Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months of children diagnosed with CHD compared to children born very preterm.

OBJECTIVE: To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes and parent behaviour ratings of children born term with CHD to children born very preterm. METHODS: A clinical research sample of 181 children (CHD [n = 81]; very preterm [≤32 weeks; n = 100]) was assessed at 18 months. RESULTS: Children with CHD and born very preterm did not differ on Bayley-III cognitive, language, or motor composite scores, or on expressive or receptive language, or on fine motor scaled scores. Children with CHD had lower ross motor scaled scores compared to children born very preterm (p = 0.047). More children with CHD had impaired scores (<70 SS) on language composite (17%), expressive language (16%), and gross motor (14%) indices compared to children born very preterm (6%; 7%; 3%; ps < 0.05). No group differences were found on behaviours rated by parents on the Child Behaviour Checklist (1.5-5 years) or the proportion of children with scores above the clinical cutoff. English as a first language was associated with higher cognitive (p = 0.004) and language composite scores (p < 0.001). Lower median household income and English as a second language were associated with higher total behaviour problems (ps < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Children with CHD were more likely to display language and motor impairment compared to children born very preterm at 18 months. Outcomes were associated with language spoken in the home and household income.

Stepping up to COVID-19: A Clinical Trial of a Telepsychology Positive Parenting Program Targeting Behavior Problems in Children With Neurological Risk.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a stepped-care parenting program implemented during COVID-19 among families of behaviorally at-risk children with neurological or neurodevelopmental disorders aged 3-9 years. METHODS: Stepped-care I-InTERACT-North increased psychological support across 3 steps, matched to family needs: (1) guided self-help (podcast), (2) brief support, and (3) longer-term parent support. The intervention was provided by clinicians at The Hospital for Sick Children. Recruitment occurred via hospital and research cohort referral. A single-arm trial using a pragmatic prospective pre-post mixed-method design was utilized to assess accrual, engagement, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. RESULTS: Over 15 months, 68 families enrolled (83% consent rate) and 56 families completed stepped-care (Step 1 = 56; Step 2 = 39; Step 3 = 28), with high adherence across Steps (100%, 98%, and 93%, respectively). Parents reported high acceptability, reflected in themes surrounding accessibility, comprehension, effectiveness, and targeted care. Positive parenting skill increases were documented, and robust improvement in child behavior problems was apparent upon Step 3 completion (p =.001, d = .390). Stepped-care was as effective as traditional delivery, while improving consent and completion rates within a pandemic context. CONCLUSIONS: This stepped-care telepsychology parenting program provides a compelling intervention model to address significant gaps in accessible mental health intervention while simultaneously balancing the need for efficient service. Findings inform program scalability beyond COVID-19 and emphasize the value of stepped-care intervention in delivering and monitoring mental health treatment.

Building I-INTERACT-North: Participatory Action Research Design of an Online Transdiagnostic Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Program to Optimize Congenital and Neurodevelopmental Risk.

To adapt an existing virtual family-based mental health intervention learning platform (I-InTERACT-North), using participatory action research design, to meet the needs of parents and children with congenital, neonatal, and neurodevelopmental conditions that impact development. A purposive sample of parent knowledge users recruited from a large pediatric hospital (n = 21) and clinician stakeholders (n = 16) participated in one interview. An iterative process was adopted to implement feedback in the adaption of the learning platform. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to examine themes across participant feedback. Initial satisfaction with the adapted website was high. Qualitative results revealed four themes: acceptability, usability, recommendations, and dissatisfaction. Addressed with iterations, technical difficulties, wanting more information on content, resources, and intended audience were areas of dissatisfaction. This study reflects the importance of participatory action research methods in informing virtual mental health interventions. Future directions to improve the learning platform are discussed.

Psychosocial Intervention Outcomes for Children with Congenital and Neonatal Conditions: Systematic Review.

There has been a historic lack of psychosocially geared treatment studies for congenital and neonatal conditions that impact brain development, despite well-established knowledge that these conditions impact cognitive development, quality of life (QoL), mental health, and academic success. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to systematically investigate the research literature focusing on the effects of interventions in psychosocially geared programs for children with neonatal brain injury on school and psychological outcomes. METHODS: Psychosocially geared programs broadly refer to interventions to improve parenting and school functioning, or child behavior, as well as other interventions that have a psychological component but may be more physically oriented, such as goal-directed physiotherapy. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, PsychINFO, and Embase was completed between June and July 2020. The methodological quality of included articles was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB-2). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and demonstrated adequate risk of bias (i.e., low risk of bias or some concerns). The studies included family (n = 2), parenting (n = 7), and child (n = 10) interventions. There is some evidence supporting the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for children with neonatal brain injury and their families on academic outcomes, behavior, and QoL, indicated by positive intervention effects in 65% (n = 13) of studies.

Understanding Early Childhood Resilience Following Neonatal Brain Injury From Parents' Perspectives Using a Mixed-Method Design.

OBJECTIVES: The current study used a mixed-method design to qualitatively examine parents' definitions of resilience and factors they believed optimized their child's early outcome following neonatal brain injury. This was followed by quantitative analyses of early developmental and mental health outcomes and their relation to salient biopsychosocial factors. METHODS: Participants were parents of children diagnosed with neonatal brain injury due to stroke or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (N=51; age range of children 18 months to 8 years). The Parent Experiences Questionnaire (PEQ) was used to qualitatively analyze parents' open-ended responses about their child's early experiences and outcome. The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Scales of Independent Behaviour Early Developmental Form (SIB-ED) parent ratings were used to measure child resilience from a quantitative perspective, identifying "at-risk" and "resilient" children using standard cutoffs. "Resilient" and "at-risk" children were compared on biopsychosocial variables using univariate t tests and chi-square analyses. RESULTS: Parents provided five unique definitions of their child's positive outcomes, and many children demonstrated resilience based on parent perspectives and quantitative definitions. Supporting factors included close medical follow-up, early intervention, and intrinsic factors within the child and parent. Group comparisons of "resilient" and "at-risk" children highlighted the importance of parent mental health across these early developmental and mental health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Many children were described as resilient during the early years by parents using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Findings highlighted the importance of parent well-being in promoting optimal early outcomes. (JINS, 2019, 25, 390-402.).

From Diagnoses to Ongoing Journey: Parent Experiences Following Congenital Heart Disease Diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: Using qualitative and quantitative methods, the current cross-sectional study examined parents' experiences at the time of their child's diagnosis, what they thought helped their child recover, barriers to support, and identified needs for future models of care. METHOD: The sample included 26 parents (22 mothers, 3 fathers, and 1 mother/father pair) of children with CHD, ranging in age between 6 months and 4 years with a mean age of 2 years. RESULTS: Qualitative results were organized around five themes: (a) They (medical team) saved my child's life, (b) My child is going to be okay, (c) Not out of the woods, (d) Optimizing support for my child and myself, and (e) What still gets in the way. Parents uniformly expressed a need for greater mental health support for their children as well as programs to improve parents' skill and confidence, with no difference between age groups (< 2 years and > 2 years of age). Common barriers to service included distance and time off work. CONCLUSION: Parents' experiences informed both acute and long term implications following CHD diagnoses, and highlight current gaps in mental health care. Direction for clinical care and improved intervention opportunities are discussed.

In their own words: developing the Parent Experiences Questionnaire following neonatal brain injury using participatory design.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to create a specific questionnaire (Parent Experiences Questionnaire) about early experiences, service involvement, and needs of children and parents following neonatal brain injury that could be used to inform clinical care and needed interventions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A mixed-method design was utilized, engaging in both qualitative and quantitative methods across three phases. Phase 1 employed participatory design involving 12 parent and clinician participants in semi-structured interviews to address main topics, item importance, and overall impressions of the questionnaire. In phase 2, the questionnaire was piloted by 32 parents. Post hoc revisions added four questions to address current parent and child therapeutic needs in phase 3. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The final questionnaire yielded 24 items addressing topics of early communication between parent and clinicians, early intervention services, efficacy, and barriers in optimizing the child's development and parents' experience. The questionnaire was reviewed positively by a group of parents in phase 2 and demonstrated good acceptance, online feasibility, stability, and association with current parental mental health and child development. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation offers a valuable new questionnaire to inform clinical care regarding discussions with parents about neonatal brain injury, evaluate the perceived efficacy of early intervention services, and guide relevant future intervention efforts.

Adolescent decision-making in Canadian medical contexts: Integrating neuroscience and consent frameworks.

The primary objective of this commentary is to integrate current neuroscientific research on brain development during adolescence, with existing consent frameworks that do not designate a minimum age for eligibility to consent to, or refuse medical treatment. To reach this objective, the three consent frameworks used in health care settings are outlined: age-based framework; mature minor framework and capacity-based framework. This commentary draws on the Canadian health care system specifically to consider consent frameworks that grant young people with decision-making capacity. Next, a brief review of adolescent brain development findings is presented, particularly pertaining to the decision-making capacity of young people within medical contexts. Ultimately, the question of whether the stage of a young person's brain development impedes their capacity to consent to, or refuse medical treatment is addressed. This commentary provides reassurance as to the compatibility between capacity-based and mature minor frameworks to consent to treatment with current neuroscientific understanding of adolescent brain development.

Cognitive functioning in children and adolescents with depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Although cognitive dysfunction is associated with depression in adults, the link in children and adolescents is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis quantifies the association between depression and cognitive function in children and adolescents. Systematic searches were conducted in six databases: Child Development and Adolescent Studies, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid APA PsycINFO, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Scopus (last search: April 2023). Studies including measures of cognitive outcomes (memory, attention, executive function, processing speed, language) among children (≤18 years) with depression were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools were used to determine study risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses of study outcomes were performed. Seventeen studies were included (15 were cross-sectional, 1 prospective, 1 randomized control trial). Participants (N = 13,567) were 10 to 17 years old (mean 13.8 ± 2.2 years; 60 % female). Compared with healthy controls, depressed participants had lower performance on tests of working memory (g = -0.40; 95 % CI: -0.67, -0.13), long-term memory (g = -0.48; 95 % CI: -0.72, -0.25), attention (g = -0.15; 95 % CI: -0.26, -0.04), executive function (g = -0.16; 95 % CI: -0.24, -0.08), and language (g = -0.23; 95 % CI: -0.36, -0.09). No performance differences were observed on tests of short-term memory or processing speed. Children and adolescents with depression demonstrated lower performance on tests of working and long-term memory, attention, executive function and language. These findings emphasize the importance of considering cognitive functioning among children with depression, and greater understanding of the effect of treatment on these outcomes. PROSPERO (CRD42022332064).

Positive parenting practices support children at neurological risk during COVID-19: a call for accessible parenting interventions.

Children and youth with neurological and/or neurodevelopmental conditions were at high risk for behavioral and mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Positive and responsive parenting practices may be one way to prevent and manage potential difficulties in families. We aimed to identify whether positive parenting practices were associated with reduced behavioral concerns in children at neurological risk during the late stages and aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we examined whether ongoing parental stress, anxiety, and depression impacted parenting practices during this time period. Families (N = 179) with children 4 to 15 years old (M = 7.11y, SD = 2.02) diagnosed with neurological (84.3%), neurodevelopmental (54.8%) or comorbid neurological and/or neurodevelopmental conditions (21.2%) were contacted to complete online questionnaires regarding demographics, parent stress, child behavior, COVID-19 conditions, and parenting practices. Multivariable linear regression (MLR) analyses examined the association between positive parenting practices and parenting competency measures with child behavioral outcomes, controlling for relevant covariates, including COVID-19 related stress. MLR were also run to determine whether parental mental health impacted parenting practices. More positive parenting practices predicted fewer child problem behaviors and lower intensity of problem behaviors. Similarly, a higher sense of satisfaction with parenting competence also predicted fewer child problem behaviors and lower intensity of problem behaviors. In addition, higher reported parental depression, anxiety, and stress significantly predicted fewer reported positive parenting practices. Findings points to the promising application of positive parenting interventions to support vulnerable families, as well as the need for parental mental health intervention to support parenting practices.

Intellectual ability and executive function in pediatric moyamoya vasculopathy.

AIM: Moyamoya vasculopathy is characterized by progressive stenosis of the major arteries of the Circle of Willis, resulting in compromised cerebral blood flow and increased risk of stroke. The objectives of the current study were to examine intellectual and executive functioning of children with moyamoya and to evaluate the impact of moyamoya type, stroke (clinical or silent), vasculopathy laterality, and disease duration on neurocognitive abilities. METHOD: Thirty pediatric participants (mean age 10 y 10 mo, SD 4 y; 18 females, 12 males) completed age-appropriate Wechsler Intelligence Scales before any therapeutic revascularization procedures. Reports of executive function were obtained from parents and teachers using the Behavior Rating Index of Executive Function. RESULTS: Children with moyamoya scored significantly lower than the test standardization samples on all indices of intelligence and ratings of executive functioning (p<0.001). Patients did not differ by type of moyamoya or history of stroke. Patients with bilateral disease and stroke scored significantly lower than those with unilateral disease on measures of overall intellectual function (p=0.035) and verbal comprehension (p=0.04). Deficits in metacognitive executive functions were also more pronounced in bilateral patients according to teacher ratings. INTERPRETATION: Children with moyamoya are at risk for intellectual and executive problems, exacerbated by bilateral disease and clinical stroke history.

Rehabilitation in Pediatric Stroke: Cognition and Behavior.

Pediatric stroke is associated with a range of maladaptive cognitive and behavioral outcomes that often require targeted intervention. Despite increasing research on neuropsychological outcomes over the past decade, evidence for effective therapies and interventions for the most commonly reported cognitive and behavioral challenges is still limited. The most widely prescribed interventions address more overt deficits in sensorimotor and speech/language functions, yet interventions for higher-order cognitive, linguistic and behavioral deficits are notably less defined. Moreover, concepts of rehabilitation in adult stroke cannot be easily translated directly to pediatric populations because the effect of stroke and recovery in the developing brain takes a very different course than in the mature brain. In pediatric stroke, neuropsychological deficits often emerge gradually over time necessitating a long-term approach to intervention. Furthermore, family and school context often play a much larger role. The goal of this review is to describe cognitive and behavioral interventions for perinatal and childhood stroke, as motor rehabilitation is covered elsewhere in this issue. We also discuss cognitive aspects of current rehabilitative therapies and technology. Acknowledging the current limited state of stroke-specific rehabilitation research in children, findings from pediatric acquired brain injury intervention and use of transdiagnostic approaches lend important insights. Because there is limited support for single domain (cognitive) trainings and translation of research rehabilitation programs to clinical practice can be challenging, the value of holistic multidisciplinary approaches to improve everyday function in children and adolescents following stroke is emphasized.

COVID-19 mental health impact among children with early brain injury and associated conditions.

This study describes the impact of COVID-19 among a clinical research sample of children with early brain injury and associated conditions. Between March 2020 and March 2021, 64 children and their parents participated. Children ranged in age between 3 and 14 years (M = 6 years, 3 months; SD = 2 years, 4 months) with a range of diagnoses (i.e., neonatal stroke, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), congenital heart disease (CHD) and preterm birth (<32 weeks)). The abbreviated CoRonavIrus Health Impact Survey (CRISIS) was completed by parents as part of their child's routine intake for neuropsychological services. Questions included COVID-19 specific ratings of child mental health impact, child, and parent stressors, with open-ended questions regarding negative and positive COVID-19 related changes. Over 40% of parents described moderate to extreme influence of COVID-19 on their child's mental health. Common child stressors reported included restrictions on leaving the home and social isolation. Among parents, the most common stress reported was caring for their child's education and daily activities. Children's mental health impact was associated with social isolation, parent mental health, COVID-19 economic concern, and number of siblings in the home. Child's age, sex, brain injury severity, or intellectual functioning were not associated with reported COVID-19 mental health impact. Some COVID-19 positives were identified, namely increased quality family time. Findings reflect the significant pandemic mental health impact among neurologically at-risk children and their families. Implications to future clinical needs and considerations for neuropsychological practice are discussed.

Pandemic Perils and Promise: Implementation of a Virtual Parenting Intervention during COVID-19 among Children with Early Neurological Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a telepsychological positive parenting intervention (I-InTERACT-North, Internet-basedInteracting Together Everyday: Recovery After Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury) during the COVID-19 pandemic among Canadian families of children at-risk for neurodevelopmental challenges given congenital or neonatal conditions. I-InTERACT-North was developed to improve behavioral and emotional outcomes in children with neurological conditions by utilizing and adapting parenting strategies from several established family-focused programmes. METHODS: A pragmatic prospective pre-post single-site pilot study design was used to assess feasibility, acceptabilty, and preliminary efficacy of I-InTERACT North during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Thirty-five families of children ages three to nine years were referred between March 2020 and January 2021. Eighteen families enrolled, and 12 (67% adherence) completed the programme. Parents reported strong therapeutic alliance and programme acceptability with barriers due to competing time demands. Therapists reported high acceptability but perceived parental burnout. Parenting confidence (d = 0.70), and child behavior (d = 1.30) improved following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate the programme's value to families during the pandemic, while underscoring unique participation barriers. Future research and clinicial implications are discussed.

[Formula: see text]Examining parent and clinician views of a hospital-based pediatric neuropsychological service: a Canadian perspective.

Understanding how pediatric neuropsychological evaluations support families and the child's medical team is an important component of ensuring evidence-based care. For the first time within a Canadian context, we investigated the impact of neuropsychological assessments on parent knowledge, advocacy, and stress and the role of socioeconomic factors in parents' perceptions of the assessment. Responses from referring clinicians were also examined. As part of a hospital quality improvement project, 91 parents of children between the ages of 3 and 17 years (M = 8y7m; SD = 4y1m) and 45 clinician consumers (clinical staff who use neuropsychological services) completed one of two online questionnaires in English: Parent Overall Assessment of Supports and Testing, or Clinician Overall Assessment of Supports and Testing. Most parents indicated the neuropsychological evaluation promoted understanding of their child's cognitive profile and improved their ability to support their child at home and at school or in the community. Families characterized as being at higher social risk indicated that the evaluation led to more changes in how they approached their child at home than families with lower social risk status. Referring clinicians indicated neuropsychological reports were effective in communicating findings to them and patients/families. The most valuable sections of the report according to referring clinicians included the diagnosis/impression and recommendations sections. Parents and referral providers reported many benefits from the neuropsychological evaluation but also identified areas for service delivery improvement. Parent perceptions varied based on family and socio environmental factors, offering important targets for future research and clinical consideration.

Measuring patient satisfaction following epilepsy surgery.

PURPOSE: To systematically review primary research examining patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery in order to obtain evidence-based estimates of this surgical outcome; to assess methods used to measure epilepsy surgery satisfaction, overall epilepsy surgery satisfaction ratings, and predictors of epilepsy surgery satisfaction. METHODS: Systematic review of published studies in English up to June 2009, focusing on patient satisfaction with all types of epilepsy surgery in patients of all ages. We excluded studies that focused on satisfaction with epilepsy treatment in general, on quality of life without specific exploration of patient satisfaction with surgery, and on satisfaction with the process of health care delivery, rather than with surgery and its outcomes. KEY FINDINGS: Eight studies met inclusion criteria. Satisfaction was assessed using one or more global questions. Four epilepsy surgery satisfaction question content patterns emerged: (1) satisfied or dissatisfied, (2) perceived success or failure, (3) overall positive or negative impact, and (4) willingness to repeat surgery or regretting surgery. Overall 71% were satisfied; 64% considered it a success; it had a positive effect for 78%; and 87% would repeat surgery. Seizure freedom was the most common predictor of epilepsy surgery satisfaction, whereas postoperative neurologic deficit predicted dissatisfaction. SIGNIFICANCE: Patient satisfaction with interventions is an important aspect of patient-centered care, but it has received little attention in epilepsy surgery. Future research is required to develop and validate epilepsy surgery satisfaction tools. We provide preliminary guiding principles for measuring satisfaction after epilepsy surgery.

Characterizing language outcomes following childhood basal ganglia stroke.

The basal ganglia are important for movement and executive function, but its contribution to language is less understood. This study explored language outcomes associated with childhood basal ganglia stroke. A detailed language coding scheme, which examined expressive and receptive language, verbal fluency, narrative discourse, pragmatic/applied language, and academics, was developed from qualitative and quantitative data acquired from neuropsychological testing and reports. Overall intellectual functioning and verbal comprehension was in the average range. Twelve participants had psychological diagnoses, including Learning Disorder. No one had a Language Disorder diagnosis. Among the 18 children who did not receive a diagnosis, many exhibited language issues in the mild to severe range according to our coding scheme. These children had higher-order language difficulties in verbal fluency, narrative, and pragmatic language rather than overt expressive difficulties noted in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) diagnostic criteria. There was an association between infarct size and ESL/immersion education, math performance, and presence of a psychological diagnosis. Psychological diagnosis was also associated with literacy skills. The results highlight that language issues following basal ganglia stroke may not be fully captured by standardized neuropsychological tests and psychological diagnoses. Findings reinforce the need to integrate quantitative and qualitative findings when examining language functioning.

Intervention experiences among children with congenital and neonatal conditions impacting brain development: patterns of service utilization, barriers and future directions.

OBJECTIVE: The current study examined reported patterns of utilization and barriers to early and school-age interventions, as well as directions for future care, among families of children with congenital or neonatal conditions with known-risk for poor neurocognitive development. The impact of the child's severity of injury, condition and adaptive functioning, as well as family sociodemographic factors were considered. METHODS: The sample included 62 parents (53 mothers, 5 fathers, 4 mother-father pairs) of children diagnosed with neonatal stroke, hypoxia ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and congenital heart disease (CHD) ranging in age between 3 to 9 years (mean age = 4.5 years, SD = 1.82). RESULTS: In this sample, approximately 80% of children were reported to have had utilized one or more therapies. The most frequent services utilized included: (a) speech and language therapy, (b) occupational therapy, and (c) physical therapy. Less than 10% of sample reported utilizing any psychological therapies. Common family barriers to all interventions included time off work, lack of childcare, and transportation. Parents of children with more severe injury or condition reported that their children were utilizing a greater number of interventions and also perceived a greater number of barriers. Over half of the parents expressed a need for more parent support groups, remote psychosocial services, and individualized psychological therapy for themselves or their family. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight patterns of utilization and perceived gaps in early and school-age interventions for children with congenital or neonatal conditions that impact neurodevelopment. Direction for clinical care and improved intervention opportunities are discussed.

Transdiagnostic feasibility trial of internet-based parenting intervention to reduce child behavioural difficulties associated with congenital and neonatal neurodevelopmental risk: introducing I-InTERACT-North.

OBJECTIVE: We examined feasibility and acceptability of an adapted telepsychological parent-child intervention to improve parenting skills and reduce emotional and behavioural difficulties in Canadian families of children at-risk for poor neurodevelopment given congenital or neonatal conditions. Preliminary program efficacy outcomes are also described. METHODS: Twenty-two families of children between the ages of 3-8 years with histories of neonatal stroke, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and serious congenital and neonatal conditions [(congenital heart disease (CHD) or prematurity)] consented to participate in an adapted telepsychological parenting skills training program (I-InTERACT-North). The program helps parents develop positive parenting skills to improve parenting competence and child behaviour through 7 online psychoeducational modules completed independently and 7 videoconference sessions with a therapist. Videoconference sessions include live coaching to support application of skills. Feasibility (i.e., number of participants eligible, consented, refused), adherence (i.e., completion time, retention rates), acceptability (i.e., website experience questionnaire, therapist and parent semi-structured interviews), and preliminary efficacy (i.e., observational coding of parenting skill, self-reported parent competence, parent-reported child behaviour) data were collected. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 22 families (86%) enrolled completed the program in an average of 10 weeks (range: 6-17 weeks). Parents and therapists reported high overall satisfaction with the program (100%), including acceptability of both the online modules (95%) and the videoconference sessions (95%). Parenting confidence (d = 0.45), parenting skill (d = 0 .64), and child behaviour (d = 0.50) significantly improved over the course of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide preliminary evidence for the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of I-InTERACT-North for parents of children with neonatal brain injury.

The association between parent stress, coping and mental health, and neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants with congenital heart disease.

Caring for the complex needs of a child with congenital heart disease (CHD) can place significant burden on the family. Parent mental health and coping have important influences on resilience and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with CHD. Objectives: To describe the uptake of a cardiac neurodevelopmental program (CNP), examine parent mental health and coping specific to parenting a child with CHD, and explore the relationship between parent mental health and child neurodevelopmental outcomes. Method: Implementation and uptake of the CNP was examined, and forty-four parents of children with CHD completed the DASS and RSQ-CHD. Results: The CNP showed significant uptake in follow-up and interventions offered including 100% completed brain MRIs of eligible patients, 35% increase in neonatal neurology consults, and 100% of families counselled on neurodevelopmental outcomes. A significant proportion of parents endorsed moderate/severe levels of anxiety (25%), depression (20%), and CHD-specific stress. Parents predominantly engaged in secondary control engagement coping (F(2,64)=75.04, p<.001, ηp2=.70). Secondary control engagement coping was associated with lower parent total stress (r=-.48, p=.006) and anxiety (r=-.47, p=.009). Higher parent stress was associated with higher anxiety (r=.45, p=.016), depression (r=.37, p=.05), more severe types of CHD (r=.35, p=.048), older child age (t(30)= -2.33, p=.03), and lower child cognitive scores (r=-.37, p=.045). More severe types of CHD were associated with lower language scores (F(3,35)=3.50, p=.03). Conclusions: This study highlights the relationship between parent mental health and early child cognitive outcomes in CHD and helps inform models of psychological care to reduce family burden and improve child outcomes.