Bisphosphonate Use May be Associated With an Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Hip Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is common among patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bisphosphonate treatment on osteoporotic patients undergoing primary THA. METHODS: Using a national database, 30,137 patients who had osteoporosis before primary elective THA were identified during 2010 to 2020. Patients undergoing nonelective THA and those using corticosteroids or other medications for osteoporosis were excluded. Bisphosphonate users and bisphosphonate naïve patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and a history of obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, tobacco use, and alcohol abuse. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were used to compare 2-year outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Among matched cohorts of 9,844 patients undergoing primary THA, bisphosphonate use was associated with a significantly higher 2-year rate of periprosthetic fracture (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.61, P = .022). There was a trend toward increased risk of any revision with bisphosphonate use (odds ratio 1.19, confidence interval 1.00 to 1.41, P = .056). Rates of infection, aseptic loosening, dislocation, and mortality were not statistically different between bisphosphonate users and bisphosphonate-naïve patients. CONCLUSION: In osteoporotic patients, bisphosphonate use before primary THA is an independent risk factor for periprosthetic fracture. Additional longer-term data are needed to determine the underlying mechanism for this association and identify preventative measures.

Elective Joint Arthroplasty Should be Delayed by One Month After COVID-19 Infection to Prevent Postoperative Complications.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether a history of recent COVID-19 infection affects the outcomes and risks of complications of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of TJA in patients who have and have not had a recent COVID-19 infection. METHODS: A large national database was queried for patients undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Patients who had a diagnosis of COVID-19 within 90-days preoperatively were matched to patients who did not have a history of COVID-19 based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and procedure. A total of 31,453 patients undergoing TJA were identified, of which 616 (2.0%) had a preoperative diagnosis of COVID-19. Of these, 281 COVID-19 positive patients were matched with 281 patients who did not have COVID-19. The 90-day complications were compared between patients who did and did not have a diagnosis of COVID-19 at 1, 2, and 3 months preoperatively. Multivariate analyses were used to further control for potential confounders. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of the matched cohorts showed that COVID-19 infection within 1 month prior to TJA was associated with an increased rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio [OR]: 6.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-28.45, P = .010) and venous thromboembolic events (odds ratio: 8.32, confidence interval: 2.12-34.84, P = .002). COVID-19 infection within 2 and 3 months prior to TJA did not significantly affect outcomes. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection within 1 month prior to TJA significantly increases the risk of postoperative thromboembolic events; however, complication rates returned to baseline after that time point. Surgeons should consider delaying elective total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty until 1 month after a COVID-19 infection.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Early Aseptic Loosening in a Large National Database.

BACKGROUND: Despite excellent longevity demonstrated in institutional studies, outcomes after cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on a population level remain unknown. This study compares 2-year outcomes between cemented and cementless TKA using a large national database. METHODS: A large national database was used to identify 294,485 patients undergoing primary TKA from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients who had osteoporosis or inflammatory arthritis were excluded. Cementless and cemented TKA patients were matched one-to-one based on age, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, sex, and year yielding matched cohorts of 10,580 patients. Outcomes at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively were compared between groups, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate implant survival rates. RESULTS: At 1 year postoperatively, cementless TKA was associated with an increased rate of any reoperation (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.92, P = .005) compared to cemented TKA. At 2 years postoperatively, there was an increased risk of revision for aseptic loosening (OR 2.34, CI 1.47-3.85, P < .001) and any reoperation (OR 1.29, CI 1.04-1.59, P = .019) after cementless TKA. Two-year revision rates for infection, fracture, and patella resurfacing were similar between cohorts. CONCLUSION: In this large national database, cementless fixation is an independent risk factor for aseptic loosening requiring revision and any reoperation within 2 years after primary TKA.

Vitamin D3 Supplementation Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if a one-time dose of vitamin D3 prior to total knee arthroplasty improves function and patient-reported outcomes, while decreasing complications. METHODS: One hundred seven patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive 50,000 international units vitamin D3 (57 patients) or placebo (50 patients) on the morning of surgery. Power analysis determined 45 patients were required in each cohort to detect a minimal clinically important difference of 6 points in the functional component of the 2011 version of the Knee Society Score (KSS), assuming an alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%. KSS and a Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no difference in improvement of KSS at 3 weeks (+4.8 points vitamin D3 versus +3.0 points placebo; P = .6) or 6 weeks (+14.5 points vitamin D3 versus +12.4 points placebo; P = .5) from baseline. There was no difference in change in TUGT at 3 weeks (+1.2 seconds vitamin D3 versus +0.6 seconds placebo; P = .6) or 6 weeks (-0.3 seconds vitamin D3 versus -0.9 seconds placebo; P = .6) from baseline. There were 4 complications in the placebo cohort within the first 90 days postoperatively and 5 complications in the vitamin D3 cohort (P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Supplementation with 50,000 international units vitamin D3 on the day of surgery failed to demonstrate statistical significant differences in functional KSS, TUGT times, or complications in the early postoperative period compared to placebo. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Low Risk of Acute Iatrogenic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Prosthetic Joint Aspiration.

BACKGROUND: Synovial fluid analysis is an essential tool in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, concern exists that aspiration may introduce infection into a noninfected joint. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of iatrogenic PJI following diagnostic knee aspiration done within 6 months of the primary TKA. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, the senior surgeon performed over 4,000 primary TKAs and aspirated 155 knees in 137 patients for whom there was a suspicion for PJI within 6 months of their primary TKA. There were 22 knees diagnosed as infected from the initial aspiration and therefore were excluded from the study. The remaining 133 aspirates in 115 patients who were negative for infection were followed for 6 months for signs and symptoms of PJI to elucidate whether aspiration introduced infection into an initially noninfected joint. RESULTS: There were 70 of 133 knees (52.6%) aspirated between 0 and 6 weeks after index TKA, 40 of 133 (30.1%) between 6 weeks and 3 months, and 23 of 133 (17.3%) between 3 and 6 months. At final follow-up, none of the 133 initially noninfected knees exhibited evidence of subsequent iatrogenic PJI or had subsequent surgery for infection. CONCLUSION: While joint aspiration is a procedure with inherent risks, this study shows that the rate of iatrogenic PJI is extremely low (0%). Therefore, if infection is suspected, the surgeon should consider joint aspiration, even in the initial postoperative period, as the risk for introducing infection is far outweighed by the risk of missing an infection.

Ultrasound-Guided Iliopsoas Bursal Injections for Management of Iliopsoas Bursitis After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas tendonitis can cause persistent pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Nonoperative management of iliopsoas tendonitis includes anti-inflammatory drugs and image-guided corticosteroid injections. This study evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections (US-CSIs) for iliopsoas tendonitis following THA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients who received an US-CSI for iliopsoas tendonitis after primary THA between 2009 and 2020 at a single institution. Outcomes including reoperation, groin pain at last follow-up, additional intrabursal injection, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year. Cross-table lateral radiographs (36 patients) or computed tomography scans (6 patients) were reviewed to determine if anterior cup overhang was present, indicating a mechanical etiology of iliopsoas tendonitis. Descriptive statistics and univariate comparison of HHS preinjection and postinjection were performed, with alpha < 0.05. RESULTS: Among the 22 patients who did not have cup overhang, four (18.2%) had persistent groin pain at mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 14-94) after US-CSI. Three patients had a second injection; none had groin pain at most recent follow-up. No patients required acetabular revision. Mean HHS improved from 74 points (range, 52-94 points) to 91 points (range, 76-100 points; P < .001) at last follow-up. Among the 20 patients who had anterior cup overhang, five underwent acetabular revision after only temporary pain relief from injection. Groin pain was resolved in all revised patients at mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 12-60) after revision. Of the remaining 15 patients, five had persistent groin pain at mean follow-up of 35 months (range, 12-83). Mean HHS improved from 69 points (range, 50-96 points) preinjection to 81 (range, 56-98 points; P = .007) at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Resolution of groin pain was demonstrated in 78.6% of patients in the cohort; however, those who did not have acetabular overhang had higher rates of success. The overall revision rate was 11.9%. US-CSI appears to be safe and effective in the diagnosis and treatment of iliopsoas tendonitis following primary THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Dual-Mobility versus Large Femoral Heads in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluated if dual-mobility bearings (DM) lower the risk of dislocation compared to large femoral heads (≥36 mm) for patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a posterior approach. METHODS: A total of 146 patients were randomized to a DM (n = 76; 46 mm median effective head size, range 36 to 59 mm) or a large femoral head (n = 70; twenty-five 36 mm heads [35.7%], forty-one 40 mm heads [58.6%], and four 44 mm heads [5.7%]). There were 71 single-component revisions (48.6%), 39 both-component revisions (26.7%), 24 reimplantations of THA after 2-stage revision (16.4%), seven isolated head and liner exchanges (4.8%), four conversions of hemiarthroplasty (2.7%), and 1 revision of a hip resurfacing (0.7%). Power analysis determined that 161 patients were required in each group to lower the dislocation rate from 8.4 to 2.2% (power = 0.8, alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: At a mean of 18.2 months (range, 1.4 to 48.2), there were three dislocations in the large femoral head group compared to two in the DM cohort (4.3 versus 2.6%; P = .67). One patient in the large head group and none in the DM group were successfully treated with closed reduction without subsequent revision. CONCLUSION: Interim analysis of this randomized controlled trial found no difference in the risk of dislocation between DM and large femoral heads in revision THA, although the rate of dislocation was lower than anticipated and continued follow-up is needed.

Addition of the Sartorius Tendon Improves Biomechanics of a Four-Strand Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autograft.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the biomechanical properties and change in graft size when adding the sartorius tendon as a fifth strand to a four-strand ST-G hamstring autograft. Additionally, the sartorius tendon was tested individually to quantify its independent biomechanical properties. METHODS: Four-strand and five-strand hamstring tendon grafts were harvested from matched cadaveric knees (mean age: 81.6 ± 9.8). These matched grafts were biomechanically tested using a MTS servohydraulic test system at a rate of testing representative of physiologic tears. The mean diameter, cross-sectional area, and ultimate load to failure were quantified and compared with a one-sided, paired Student's t-test. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the five-strand graft was significantly larger than the four-strand graft (9.30 ± .84 mm vs 8.10 ± .42 mm; P = .002). The average ultimate load to failure of the five-strand graft was 65.3% higher than the four-strand graft (2984.05 ± 1085.11 N vs. 1805.03 ± 557.69 N; P = .009) and added 14.8% to the diameter of the four strand ST-G autograft. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of the sartorius tendon to a four-strand hamstring autograft significantly increased ultimate load to failure by 65%, graft cross-sectional area by 32%, and graft diameter by 15% compared to a traditional four-strand ST-G autograft. This information can be helpful to surgeons who wish to improve the strength of a four-strand ST-G autograft and for undersized grafts as an alternative to allograft supplementation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The addition of the sartorius to the four-strand ST-G hamstring autograft significantly increases the ultimate load to failure and overall graft diameter, which can be particularly helpful in undersized autografts as an alternative to allograft supplementation.

Current Concepts in the Orthopaedic Management of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a genetic condition marked by progressive muscle degeneration, presents notable orthopaedic challenges, especially scoliosis, which deteriorates patients' quality of life by affecting sitting balance and complicating cardiac and respiratory functions. Current orthopaedic management strategies emphasize early intervention with corticosteroids to delay disease progression and the use of surgical spinal fusion to address severe scoliosis, aiming to enhance sitting balance, alleviate discomfort, and potentially extend patient lifespan. Despite advancements, optimal management requires ongoing research to refine therapeutic approaches, ensuring improved outcomes for patients with DMD. This review synthesizes recent findings on surgical and nonsurgical interventions, underscoring the importance of a multidisciplinary approach tailored to the dynamic needs of patients with DMD.

Retainment of U.S. Orthopaedic Surgeons in Academia from 2016 to 2022.

Background: Academic medical centers greatly benefit from retaining their physicians; that ensures continuity in patient care, enhances resident education, and maintains a pool of experienced clinicians and researchers. Despite its importance, little research has been published on the retainment of academic faculty in orthopaedics. To address this gap, this study investigates the demographic trends of academic orthopaedic surgeons from 2016 to 2022. By analyzing data pertaining to gender distribution, years of practice, research productivity, and institutional rankings, we aimed to gain insights into the factors influencing faculty retainment, institution changes, and new entrants into academic orthopaedics. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of U.S. academic orthopaedic surgeons affiliated with programs under the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 2016 and 2022 was performed. Faculty present in both the 2016 and the 2022 data were classified as being "retained" in academia; those present only in 2016, as having "left" academia; and those present only in 2022, as being "new" to academia. The retained group was then divided into movers (those who moved to other institutions) and non-movers. Results: Retained orthopaedists had fewer years of practice, a higher h-index (Hirsch index), and more publications. Non-fellowship-trained orthopaedists had less retainment in academia, and orthopaedists with fellowships in oncology had more retainment in academia. Additionally, movers also had fewer years in practice but an equal level of scholarly productivity when compared with non-movers. Lastly, higher-ranked academic programs retained a greater proportion of orthopaedic surgeons. Conclusions: Over the study period, a majority of orthopaedists (56.99%) chose to remain in academia. Those retained tended to be in the earlier stages of their careers, yet demonstrated higher research output. Notably, the representation of female orthopaedists in academic orthopaedics is on the rise. Conversely, lower-ranked programs faced higher turnover rates, highlighting the challenges that they encounter in retaining faculty members. Clinical Relevance: Academic medical centers benefit from retaining orthopaedic surgeons by maintaining patient relationships, having consistency in resident education, and building on clinical and research expertise. Likewise, orthopaedists benefit from understanding the trends in current academic employment, in order to optimize career planning decisions.

Late Manipulation under Anesthesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Improved Range of Motion and a Low Complication Rate.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of late manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness performed from ≥12 weeks to more than a year after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 152 patients receiving MUA ≥12 weeks after primary TKA from 2014 to 2021 were reviewed. The primary outcome measured was change in range of motion (ROM). We tracked intraoperative complications and the need for repeat MUA or open procedure for continued stiffness after initial MUA. Three subgroups were analyzed: Group 1 included 58 knees between 12 weeks and 6 months after TKA, Group 2 included 44 knees between 6 and 12 months after TKA, and Group 3 included 50 knees ≥12 months after TKA. Analysis included descriptive statistics and univariate analysis, with α <0.05. Groups 1 to 3 all significantly increased their overall ROM by 20.9, 19.2, and 22.0 degrees, respectively. All groups significantly increased their flexion and extension from preoperatively. Group 1 had one intraoperative supracondylar femur fracture (1.7%) requiring open reduction and internal fixation, and five patients required repeat MUA or open procedure (8.6%). Group 2 had no intraoperative fractures, and five patients required repeat MUA or open procedure (11.4%). Group 3 had one intraoperative tibial tubercle avulsion fracture managed conservatively (2.0%) and one repeat MUA (2.0%). Late MUA resulted in significantly improved ROM in all groups. ROM improved more as the time from index TKA increased, although statistically insignificant. Repeat MUA or open procedure rate decreased with MUA ≥12 months from TKA, although statistically insignificant. The overall intraoperative fracture risk was 1.3%.

Evaluating the Readability of Patient Education Materials for Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering, Distraction-Based Methods, and Posterior Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Pediatric Spinal Deformity.

BACKGROUND: The Internet is an important source of information for patients, but its effectiveness relies on the readability of its content. Patient education materials (PEMs) should be written at or below a sixth-grade reading level as outlined by agencies such as the American Medical Association. This study assessed PEMs' readability for the novel anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT), distraction-based methods, and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in treating pediatric spinal deformity. METHODS: An online search identified PEMs using the terms "anterior vertebral body tethering," "growing rods scoliosis," and "posterior spinal fusion pediatric scoliosis." We selected the first 20 general medical websites (GMWs) and 10 academic health institution websites (AHIWs) discussing each treatment (90 websites total). Readability tests for each webpage were conducted using Readability Studio software. Reading grade levels (RGLs), which correspond to the US grade at which one is expected to comprehend the text, were calculated for sources and independent t tests compared with RGLs between treatment types. RESULTS: The mean RGL was 12.1 ± 2.0. No articles were below a sixth-grade reading level, with only 2.2% at the sixth-grade reading level. AVBT articles had a higher RGL than distraction-based methods (12.7 ± 1.6 vs 11.9 ± 1.9, P = 0.082) and PSF (12.7 ± 1.6 vs 11.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.032). Materials for distraction-based methods and PSF were comparable (11.9 ± 1.9 vs 11.6 ± 2.3, P = 0.566). Among GMWs, AVBT materials had a higher RGL than distraction-based methods (12.9 ± 1.4 vs 12.1 ± 1.8, P = 0.133) and PSF (12.9 ± 1.4 vs 11.4 ± 2.4, P = 0.016). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients' health literacy is important for shared decision-making. Assessing the readability of scoliosis treatment PEMs guides physicians when sharing resources and discussing treatment with patients. CONCLUSION: Both GMWs and AHIWs exceed recommended RGLs, which may limit patient and parent understanding. Within GMWs, AVBT materials are written at a higher RGL than other treatments, which may hinder informed decision-making and patient outcomes. Efforts should be made to create online resources at the appropriate RGL. At the very least, patients and parents may be directed toward AHIWs; RGLs are more consistent.

High rate of failure after revision extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Patients who fail initial extensor mechanism allograft (EMA) reconstruction for extensor mechanism disruption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are left with few options. This study evaluated outcomes in patients that underwent revision EMA reconstruction following a failed EMA. METHOD: Ten patients that underwent revision EMA for failed index EMA with minimum 1-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients receiving fresh-frozen EMA (quadriceps tendon, patella, patellar tendon, and tibial tubercle) at index and revision EMA were included. The primary outcome was EMA failure defined as revision surgery, extensor lag > 30°, or Knee Society Score (KSS) < 60 at last follow-up. Descriptive statistics were performed, with p < 0.05. RESULTS: Mean extensor lag improved from 55.6°±26.7° pre-revision to 32.8°±29.6° (p = 0.13) at mean follow-up of 43.8 months (range, 12-124 months). Mean KSS improved from 41.0 ±â€¯9.5 pre-revision to 73.4 ±â€¯14.5 at last follow-up (p < 0.001). All patients required assistive devices for ambulation at final follow-up: one (10.0%) required a wheelchair, five (50.0%) required a walker, and four (40.0%) required a cane. Seven (70.0%) patients experienced EMA failure at a mean of 33.6 months (range, 2-124) following revision EMA: three (30.0%) were revised for periprosthetic joint infection (one of which also had extensor lag > 30°), three (30.0%) additional patients had extensor lag > 30°, and one (10.0%) patient had KSS < 60 (this patient developed PJI and was treated nonoperatively with chronic antibiotic suppression). CONCLUSIONS: Revision EMA reconstruction fails at a high rate despite leading to improvements in KSS. Further research is needed to develop effective prevention and treatment strategies for failure after initial EMA reconstruction.

Short-Term Indwelling Foley Catheters Do Not Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Uncomplicated Primary THA and TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine whether a short-term Foley catheter (inserted in the operating room and removed upon arrival to the orthopaedic floor) would reduce the risk of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in patients undergoing primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-eight patients undergoing inpatient primary TKA (n = 228) or THA (n = 160) with spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive a short-term Foley catheter (n = 194) or no Foley (n = 194). There were 143 male and 245 female patients. The primary outcome was POUR, defined as requiring ≥2 straight catheterizations or the placement of an indwelling urinary catheter when indicated by retention of ≥450 mL on bladder scans. Secondary outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 3 weeks and the need for ≥1 straight catheterization. A power analysis determined that 194 patients per group were required to detect a 7% minimal clinically important difference in POUR rates at 80% power and alpha of 0.05. Intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses were performed (2 patients received the non-allocated treatment). Outcomes were compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate analyses, with alpha < 0.05. RESULTS: Nine patients developed POUR: 4 in the short-term Foley group and 5 in the control group (2.1% versus 2.6%; p = 1.00). Of those who developed POUR, 8 were male and 1 was female (88.9% versus 11.1%; p = 0.002). Twenty-four patients required ≥1 straight catheterization: 10 in the Foley group and 14 in the control group (5.2% versus 7.2%; p = 0.40). Four patients developed UTIs: 3 in the Foley group and 1 in the control group (1.5% versus 0.5%; p = 0.62) on intention-to-treat analysis, and 4 in the Foley group and none in the control group (2.1% versus 0.0%; p = 0.12) on as-treated analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a short-term Foley catheter inserted in the operating room and removed on arrival to the orthopaedic floor does not decrease the rate of POUR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complications and costs of patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of patellofemoral arthritis. Although PFA may preserve native kinematics and accelerate recovery, it has been associated with higher revision rates. The purpose of this study is to compare complication rates and costs between PFA and TKA. METHODS: Using the PearlDiver database, 6,179 patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis treated with PFA or TKA from 2010-2015 were retrospectively reviewed with 5-year follow up. PFA and TKA patients were matched by age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index via a 1:1 stepwise algorithm. Five-year costs and complications were compared between matched cohorts. The lifetime costs of PFA and TKA were evaluated with Markov decision modeling. RESULTS: Compared to TKA, PFA was associated with fewer Emergency Department (ED) visits (6.1% vs 3.9%, p = 0.004) but a higher 5-year revision rate (9.9% vs 4.2%, p < 0.001). After multivariate regression, PFA was independently more likely to require revision (odds ratio 2.60, 95% confidence interval 1.32-4.71, p = 0.003). PFA was associated with lower total healthcare costs at every time point between 3 months ($18,014 vs $26,473, p < 0.001) and 5 years ($20,837 vs $27,942, p < 0.001). On average, the lifetime cost of PFA per patient was $5,235 less than for TKA ($26,343 vs $31,578). CONCLUSIONS: PFA is a less expensive alternative to TKA with a similar risk of medical complications but is associated with a significantly higher 5-year revision rate. Future studies should examine the reasons for PFA failure and methods to mitigate this risk.

Can Patients Accurately Recall their Preoperative Pain and Functional Scores Following Rotator Cuff Repair and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Objectives: Accurate analysis of preoperative shoulder pain and function is important for understanding treatment efficacy and producing high-quality research. Oftentimes, preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are missing. Therefore the accuracy of recalled preoperative PROs may be important. We investigate the ability of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair (RCR) or shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to recall their preoperative PROs. Methods: We identified 145 patients who underwent either RCR or TSA and had preoperative PROs. All patients completed the ASES, SANE, SST, and VAS surveys within 3 months prior to surgery. Patients were contacted between one and four years after surgery and asked to recall their baseline pain and shoulder function prior to surgery. The mean difference was calculated by determining the difference between the mean recalled score and the mean actual score. Intraobserver reliability analysis was performed, comparing recall and actual score for each using the 2-way mixed-effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model. The ICC values > 0.75 were considered excellent, values between 0.4 and 0.75 were considered moderate, and values of < 0.4 demonstrated a weak agreement. Results: For patients who underwent RCR, the mean differences between actual and recalled ASES, SANE, SST and VAS pain were 6.3 (P=0.004), 2.0 (P=0.155), -0.04 (P=0.625) and - 1.0 (P<0.001), respectively. In patients who underwent TSA, the mean differences between actual and recalled ASES, SANE, SST and VAS pain were 4.5 (P =0.038), -3.9 (P=0.262), -1.2 (P=0.001) and -1.5 (P<0.001), respectively. ASES, SST, and VAS show moderate reliability, and SANE reliability was weak in both RCR and TSA populations. Patients had a tendency to recall higher pain scores than actual preoperative pain scores. Conclusion: In patients who underwent RCR or TSA, there was too much variability between individual patient's ability to accurately recall preoperative pain and function to reliably use recall data for research purposes.

Femur Strength is Similar Before and After Iatrogenic Fracture During Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical strength of femurs before an iatrogenic periprosthetic fracture vs after an initial fracture with supporting cerclage fixation during cementless total hip arthroplasty. Material and methods: Nineteen composite femurs and 5 matched pairs of cadaveric femurs were implanted with a single-wedge or dual-wedge tapered femoral stem and tested for ultimate load to failure producing a periprosthetic fracture. Following initial fracture, each femur was cerclaged with Vitallium cables and retested for ultimate load to failure. The mean force eliciting iatrogenic fracture before cabling and that after cabling were compared with a two-sided paired Student's t-test. Results: All composite femurs developed periprosthetic fractures with an average length extension from the calcar of 75.17 mm. For the 19 composite femurs, the mean ultimate load to failure before cabling and that after cabling were not significantly different (2422.95 N vs 2505.14 N, P = .678). For the 10 cadaveric femurs, the mean ultimate load to failure for the initial fracture vs that after cabling was statistically comparable (5828.62 N vs 7002.63 N, P = .126). Subanalysis of the 5 cadaveric femurs with a double-wedge stem revealed a significantly higher mean load to failure following cabling (5007.38 N vs 7811.17 N, P = .011). Conclusion: Biomechanical strength was similar for femurs that sustained an initial iatrogenic periprosthetic fracture and the same femurs cabled with cerclage wires after being fractured. These data may assist in operative decision-making for treating iatrogenic fractures during total hip arthroplasty.

Single-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty in an Ambulatory Surgical Center: A Report of Three Cases.

In recent years, there has been increased interest in transitioning total joint arthroplasty procedures from inpatient settings to ambulatory surgical centers to decrease costs and eliminate the need for hospital stays. In addition, simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been found to be favorable in certain patient populations when compared with staged bilateral THA. In this study, we report the results of a series of three patients who underwent single-stage bilateral THA in a free-standing ambulatory surgical center with excellent short-term outcomes and no 90-day complications.

Negative Online Ratings of Joint Replacement Surgeons: An Analysis of 6,402 Reviews.

BACKGROUND: With the expanding accessibility of online health-care information, patients frequently report visiting physician rating websites before choosing a surgeon. As such, it is important to analyze patients' perception of arthroplasty surgeons as reflected on physician rating websites. METHODS: A total of 6402 online reviews of arthroplasty surgeons were extracted for analysis. Each review rated less than 5 on a 5-point scale was deemed a "negative" review and was subsequently assigned to an appropriate category. Reviews were stratified by practice type, years in practice, gender, and low (<3) vs high (> 3) ratings. RESULTS: A total of 6402 reviews comprising 315 physicians were included in the analysis. The average rating for all surgeons was 4.35. The average rating for physicians in private practice was 4.3, compared to 4.5 for those in an academic setting. The average rating for physicians in practice for 1-10 years was 4.46, compared to 4.03 for those with >10 years of experience (P < .001). The most common factors contributing to negative reviews were bedside manner, wait time, poor outcome, and surgeon proficiency. Surgeon-dependent factors were more commonly associated with lower rated reviews (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty surgeons typically receive high online ratings, with a mean of 4.35 on a 5-point scale. Physicians in academic practice received higher ratings than those in private practice, and physicians who have been in practice for 1-10 years received higher ratings than those with more than 10 years in practice. The most common factors contributing to negative reviews are surgeon-dependent, including bedside manner, poor outcome, and surgeon proficiency.

Variability of Cutting and Thermal Dynamics Between New and Used Acetabular Reamers During Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening of the acetabular component remains one of the leading causes of early failure of total hip arthroplasty. Poor apposition of bone onto the implant surface can be due to inaccurate reaming and osteonecrosis of the acetabular bone due to the heat generated while reaming. METHODS: New and used acetabular reamers were tested on an MTS system using a clinically relevant force of 87.6 N. A thermal profile and depth achieved by the reamers were analyzed and compared between the 2 cohorts. Heat generated and force required for the community used reamers to achieve the same depth as the new reamers were subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: The new reamers achieved a depth 3.4 mm deeper than the community reamers (P < .001). The new reamers generated 4.1°C less heat than the community reamers (P = .007) under the same force and time. When programmed to ream to the average depth of the new reamers, the community reamers generated 16.8°C more heat (P = .002) and required forces 95-318% greater than the 87.6 N force used by the new reamers. CONCLUSIONS: Community use of reamers will cause variations in depth of penetration and increased temperatures at a clinically generated force vs new reamers. When community reamers were forced to the same depths the new reamers achieved, a significantly greater amount of heat was generated, and an increased amount of time was needed, both of which are known risk factors for osteonecrosis.