[Angiotensin II-receptor antagonists compared to other antihypertensives: still insufficient evidence for reducing the risk of cerebrovascular incidents]. / Angiotensine II-receptorantagonisten vergeleken met andere antihypertensiva: nog onvoldoende bewijs voor een lager risico op herseninfarcten.

--There is growing evidence that angiotensin II-receptor antagonists may have protective effects for preventing cerebrovascular incidents. --It is unlikely that these effects are due only to a decrease in blood pressure. --One hypothesis is that high concentrations ofangiotensin II result in improved cerebral perfusion ofangiotensin type 2-receptor mediated mechanisms such as local vasodilatation and angiogenesis. --Several clinical and preclinical studies support this hypothesis. --The results of these studies are discussed in this overview. There is still insufficient evidence that a protective effect on the brain occurs.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: To investigate dose escalation of oral paclitaxel in combination with dose increment and scheduling of cyclosporine (CsA) to improve the systemic exposure to paclitaxel and to explore the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 53 patients received, on one occasion, oral paclitaxel in combination with CsA, coadministered to enhance the absorption of paclitaxel, and, on another occasion, intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour infusion. RESULTS: The main toxicities observed after oral intake of paclitaxel were acute nausea and vomiting, which reached DLT at the dose level of 360 mg/m(2). Dose escalation of oral paclitaxel from 60 to 300 mg/m(2) resulted in significant but less than proportional increases in the plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of paclitaxel. The mean AUC values +/- SD after 60, 180, and 300 mg/m(2) of oral paclitaxel were 1.65 +/- 0.93, 3.33 +/- 2.39, and 3.46 +/- 1.37 micromol/L.h, respectively. Dose increment and scheduling of CsA did not result in a further increase in the AUC of paclitaxel. The AUC of intravenous paclitaxel was 15.39 +/- 3.26 micromol/L.h. CONCLUSION: The MTD of oral paclitaxel was 300 mg/m(2). However, because the pharmacokinetic data of oral paclitaxel, in particular at the highest doses applied, revealed nonlinear pharmacokinetics with only a moderate further increase of the AUC with doses up to 300 mg/m(2), the oral paclitaxel dose of 180 mg/m(2) in combination with 15 mg/kg oral CsA is considered most appropriate for further investigation. The safety of the oral combination at this dose level was good.

Coadministration of oral cyclosporin A enables oral therapy with paclitaxel.

i.v. paclitaxel is inconvenient and associated with significant and poorly predictable side effects largely due to the pharmaceutical vehicle Cremophor EL. Oral administration may be attractive because it may circumvent the use of Cremophor EL. However, paclitaxel, as well as many other commonly applied drugs, has poor bioavailability caused by high affinity for the mdrl P-glycoprotein drug efflux pump, which is abundantly present in the gastrointestinal tract. Consequently, inhibition of P-glycoprotein by oral cyclosporin A (CsA) should increase systemic exposure of oral paclitaxel to therapeutic levels. A proof-of-concept study was carried out in 14 patients with solid tumors. Patients received one course of oral paclitaxel of 60 mg/m2 with or without 15 mg/kg CsA and with i.v. paclitaxel in subsequent courses. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and its major metabolites were determined during the first two courses. In addition, levels of CsA, Cremophor EL, and ethanol were measured. Bioavailability of oral paclitaxel in combination with CsA was 8-fold higher than after oral paclitaxel alone (P<0.001). Therapeutic concentrations were achieved on average during 7.4 h, which is comparable with an equivalent i.v. dose. The oral combination was well tolerated and did not induce gastrointestinal toxicity or myelosuppression. Cremophor EL plasma levels after oral drug administration were undetectable. In conclusion, coadministration of oral CsA increased the systemic exposure of oral paclitaxel from negligible to therapeutic levels. The combination enables treatment with oral paclitaxel. Undetectable Cremophor EL levels after oral administration may have a very beneficial influence on the safety of the treatment with oral paclitaxel.

Alternative formulations of paclitaxel.

Paclitaxel, a novel antitumour agent, is active clinically against advanced ovarian and breast cancer and under investigation for various other cancers. One of the problems associated with the intravenous administration of paclitaxel is its low solubility in water. The current pharmaceutical formulation consists of a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of ethanol and Cremophor EL. This formulation, however, has been demonstrated to cause some severe hypersensitivity reactions. Therefore the development of a safer intravenous formulation devoid of Cremophor EL is an important investigational issue. This review deals with some of the most promising formulation alternatives.

Clinical pharmacology of anticancer agents in relation to formulations and administration routes.

In the past years, alternative administration routes and pharmaceutical formulations of anticancer agents have been investigated in order to improve conventional chemotherapy treatment. The impact of these adjustments on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is discussed. A review of the literature shows many examples of alternative administration forms of anticancer agents with improved pharmacokinetics. Local administration routes have been investigated in order to reduce the systemic toxicity and to enhance the local efficacy of conventional chemotherapy. Oral administration of anticancer agents is preferred by patients for its convenience and its potential for outpatient treatment. In addition, oral administration facilitates a prolonged exposure to the cytotoxic agent. However, poor bioavailability and substantial interpatient variability are noted as limitations for oral chemotherapy. Increased tumour selectivity can also be achieved by the use of specific pharmaceutical formulations, such as liposomes and macromolecular drug conjugates. The composition of these formulations often determine the pharmacokinetic behaviour of the formulated drug. In conclusion, several alternative administration forms of anticancer agents have been designed in the past years, with the potential for improvement of conventional chemotherapy, however, more extensive clinical evaluation of these novel strategies is warranted to prove their real clinical value.

Validated method for the determination of platinum from a liposomal source (SPI-77) in human plasma using graphite furnace Zeeman atomic absorption spectrometry.

A sensitive analytical method based on flameless atomic absorption spectrometry with Zeeman correction has been validated for the quantitative determination in human plasma of platinum originating from cisplatin in a liposomal source, SPI-77. The performance of the method was acceptable over a sample concentration range of 0. 125-1.25 micromol platinum/L and the lower limit of quantification was determined to be 1.25 micromol platinum/L in undiluted clinical samples. The performance data of the assay were investigated using both a calibration curve with carboplatin in plasma ultrafiltrate and diluted human plasma samples spiked with SPI-77. The recoveries, between-day and the within-day precisions of both methods of calibration were not significantly different allowing carboplatin ultrafiltrate calibration standards to be used to quantify platinum derived from SPI-77 in human plasma. Apparently, the liposomal formulation had no significant influence on the determination of platinum. The usefulness of the presented method was demonstrated in a phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study. In addition, in vitro experiments were carried out to determine the distribution of SPI-77 in blood. The results indicated that platinum from SPI-77 mainly concentrates in plasma and that binding to and/or endocytosis in red blood cells is negligible.

Phase II trial of topically applied miltefosine solution in patients with skin-metastasized breast cancer.

Skin deposits from breast cancer can present serious therapeutic problems, especially when resistant to conventional therapy. Topical application of a cytotoxic drug may represent an attractive new treatment modality devoid of major systemic toxicity. Miltefosine was selected because of its efficacy in breast cancer models. A mixture of alkylated glycerols of various chain lengths and water was used as the pharmaceutical vehicle to dissolve and to further facilitate tissue penetration of miltefosine. In our Institute a phase II study was performed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topically applied miltefosine in patients with cutaneous metastases from breast cancer. Thirty-three patients in total entered the trial. A 6% miltefosine solution was applied once daily in the first week and twice daily in the following weeks. The planned minimum treatment duration was 8 weeks. We found an overall response rate of 43% for 30 evaluable patients, composed of 23% complete response and 20% partial response. The median response duration was 18 weeks, range 8-68. Toxicity consisted mainly of localized skin reactions, which could be controlled by a paraffin-based skin cream and, where appropriate, by dose modification. No systemic toxicities were observed. We conclude that topical miltefosine is an effective treatment modality in patients with skin metastases from breast cancer.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of PNU166945, a novel water-soluble polymer-conjugated prodrug of paclitaxel.

Intravenous administration of paclitaxel is hindered by poor water solubility of the drug. Currently, paclitaxel is dissolved in a mixture of ethanol and Cremophor EL; however, this formulation (Taxol) is associated with significant side effects, which are considered to be related to the pharmaceutical vehicle. A new polymer-conjugated derivative of paclitaxel, PNU166945, was investigated in a dose-finding phase I study to document toxicity and pharmacokinetics. A clinical phase I study was initiated in patients with refractory solid tumors. PNU16645 was administered as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks at a starting dose of 80 mg/m(2), as paclitaxel equivalents. Pharmacokinetics of polymer-bound and released paclitaxel were determined during the first course. Twelve patients in total were enrolled in the study. The highest dose level was 196 mg/m(2), at which we did not observe any dose-limiting toxicities. Hematologic toxicity of PNU166945 was mild and dose independent. One patient developed a grade 3 neurotoxicity. A partial response was observed in one patient with advanced breast cancer. PNU166945 displayed a linear pharmacokinetic behavior for the bound fraction as well as for released paclitaxel. The study was discontinued prematurely due to severe neurotoxicity observed in additional rat studies. The presented phase I study with PNU166945, a water-soluble polymeric drug conjugate of paclitaxel, shows an alteration in pharmacokinetic behavior when paclitaxel is administered as a polymer-bound drug. Consequently, the safety profile may differ significantly from standard paclitaxel.