Improved myocardial protection in the failing heart by selective endothelin-A receptor blockade.

OBJECTIVE: Ischemia/reperfusion injury caused by cardioplegic arrest is still a major challenge in patients with reduced left ventricular function. We investigated the effect of chronic versus acute administration of the selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist (ERA) TBC-3214Na during ischemia/reperfusion in failing hearts. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent coronary ligation. Three days after myocardial infarction (MI), 19 randomly assigned animals (ERA chronic) were administered TBC-3214Na continuously with their drinking water, 29 MI rats received placebo, and 3 rats died during the observation period. Six weeks after infarction, hearts were evaluated in a blood-perfused working heart model during 60 minutes of ischemia and 30 minutes of reperfusion. In 14 MI rats, TBC-3214Na (ERA acute) was added to the cardioplegic solution during ischemia. Thirteen MI rats served as control. RESULTS: At a similar infarct size, postischemic recovery of cardiac output (ERA chronic: 91% +/- 10%, ERA acute: 86% +/- 11% vs control: 52% +/- 15%; P < .05) and external heart work (ERA chronic: 90% +/- 10%, ERA acute: 85% +/- 13% vs control: 51% +/- 17%; P < .05) was significantly enhanced in both TBC-3214Na-treated groups whereas recovery of coronary flow was only improved in ERA acute rats (ERA acute: 121% +/- 23% vs ERA chronic: 75% +/- 13%; control: 64% +/- 15%; P < .05). Blood gas measurements showed enhanced myocardial oxygen delivery and consumption with acute TBC-3214Na therapy. Additionally, high-energy phosphates (phosphocreatine) were significantly higher and transmission electron microscopy revealed less ultrastructural damage under acute TBC-3214Na administration. CONCLUSION: Acute endothelin-A receptor blockade is superior to chronic blockade in attenuating ischemia/reperfusion injury in failing hearts. Therefore, acute endothelin-A receptor blockade might be an interesting option for patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac surgery.

Incidence and diagnosis of thrombosis in children with short-term central venous lines of the upper venous system.

OBJECTIVES: Deep venous thrombosis in children is frequently related to central venous lines. Study objectives were to determine objectively the incidence of deep venous thrombosis in children with short-term central venous lines and to assess the diagnostic value of venography, venous ultrasonography, and echocardiography, in a prospective cohort study. METHODS: Consecutive children with congenital heart disease requiring short-term central venous lines in the upper venous system were screened systematically for deep venous thrombosis by using venography, venous ultrasonography, and echocardiography, according to standardized protocols. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 90 children (median age: 2.7 years; range: birth to 18 years). Most central venous lines (97%) were located in the jugular veins. The overall incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 25 cases (28%) among 90 children. Venography identified deep venous thrombosis located in the subclavian and central veins but missed most deep venous thrombosis in the jugular veins. Venous ultrasonography had good sensitivity in the jugular veins but did not detect deep venous thrombosis in central veins. Echocardiography detected only 1 case of central deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of central venous line-related deep venous thrombosis in children with short-term central venous lines is high and comparable to reports for children with long-term central venous lines. Sensitivities of venography, venous ultrasonography, and echocardiography in children vary depending on the affected venous segment. A combination of diagnostic tests is required for sensitive detection of central venous line-related deep venous thrombosis in the upper venous system.