Genomic clustering analysis identifies molecular subtypes of thymic epithelial tumors independent of World Health Organization histologic type.

Further characterization of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) is needed. Genomic information from 102 evaluable TETs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset and from the IU-TAB-1 cell line (type AB thymoma) underwent clustering analysis to identify molecular subtypes of TETs. Six novel molecular subtypes (TH1-TH6) of TETs from the TCGA were identified, and there was no association with WHO histologic subtype. The IU-TAB-1 cell line clustered into the TH4 molecular subtype and in vitro testing of candidate therapeutics was performed. The IU-TAB-1 cell line was noted to be resistant to everolimus (mTORC1 inhibitor) and sensitive to nelfinavir (AKT1 inhibitor) across the endpoints measured. Sensitivity to nelfinavir was due to the IU-TAB-1 cell line's gain-of function (GOF) mutation in PIK3CA and amplification of genes observed from array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), including AURKA, ERBB2, KIT, PDGFRA and PDGFB, that are known upregulate AKT, while resistance to everolimus was primarily driven by upregulation of downstream signaling of KIT, PDGFRA and PDGFB in the presence of mTORC1 inhibition. We present a novel molecular classification of TETs independent of WHO histologic subtype, which may be used for preclinical validation studies of potential candidate therapeutics of interest for this rare disease.

Computational Biological Modeling Identifies PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy Sensitivity Among Molecular Subgroups of KRAS-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: KRAS-mutated (KRASMUT) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is emerging as a heterogeneous disease defined by comutations, which may confer differential benefit to PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. In this study, we leveraged computational biological modeling (CBM) of tumor genomic data to identify PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity among KRASMUT NSCLC molecular subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicohort retrospective analysis, the genotype clustering frequency ranked method was used for molecular clustering of tumor genomic data from 776 patients with KRASMUT NSCLC. These genomic data were input into the CBM, in which customized protein networks were characterized for each tumor. The CBM evaluated sensitivity to PD-(L)1 immunotherapy using three metrics: programmed death-ligand 1 expression, dendritic cell infiltration index (nine chemokine markers), and immunosuppressive biomarker expression index (14 markers). RESULTS: Genotype clustering identified eight molecular subgroups and the CBM characterized their shared cancer pathway characteristics: KRASMUT/TP53MUT, KRASMUT/CDKN2A/B/CMUT, KRASMUT/STK11MUT, KRASMUT/KEAP1MUT, KRASMUT/STK11MUT/KEAP1MUT, KRASMUT/PIK3CAMUT, KRAS MUT/ATMMUT, and KRASMUT without comutation. CBM identified PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity in the KRASMUT/TP53MUT, KRASMUT/PIK3CAMUT, and KRASMUT alone subgroups and resistance in the KEAP1MUT containing subgroups. There was insufficient genomic information to elucidate PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity by the CBM in the KRASMUT/CDKN2A/B/CMUT, KRASMUT/STK11MUT, and KRASMUT/ATMMUT subgroups. In an exploratory clinical cohort of 34 patients with advanced KRASMUT NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 immunotherapy, the CBM-assessed overall survival correlated well with actual overall survival (r = 0.80, P < .001). CONCLUSION: CBM identified distinct PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity among molecular subgroups of KRASMUT NSCLC, in line with previous literature. These data provide proof-of-concept that computational modeling of tumor genomics could be used to expand on hypotheses from clinical observations of patients receiving PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and suggest mechanisms that underlie PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity.

Computational modeling of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) to identify personalized therapy using genomics.

Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) is an aggressive hematological malignancy for which optimal therapeutic approaches are poorly characterized. Using computational biology modeling (CBM) in conjunction with genomic data from cell lines and individual patients, we generated disease-specific protein network maps that were used to identify unique characteristics associated with the mutational profiles of ETP-ALL compared to non-ETP-ALL (T-ALL) cases and simulated cellular responses to a digital library of FDA-approved and investigational agents. Genomics-based classification of ETP-ALL patients using CBM had a prediction sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 87%, respectively. This analysis identified key genomic and pathway characteristics that are distinct in ETP-ALL including deletion of nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1), mutations of which are used to direct therapeutic decisions in acute myeloid leukemia. Computational simulations based on mutational profiles of 62 ETP-ALL patient models identified 87 unique targeted combination therapies in 56 of the 62 patients despite actionable mutations being present in only 37% of ETP-ALL patients. Shortlisted two-drug combinations were predicted to be synergistic in 11 profiles and were validated by in vitro chemosensitivity assays. In conclusion, computational modeling was able to identify unique biomarkers and pathways for ETP-ALL, and identify new drug combinations for potential clinical testing.