Remediation of zearalenone mycotoxin contamination in rumen fluid by phytochemical compounds of Zataria multiflora.

Background: Zearalenone (ZEA), which is one of the most prevalent wheat and corn seeds mycotoxins causes acute and chronic toxicities in ruminants, poultry, and aquatic animals. Among commercial toxin binders, only a few active charcoals have the significant ability to adsorb ZEA contamination; nevertheless, active charcoal is not considered a sound additive by the feed industry. Aims: This study aimed to screen and identify the ZEA-degradation compounds of the Zataria multiflora (Shirazi thyme) in the cattle rumen fluid. Methods: In this investigation, essential oil and different extracts (n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol) of the aerial part of Shirazi thyme (at three concentrations of 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/ml) were screened to reduce ZEA contamination conditions (2 µg/ml) in rumen fluid. ZEA-content was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a fluorescence detector. In addition, Shirazi thyme phytochemical compounds responsible for eliminating ZEA were localized by HPLC-based activity profiling and then identified by mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Results: Both n-hexane and methanol extracts of Z. multiflora, considerably remediated ZEA (63-78%) from rumen fluid. According to HPLC-based activity profiling of Z. multiflora extract and LC-MS analysis, two triterpene compounds, including ursolic and oleanolic acids were introduced as ZEA degradation agents. Conclusion: Z. multiflora could be recommended as a new botanical source, and ursolic and oleanolic acids could be introduced as new phytochemical compounds that degrade ZEA.

Immunological arousal during acute Q fever infection.

Physicians often encounter patients who present with a vague clinical syndrome. A wide serological workup is often ordered, which may include tests for Coxiella burnetii in endemic areas. Often, the results of these tests pose new dilemma, with overlapping positive laboratory assays. The objective of this investigation was to characterise the serological overlap between acute Q fever and other infectious and immunological diseases. We retrospectively scanned the files of patients with a positive or equivocal immunoglobulin (Ig) M for C. burnetii phase II over a period of 8 years in a general hospital. Clinical and laboratory data, including antibodies to infectious agents and antibodies related to immunological states, were recorded. Anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), smooth muscle antibody (SMA) and rheumatoid factor were positive in 38%, 33.3% and 22.2% of the cases, respectively. In patients with acute Q fever, elevated IgM levels for Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Mycoplasma pneumoniae, parvovirus, Bordetella pertussis, Rickettsia conorii and R. typhi were noted in 13.8%, 8.3%, 12.12%, 22.2%, 25%, 13% and 21.7% of cases, respectively. Acute Q fever induces a non-specific immunological arousal in a significant number of patients. This may interfere with diagnosis and delay treatment. Caution, clinical judgment and serological follow-up is warranted in such conditions.

Near-infrared spectroscopy for evaluation of peripheral vascular disease. A systematic review of literature.

OBJECTIVES: To assess near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as a method for the diagnosis and evaluation of peripheral vascular disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched with a search protocol presented below. Handsearching through reference lists of the retrieved articles and reviews was conducted. MAIN RESULTS: 224 and 57 abstracts from MEDLINE and CENTRAL respectively were retrieved from which 21 studies were selected. NIRS was evaluated for the diagnosis and severity evaluation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Its parameters were shown to reflect the clinical status of patients, with good correlation to existing methods. CONCLUSIONS: Currently NIRS technology can serve as an adjunct method for the diagnosis and evaluation of patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction is a common multi-factorial complication of diabetes mellitus. Numerous strategies have been tried to overcome this diabetic complication. In recent years, phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors have been introduced in the management of erectile dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effect of PDE-5 inhibitors on the management of erectile dysfunction in diabetic men. SEARCH STRATEGY: Studies were obtained from computerised searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, in which treatment with PDE-5 inhibitors was compared to control, in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: Eight randomised controlled trials were identified. A total 976 men were allocated to receive a PDE-5 inhibitor and 741 were randomised to the control groups. Overall, 80% of the participants suffered from type 2 diabetes mellitus. The weighted mean difference (WMD) for the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questions 3 and 4 (frequency of penetration during and maintaining erection to completion of intercourse) was 0.9 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.1) and 1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.2) at the end of the study period, in favour of the intervention group. The WMD for the IIEF erectile dysfunction domain at the end of the study period was 6.6 (95% CI 5.2 to 7.9) in favour of the PDE-5 inhibitors arm. The relative risk (RR) for answering "yes" to a global efficacy question ( "did the treatment improve your erections?") was 3.8 (CI 95% 3.1 to 4.5) in the PDE-5 inhibitors compared with the control arm. The WMD between the percentage of successful attempts in the PDE-5 inhibitors and in the control arm was 26.7 (95% CI 23.1 to 30.3). Mortality was not reported in any of the included trials. Adverse cardiovascular effects were reported in one study. Headache was the most frequent adverse event reported, flushing was the second most common event, with upper respiratory tract complaints and flu like syndromes, dyspepsia, myalgia, abnormal vision and back pain also reported in a descending order of frequency. The overall risk ratio for developing any adverse reaction was 4.8 (CI 95% 3.74 to 6.16) in the PDE-5 inhibitors arm as compared to the control. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient evidence exists that PDE-5 inhibitors form a care that improves erectile dysfunction in diabetic men.

The effects of proton pump inhibition on patient-reported severity of dyspepsia when receiving dual anti-platelet therapy with clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin: analysis from the Clopidogrel and the Optimization of Gastrointestinal Events Trial.

BACKGROUND: Dual anti-platelet therapy with clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin increases the risk for gastrointestinal clinical events. Omeprazole has been shown to significantly reduce these events without compromising cardiovascular safety in patients treated with dual anti-platelet therapy. Whether or not omeprazole improves patient-reported outcomes is undetermined. AIM: To assess the impact of prophylactic omeprazole with background dual anti-platelet therapy on patient-reported symptoms of dyspepsia compared to placebo. METHODS: We analysed results of the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment questionnaires collected in the Clopidogrel and the Optimization of Gastrointestinal Events Trial. RESULTS: Patient-reported outcome data from 3759 subjects were available for analysis. At 4 weeks, the mean scores of pain intensity and nonpain symptoms were lower in the omeprazole group (5.61 ± 0.17 vs. 6.40 ± 0.17, P = 0.001, and 10.61 ± 0.07 vs. 11.00 ± 0.07, P < 0.001 respectively). These differences were maintained at 24 weeks (5.91 ± 0.35 vs. 7.10 ± 0.37, P = 0.020 for pain intensity; 10.36 ± 0.12 vs. 10.93 ± 0.13, P = 0.001 for nonpain symptoms). After adjusting for covariates there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the percent of patients with dyspepsia during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to reducing the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, statistically significant benefits with prophylactic omeprazole use on both pain and nonpain symptoms were evident at 4 weeks and sustained through 24 weeks. The clinical significance of these overall results is unclear, but greater in patients with pain at baseline.

Venous thromboembolism and the utility of the Padua Prediction Score in patients with sepsis admitted to internal medicine departments.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is prevalent in internal medicine (IM) departments. Elderly patients with sepsis and chronic medical conditions are at an increased risk for venous thromboemolism (VTE). The objective of this study was to assess the rate of VTE and the accuracy of the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) to predict VTE in patient with sepsis admitted to IM departments. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on septic patients admitted to IM departments in a community-based medical center. Additionally, we retrospectively collected VTE risk factors and events throughout a 1-year post hospitalization period. We computed the PPS for every patient, and analyzed the data accordingly. RESULTS: In total, 1080 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 74.68 ± 16.1 years. The average PPS was 4.86 ± 2.26, and 71.2% of the patients had a positive PPS. Only 17.8% of the patients received anticoagulant prophylaxis during their hospital stay. Seven patients had VTE on admission, 14 (1.29%) acquired in-hospital VTE, and 7 (0.65%) had VTE post discharge throughout 1 year. In all, 21.9% patients died during hospitalization, and the overall survival rate was 64%. PPS was not correlated with anticoagulant administration (P = 0.36), in-hospital VTE (P = 0.23) or 1-year VTE (P = 0.40), but was significantly associated with in-hospital death and survival (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The rate of VTE in medical patients with sepsis in IM departments is low, and PPS lacks granularity in detecting patients at risk of acquiring it. In this population, a positive PPS is highly associated with death, and may reflect a more general co-morbidity and disease severity index.

Sepsis in nonagenarians admitted to internal medicine departments: a comparative study of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are at a higher risk of acquiring sepsis, and are largely being treated in Internal Medicine (IM) departments. AIM: To characterize the differences between nonagenarians and other age groups in patients admitted to IM departments with sepsis, and to assess predictors for survival in patients older than 90 years of age. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective registry of all-comers with sepsis admitted to IM departments in a community-based Medical Center was build. Patients' demographics, medical history, clinical presentation and outcomes were recorded and analyzed according to age groups. RESULTS: One thousand and eighty patients were followed for a mean of 83.63 ± 65.90 days. Nonagenarians constituted 10.93% (118/1080) of our cohort. Of these, 70.48% had a cognitive impairment and 82.60% had reduced functional state. Of these, 5.61 and 10.50% fulfilled the criteria of septic shock and severe sepsis, respectively. Sepsis category was significantly influenced by age groups (P < 0.001). Complications secondary to sepsis at admission and throughout hospitalization, and mortality rates, were higher in the nonagenarian population (61.86 vs. 51.14%, P = 0.032 and 37.29 vs. 20.06%, P < 0.001, respectively), and overall survival was significantly lower in the nonagenarian population (40.68 vs. 66.84%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients treated in IM departments for sepsis are old, and a significant percentage is older than 90 years of age with reduced function and mental status at baseline. These frail patients are afflicted by a worse outcome, which is most likely associated with poor functional status at baseline and severe deconditioning during the acute illness. Prognostic tools are needed to address today's trends in patient-mix and disease severity, specifically for very-old patients admitted with sepsis cared for in IM departments.