[Increased glucose uptake by seborrheic keratosis on PET scan]. / Hyperfixation intense d'une kératose séborrhéique en TEP-TDM.

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) is an examination based upon the uptake of a radioactive tracer by hypermetabolic cells. It is primarily used in tandem with tomodensitometry (PET-TDM) for cancer staging because of its high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of metastases. However, unusually high uptake may occur with benign tumours, including skin tumours. Herein, we report an extremely rare case of pathological uptake levels resulting from seborrhoeic keratosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 55-year-old male patient with oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma was referred to us following the discovery of an area of high marker uptake following PET-TDM and corresponding to a pigmented skin lesion. No other areas of suspect high uptake were seen. The lesion was surgically excised and histological examination indicated seborrhoeic keratosis. The histological appearance was that of standard seborrhoeic keratosis without any notable mitotic activity. DISCUSSION: PET-TDM is an examination that enables diagnosis of malignancy. However, rare cases have been described of increased marker uptake by benign cutaneous tumours such as histiocytofibroma, pilomatricoma and condyloma. To date, there have only been only very few cases of increased uptake due to seborrhoeic keratosis. CONCLUSION: This extremely unusual case of increased glucose uptake in PET-TDM due to seborrhoeic keratosis confirms that the hypermetabolic activity detected by this examination is not necessarily synonymous with malignancy and that confirmation by clinical and histological findings is essential. The reasons for increased metabolic activity within such benign tumours are not known.

Radiation-induced lung toxicity predictors: Retrospective analysis of 90 patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The main complication after hypofractionated radiotherapy for lung carcinoma is radiation-induced lung toxicity, which can be divided into radiation pneumonitis (acute toxicity, occurring within 6 months) and lung fibrosis (late toxicity, occurring after 6 months). The literature describes several predictive factors related to the patient, to the tumor (volume, central location), to the dosimetry and to biological factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 90 patients treated with stereotactic body irradiation for stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma between December 2010 and May 2015. RESULTS: Radiation pneumonitis was observed in 61.5% of the patients who were mainly asymptomatic (34%). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was not predictive of radiation pneumonitis, whereas active smoking was protective. Centrally located tumors were not more likely to result in this complication if the radiation schedule utilized adapted fractionation. In our study, no predictive factor was identified. Whereas the mean lung dose was a predictive factor in 3D radiotherapy, the lung volume irradiated at high doses seemed to be involved in the pathogenesis after hypofractionated radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The discovery of predictive factors for radiation pneumonitis is difficult due to the rarity of this complication, especially with an 8×7.5Gy schedule. Radiation pneumonitis seems to be correlated with the volume irradiated at high doses, which is in contrast to the known knowledge about the organs in parallel. This finding leads us to raise the hypothesis that vessel damage, organs in series, occurring during hypofractionated radiotherapy could be responsible for this toxicity.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung carcinomas: Moderate hypofractionation optimizes outcome.

OBJECTIVES: In case of inoperability or refusal of surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the most effective treatment for a stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The results obtained by this irradiation technique are considerably superior to those observed in the time of conventional 3D irradiation and its toxicities are much less important, which makes it possible in elderly patients, or those presenting cardio-pulmonary comorbidities and a poor perfomance status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 90 patients who underwent SBRT for a stage I NSCLC between 2010 and 2015. Its purpose is to describe its effectiveness in term of overall survival (OS), specific survival (SS), local control (LC), regional control (RC) and metastatic control (MC) as well as their prognostic factors, and its tolerance. RESULTS: LC, RC, MC as well as OS and SS rate at 4 years were comparable to the main prospective studies, respectively 89%, 92%, 70%, 33% and 66%. No LC prognostic factor could be identified. Radiation pneumonitis was observed with a rate of 61.5%, of which 56% were asymptomatic, and 4% of the patients had a rib fracture. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is an efficient and well-tolerated treatment for stage I non-small cell lung carcinomas.

[Radiotherapy of bone metastases in France: A descriptive monocentric retrospective study]. / Radiothérapie des métastases osseuses en France : étude descriptive rétrospective monocentrique.

PURPOSE: Bone metastases cause pain and affect patients' quality of life. Radiation therapy is one of the reference analgesic treatments. The objective of this study was to compare the current practices of a French radiotherapy department for the treatment of uncomplicated bone metastases with data from the literature in order to improve and optimize the management of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective monocentric study of patients who underwent palliative irradiation of uncomplicated bone metastases was performed. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients had 116 treatments of uncomplicated bone metastases between January 2014 and December 2015, including 44 men (48%) and 47 women (52%) with an average age of 63years (25-88years). Primary tumours most commonly found were breast cancer (35%), lung cancer (16%) and prostate cancer (12%). The regimens used were in 29% of cases 30Gy in ten fractions (group 30Gy), in 21% of cases 20Gy in five fractions (group 20Gy), in 22% of cases 8Gy in one fraction (group 8Gy) and in 28% of cases 23.31Gy in three fractions of stereotactic body irradiation (stereotactic group). The general condition of the patient (P<0.001), pain score and analgesic (P<0.001), oligometastatic profile (P=0.003) and practitioner experience (P<0.001) were factors influencing the choice of the regimen irradiation. Age (P=0.46), sex (P=0.14), anticancer treatments (P=0.56), concomitant hospitalization (P=0.14) and the distance between the radiotherapy centre and home (P=0.87) did not influence the decision significantly. A total of three cases of spinal compression and one case of post-therapeutic fracture were observed, occurring between one and 128days and 577days after irradiation, respectively. Eight percent of all irradiated metastases were reirradiated with a delay ranging between 13 and 434days after the first irradiation. The re-irradiation rate was significantly higher after 8Gy (P=0.02). The rate of death was significantly lower in the stereotactic arm (P<0.001) and overall survival was significantly greater in the stereotactic arm (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients' analysed was comparable to the population of different studies. Predictive factors for the choice of the treatment regimen were identified. Non-fractionnated therapy was underutilised while stereotactic treatment was increasingly prescribed, showing an evolution in the management of patients.

[Prognostic factors for head and neck cancer reirradiation: A systematic review]. / Facteurs pronostiques de la ré-irradiation des cancers des voies aérodigestives supérieures : revue de la littérature.

PURPOSE: To specify the effectiveness of head and neck cancer reirradiation and make a synthesis of prognostic factors established by published series of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Original series of external reirradiation of head and neck cancer with at least ten patients were sought in Medline database. RESULTS: Exclusive reirradiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy offers 11 months of median overall survival, versus 6 months for chemotherapy alone, and 20 to 40% of the patients are still alive two years after treatment. Postoperative reirradiation allows 3 years overall survival from 40 to 60%. However, side effects of grade 3 or more arise in more than half of patients. Patient-related good prognostic factors are male, young age, good performance status without comorbidities. Those related to the disease are low rT and rN stage, poor differentiation, other than squamous cell carcinomas and a nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal or laryngeal location. Concerning the treatment, surgical resection, a dose higher than 50 to 60Gy in a smaller-irradiated volume, an interval between the two treatments of more than 2 years and the use of an innovating technology are the most commonly highlighted prognostic factors. Concurrent chemotherapy is often associated with higher toxicity rates, without improving overall survival, unless using cisplatin for selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Head and neck cancer reirradiation achieves long-term survival outcomes. However, regarding to its associated side effects, patients need to be carefully selected based on prognostic factors.

[Orodental status before radiation therapy of the head and neck area: A prospective analysis on 48 patients]. / État buccodentaire des patients avant radiothérapie des voies aérodigestives supérieures : analyse prospective de 48 patients.

PURPOSE: The treatment by irradiation of tumours of the upper head and neck tract cause many complications on the oral sphere, such as mucositis, dysphagia, asialia and tooth decay. Associated manifestations are frequent and their severity has been poorly studied. However, the patient's quality of life is directly correlated with their oral health. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out an evaluation of the oral health of 48 patients with an upper head and neck tract cancer treated by irradiation at the Paul-Strauss Centre in Strasbourg. The inclusion criteria of this study concerned the localization of the tumour in the upper head and neck tract and a treatment by irradiation associated or not to chemotherapy. RESULTS: The patients of the study were concerned by alcohol and smoking intoxication, on average, 22.2 pack-year and 2.2 glasses of alcohol per day. They received an irradiation of 60.9Gy on average. Their oral health was characterized by a DMFT (decayed, missing, filled teeth) index of 16.1, with, in mean, eight missing teeth and eight filling teeth and, by the presence of dental plaque in 70% of cases. Along the treatment by irradiation, the oral complications evaluation showed that on average, patients developed mucositis 18 days after the beginning of radiotherapy, xerostomia after 20 days, and dysphagia after 17 days. At the end of the treatment, we noted an oral hygiene improvement, with teeth brushing more frequent (two to three per day), mouthwash use, and daily fluoride prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights of the dental status of patients irradiated in the oral cavity. This series lays the groundwork for the study of prosthesis requirement and dosimetry calculation.

[Dental state in patients with head and neck cancers]. / État dentaire des patients atteints d'un cancer des voies aérodigestives supérieures.

In France, in 2005, there were approximately 16,000 new cases of head and neck cancer. These cancers have an unfavourable prognosis: the survival rates at 3 and 10 years are 50% and 10% respectively. The consumption of alcohol and tobacco is the most important risk factor; in some countries HPV infection was identified as a risk factor of head and neck tumours. Furthermore, a poor oral hygiene seems to raise this risk. We found many decay and periodontium problems in patients with an upper aerodigestive tract cancer. An evaluation of dental state is necessary before any cancer treatment. Treatments by radiotherapy engender noxious effects: hypocellular, hypovascularization, hypoxie of the irradiated tissues, which lead to immediate and chronically oral complications such as mucositis, fibrosis, xerostomia, decay, or osteoradionecrosis. An oral follow-up of these patients can prevent these complications, or reduce the severity of oral complications, and promote a good oral state.

[SMART syndrome: case report of a rare complication after cerebral radiation therapy]. / SMART Syndrome : à propos d'un cas d'une complication rare après radiothérapie cérébrale et revue de la littérature.

The authors report a 71-year-old woman case who developed, 7 years after a cerebral radiation therapy for a parietooccipital glioblastoma, a stroke-like migraine attacks after radiotherapy syndrome (SMART syndrome), a rare complication characterized by reversible neurologic deficits with migraine described after cerebral irradiation. Transient gyriform reversible enhancement is found on MRI during crises. This case report allows discussing the clinical, iconographic presentation and the clinical outcome of this syndrome at the light of the literature publication.

[Solitary fibrous tumors: Case report of a late relapse]. / Tumeur fibreuse solitaire: cas clinique d'une récidive tardive.

Authors report a case of a woman with a metastasis of a solitary fibrous tumor, 14 years after the diagnosis of a hemangiopericytoma of the soft tissues. This case report allows discussing the pathological features, the therapeutical option and the outcome of these tumors.