RESUMO
This is a single arm, open label perioperative trial to assess the feasibility, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of treatment with safusidenib following biopsy, and prior to surgical resection in patients with IDH1 mutated glioma who have not received radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Fifteen participants will receive treatment in two parts. First, biopsy followed by one cycle (28 days) of safusidenib, an orally available, small molecular inhibitor of mutated IDH1, then maximal safe resection of the tumor (Part A). Second, after recovery from surgery, safusidenib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (Part B). This research will enable objective measurement of biological activity of safusidenib in patients with IDH1 mutated glioma. Anti-tumor activity will be assessed by progression free survival and time to next intervention.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05577416 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Adult low-grade gliomas (aLGG) are primary brain cancers, defined by mutations in IDH1 or IDH2. When the IDH gene becomes abnormal (mutated), production of a metabolite that causes cancer cells to grow is increased. These tumors grow slowly but invade the normal functioning brain, making them nearly impossible to cure. The current standard of care treatment includes surgery, followed by radiation therapy and chemotherapy, the timing of which depends on the risk of cancer regrowth. Some patients may be suitable for monitoring with MRI scans alone, however recurrences will inevitably occur. Recently developed targeted mutant IDH inhibitors for aLGG patients may be beneficial both at diagnosis and recurrence. Notably, early treatment prior to radiation therapy and chemotherapy delays growth of aLGG and the need for subsequent radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Nevertheless, most patients will eventually suffer further tumor growth and the optimal timing and sequencing of these therapies remains an area of active research. This research investigates the mutant IDH1 inhibitor safusidenib. The researchers are conducting an innovative clinical trial where patients with aLGG, who have not received radiation therapy or chemotherapy, are treated with safusidenib following a biopsy and prior to surgical removal of their tumor. In this study they investigate whether this trial design is safe and feasible, and how safusidenib works; with the goal to better understand the optimal use of IDH inhibitors for patients with aLGG.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for breast cancer varies according to hormone receptor (HR), human epidermal growth factor receptor type-2 (HER2) subtype and Ki-67 proliferation index. Whether MRI accuracy varies by genomic signatures is unknown. We examined the accuracy of MRI in the NEONAB trial (Clinicaltrials.gov #: NCT01830244). AIM: To examine the accuracy of MRI to predict pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the NEONAB trial. METHODS: Patients with stages II-III breast cancer received sequential epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and nab-paclitaxel and trastuzumab if they were HER2+. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the utility of preoperative MRI to predict pathological complete response (pCR). Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between MRI and pathological assessment of residual disease. RESULTS: MRI correctly predicted pCR in 64.1% of the cohort. Sensitivity and specificity were 52% and 78%, respectively; PPV 73% and NPV 58%. MRI predicted pCR most accurately in HER2-positive patients; sensitivity 58%, specificity 100%, PPV 100% and NPV 38%. MRI had higher PPV and NPV in tumours with Ki-67 ≥ 15% than tumours with Ki-67 < 15%, 75% versus 50% and 57.5% versus 50%, respectively. In this study, MRI underestimated residual tumour size by 1.65 mm (limits of agreement: 43.07-39.77 mm). CONCLUSIONS: MRI appears more accurate for predicting pCR in HER2+ disease than other subtypes and in cancers with Ki-67 ≥ 15% compared to those with Ki-67 < 15%. Accuracy of MRI in our HR+, RS ≥ 25 cohort is comparable to previous reports of unselected HR+ disease. MRI post-NST should be interpreted in conjunction with HER2 status and Ki-67 index of the primary.