The prevalence rates and adversities of delirium: Too common and disadvantageous.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence rates and adversities of delirium have not yet been systematically evaluated and are based on selected populations, limited sample sizes, and pooled studies. Therefore, this study assesses the prevalence rates and outcome of and odds ratios for managing services for delirium. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) 5, the Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) scale, and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) construct, 28,118 patients from 35 managing services were included, and the prevalence rates and adverse outcomes were determined by simple logistic regressions and their corresponding odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Delirious patients were older, admitted from institutions (OR 3.44-5.2), admitted as emergencies (OR 1.87), hospitalized twice longer, and discharged, transferred to institutions (OR 5.47-6.6) rather than home (OR 0.1), or deceased (OR 43.88). The rate of undiagnosed delirium was 84.2%. The highest prevalence rates were recorded in the intensive care units (47.1-84.2%, pooled 67.9%); in the majority of medical services, rates ranged from 20% to 40% (pooled 26.2%), except, at both ends, palliative care (55.9%), endocrinology (8%), and rheumatology (4.4%). Conversely, in surgery and its related services, prevalence rates were lower (pooled 13.1%), except for cardio- and neurosurgical services (53.3% and 46.4%); the lowest prevalence rate was recorded in obstetrics (2%). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Delirium remains underdiagnosed, and novel screening approaches are required. Furthermore, this study identified the impact of delirium on patients, determined the prevalence rates for 32 services, and elucidated the association between individual services and delirium.

Inpatient Treatment for Severe Nonsurgical Dermatological Disorders: Prevalence, Care Infrastructure and Reimbursement in Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Since 2012, Swiss inpatient dermatology is funded through a flat rate payment system based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). OBJECTIVE: To analyze the reimbursement of nonsurgically treated severe disorders of the skin under the system called SwissDRG. METHODS: Three retrospective, cross-sectional cohort studies were performed. Data sets were received from the Swiss Federal Office of Statistics (1,285,685 retained records), the five Swiss university hospitals (370,964 retained records) and our center (72,211 retained records). RESULTS: Cases accounted for 0.04% of all hospitalizations nationwide, with 43.7% treated at university hospitals. Treatment at university hospitals produced a mean loss of USD 3,711 per case. Lyell syndrome cases were especially underfunded (mean loss USD 31,906). Extra-county admissions and direct referrals were significant predictors of total inpatient costs (p = 0.019 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest grouping Lyell syndrome cases into burn DRGs and evaluating extra-county admissions and direct inpatient referrals as DRG split criteria.