Detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with MS.

BACKGROUND: The existence of isolated cognitive relapses (ICRs) in persons with MS (PwMS) has been debated. OBJECTIVE: To examine relapses with decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) but no change on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). METHODS: This 3-year prospective cohort study identified PwMS experiencing a relapse with decrease on SDMT. Participants with SDMT decline/stable EDSS were labeled "ICR," while those with a corresponding decrease on EDSS were classified "Relapse with Cognitive Decline (RCD)." Two definitions of SDMT decline were explored: (1) ⩾ 8 points, and (2) ⩾ 4 points. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between ICR and RCD. RESULTS: The full cohort had 592 participants: 83 experienced relapses; 22 (26.5%) had an SDMT decrease of ⩾ 8 points; 14 (63.6%) met ICR criteria. Logistic regression (X2(1) = 5.112, p = 0.024) using demographics and disease characteristics explained 28.4% of the variance in ICR versus RCD. Only the MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire was associated with ICR (odds ratio (OR): 8.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-16.4) 40 relapsing participants with SDMT decrease of ⩾ 4 points were identified: 26 (65%) had a stable EDSS (ICR). Logistic regression did not find any variable predictive of ICR. CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstrates evidence of ICR in PwMS.

Auditory Test of Processing Speed: Preliminary validation of a smartphone-based test of mental speed.

BACKGROUND: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a gold-standard measure of cognitive efficiency and processing speed for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) but relies on vision and oculomotor function. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a new processing speed test with minimal memory involvement and no eye function requirements. METHODS: We created an Auditory Test of Processing Speed (ATOPS). A total of 122 PwMS, of whom 33 were severely disabled (median Expanded Disability Status Scale 8.0) and 37 healthy volunteers (HVs), were enrolled. We assessed sensitivity to discriminate MS participants from HVs, convergent validity between ATOPS and SDMT, sensitivity to discriminate between cognitively impaired (CI) and cognitively preserved (CP) MS participants, and correlations with MS pathology (overall brain lesion burden). Acceptability was examined with completion rates and participant ratings of ATOPS. RESULTS: ATOPS discriminated PwMS from HVs (d = 0.739-0.856), correlated with SDMT (|r| = 0.528-0.587), discriminated between CI and CP PwMS (d = 0.623-0.776), and correlated with lesion burden (r = 0.332-0.436). All groups indicated high favorability of ATOPS and severely disabled MS patients could be assessed by ATOPS more frequently than by SDMT (100% vs. 72.4% completion). CONCLUSIONS: ATOPS is a novel, accessible, and acceptable cognitive processing speed test that may be useful in clinical and/or research settings.