Medication Adherence Assessment and Cost Analysis of COPD Treatment Under Out-Patient Clinic in Vietnam.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) out-patient clinic is for stable patients but it requires patient's adherence to medicine and medical checkups. Our study aimed to assess COPD out-patient clinics management efficacy with respect to medication adherence and treatment costs at 3 out-patient clinics. Data were collected through 514 patient interviews and from medical records for statistical analysis. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (28.8%), and 52.9% of patients had experienced exacerbations in the past year requiring 75.7% of them to be hospitalized. According to the Morisky scale, 78.8% had high adherence and 82.9% were using inhaled corticosteroids regimens. The mean cost per year among different cohorts varied, with the out-patient cohort at $305.93, the acute exacerbations of COPD non-hospital cohort at $247.39, the standard admission cohort at $1275.3, and the emergency department cohort at $2132.5. Patients with low medication adherence had significantly lower annual costs ($238.25 vs $325.04, P = .001). In Vietnam, economic constraints have made Inhaled corticosteroids/ Long-acting ß-2 agonists the main mode of treatment. However, the exclusion of Long-acting ß-2 agonists/Long-acting anti-muscarinic antagonists drugs from health insurance coverage poses a challenge to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease-based prescription practices and increases the importance of monitoring medication adherence, particularly in patients with higher COPD Assessment Test scores.

Stepping down therapy for well-controlled mild asthma: an experience from University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City.

BACKGROUND: Stepping down treatment for well-controlled mild asthma is challenging to clinicians. The step-down strategy using regularly-intermittent low-dose inhaled corticosteroid has been applied at the University Medical Center (UMC) of Ho Chi Minh City, called as "UMC" approach. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of UMC step-down strategy in well- controlled mild asthma. METHODS: A real-world retrospective descriptive study was conducted at UMC from 2009 to 2018. All asthmatic patients (age ≥ 12) who received step-down therapy using this UMC approach were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 2,072 asthma patients to be treated with UMC step-down strategy, only 112 subjects were eligible. The median age was 38.5 years and female was 62.5%. Most patients at their initial presentation were indicated step 4 treatment (87.5%). The controller medications before initiation of UMC treatment included fluticasone propionate 125 µg once-daily, salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 25/125 µg once-daily, and formoterol/budesonide 4.5/160 µg once-daily. After being treated with the UMC approach, the rates of well-controlled asthma ranged from 67.6% to 91.1%. During 1 year with UMC treatment, pulmonary function remained stable and only 7 subjects (6.3%) developed exacerbation. CONCLUSION: The UMC step-down treatment for well-controlled mild asthma was relatively efficient in maintaining asthma control, stabilization of pulmonary function, and reducing risk of severe exacerbation.