Pediatricians' attitudes in management of acute otitis media and ear pain in Turkey.

OBJECTIVES: Acute otitis media (AOM) is predominantly a disease of childhood and one of the common reasons for prescribing antibiotics. Ear pain is the main symptom of AOM, with the result that parents frequently seek immediate medical assistance for their children. Antibiotic therapy for AOM does not provide symptomatic relief in the first 24 hours, and analgesics are commonly recommended for relieving the pain associated with AOM. The aims of the present study were to assess pediatricians' attitudes toward AOM and ear pain management in Turkey. METHODS: This multicenter descriptive questionnaire study was conducted in 20 centers from different geographic locations in Turkey, with 977 pediatricians, between June 2015 and December 2016. The questionnaire comprised 20 questions focusing on the pediatricians' sociodemographic variables, experiences, and treatment related to AOM and ear pain. RESULTS: Of the pediatricians, 58.2% were residents, 36.5% were specialists, and 4.3% were lecturers. Most participants were working in a university hospital (54.8%) or education and research hospital (32.2%). In general daily practice, the AOM diagnosis rates were between 6% and 20% in outpatient clinics, and 52.3% of the participants stated the patients complained about ear pain in pediatric clinics. The watchful waiting (WW) rate, as opposed to immediate antibiotic treatment, was 39.8% for all the pediatricians. The pediatric residents used the WW strategy less than the specialists and lecturers did (p = 0.004). The rates of the WW strategy were higher in outpatient clinics where AOM was commonly diagnosed (p < 0.001). The most common antibiotic prescribed for AOM was amoxicillin clavulanate (76.7%). The mean recommended treatment period for AOM was 9.3 ± 2.2 days. The choices for systemic ear pain treatment were acetaminophen (26.8%), ibuprofen (29.4%), and alternating between ibuprofen and acetaminophen (43.9%). Moreover, 34.6% of the participants recommended topical agents for otalgia. Topical agents were more commonly recommended by the pediatric residents than specialists or lecturers (p < 0.001). Finally, 58.3% of pediatricians had experiences of the parents' usage of a variety of herbal and folk remedies, such as breast milk or olive oil, for their children's ear pain. CONCLUSION: Amoxicillin clavulanate was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic for AOM. WW was approved by the pediatricians, and having more AOM patients was a significant factor in the physicians' choice of WW; nevertheless, the WW rate was poor. Implementation of educational intervention strategies will help pediatricians in improving their compliance with evidence-based guidelines for AOM treatment. Otalgia is taken seriously by parents and pediatricians, and otalgia treatment seems to be well accepted in Turkey for providing symptomatic relief and enhancing the patients' quality of life.

Influence of observer experience and training on proficiency in coronary CT angiography interpretation.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of experience and training on the proficiency in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) interpretation of practitioners with different levels of experience. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine radiologist and cardiologist observers with varying prior CCTA experience ranging from novice to expert independently analyzed two case series of 50 catheter-correlated CCTA studies for coronary artery stenosis (0%, ≤49%, 50-74%, 75-99%, or 100%). Results of the first case series were unblinded and presented along with catheter angiography results to each reader before proceeding to the second series. Diagnostic accuracy on a per-segment basis was compared for all readers and both case series, respectively. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between CCTA and catheter angiography initially ranged between good (r=0.87) and poor (r=0.26), depending on reader experience, and significantly (p<0.05) improved in the second case series (range: r=0.42 to r=0.91). Diagnostic accuracy was significantly (p<0.05) higher for more experienced readers (range: 96.5-97.8%) as compared to less experienced observers (range: 90.7-93.6%). After completion of the second case series for less experienced readers sensitivity and PPV significantly (p<0.05) improved (range: 62.7-67.8%/51.4-84.1%), but still remained significantly (p<0.05) lower as compared to more experienced observers (range: 89.8-93.3%/80.6-93.3%). CONCLUSION: The level of experience appears to be a strong determinant of proficiency in CCTA interpretation. Limited one-time training improves proficiency in novice readers, but not to clinically satisfactory levels.

64-slice multidetector-row computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: interobserver agreement among radiologists with varied levels of experience on a per-patient and per-segment basis.

PURPOSE: To assess the interobserver variability of 4 radiologists with different levels of experience in the evaluation of 64-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography (cCTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two board-certified radiologists with 10 and 8 years of experience in reading cCTA and 2 radiology residents, 1 with 3 years of experience in reading cCTA and 1 with experience in reading general computed tomographic scans but without dedicated cCTA training, participated in the study. All the observers independently analyzed 50 cCTA studies for signs of coronary artery disease (stenosis of 0%, ≤49%, 50% to 74%, 75% to 99%, or 100%). Diagnostic accuracy of the 4 readers for stenosis detection on cCTA was compared with that of conventional angiography on a per-segment and per-patient basis. No patients, vessels, or segments were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: On a per-segment basis, correlation between cCTA and invasive coronary angiography was good for readers with more than 10 (r=0.75), more than 8 (r=0.75), and more than 3 (r=0.73) years of cCTA experience. The correlation coefficient was poor (r=0.39) for the untrained reader. Sensitivity was not significantly (P=0.56) different between observers with more than 8 and more than 10 years of experience but was significantly (P>0.05) lower for the reader with less than 3 years experience and for the untrained reader. However, we found no significant difference in overall diagnostic accuracy on a per-patient (P=0.86) and on a per-segment level (P=0.72) among the 4 readers. CONCLUSION: The level of experience significantly influences the sensitivity of coronary artery stenosis detection at cCTA, and thus highlights the need for dedicated training in cCTA interpretation.