Dopamine antagonist effects on locomotor activity in naive and ethanol-treated FAST and SLOW selected lines of mice.

The FAST and SLOW lines of mice are being selectively bred in replicate for differential sensitivities to the locomotor activating effects of ethanol. Whereas FAST-1 and FAST-2 mice are stimulated by 2.0 g/kg ethanol, SLOW-1 and SLOW-2 mice are not stimulated, and are often depressed, by this dose. The dopamine antagonists, SCH-23390 (D1) and raclopride (D2), produced dose-dependent decreases in the locomotor activity of EtOH-naive mice of both lines and replicates; however, FAST and SLOW mice were not differentially sensitive to these effects. The absence of a line difference in activity response to the dopamine antagonists suggests that dopamine receptor function has not been altered by selective breeding for differences in sensitivity to the stimulant effects of ethanol. The ethanol-stimulated activity of FAST-1 and FAST-2 mice was decreased by administration of the dopamine antagonists, haloperidol and raclopride, at doses that had no effect on basal locomotor activity. SCH-23390 decreased ethanol-stimulated activity of FAST-1, but not FAST-2 mice. The ethanol-induced activity changes of SLOW mice were generally unaffected by antagonist administration. These results suggest a role for dopaminergic systems in mediating ethanol-stimulated activity in selectively bred FAST mice. Coadministration of SCH-23390 and raclopride decreased ethanol-induced activation to a greater degree than either drug alone, further suggesting that both D1 and D2 receptor systems contribute to the full expression of the ethanol stimulant response.

MK-801 potentiates ethanol's effects on locomotor activity in mice.

FAST vs. SLOW selected mouse lines and C57BL/6J (B6) vs. DBA/2J (D2) inbred strains differ in their sensitivities to ethanol's locomotor stimulant effects, and provide two unique sets of genetic animal models to study neurophysiological substrates of this behavior. To determine whether NMDA receptor function mediates sensitivity to ethanol's stimulant effects, we assessed the effects of the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, MK-801, on locomotor activity of naive and ethanol-treated FAST, SLOW, B6, and D2 mice. MK-801 (0.01-0.5 mg/kg, I.P.) had biphasic effects in all genotypes, with stimulation at moderate doses and decreased activation at the highest dose. FAST mice were more activated by MK-801 than SLOW mice, suggesting that selection differentially altered NMDA receptor function between the lines. B6 and D2 mice did not differ in locomotor responses following MK-801 administration. Stimulant doses of MK-801 decreased or blocked ethanol-stimulated locomotor activity in FAST and D2 mice, and potentiated the locomotor depressant actions of ethanol in SLOW and B6 mice. Potentiation of ethanol's activating properties was observed in one treatment group in D2 mice. These data suggest that NMDA receptors modulate ethanol's stimulant properties, by a more significant involvement in expression of ethanol's locomotor depressant properties.

Ontogeny of ethanol-induced locomotor activity and hypothermia differences in selectively bred FAST and SLOW mice.

The replicate lines of selectively bred FAST and SLOW mice differ in locomotor response to 2 g/kg ethanol (EtOH). FAST mice show enhanced locomotion; SLOW mice exhibit no change or locomotor depression. Little is known about the responses of FAST and SLOW mice to EtOH during development. We assessed the locomotor responses of FAST and SLOW mice at postnatal days (P) 10, 15, 30, and 60. A genetically correlated response, EtOH-induced hypothermia, was also investigated. Although all animals demonstrated their respective selection phenotypes in adulthood, developing FAST mice exhibited ethanol stimulation by P15 (replicate 1) or P30 (replicate 2). At these ages, responses of FAST mice differed from those of SLOW. The stimulant response in FAST mice was adult-like at P30. EtOH-induced hypothermia was seen in SLOW mice by P15. These data suggest that sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant effects of EtOH changes during postnatal development, and may mirror developmental profiles for certain neurotransmitter systems.

Neurochemical bases of locomotion and ethanol stimulant effects.

The locomotor stimulant effect produced by alcohol (ethanol) is one of a large number of measurable ethanol effects. Ethanol-induced euphoria in humans and locomotor stimulation in rodents, a potential animal model of human euphoria, have long been recognized and the latter has been extensively characterized. Since the euphoria produced by ethanol may influence the development of uncontrolled or excessive alcohol use, a solid understanding of the neurochemical substrates underlying such effects is important. Such an understanding for spontaneous locomotion and for ethanol's stimulant effects is beginning to emerge. Herein we review what is known about three neurochemical substrates of locomotion and of ethanol's locomotor stimulant effects. Several lines of research have implicated dopaminergic, GABAergic, and glutamatergic neurotransmitter systems in determining these behaviors. A large collection of work is cited, which strongly implicates the above-mentioned neurotransmitter substances in the control of spontaneous locomotion. A smaller, but persuasive, body of evidence suggests that central nervous system processes utilizing these transmitters are involved in determining the effects of ethanol on locomotion. Particular emphasis has been placed on the mesolimbic ventral tegmental area to nucleus accumbens dopaminergic pathway, and on the ventral pallidum/substantia innominata, where GABA and glutamate have been found to play a role in altering the activity of this dopaminergic pathway. Research on ethanol and drug locomotor sensitization, increased responsiveness to the substance with repeated administration, is also reviewed as a process that may be important in the development of drug addiction.

Bidirectional selective breeding for ethanol effects on locomotor activity: characterization of FAST and SLOW mice through selection generation 35.

Increased recognition of the advantages of genetic animal models has led to heightened interest in their use and development. A replicated bidirectional selective breeding project has produced lines of mice that differ in their locomotor responses to 2.0 g/kg ethanol. FAST-1 and FAST-2 mice are highly stimulated by ethanol (EtOH), whereas SLOW-1 and SLOW-2 mice are either not affected or respond with locomotor depression. Current heritability estimates indicate that approximately 6-8% of the response variance in the FAST lines and 2-10% of the response variance in the SLOW lines is of additive genetic origin. Little systematic response to selection has occurred in recent generations, which implies that the limits of selection have been reached. Analysis of saline activity over 35 generations of selection indicates that baseline activities have not changed during the course of selection in three of the lines, whereas baseline activity of FAST-1 mice has increased slightly. In EtOH dose-response studies (0.5-3.0 g/kg), FAST mice had biphasic dose-response curves, whereas the locomotor activity of SLOW mice was either unaffected or depressed by all doses of EtOH. In addition, FAST mice spent more time in motion, traveled farther per movement, traversed greater distances in the center of the test chamber, and ambulated more quickly than SLOW mice when given EtOH. FAST and SLOW mice differed in EtOH clearance rates; however, the differences were slight relative to the large difference in locomotor response. We encourage the use of FAST and SLOW mice to investigate neurophysiological factors underlying sensitivity to the behavioral effects of EtOH, with a view to further testing of the postulated homology between locomotor stimulant effects and addiction potential of drugs of abuse.

Seizure sensitivity and GABAergic modulation of ethanol sensitivity in selectively bred FAST and SLOW mouse lines.

FAST and SLOW selected mouse lines were bred for differences in locomotor response to low-dose ethanol. FAST mice exhibit an extreme stimulant response and SLOW mice exhibit locomotor depression at the same ethanol dose. We tested the hypothesis that gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) systems modulate ethanol's stimulant effects by examining convulsant responses to GABAA receptor ligands, and by assessing the effects of GABAA and GABAB ligands on locomotor activity in the presence and absence of EtOH. FAST mice were more sensitive to the convulsant effects of GABAA drugs, and to one of two non-GABAergic drugs also tested. FAST and SLOW mice differed in locomotor responses to two benzodiazepines, but not to other GABAA receptor ligands. Ethanol's stimulant effects were not selectively altered by bicuculline or picrotoxin. The selected lines differed in sensitivity to the locomotor depressant effects of the GABAB agonist, baclofen. Ethanol-stimulated activity of FAST mice was inhibited by baclofen, and this effect was reversed by administration of the GABAB antagonist, CGP-35348. These GABAB receptor mediated effects were replicated in DBA/2J inbred mice that exhibit extreme sensitivity to ethanol's stimulant effects. In summary, we found moderate to strong evidence that some sites on the GABAA receptor complex were altered as a consequence of selection of FAST and SLOW mice, but found little support for GABAA mediation of EtOH-stimulated activity. In contrast, we found moderate evidence for differential alteration of GABAB receptor function; however, GABAB receptor involvement in ethanol-stimulated activity was strongly supported by results in the selected lines and an inbred strain.

Effects of acute and repeated ethanol exposures on the locomotor activity of BXD recombinant inbred mice.

Investigations of ethanol's (EtOH's) complex response profile, including locomotor and other effects, are likely to lead to a more in-depth understanding of the constituents of alcohol addiction. Locomotor activity responses to acute and repeated EtOH (2 g/kg, ip) exposures were measured in BXD recombinant inbred (RI) mice and their C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) progenitors. Both the acute response and the change in initial EtOH response with repeated treatments were strain-dependent. The coefficient of genetic determination was 0.38-0.49 for initial locomotor response to EtOH, and 0.29 for change in response. Changes in response were largely attributable to sensitization of locomotor stimulation. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses identified significant marker associations with basal activity, acute locomotor response, and change in response. Markers were for QTL on several chromosomes, and there was only one case of overlap in marker associations among phenotypes. Acute locomotor response and locomotor sensitization were negatively correlated with 3% EtOH preference drinking data collected in BXD RI strains. Overall, these results demonstrate locomotor sensitization induced by EtOH, suggest independence of genetic determination of locomotor responses to acute and repeated EtOH exposure, and partially support a relationship between reduced sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant/sensitizing effects of EtOH and EtOH consumption.

Correlated responses to selection in FAST and SLOW mice: effects of ethanol on ataxia, temperature, sedation, and withdrawal.

A replicated bidirectional selective breeding program has produced lines of mice that differ in locomotor response to ethanol (EtOH). FAST mice were bred for high locomotor activation, whereas SLOW mice were bred for low or depressed locomotor activity in response to 2.0 g/kg of EtOH. We tested FAST and SLOW mice for differences in sensitivity to the incoordinating (1.5 to 2.5 g/kg), hypothermic (3.0 g/kg), and sedative (4.0 g/kg) effects of EtOH, and for differences in sensitivity to withdrawal after acute and chronic EtOH exposure. SLOW mice were more ataxic in a grid test and developed greater tolerance than FAST mice at 2.0 g/kg of EtOH, were more hypothermic than FAST mice, and were more sensitive to the sedative effects of EtOH than FAST mice, as measured by latency to and duration of loss of righting reflex, and by blood ethanol concentrations at regain of the righting reflex. FAST mice had more severe withdrawal seizures after chronic exposure, but did not differ from SLOW mice in withdrawal severity after an acute injection of EtOH. These data suggest that FAST mice are generally more sensitive to central nervous system excitation, and SLOW mice are generally more sensitive to central nervous system sedation by EtOH, and further suggest genetic overlap with respect to genes that mediate locomotor responses to EtOH and genes determining sensitivity to EtOH-induced ataxia, hypothermia, sedation, and withdrawal severity after chronic exposure. Our current observations are in contrast to observations made earlier in selection, in which few line differences in sensitivity to EtOH effects other than locomotor activity were found. Thus, it seems that continued selection for differences in locomotor response to EtOH has produced genetically correlated differences in other EtOH responses.