RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by selective thoracic fusion (STF) with lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at touched vertebra (TV) vs stable vertebra (SV). METHODS: The databases PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched until November 2020.Studies which had Lenke type 1 curves and Lenke type 2 curves in adolescent population treated by STF and which reported pre- and post-operative curve characteristics including correction percentage and complications were included. Studies which did not report the LIV selection, curve correction percentages and whose full text could not be acquired were excluded. RESULTS: Eight studies were included for analysis of which seven were found to be retrospective studies (level III evidence) and one was prospective study (level II evidence) each. Overall proportional meta-analysis found no significant difference in correction rate, total srs-22 scores, and complication rates. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of SV group and TV group as LIV for selective thoracic fusions in AIS reveals a comparable outcome in terms of curve correction, patient satisfaction scores and complication rates. The TV can be chosen safely as the LIV especially in type A and B Lenke 1&2 curves, as it saves more motion segments when compared to SV.
RESUMO
This study was designed to systematically review and meta-analyze the functional and radiological outcomes between lateral and posterior approaches in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). Both lateral (lumbar, extreme, and oblique) and posterior interbody fusion (posterior lumbar and transforaminal) are used for deformity correction in patients with ADS with unclear comparison in this cohort of patients in the existing literature. A literature search using three electronic databases was performed to identify studies that reported outcomes of lateral (group L) and posterior interbody fusion (group P) in patients with ADS with curves of 10°-40°. Group P was further subdivided into minimally invasive surgery (MIS-P) and open posterior (Op-P) subgroups. Data on functional, radiological, and operative outcomes, length of hospital stay (LOHS), fusion rates, and complications were extracted and meta-analyzed using the random-effects model. A total of 18 studies (732 patients) met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found in functional and radiological outcomes between the two groups on data pooling. Total operative time in the MIS-P subgroup was less than that of group L (233.86 minutes vs. 401 minutes, p <0.05). The total blood loss in group L was less than that in the Op-P subgroup(477 mL vs. 1,325.6 mL, p <0.05). Group L had significantly less LOHS than the Op-P subgroup (4.15 days vs. 13.5 days, p <0.05). No significant difference was seen in fusion rates, but complications were seen except for transient sensorimotor weakness (group L: 24.3%, group P: 5.6%; p <0.05). Complications, such as postoperative thigh pain (7.7%), visceral injuries (2%), and retrograde ejaculation (3.7%), were seen only in group L while adjacent segment degeneration was seen only in group P (8.6%). Lateral approach has an advantage in blood loss and LOHS over the Op-P subgroup. The MIS-P subgroup has less operative time than group L, but with comparable blood loss and LOHS. No significant difference was found in functional, radiological, fusion rates, pseudoarthrosis, and complications, except for transient sensorimotor deficits. Few complications were approach-specific in each group.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the functional, neurological, and radiological outcomes after anterior surgery in thoracolumbar burst fractures. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-six patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures (T11-L2). INTERVENTION: Anterior decompression, anterior column reconstruction with mesh cage, and instrumented stabilization. OUTCOME: Functional (Visual Analog Score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Spinal Cord Independence Measure), neurological (ASIA Impairment Scale), and radiological (kyphosis, anterior vertebral height loss, canal encroachment %) parameters. RESULTS: Patients were prospectively followed for a mean duration of 5.9 ± 3.2 years (2.4-10 years). Statistically significant improvement was noted in functional outcomes from preop values (P-value < 0.001). 29 patients (80.5%) had improvement in neurology after surgery at the final follow-up with a positive correlation with % change in canal encroachment (r = 0.64, P -0.018). The mean preoperative kyphosis of 29.1 ± 11.9 degrees got corrected to 9.4 ± 3.8 degrees in immediate postop and 15.7 ± 11.8 at the final follow-up(P < 0.001). Preoperative mean canal encroachment of 58.5 ± 15.7% was reduced to 6.5 ± 3.2% postoperatively (P < 0.001). Two patients developed neurological complications (subacute progressive ascending myelopathy), and 5 patients developed pulmonary complications. No pseudarthrosis, implant loosening, or cage migration was noted in any patient. CONCLUSION: Anterior surgery performed in 36 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures in our study showed good outcomes. 80.5% of patients improved in neurology after surgery by at least one ASIA Impairment Scale grade. There was statistically significant improvement noted in radiological outcome (Kyphosis and Canal encroachment %) and functional outcome (Visual Analog Score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Spinal Cord Independence Measure score) after surgery in immediate postop and at the final follow-up. Only 13.8% of patients developed pulmonary complications that were managed successfully with chest drain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.