Postural control and trunk stability on sway parameters in adults with and without chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Postural sway changes often reflect functional impairments in adults with chronic low back pain (LBP). However, there is a gap in understanding how these individuals adapt their postural strategies to maintain stability. PURPOSE: This study investigated postural sway distance and velocity, utilizing the center of pressure (COP) and center of gravity (COG), between adults with and without LBP during repeated unilateral standing trials. METHODS: Twenty-six subjects with LBP and 39 control subjects participated in the study. Postural sway ranges, COP/COG sways, and sway velocities (computed by dividing path length by time in anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions over 10 s) were analyzed across three unilateral standing trials. RESULTS: A significant group interaction in sway range difference was observed following repeated trials (F = 5.90, p = 0.02). For COG sway range, significant group interactions were demonstrated in both directions (F = 4.28, p = 0.04) and repeated trials (F = 5.79, p = 0.02). The LBP group demonstrated reduced ML sway velocities in the first (5.21 ± 2.43 for the control group, 4.16 ± 2.33 for the LBP group; t = 1.72, p = 0.04) and second (4.87 ± 2.62 for the control group, 3.79 ± 2.22 for the LBP group; t = 1.73, p = 0.04) trials. CONCLUSION: The LBP group demonstrated decreased ML sway velocities to enhance trunk stability in the initial two trials. The COG results emphasized the potential use of trunk strategies in augmenting postural stability and optimizing neuromuscular control during unilateral standing.

Normalized stability time analysis within the boundaries between adults with and without fear of falling.

BACKGROUND: The unilateral stance test, measured by the center of pressure (COP), has been widely used to identify balance deficits. However, there is a critical gap in understanding the specific COP thresholds on postural stability in adults with a fear of falling (FOF). AIMS: To investigate the normalized stability time, which was defined as the ratio of time spent within stability boundaries to the total test duration, under different visual conditions and specific thresholds between adults with and without FOF. METHODS: Twenty-one older adults with FOF and 22 control subjects completed the unilateral limb standing test in eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Normalized stability times were computed based on five pre-determined COP sway range thresholds: 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, and 30 mm. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the diagnostic accuracy of FOF. There were significant differences in the effects of both visual conditions (F = 46.88, p = 0.001) and threshold settings (F = 119.38, p = 0.001) on stability time between groups. The FOF group significantly reduced normalized stability time at the 10 mm COP threshold under eyes-closed conditions (t = - 1.95, p = 0.03). DISCUSSION: The findings highlight the heightened sensitivity of the 10 mm COP threshold in identifying group variances in postural stability when eyes are closed. Moreover, the FOF group displayed a marked reduction in stability duration based on visual scenarios and normalized thresholds. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the need to account for both COP boundaries and visual conditions in adults with FOF. When assessing postural control during unilateral stances, clinicians must also give attention to non-visual cues.

Postural adaptations within normalized stability between older adults with and without chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Adaptations of dynamic balance performance are related to sway excursions in older adults with chronic low back pain (LBP). However, there is a lack of understanding on postural control within different thresholds of radius from the center of pressure (COP). PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the normalized stability based on the time-in-boundary (TIB) during repeated unilateral limb standing trials between subjects with and without chronic LBP. METHODS: There were 26 older adults with LBP and 39 control subjects who completed three trials of repeated unilateral limb standing on a force plat. RESULTS: The TIB based on the seven thresholds was analyzed, and the groups demonstrated a significant interaction on thresholds for TIB (F = 8.76, p = 0.01). The TIB was significantly different in the 10 mm (F = 4.01, p = 0.04), 15 mm (F = 5.21, p = 0.03), and 20 mm (F = 4.48, p = 0.04) radius of thresholds only in the second trial. However, there was no group difference on TIB at the first and third trials due to potential compensatory and/or adaptive reactions to avoid fall risks. CONCLUSION: The LBP group lacked postural stability within the thresholds less than a 20 mm radius at the second trial of unilateral standing. The significant group interaction with the thresholds indicates an adaptation strategy on sway thresholds. This postural reaction from repeated trials should be considered with sway excursion adjustments and fall prevention in older adults with LB.

Delayed response in rectus abdominis muscle following a step perturbation in subjects with and without recurrent low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Delayed trunk and lower limb muscle activation is associated with balance loss and fall injuries in subjects with recurrent low back pain (LBP). PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare differences in the onset of muscle contractions of the trunk and lower limb muscles following a treadmill-induced step perturbation between subjects with and without LBP. METHODS: Eighty-three right limb dominant individuals (43 subjects with LBP and 40 control subjects) were exposed to the perturbation (0.31 m/s velocity for 0.2 m). The electromyography (EMG) reaction times were analyzed during the first step following the perturbation. The EMG electrodes were placed on both sides of the trunk and lower limbs, including the rectus abdominis (RA), erector spinae (ES), tibialis anterior (TA), and gastrocnemius (GA) muscles. RESULTS: The group x muscle interaction was statistically significant (F = 9.44, p = 0.003). The TA muscle activation was significantly delayed compared to the RA, ES, and GA. There was a significant interaction on side x muscle (F = 4.14, p = 0.04). The RA muscles were significantly delayed on the non-dominant (t = - 3.35, p = 0.001) and dominant (t = - 2.53, p = 0.01) sides in the LBP group. CONCLUSION: The LBP group demonstrated a delayed reaction time on the RA muscles, which indicated poor trunk control relative to the lower limbs. The delayed bilateral RA muscle might indicate possible coordination problems relative to the ES and lower limb muscles, which may lead to potential fall hazards.

The progression of the vertebral body bruise associated with a spinal fracture.

BACKGROUND: Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have made it possible to find the vertebral body bruise (VBB), which was not found in computed tomography (CT) after trauma. There has been only one study with adult patients about whether traumatic VBB will cause a collapse of the vertebral body or not. The purpose is to elucidate the progression of VBB in non-osteoporotic adult patients and to identify the possible factors influencing the progression. METHOD: The VBB was defined on MRI as band-like or diffuse zones of high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences without fracture of the cortex based on CT. The study population with traumatic VBB associated with non-osteoporotic spinal fracture was composed of 15 females and 21 males. The minimal follow-up period was 6 months. The ratio of anterior to posterior heights of the VBB, the ratio of anterior heights of the VBB to the average of those of cranial and caudal adjacent vertebral bodies, the anterior wedge angle of the VBB, and the focal angle around the VBB were compared between the initial and final visits. We evaluated the age of the patients, the C2 plumb line distance, the regional location of VBB, the etiology of VBB, and the treatment methods of the fractures as possible risk factors influencing the progression. RESULTS: There was no difference in the ratios and angles between the initial and final visits. The differences in the ratios and angles between the initial and final visits were not dependent on the possible risk factors. The anterior superior area is the most common in the distribution of VBB. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike compression fractures, the vertebral body with traumatic VBB found in adult patients with non-osteoporotic spinal fractures of AO classification A or B types did not develop collapse. In clinical practice, it is reasonable to diagnose it as a spinal fracture rather than a VBB if the collapse of a possible VBB occurs.

The reaction times and symmetry indices in the bilateral trunk and limb muscles in control subjects and subjects with low back pain that persisted two months or longer.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate the reaction times and symmetry index (SI) of the bilateral trunk and limb muscles between control subjects and subjects with low back pain (LBP) that persisted for two months or longer. METHODS: Fifty-seven right limb dominant subjects (31 healthy control subjects and 26 subjects with LBP) participated in this study. The subjects were exposed to a slip perturbation (0.24 m/sec velocity for 1.20 cm), which caused them to move forward for 0.10 s in standing while holding a tray. The electromyography (EMG) electrodes were placed on the bilateral erector spinae (ES), rectus abdominis (RA), rectus femoris, hamstring, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, biceps brachii (BB), and triceps brachii muscles. The reaction times were analyzed, and the SI was used to compare the bilateral trunk and limb muscles for the degree of asymmetry between groups. RESULTS: The ES reaction time was significantly delayed in the control group (0.33 ± 0.22 vs. 0.22 ± 0.17; t = 2.25, p = 0.03). The SI of reaction times was significantly different on the RA (t = -2.28, p = 0.03), ES (t = -2.36, p = 0.04), and BB (t = -2.15, p = 0.04) muscles between groups. CONCLUSION: The delayed non-dominant ES reaction time might indicate a freedom of pain recurrence in the control group. Although the asymmetry increased on the RA and BB muscles in the LBP group, it decreased on the ES muscle. The asymmetries on the trunk and BB muscles were evident in the LBP group. The asymmetrical reactions in the arm-trunk muscles need to be considered for rehabilitation strategies.

Reliability of the Kinematic Steadiness Index during one-leg standing in subjects with recurrent low back pain.

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of standing time and the Kinematic Steadiness Index (KSI) in one-leg standing compared with the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test while considering anthropometric factors in subjects with recurrent low back pain (LBP). METHODS: Sixty-six individuals participated in the study. The data were collected on two different days, 1 week apart. The KSI of the core spine, using video motion-capture techniques, was based on the relative standing time and relative standstill time. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was compared for the reliability between measures. The covariates, such as age, Body Mass Index, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were analyzed for any interactions based on these measures. RESULTS: The standing time (t = - 1.01, p = 0.32) and the KSI (t = - 1.70, p = 0.09) were not significantly different between measures. The TUG results were not different between measures (t = 1.01, p = 0.32). The Cronbach's alpha for the standing time was 0.84, for KSI was 0.89, and for TUG was 0.76. The standing time and KSI demonstrated an interaction with age, while the TUG demonstrated an interaction with the ODI score. CONCLUSIONS: The KSI during one-leg standing could help to develop a practical tool to justify quantity and quality of balance outcome measures, which identify balance deficits and core spine rehabilitation strategies in subjects with recurrent LBP.

The Sensitivity of Thresholds by Ground Reaction Force and Postural Stability in Subjects With and Without Navicular Drop.

Understanding plantar pressure changes is an important component of the functional evaluation of subjects with flat foot. However, the altered postural control determined by the threshold from the vertical ground reaction force (GRF) requires clarification. The purpose of our study was to investigate the various GRF thresholds in subjects with and without flat foot during 1-leg standing. We included 34 control subjects and 30 subjects with flat foot in the present study. They performed the 1-leg standing test for 30 seconds, with the contralateral hip and knee flexed approximately 90°. The sensitivity of the various GRF thresholds (3, 7, 15, 50, and 100 N) for the postural stability index was analyzed with and without visual input. The standing times for the control and flat foot groups were 23.76 ± 4.42 and 21.78 ± 6.59 seconds, respectively, with no significant differences (t = 1.23; p = .22). The 2 groups demonstrated a significant interaction between the visual condition and the threshold levels (F = 11.40; p = .001). The postural stability index was significantly different in the eyes-open condition (0.95 ± 0.08 for the control group versus 0.84 ± 0.23 for the flat foot group; t = 2.29; p = .02). However, no difference was found in the eyes-closed condition (0.94 ± 0.10 for the control group versus 0.81 ± 0.30 for the flat foot group; t = 1.45; p = .15). These results indicate that GRF thresholds less than the 15N setting are sensitive to detect postural stability between groups, especially in the eyes-open condition. The GRF threshold setting, in addition to the visual condition, could alter the outcomes of sensitive plantar pressure changes in subjects with flat foot.

Analysis of relative kinematic index with normalized standing time between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain.

PURPOSE: Although subjects with recurrent low back pain (LBP) demonstrate altered postural control, their postural steadiness during one leg standing is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate postural steadiness based on relative kinematic index of the lower limbs and trunk with normalized standing time in subjects with recurrent LBP during dominant and non-dominant leg standing. METHODS: Sixty individuals participated in the study, including 29 subjects in the control group (18 male, 11 female) and 31 subjects with recurrent LBP (21 male, 10 female). The outcome measures included relative kinematic index of the body regions and normalized standing time during the one leg standing test. The relative kinematic index was the ratio between standstill time and successful standing time. The normalized standing time was defined as a ratio between the successful standing time and the requested standing time. RESULTS: The control group demonstrated significantly longer normalized standing time on the dominant (t = -2.57, p = 0.013) and non-dominant (t = -2.78, p = 0.007) legs than the LBP group. The relative kinematic index of the core spine model significantly decreased for the dominant (t = -3.01, p = 0.004) and non-dominant (t = -3.06, p = 0.003) legs in the LBP group. In addition, the kinematic index indicated pelvis and non-dominant shank during dominant leg standing (R 2 = 0.97) in the LBP group. In the control group, the pelvis was significantly correlated with the core spine model during standing on the dominant (R 2 = 0.95) and non-dominant (R 2 = 0.97) legs. CONCLUSIONS: The relative kinematic index of the pelvis was found to be most significant for longer standing durations in both groups. In the LBP group, the shank and foot were significantly higher in addition to the pelvis due to possible compensatory motion. The control group took advantage of pelvic control with the core spine to minimize lower limb movements. Clinicians need to consider the core spine for pelvic control to refine postural adaptations in subjects with recurrent LBP.

A study on the effects of visual condition on postural stability in adults with and without chronic low back pain.

This study was conducted to compare postural stability during repeated unilateral standing tasks between adults with and without chronic low back pain (LBP) while considering visual input. The study involved 26 participants with LBP and 39 control participants. Each participant performed three trials of standing tasks on the dominant limb using a stable platform. The Falls Efficacy Scale was utilized to assess fall-related self-efficacy and fear of falling due to potential physical frailty. The center of pressure (COP) sway excursion was analyzed at 10 mm and 20 mm thresholds for the time-in-boundary (TIB). The results indicated a significant fear of falling difference in the LBP group compared to the control group (t = 3.27, p = 0.001). The LBP group demonstrated a significant interaction between visual condition and TIB (F = 8.45, p = 0.01), particularly in the LBP group, which demonstrated a notable decrease in TIB at 10 mm (54.02 % compared to the control group's 70.40 %) and 20 mm (70.93 % compared to the control group's 85.92 %) thresholds during the second trial and at 10 mm (59.73 % compared to the control group's 73.84 %) during the third trial in the eyes open condition. Overall, visual condition demonstrated significant interactions on thresholds (F = 15.80, p = 0.001, η2p = 0.21) as well as trials  ×  thresholds (F = 4.21, p = 0.04, η2p = 0.07). These findings indicate a potential adaptation in postural control among the LBP group with visual feedback. Further research is warranted to explore group differences when considering visual conditions and sway excursion thresholds.

Assessing postural stability in flatfoot using a time-in-boundary method during single-leg standing.

Flatfoot, a foot deformity characterized by the collapse of the arch, significantly impacts an individual's balance and stability. This study explored postural adjustments and sway excursions in individuals with and without flatfoot using the Time-in-Boundary method. This method assessed relative stability by exploring various center of pressure radius thresholds during three trials of single-leg stance. We observed significant interactions in threshold levels (F = 4.37, p = 0.04) and normalized relative stable times (F = 7.64, p = 0.01), particularly in the initial trials. Initially, the flatfoot group showed marked decreases in stable times at 10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm thresholds, which expanded to 25 mm and 30 mm in subsequent trials. Despite a significant decrease in stability at the 30 mm threshold in early trials, participants exhibited improved stability control as trials progressed. This enhancement likely reflects a combination of a learning effect and an increased understanding of the task requirements, underscoring the adaptability of postural control systems to the biomechanical challenges posed by flatfoot. The Time-in-Boundary method has proven to be an effective tool for clinicians to assess postural control, playing a vital role in developing customized rehabilitation strategies for individuals with flatfoot.

Disability and back muscle fatigability changes following two therapeutic exercise interventions in participants with recurrent low back pain.

BACKGROUND: The level of disability and endurance of back muscles have been investigated, but there is conflicting evidence following specific exercise interventions for participants with recurrent low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the level of disability and slope of median frequency (MF) of thoracic and lumbar erector spinae (ES) muscles following core stabilization exercise (CSE) and spinal flexibility exercise (SFE). MATERIAL/METHODS: In total, 46 individuals participated in this study. There were 25 participants in the CSE intervention group (average age of 47.7 ± 8.9 years) and 21 participants in the SFE group (average age of 53.1 ± 9.0 years). Each group participated in the specific exercise intervention program for 4 weeks while maintaining their current activity and/or exercise levels. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to measure the level of disability changes. The fatigability of the ES back muscles was measured by the slope of MF, using a modified Sorensen test. RESULTS: The disability level decreased significantly following CSE intervention (t=2.23, p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in muscle fatigability changes in the 4-week intervention period for either group. CONCLUSIONS: The CSE intervention reduced disability level following the 4-week intervention period. Further studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness of specific back muscle exercises in longer intervention periods for back muscle fatigability.

Asymmetrical gait in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: This study investigated side-to-side gait asymmetry in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: There were 20 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and 20 age-matched control subjects, who participated in the study. To minimize confounding effects, we recruited patients with similar spinal curvature for the scoliosis group, and all participants are right hand dominant. The participants were instructed to ambulate on a 10 m walkway while barefoot. There were two force plates in the middle of the walkway. The ground reaction force (GRF) and angular displacements of six segments (foot, shank, thigh, pelvis, trunk, and head) were measured during one gait cycle based on the right and left lower extremities. To remove the positional information in the kinematic data, the derivative of angular displacement in each segment was calculated. To evaluate the side-to-side gait symmetry, we calculated the cross-correlation of each bilateral gait parameter. RESULTS: In the kinematics, the scoliosis group demonstrated asymmetrical gait in the frontal and transverse planes compared to the control group. In the GRF data, the scoliosis group demonstrated asymmetrical gait in the medial-lateral (M/L) direction compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that the scoliosis group produced an asymmetrical rotation pattern of the segments bilaterally in the frontal and transverse planes, resulting in asymmetrical GRF patterns in the M/L direction. This asymmetrical gait may be produced by changes in global postural control during gait and not simply by changes in control of only one or two specific segments.

The dynamic postural steadiness and stabilization time between older adults with and without recurrent low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Although postural control measures were reported to identify neuromuscular impairments, postural steadiness and stabilization time were not carefully investigated between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain (LBP). Research QuestionAre there group differences in the stabilization time, direction of sway, and dynamic postural steadiness index (DPSI) during one-leg standing? METHODS: Thirty-four control subjects and 29 subjects with recurrent LBP participated in the study. Each subject stood upright on a single leg with and without visual input. The outcomes were measured for standing duration (sec), direction of sway, and the DPSI, which included the vertical steadiness index (VSI). The VSI assesses fluctuations to standardize the vertical ground reaction forces on the force plate. RESULTS: The control group demonstrated significantly longer standing duration compared to the LBP group during the eyes-open condition (t = 3.55, p = 0.001). The LBP group demonstrated significantly faster stabilization time (t = 2.53, p = 0.01) in the sagittal plane. The DPSI demonstrated an excellent relationship with the VSI without visual input in the control group (r = 0.98, p = 0.001). The directions of sway demonstrated a significant interaction between groups (F = 9.29, p = 0.004). SIGNIFICANCE: Although standing duration in the eyes-open condition decreased in the LBP group, a faster stabilization time in the sagittal plane was evident compared to the control group to adapt postural stability. These results indicated that vertical dynamic steadiness with visual input might be important to enhance compensatory postural control.

Spontaneous Hematomyelia Associated with the Use of Non-vitamin K Antagonist.

Vitamin K antagonists have been frequently prescribed as anticoagulants with the potential side effect of spontaneous hematomyelia with a poor prognosis. However, to our knowledge, there has been no report of spontaneous hematomyelia combined with the use of a non-vitamin K antagonist. A 63-year-old man presented with left leg weakness, impaired sensation, and urinary retention while taking rivaroxaban (non-vitamin K antagonist) for 4 months for atrial fibrillation. Anticoagulant agents were discontinued. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy was administered without surgical hematoma evacuation. Three months after the initial development of the hematomyelia, the symptoms improved to grade 5 for both lower extremities, and there was complete recovery in sensory and urinary functions. This might be the first description of a complete recovery of neurologic deficits without hematoma evacuation in spontaneous hematomyelia patients caused by non-vitamin K antagonist therapy.

A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of spinal stabilization exercise intervention based on pain level and standing balance differences in patients with low back pain.

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have evaluated exercise interventions compared with other treatment strategies for subjects with recurrent low back pain (LBP); however, subject pain level and balance were not carefully considered. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of spinal stabilization exercises (SSE) for managing pain and increasing balance strategy changes following unexpected perturbations in patients diagnosed with recurrent LBP. MATERIAL/METHODS: Twenty-one age- and gender-matched patients participated in a supervised SSE or control exercise program 5 times a week over a 4-week period. The Million Visual Analogue Scale (MVAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to measure each patient's level of pain and disability. Balance measurements were derived from recordings of the anterior-posterior (A/P) and medio-lateral (M/L) center of pressure (COP) displacements during 3 consecutive, unexpected random perturbations. RESULTS: The level of reported pain and disability significantly decreased following treatment for both groups. Although the M/L sway was not significantly different in either group (p=0.86), there was a significant difference between group and measurement time during A/P sway (p=0.04). The A/P displacement of the SSE group significantly decreased compared with the control group. The decreased A/P displacement can be linked to the SSE intervention, which helps prevent further injury by limiting an individual's response rate to external perturbations. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians might consider SSE for LBP patients as a possible rehabilitation strategy to reduce A/P displacement.

Factors affecting shoulder-pelvic integration during axial trunk rotation in subjects with recurrent low back pain.

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder-pelvic integration could play a central role in the control of dynamic posture and movement. However, kinematic coordination during axial trunk rotation has not been carefully investigated in subjects with recurrent low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum rotational angles of the shoulders and pelvis in the transverse plane between subjects with and without recurrent LBP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 38 age-matched subjects (19 control subjects: 69.00 ± 5.75 years old and 19 subjects with LBP: 68.79 ± 5.40 years old) participated in the study. The axial trunk rotation test was conducted in the upright position with bilateral hips and knees fully extended and both feet shoulder width apart. RESULTS: The results of this study indicated that there was a difference in pelvic girdle rotation between groups (100.79 ± 26.46 in the control group, 82.12 ± 23.16 in the LBP group; t = 2.31, p = 0.02); however, there was no difference for the shoulder girdle (177.63 ± 36.98 in the control group, 156.42 ± 30.09 in the LBP group; t = 1.91, p = 0.06). There were interactions with age (F = 9.27, p = 0.004) and BMI (F = 7.50, p = 0.01) with the rotational angles of the shoulder and pelvis. CONCLUSION: These results indicated a different pattern of trunk rotation movement with the age and BMI serving as important factors to consider for recurrent LBP. The results of our study also indicated a different pattern of shoulder and pelvic coordination with age and gender. Clinicians need to consider the consequences of limited shoulder-pelvic rotational angles, especially limited rotational angle on the pelvis during trunk axial rotation. Further studies are required to determine the causes of the underlying problems for clinical decision-making and altered shoulder-pelvic rotation in subjects with recurrent LBP.

Three-dimensional kinematic lumbar spine motion analyses of trunk motion during axial rotation activities.

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental design was conducted to investigate kinematic changes in 3-dimensional trunk motions between subjects with and without chronic low back pain (LBP) while demonstrating axial rotation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare 3-dimensional kinematic data for the upper and lower thorax and the lumbar spine from the axis of the core spine during axial rotation activities in the standing position while considering anthropometric factors in subjects with and without LBP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rotation of the trunk is associated with a large number of LBP cases and surrounding spinal tissue injuries. METHODS: Fifteen subjects with chronic LBP (5 men, 10 women) and 15 subjects without LBP (9 men, 6 women) participated in this study. The outcome measures included kinematic data of actual trunk rotation angles for the upper and lower thorax and the lumbar regions relative to the core spine (spinal root) in sagittal, coronal, and transverse axes. RESULTS: The spinal range of motion was significantly different for each spinal region (F=240.25, P=0.001) and axis (F=213.91, P=0.001). There was a significant interaction between the spinal region and the group (F=4.34, P=0.04). There was also a 3-way interaction with the spinal region, the axis, and the group (F=11.04, P=0.001). These results indicated that spinal region and axes are important to consider because the upper thorax demonstrated a significantly greater rotational displacement in subjects with chronic LBP. Among the anthropometric factors, age (F=6.24, P=0.02) interacted with the spinal region and the axis. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased spinal range of motion in older subjects might result in a stiffened spine in addition to possible poor proprioception from back injuries to passive structures in subjects with chronic LBP.

Comparison of kinematic similarity index during gait between adults with and without nonspecific chronic neck pain.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with nonspecific chronic neck pain (NP) walk with a stiffer spine. However, there is a lack of understanding on kinematic similarities on the limbs during gait between individuals with and without NP. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are there differences in gait parameters and the kinematic similarity index (SI) between individuals with and without NP? METHODS: Eighteen individuals with NP and 17 controls participated in this study. A three-dimensional motion capture system and two force plates were utilized to measure kinematic changes of the upper and lower limbs during gait. The gait parameters included cadence, speed, stride length, and step width. The SI calculations were compared based on the response vectors from the NP group and the prototype response vectors from the control participants. The SI values at 5% intervals of the entire gait cycle were compared between groups. RESULTS: Although the gait parameters were not significantly different between groups, the SI values of the control group were significantly higher than the NP group during gait (0.98 ± 0.02 vs. 0.95 ± 0.03), especially at the midstance (10-30 %) and swing (80-90 %) phases. Also, the standard deviation of the SI decreased in the control group when compared to the NP group (0.02 ± 0.01 vs. 0.04 ± 0.02). SIGNIFICANCE: The SI was a useful measure to differentiate similarities between groups in the gait cycle at specific phases. These results indicated that the NP group demonstrated a greater variation of walking patterns during the midstance and swing phases and displayed altered compensatory gait. Clinicians need to consider the similarities of the kinematic changes for the NP group to aid in detection of limb motion differences and the resulting gait dysfunction.

Asymmetrical thoracic-lumbar coordination during trunk rotation between adolescents with and without thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparative study. PURPOSE: To compare thoracic-lumbar kinematic changes and coordination based on coupling angles (CAs) in two different directions of trunk rotation between adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and control subjects. Altered three-dimensional (3D) deviations are often apparent in AIS groups during functional activities, such as gait. However, there is a lack of consistent evidence on coordinated motions during different directions of trunk rotation. METHODS: This study included 14 AIS and 17 age-matched control subjects who were all right limb dominant. A motion capture system was utilized to analyze the spinal segment motions. The outcome measures included range of motion (ROM) at the first thoracic (T1), seventh thoracic (T7), and first lumbar (L1) spinous processes as well as the sacral tubercle (S1). The CAs compared in-phase (rotation from right to left) and anti-phase (rotation from left to right) trunk rotations. RESULTS: Although there was no significant association with the spinal segments in the control group, the Cobb angle demonstrated significant positive correlations with anti-phase at T7 and L1 as well as in-phase at L1. Regarding the CAs, the groups demonstrated a significant interaction with both phases (F = 4.7, p = 0.04). The AIS group demonstrated positive correlations with ROM during in-phase at L1 and anti-phase at T7 and L1. CONCLUSION: The coordination based on the CAs of the lumbar spine relative to the thoracic spine significantly decreased during left to right trunk rotation in the AIS group. These results indicated that the AIS group demonstrated directional dissociation toward the dominant side of lumbar rotation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.