatrogenic humeral neck fracture during closed reduction under sedation.

The "anchor shape" technique for long head of the biceps tenotomy to avoid the popeye deformity.

Surgical options for symptomatic pathologies of the long head of the biceps (LHB) include tenotomy and tenodesis. Tenotomy is surgically simple and quick, does not require immobilization, and avoids implant complications. However, it is associated with residual "Popeye" muscle deformity and biceps muscle cramps. Tenodesis avoids Popeye deformity, but it is technically a more difficult operation with a longer rehabilitation period and possible implant complications. The purpose of this report is to describe a novel technique for LHB tenotomy that avoids the Popeye muscle deformity. Before releasing the LHB from its anchor over the superior labrum, this technique consists of making an oblique incision, involving 50% of the tendon, distal to its attachment at the superior labrum. A second standard complete tenotomy incision is made about 1.5 cm medial to the oblique incision. The remaining stump of the LHB at the tendon-labrum junction is resected. The first incision, an oblique incomplete incision, allows the remnant of the LHB to open up and form an "anchor shape" that anchors the LHB at the articular entrance of the bicipital groove, thus decreasing the risk of Popeye deformity.