Neuroblastoma Screening at 1 Year of Age: The Final Results of a Controlled Trial.

Background: Neuroblastoma screening aims to reduce neuroblastoma-related mortality. A controlled trial showed no reduction in stage 4 disease incidence and preliminary mortality data. This article presents epidemiologic and clinical data 20 years after cessation of the screening program. Methods: The patients with detected disease in the screening area were compared with the clinically diagnosed patients in the control area and in the prestudy and poststudy cohorts. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results: The cumulative incidence for children aged 1 to 6 years in the birth study cohorts (1994-1999) in the screening arm was 13.4 cases per 100 000 births (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.2 to 14.6) based on 61.2% of screening participants and 38.8% of nonparticipants. Screening participants had a cumulative incidence of 15.7 (95% CI = 14.0 to 17.4) per 100 000 births. The cumulative incidence in the contemporary control cohort was 9.3 (95% CI = 8.2 to 10.3) per 100 000 births, 7.6 (95% CI = 6.8 to 8.4) in the prestudy cohort, and 8.1 (95% CI = 7.4 to 8.9) in the poststudy cohort from 2000 to 2004 (P < .001 each). The increased incidence in the screening cohort was restricted to stages 1 through 3, while stage 4 incidence was not reduced. The cumulative mortality for deaths within 10 years from diagnosis and per 100 000 births remained unchanged. Patients with stage 4 disease detected by screening had better biological characteristics and an improved outcome compared with those stage 4 cases not detected by screening. Conclusions: Neuroblastoma screening at 1 year of age reduced neither stage 4 incidence nor neuroblastoma mortality and was affected by overdiagnosis, leading to unnecessary treatment. A few screening-detected stage 4 cases represent a biologically interesting subgroup but do not change the recommendation to close the "catecholamine-based neuroblastoma screening book."

Does the time-point of relapse influence outcome in pediatric rhabdomyosarcomas?

BACKGROUND: Childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), a soft tissue malignant tumor of skeletal muscle origin, accounts for approximately 3.5% of the cases of cancer among children 0-14 years and 2% of the cases among adolescents and young adults 15-19 years of age. PROCEDURE: We evaluated survival (SUR) after first relapse depending on the time to relapse (TTR) in RMSs of childhood and adolescence. Early, intermediate, and late relapsing patients were evaluated for prognostic risk factors. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-four patients with RMS enrolled in the German sarcoma trial CWS-81, CWS-86, CWS-91, and CWS-96 met selection criteria. Of the 234 patients, 35%, 32%, and 33% relapsed within 6 (early), 6-12 (intermediate), and more than 12 (late) months respectively after the end of primary therapy. Four-year SUR was 12%, 21%, and 41% for early, intermediate, and late relapse respectively (P < 0.001). Four-year SUR after local relapse was 18% (early), 38% (intermediate), and 49% (late). Embryonal RMS showed four year SUR of 16%, 30%, and 46% (P < 0.001) whereas alveolar histology showed four year SUR of 8%, 6%, and 23% (P < 0.01) for early, intermediate, and late relapse respectively. CONCLUSION: TTR has significant influence on prognosis in relapsed RMS. It influences SUR independent of other features such as type of relapse, histology, tumor site, primary treatment time or irradiation in primary treatment.

Treatment of children with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma with oral maintenance compared to high dose chemotherapy: report of the HD CWS-96 trial.

PURPOSE: We prospectively studied the efficacy of high dose therapy (HDT) versus an oral maintenance treatment (OMT) in patients with stage IV soft tissue sarcoma (STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Both groups were pretreated with the CEVAIE combination consisting of carboplatin, etoposide, vincristine, actinomycin D, ifosfamide, and epirubicin. HDT consisted of a tandem cycle of thiotepa (600 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (4,500 mg/m(2)) and melphalan (120 mg/m(2)) plus etoposide (1,800 mg/m(2)). This treatment was compared with OMT, consisting of four cycles trofosfamide (10 days 2 x 75 mg/m(2)/day) plus etoposide (10 days 2 x 25 mg/m(2)/day), and 4 cycles trofosfamide (10 days 2 x 75 mg/m(2)/day) plus idarubicin (10 days 4 x 5 mg/m(2)). Eligibility criteria were: diagnosis confirmed by reference pathology, primary stage IV, below 22 years of age, and having completed the study therapy. RESULTS: From 96 patients 45 were treated with HDT and 51 with OMT. The main risk parameters were equally distributed in both arms. After a median follow-up of 57.4 months, 11/45 (24.4%) patients in the HDT-arm and 26/51 (57.8%) patients in OMT-arm were alive. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an overall survival for the whole group of 0.27 (OMT group: 0.52, HDT group 0.27, log rank P = 0.03). The proportional hazard analysis for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) or "RMS-like" tumors (77.1% of all patients) demonstrated an independent benefit of OMT on outcome. CONCLUSION: Oral maintenance therapy seems to be a promising option for patients with RMS-like stage IV tumors.

Neuroblastoma screening at one year of age.

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma is the second most common type of childhood tumor. It is not known whether screening for neuroblastoma at one year of age reduces the incidence of metastatic disease or mortality due to neuroblastoma. METHODS: We offered urine screening for neuroblastoma at approximately one year of age to 2,581,188 children in 6 of 16 German states from 1995 to 2000. A total of 2,117,600 eligible children in the remaining states served as controls. We compared the two groups in terms of the incidence of disseminated disease and mortality from neuroblastoma. RESULTS: A total of 1,475,773 children (61.2 percent of those who were born between July 1, 1994, and October 31, 1999) underwent screening. In this group, neuroblastoma was detected by screening in 149 children, of whom 3 have died. Fifty-five children who had negative screening tests were subsequently given a diagnosis of neuroblastoma; 14 of these children have died. The screened group and children in the control area had a similar incidence of stage 4 neuroblastoma (3.7 cases per 100,000 screened children [95 percent confidence interval, 2.7 to 4.7] and 3.8 per 100,000 controls [95 percent confidence interval, 2.9 to 4.6]) and a similar rate of death among children with neuroblastoma (1.3 deaths per 100,000 screened children [95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 1.8] and 1.2 per 100,000 controls [95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 1.7]). Comparison of the screened group and the children in the control area revealed substantial overdiagnosis in the former group (an estimated rate of 7 cases per 100,000 children [95 percent confidence interval, 4.6 to 9.2]); the overdiagnosis rate represents children who had neuroblastoma that was diagnosed by screening but who would not benefit from earlier diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings do not support the usefulness of general screening for neuroblastoma at one year of age.

Pediatric malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: the Italian and German soft tissue sarcoma cooperative group.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in children with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) and to identify risk factors associated with outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 167 untreated eligible patients enrolled onto the Italian and German studies between 1975 and 1998 entered this analysis. Seventeen percent of patients had neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Chemotherapy was administered to 74% of patients; radiotherapy was administered to 38% of patients. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 7 years, 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 51% and 37%, respectively. The 5-year OS and PFS by Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) groupings were as follows: group I, 82% and 61%; group II, 62% and 37%; group III, 32% and 27%; group IV, 26% and 21%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified IRS groups, size, invasiveness, primary site, age, and presence of NF1 as prognostic factors; multivariate analysis identified absence of NF1, tumor invasiveness T1, IRS groups I to II and extremity of primary site as independent favorable factors for OS. A trend was observed toward a benefit from radiotherapy after initial gross resection. The overall response rate to primary chemotherapy, including minor responses, in group III patients was 45%. CONCLUSION: MPNST is an aggressive tumor for which complete surgical resection is the mainstay of successful treatment. Postoperative radiotherapy may have a role in improving local control in patients with minimal residual tumor. The reported responses to primary chemotherapy suggest that it may be effective in patients with tumor considered unresectable at diagnosis.

Synovial sarcoma of childhood and adolescence: a multicenter, multivariate analysis of outcome.

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic factors related to outcome in 219 children and adolescents with synovial sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We combined the experiences of the four following research groups: Cooperative Weichteilsarkomastudie Group, Germany (n = 95); St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN (n = 49); Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy (n = 33); and The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (n = 42). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 13 years (range, 1 to 20 years), and the median follow-up was 6.6 years (range, 0.5 to 30.7 years). The estimated 5-year overall survival and event-free survival rates for the entire group were 80% +/- 3% (SE) and 72% +/- 3%, respectively. A previously unreported interaction between tumor size and invasiveness was observed that statistically significantly related to outcome. In multivarible analysis, patients with T1B and T2B disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.9 to 16.2; and HR = 5.9, 95% CI, 2.1 to 16.4, respectively) or Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) Clinical Group III and IV disease (HR = 2.7, 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.5; and HR = 14.1, 95% CI, 4.3 to 31.3, respectively) had poor overall survival. Treatment with radiotherapy was related to improved overall survival (HR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7). In IRS Group III patients, objective response to chemotherapy (18 of 30, 60%) correlated with improved survival. CONCLUSION: Clinical group, tumor size, and invasiveness are important prognostic factors. Multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to determine both the effect of chemotherapy on survival and the necessity of local radiotherapy in patients with completely resected tumors.

Group II rhabdomyosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcomalike tumors: is radiotherapy necessary?

PURPOSE: In the prospective Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (CWS) 81, 86, 91, and 96 trials, radiotherapy was omitted in some patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma-like tumors within Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) group II. This analysis evaluates whether subgroups can be defined for which radiotherapy is not necessary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred three patients who were registered between January 1981 and December 1998 were eligible for evaluation. Radiotherapy was given depending on tumor location, histology, and whether a secondary complete resection could be performed. The recommended radiation doses ranged from 32 to 54 Gy. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients did receive and 93 patients did not receive radiotherapy. The calculated local control after 5 years was 83% with and 65% without radiotherapy (P <.004). Event-free survival (EFS) at 5 years was 76% and 58%, respectively (P <.005). Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 84% and 77% (P = not significant). The differences in local control were significant for the subgroups of irradiated patients with favorable histology, favorable site, and initial tumor size of less than 5 cm. A trend for improved local control with irradiation was observed for patients with unfavorable site, unfavorable histology, and large primary tumors. EFS was significantly improved for irradiated patients who had unfavorable histology, both favorable and unfavorable tumor sites, and small initial tumors. OS was significantly improved for patients with unfavorable histology through radiation. CONCLUSION: Local control and EFS in group II patients are improved with radiotherapy. No subgroup could be defined for which the omission of radiotherapy produced outcome equivalent to that of patients who were irradiated.

Children may not benefit from neuroblastoma screening at 1 year of age. Updated results of the population based controlled trial in Germany.

Neuroblastoma is the second most frequent malignancy in childhood. We investigated whether screening for neuroblastoma at 1 year of age reduces the incidence of metastatic disease or mortality. Screening was offered in 6 of the 16 German states from 1995 to 2000 with the remaining states serving as controls. We studied 2,581,188 children in the screening area born between 1994 and 1999 and 2,117,600 in the control area. We compared mortality from neuroblastoma and the incidence of disseminated disease in the two groups. The screened group and the control group had similar rates of stage 4 neuroblastoma and mortality due to neuroblastoma. Comparison of the screened group and the control area revealed substantial over diagnosis in the screened participants. The present findings provide no support for mass screening for neuroblastoma at 1 year of age.

Cooperative trial CWS-91 for localized soft tissue sarcoma in children, adolescents, and young adults.

PURPOSE: To improve risk-adapted therapy for localized childhood soft tissue sarcoma within an international multicenter setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred forty-one patients younger than 21 years with localized rhabdomyosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma-like tumors (ie, extraosseous tumors of the Ewing family, synovial sarcoma, and undifferentiated sarcoma) were eligible. Therapy was stratified according to postsurgical stage, histology, and tumor site. In unresectable tumors, treatment was further adapted depending on response to induction chemotherapy, TN classification, tumor size and second-look surgery. A novel five-drug combination of etoposide, vincristine, dactinomycin, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (EVAIA) was evaluated for high-risk patients, but cumulative chemotherapy dosage and treatment duration were reduced for the remaining individuals as compared with that of the previous trial CWS-86. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) was recommended at doses of either 32 or 48 Gy. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 8 years, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall (OS) survival for the entire cohort was 63% +/- 4% and 73% +/- 4%, respectively (all survival rates in this abstract are calculated and displayed with +/-95% CI). EFS/OS rates by histology were 60% +/- 5%/72% +/- 5% in rhabdomyosarcoma, 62% +/- 10%/69% +/- 10% for Ewing tumors of soft tissues, 84% +/- 12%/90% +/- 10% for synovial sarcoma, and 67% +/- 38%/83% +/- 30% for undifferentiated sarcoma, respectively. Response to one cycle of the five-drug combination EVAIA was similar to that of the four-drug combination VAIA used in CWS-86. Two hundred twelve patients with rhabdomyosarcoma underwent radiation (EFS, 66% +/- 6%); 53 of those patients had a favorable risk profile and received 32 Gy of HART (EFS, 73% +/- 12%). TN classification, tumor site, tumor size, histology, and age were prognostic in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Improved risk stratification enabled decreased therapy intensity for selected patients without compromising survival. Intensified chemotherapy with EVAIA did not improve outcome of localized high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma.

Initial patient characteristics can predict pattern and risk of relapse in localized rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of primary tumor-, treatment-, and patient-related factors predicting relapse pattern, risk, and survival after relapse with the aim to design a risk-adapted, tumor-directed surveillance program for patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand one hundred sixty-four patients with nonmetastatic RMS achieved complete remission at the end of multimodal therapy in the consecutive trials of the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS)-81, CWS-86, CWS-91, and CWS-96 between 1980 and 2002 (median follow-up, 5 years). Three hundred thirty-seven of these individuals developed either locoregional, metastatic, or combined relapses. Predictive factors for relapse, its pattern, and postrelapse survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Age, histology, tumor size, tumor site, postsurgical stage, and omission of radiotherapy were identified as factors associated with an increased relapse risk in multivariate analyses. Relapse rates did not differ among the CWS trials. Median time to relapse was 1.43 years from first diagnosis (range, 0.13 to 13.5 years). There were 217 locoregional, 72 metastatic, and 48 combined recurrences. Only two patients developed metastases more than 4 years after diagnosis, and both had combined recurrences. Five-year postrelapse survival was 24%. Patient subsets with consistent relapse pattern, risk, and postrelapse survival rates were identified on the basis of histologic subtype and tumor size. CONCLUSION: Initial patient and tumor characteristics predict pattern and risk of relapse and also correlate with postrelapse survival probabilities. In localized RMS, tumor-directed follow-up should focus on the primary site. Screening for metastatic relapse may not be necessary more than 4 years after diagnosis. The identification of subgroups with distinctive pattern and risk of relapse may be used to develop risk-adapted, tumor-directed guidance for detection of recurrent disease in localized RMS.

Grossly-resected synovial sarcoma treated by the German and Italian Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Cooperative Groups: discussion on the role of adjuvant therapies.

Differently from adult oncologists that considered synovial sarcoma (SS) a tumor with uncertain chemosensitiveness, since two decades pediatric oncologists in Europe assumed that chemotherapy played an important role in SS treatment, so most pediatric patients were included in rhabdomyosarcoma protocols, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of risk factors. The German and Italian groups reviewed the data of grossly resected SS patients in order to define a risk-adapted treatment program for the next European protocol. A total of 150 patients < 21 years with localized SS who underwent initial gross resection between 1975 and 2002 were the object of this study. All but four cases received adjuvant chemotherapy. Post-operative radiotherapy was administered to 50% Group I and to 92% Group II patients. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 77% and 89%, respectively. Survival rates were influenced by tumor size (EFS 92% and 56% for size < or = and > 5 cm, respectively) and local invasiveness, not by surgical margins. No metastatic relapses occurred in Group I < or = 5 cm patients, while the outcome was poor for T2B patients (EFS 41%) due to a high rate of metastatic relapse. Our study was unable to assess the role of adjuvant treatments in grossly-resected SS, but identified a subset of low-risk patients (IRS Group I, size < or = 5 cm), for which the omission of adjuvant chemotherapy could be suggested, and a subset of high-risk patients (T2B), who need treatment intensification.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in children and adolescents with surgically resected, high-risk adult-type soft tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE: This analysis evaluates whether adjuvant chemotherapy can be recommended for high-risk, surgically-resected, adult-type non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) within the new European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) protocol. The Italian and German Cooperative Groups reviewed their data-bases, analyzing patients classified as group I-II, with high-grade tumor (G3) larger than 5 cm in size. METHODS: The analysis included 36 patients, and compared the clinical features and outcome of the group of 21 patients who received chemotherapy versus the group of 15 patients treated with local therapies only. RESULTS: For the series as a whole, 5-year event-free survival (EFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) were 26.2%, 34.0%, and 37.5%, respectively. In patients treated with chemotherapy, MFS and OS were 49.5% and 41.5% (median time to relapse: 13 months). In patients who did not receive chemotherapy, MFS and OS were 0% and 23.8% (median time to relapse: 3 months). CONCLUSION: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in NRSTS is still uncertain, however, the current retrospective analysis showed that: (1) despite the globally good prognosis of grossly-resected cases, patients with G3 and large-size have a high-risk of metastatic spread, and (2) MFS appears to be better in patients who had chemotherapy. Based in part on these results, and in accordance with recent suggestions coming from the literature on adult sarcomas, the EpSSG NRSTS protocol will recommend adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk surgically-resected patients.