Vascular fingerprint tool to identify patients with testicular cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy at high risk of early cardiovascular events.

BACKGROUND: Patients with testicular cancer treated with chemotherapy have an increased risk of developing early cardiovascular events. Identification of patients with testicular cancer at a high risk of these events enables the development of preventative strategies. This study validates the vascular fingerprint tool to identify these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a multicenter prospective study in patients with metastatic testicular cancer [International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) good or intermediate risk; retroperitoneal mass <5 cm]. In eligible patients, the vascular fingerprint was assessed before the start of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, which consists of five risk factors, namely, smoking, overweight (body mass index >25 kg/m2), hypertension (blood pressure >140/90 mmHg), dyslipidemia (fasting cholesterol >5.1 mmol/l or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol >2.5 mmol/l), and diabetes mellitus (fasting glucose ≥7.0 mmol/l). The presence of three or more risk factors was defined as high-risk vascular fingerprints. A log-rank test was carried out with a cardiovascular event within 1 year after the start of chemotherapy as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients with metastatic testicular cancer were included; 15 patients (8%) developed a cardiovascular event: 4 (2%) arterial events and 11 (6%) venous thrombotic events. Overall, 189 vascular fingerprint scores were available. Patients with a high-risk vascular fingerprint (62/189) had a higher risk of developing a cardiovascular event (hazard ratio 3.27, 95% confidence interval 1.16-9.18; log-rank: P = 0.017). Histological diagnosis, prognosis group, cumulative chemotherapy dose, and retroperitoneal mass size did not differ between patients with or without a cardiovascular event. All patients with an arterial event had a high-risk vascular fingerprint compared with 5/11 patients with a venous event. Overweight was more prevalent in patients with cardiovascular events (87% versus 59%; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: The vascular fingerprint is a validated tool to identify patients with testicular cancer at a high risk of developing early cardiovascular events. This tool can be used to develop preventative strategies with anticoagulant treatment.

Shared-care survivorship program for testicular cancer patients: safe and feasible.

BACKGROUND: Testicular cancer survivors are at risk for cardiovascular disease, often preceded by early development of cardiovascular risk factors due to chemotherapeutic treatment. Therefore, close collaboration between oncologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) is needed during follow-up to monitor and manage cardiovascular risk factors. We designed a shared-care survivorship program, in which testicular cancer patients visit both their oncologist and their PCP. The objective of this study was to test the safety and feasibility of shared-care follow-up after treatment for metastatic testicular cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed as an observational cohort study with a stopping rule to check for the safety of follow-up. Safety boundaries were defined for failures in the detection of signals indicating cancer recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of carried out cardiovascular risk assessments, psychosocial status and patient preferences measured with an evaluation questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients were enrolled (69% of eligible testicular cancer patients). Almost all (99%, n = 150) PCPs of the enrolled patients agreed to participate in the study. In total, 364 primary care visits took place. No failures occurred in the detection of relapsed testicular cancer. Four follow-up visits were considered as failures because of organizational issues, without activation of the stopping rule. Eventually, the safe boundary was crossed indicating that this shared-care model is a safe alternative for follow-up after testicular cancer. Patients were satisfied with the knowledge level of PCPs. PCPs were willing to further extend their role in follow-up care after cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Shared-care follow-up is safe and feasible in this patient population. Patients benefit from personalized care, partly close to their home. Within shared care, PCPs can have an important role in cardiovascular risk management and psychosocial survivorship issues.