Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Treat Pseudomyxoma Peritonei of Ovarian Origin: A Retrospective French RENAPE Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian pseudomyxoma peritonei (OPMP) are rare, without well-defined therapeutic guidelines. We aimed to evaluate cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat OPMP. METHODS: Patients from the French National Network for Rare Peritoneal Tumors (RENAPE) database with proven OPMP treated by CRS/HIPEC and with histologically normal appendix and digestive endoscopy were retrospectively included. Clinical and follow-up data were collected. Histopathological and immunohistochemical features were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a median age of 56 years were included. The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 16. Following CRS, the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score was CC-0 for 9/15 (60%) patients, CC-1 for 5/15 (33.3%) patients, and CC-2 for 1/15 (6.7%) patients. The median tumor size was 22.5 cm. After pathological review and immunohistochemical studies, tumors were classified as Group 1 (mucinous ovarian epithelial neoplasms) in 3/15 (20%) patients; Group 2 (mucinous neoplasm in ovarian teratoma) in 4/15 (26.7%) patients; Group 3 (mucinous neoplasm probably arising in ovarian teratoma) in 5/15 (33.3%) patients; and Group 4 (non-specific group) in 3/15 (20%) patients. Peritoneal lesions were OPMP pM1a/acellular, pM1b/grade 1 (hypocellular) and pM1b/grade 3 (signet-ring cells) in 13/15 (86.7%), 1/15 (6.7%) and 1/15 (6.7%) patients, respectively. Disease-free survival analysis showed a difference (p = 0.0463) between OPMP with teratoma/likely-teratoma origin (groups 2 and 3; 100% at 1, 5, and 10 years), and other groups (groups 1 and 4; 100%, 66.6%, and 50% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggested that a primary therapeutic strategy using complete CRS/HIPEC for patients with OPMP led to favorable long-term outcomes.

[Low-grade eosinophilic unclassified renal cell carcinoma, a recently proposed entity in the spectrum of eosinophilic renal cells tumors: Report of one case and discussion]. / Le carcinome rénal inclassé de bas grade à cellules éosinophiles, une entité récemment proposée dans le spectre des tumeurs rénales à cellules éosinophiles : étude d'un cas et discussion.

Low-grade eosinophilic unclassified renal cell carcinoma is a rare kidney tumor recently described, not included in the WHO classification, which is very close to oncocytoma. It is unknown to most pathologists and clinicians. From a histopathological point of view, this tumor is composed of oncocytic cells arranged in a diffuse and solid pattern, without cell nests, that makes it possible to differentiate it from oncocytoma, and expresses cytokeratin 7 (CK7) heterogeneously. We report a case with a cranial vault metastasis, and present the features to differentiate this entity from oncocytoma. Furthemore, we discuss about unclassified renal cell carcinomas with oncocytic cells.

Challenging Metastatic Melanoma to the Lung With p40 Expression: A Diagnostic Pitfall, Case Report.

p40 immunohistochemistry is a cornerstone of histopathological examination for non-small cell lung carcinoma. p40 is an isoform of p63 and is reported to be highly specific for the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. Very rare pitfalls are reported for this antibody, and p40 is typically negative in melanoma. A 66-year-old patient was admitted for multiple hemorrhagic brain tumors evocative of secondary tumors. On imaging, a 26 mm lung tumor was detected, and a biopsy of the lung tumor was performed. The tumor was stained by melanic markers and diffusely stained by p40 and p63. Molecular analysis found a somatic p.Asn581Ser (c.1742A>G) point mutation in exon 15 of BRAF and a p.Arg80Ter (c.238C>T) germline variant of CDKN2A , a predisposing mutation to melanoma. This case report highlights the importance of clinical, pathologic, and molecular correlation.

Differential diagnosis of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: utility of p16 in combination with MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry.

The differential diagnosis between atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) from their morphologic counterparts is challenging. Currently, the diagnosis is guided by MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and is confirmed by the amplification of the corresponding genes. Recently, p16 IHC has been proposed as a useful diagnostic biomarker. The objective was to assess the utility of p16 IHC in the differential diagnosis of ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS. Our series included 101 tumors that were previously analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 and CDK4 amplification. We compared sensitivity and specificity of p16 IHC to MDM2 and CDK4 IHC in the differential diagnosis of ALT-WDLPS (n=19) versus benign adipocytic tumors (n=44) and DDLPS (n=18) versus mimicking sarcomas (n=20). In the differential diagnosis of ALT-WDLPS, p16 had a sensitivity of 89.5% but a specificity of 68.2%, which was impaired by false-positive lipomas with secondary changes, especially in biopsies. Likewise, in the differential diagnosis of DDLPS, p16 had a sensitivity of 94.4% and a specificity of 70%, which hampered its use as a single marker. However, adding p16 to MDM2 and/or CDK4 increased diagnostic specificity. Indeed, MDM2+/p16+ tumors were all ALT-WDLPS, and MDM2-/p16- tumors were all benign adipocytic tumors. Moreover, all MDM2+/CDK4+/p16+ tumors were DDLPS, and the MDM2-/CDK4-/p16- tumor was an undifferentiated sarcoma. Although the use of p16 as a single immunohistochemical marker is limited by its specificity, its combination with MDM2 and CDK4 IHC may help discriminate ALT-WDLPS/DDLPS.