Diabetes does not affect outcome of symptomatic carotid stenosis treated with endovascular techniques.

BACKGROUND: The influence of diabetes on carotid revascularization techniques is controversial, with few data regarding angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Our purpose was to analyze whether its presence constitutes a risk factor for poor outcome of patients with carotid stenosis treated with CAS. METHODS: We compared 30-day and long term morbidity and mortality, as well as restenosis rates, of non diabetic and diabetic patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis treated with endovascular techniques. RESULTS: 318 consecutive patients, 116 (36.5%) of them diabetics, were followed for a median of 56 months. Cumulative 30-day stroke, ischemic cardiopathy and death rate was 4% for non diabetics and 5.2% for diabetics (non significant). Long term stroke and mortality rate was 26.4% for the first group and 34.3% for the second (non significant). The most frequent causes of death were myocardial infarction (17.5% non diabetics, 44% diabetics, p = 0.04), ischemic stroke (12.5% non diabetics, 4% diabetics, non significant) and cancer (30% non diabetics, 16% diabetics, non significant). Twelve patients (6.4%) had restenosis ≥ 50%, 5.9% non diabetic, 7.4% diabetic, also without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, endovascular treatment is both efficient and safe in diabetic patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis; therefore, the presence of diabetes mellitus did not increase the risks linked to CAS procedure.

Long-term outcome in patients with carotid artery stenting and contralateral carotid occlusion: a single neurovascular center prospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical features and early and late outcome of patients treated with carotid artery stenting for carotid stenosis with occlusion of the contralateral vessel (CAS-CCO), and compare them to patients without occlusion (CAS-NO). METHODS: From 1999 through 2010, 426 patients with 479 procedures were prospectively recorded, 61 patients (14.3%) CAS-CCO, and 365 patients CAS-NO. Immediate CAS complications, complications within the first 30 days and long-term complications were documented through annual clinical and ultrasonological follow-up visits. Stenosis rate was recorded. RESULTS: Patients with mean age of 68.4 years, 80% men had: (1) periprocedural stroke in three cases (0.7%), (2) cumulative 30-day stroke, ischemic cardiopathy, and death in 4.2%, without differences between groups (CAS-CCO 3.3%, CAS-NO 4.4%). Mean follow-up period was 55 ± 32.78 months, median 56 months. (3) Stroke during the follow-up in 8%, without differences between CAS-CCO and CAS-NO groups (3.7% and 8.8%). (4) Myocardial infarction in 11.2% and (5) global mortality in 24.3%, without statistical differences between groups. Of the 254 cases enrolled in the restenosis analysis, 44 patients (17.3%) had restenosis of any grade during a mean follow-up period of 52 months, without statistical differences between CAS-CCO and CAS-NO groups. Only 7.5% presented restenosis ≥ 50%. Its occurrence was statistically associated with previous neck radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Periprocedural risks and long-term outcomes of patients treated with CAS and presenting a contralateral carotid occlusion does not differ from regular patients treated with CAS. Based on the low stenosis rate of our study, our results do not give credit to extra surveillance measures in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion.

[Long-term development of carotid stenosis treated by endovascular means: a prospective study in a neurovascular unit]. / Evolución a largo plazo de la estenosis carotídea tratada endovascularmente: estudio prospectivo en una unidad neurovascular.

AIMS: Even today, unlike endarterectomy, long-term development in carotid angioplasty has still not been well defined. The aim of this study is to describe both the short- and long-term development and the rate of restenosis in a consecutive series of patients with carotid stenosis who underwent endovascular treatment at the Hospital Universitario La Fe; a distinction is made between patients with and without symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1999 to 2010, 426 patients were submitted to a carotid angioplasty (25.5% were asymptomatic patients). Clinical follow-ups were conducted in the case of 374 patients. They had annual check-ups and every year a neurosonological study was performed. The aim was to determine what complications occurred during the first 30 days, as well as the long-term complications, to establish the rate of restenosis and to evaluate possible differences between patients with and without symptoms. RESULTS: The morbidity and mortality rate in the first month was 4.2% (4.4% in symptomatic patients and 3.8% in asymptomatic patients). The mean follow-up time was 55 months: 8% of patients presented strokes, 11% suffered from myocardial infarct and 24.3% died, with no significant differences between patients with or without symptoms. The rate of restenosis was 17.3% at five years, 7.5% equal to or above 50% and, of those, 1.1% were symptomatic. Five patients with significant restenosis were successfully treated with endovascular techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid angioplasty is an effective, safe technique in the hands of an experienced professional; our findings are good, both in the short and the long term, with a low rate of restenosis. If this latter condition occurs, vascular intervention techniques are safe and efficient.