Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 45(1): 9-15, 2019 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30653232

RESUMO

Polypharmacy, defined as the use of five or more medications, is becoming increasingly prevalent in older adults throughout the United States. Depre-scribing, along with the use of existing tools, such as the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria, can help guide health care providers in reducing the risks associated with polypharmacy such as side effects and drug interactions. The framework of deprescribing and the use of existing guidelines and resources are valuable in guiding health care providers in addressing polypharmacy. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(1), 9-15.].


Assuntos
Desprescrições , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Geriatria/métodos , Guias como Assunto , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Polimedicação , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
2.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 43(4): 9-14, 2017 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28358971

RESUMO

The current quality improvement initiative evaluated the medication reconciliation process within select nursing homes in Washington, DC. The identification of common types of medication discrepancies through monthly retrospective chart reviews of newly admitted patients in two different nursing homes were described. The use of high-risk medications, namely antidiabetic, anticoagulant, and opioid agents, was also recorded. A standardized spreadsheet tool based on multiple medication reconciliation implementation tool kits was created to record the information. The five most common medication discrepancies were incorrect indication (21%), no monitoring parameters (17%), medication name omitted (11%), incorrect dose (10%), and incorrect frequency (8%). Antidiabetic agents in both sites were the most used high-risk medication. This initiative highlights that medication discrepancies on admission are common in nursing homes and may be clinically impactful. More attention needs to be given to work flow processes to improve medication reconciliation considering the increased risk for adverse drug events and hospitalizations. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing and Mental Health Services, 43(4), 9-14.].


Assuntos
Enfermagem Geriátrica/normas , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/normas , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Casas de Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , District of Columbia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 15(4): 101771, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615579

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The heterogeneity in health and functional ability among older patients makes the management of cancer a unique challenge. The Geriatric Oncology Program at the University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center (BWMC) was created to optimize cancer management for older patients. This study aimed to assess the benefits of the implementation of such a program at a community-based academic cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed patients aged ≥80 years presenting to the Geriatric Oncology Program between 2017 and 2022. A multidisciplinary team of specialists collectively reviewed each patient using geriatric-specific domains and stratified each patient into one of three management groups- Group 1: those deemed fit to receive standard oncologic care (SOC); Group 2: those recommended to receive optimization services prior to reassessment for SOC; and Group 3: those deemed to be best suited for supportive care and/or hospice care. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 233 patients, of which 76 (32.6%) received SOC, 43 (18.5%) were optimized, and 114 (49.0%) received supportive care or hospice referral. Among the optimized patients, 69.8% were deemed fit for SOC upon re-evaluation following their respective optimization services. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Clinical Frailty Scale (CSHA-CFS) score was implemented in 2019 (n = 90). Patients receiving supportive/hospice care only had an average score of 5.8, while the averages for those in the optimization and SOC groups were 4.6 and 4.1, respectively (p ≤0.001). Patients receiving SOC had the longest average survival of 2.71 years compared to the optimization (2.30 years) and supportive care groups (0.93 years) (p ≤0.001). For all patients that underwent surgical interventions post-operatively, 23 patients (85%) were discharged home and four (15%) were discharged to a rehabilitation facility. DISCUSSION: The present study demonstrates the profound impact that the complexities in health status and frailty among older individuals can have during cancer management. The Geriatric Oncology Program at BWMC maximized treatment outcomes for older adults through the provision of SOC therapies and optimization services, while also minimizing unnecessary interventions on an individual patient-centric level.


Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica , Geriatria , Oncologia , Neoplasias , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Neoplasias/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Fragilidade/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA