Very low dose glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: Impact of b/tsDMARDs initiation timing on glucocorticoid withdrawal.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effectiveness and safety of very low-dose (<5 mg daily) glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with RA treated with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we included all RA patients who started their first b/tsDMARDs at our institution between 2015 and 2020 and were monitored every 6 months for 3 years. Relationships between exposure to very low-dose GCs and disease activity were examined through multivariable logistic regression and repeated-measures analysis of variance. The impact of very low-dose GCs on safety was also evaluated. RESULTS: We enrolled 229 RA patients, of whom 68% were prescribed very low-dose GCs and 32% received no GCs. After three years on b/tsDMARDs, 32% had never abandoned, 20% had gone on and off, and 23% had permanently discontinued very low-dose GCs, while 25% had never taken GCs. Shorter disease duration at b/tsDMARD initiation was the single modifiable predictor of very low-dose GCs cessation (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.03-1.14 for any 1-year decrease; p= 0.001). A significant association existed between ongoing utilization of very low-dose GCs and persistent moderate disease activity. Use of very low-dose GCs was associated with hypertension (20% vs 11%) and myocardial infarction (2.3% vs 0%). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of RA patients treated with b/tsDMARDs continue to receive very low-dose GCs without significantly improving disease control. However, this appears to increase cardiovascular morbidity.

The SLE-DAS provides an accurate and feasible flare tool in the clinical setting: a validation study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the criterion validity of the SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS) flare tool and compare its performance in identifying flares against other instruments. METHODS: Patients with SLE fulfilling SLE-DAS low disease activity at baseline were included from two academic lupus clinics. During follow-up, flares were identified by the senior attending clinician, applying the expert-consensus-based definition as gold-standard. The first clinical flare from flaring patients, and the first visit after baseline in patients without flares were analysed. In each no flare/flare visits, we assessed flares by SLE-DAS (score increase ≥1.72), classic-SELENA Flare Index (c-SELENA FI), revised-SELENA FI (r-SELENA FI), and SLEDAI-2K (score increase ≥4). We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's Kappa agreement of each flare tool against the gold-standard. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients were included and followed-up for 22.9 (14.2) months. Incidence of flares was 8.19/100 patient-years, with 69 patients experiencing flares. The SLE-DAS identified 96.6% of the expert-defined flares implying a treatment change and classified 28.0% of those as moderate/severe. Sensitivity and specificity for the gold-standard flare definition were: SLE-DAS 97.1% and 97.3%, c-SELENA FI 88.4% and 98.1%, r-SELENA FI 88.4% and 96.8%, SLEDAI-2K 56.5% and 99.2%, respectively. Kappa coefficients of these instruments were 0.902 (95% CI: 0.847, 0.957), 0.870 (95% CI: 0.805, 0.935), 0.832 (95% CI: 0.761, 0.903), and 0.663 (95% CI: 0.557, 0.769), respectively. The number of flare misclassifications was lowest with the SLE-DAS, and highest with the SLEDAI-2K. CONCLUSION: The SLE-DAS accurately identifies and categorizes flares as mild or moderate/severe. It is feasible and, thus, may help the physicians' treatment decisions in the clinical practice setting.

Therapeutic Strategies and Outcomes in Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An International Multicenter Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: The management of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) poses considerable challenges due to limited clinical trials. Therapeutic decisions are customized based on suspected pathogenic mechanisms and symptom severity. This study aimed to investigate therapeutic strategies and disease outcome for patients with NPSLE experiencing their first neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study defined NP events according to the American College of Rheumatology case definition, categorizing them into three clusters: central/diffuse, central/focal and peripheral. Clinical judgment and a validated attribution algorithm were used for NP event attribution. Data included demographic variables, SLE disease activity index, cumulative organ damage, and NP manifestation treatments. The clinical outcome of all NP events was determined by a physician seven-point Likert scale. Predictors of clinical improvement/resolution were investigated in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The analysis included 350 events. Immunosuppressants and corticosteroids were more frequently initiated/escalated for SLE-attributed central diffuse or focal NP manifestations. At 12 months of follow-up, 64% of patients showed a clinical improvement in NP manifestations. Focal central events and SLE-attributed manifestations correlated with higher rates of clinical improvement. Patients with NP manifestations attributed to SLE according to clinical judgment and treated with immunosuppressants had a significantly higher probability of achieving clinical response (OR 2.55, 95%CI 1.06-6.41, p= 0.04). Age at diagnosis and focal central events emerged as additional response predictors. CONCLUSION: NP manifestations attributed to SLE by clinical judgment and treated with immunosuppressants demonstrated improved 12-month outcomes. This underscores the importance of accurate attribution and timely diagnosis of NPSLE.

Anifrolumab In Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Real-Life, Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To report the real-world experience on the use of ANI in refractory SLE. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study involving 9 Italian SLE referral centers participating in a compassionate use program for the use of ANI in active adult SLE patients in whom all the available treatment choices failed, were not tolerated or contraindicated.At baseline, at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment, overall and organ specific disease activity, flares, daily glucocorticoid (GC) dose, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were enrolled. At 4 weeks after starting ANI, a significant decrease in SLEDAI-2K (p=0.005), SLEDAS (p=0.005) and PGA (p=0.001) was recorded, and the same trend was maintained over time. A significant reduction in CLASI-activity (p<0.001) and in tender (p=0.026) and swollen (p=0.017) joint count was also recorded. At 3 months of follow-up, 33% of patients already achieved a remission state, while 46% were in LLDAS; at 6 months, 50% were in remission and 80% in LLDAS. A significant reduction in the mean GC daily dose was observed, starting from week 4 (p=0.04). A total of 4 disease flares according to the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index were recorded (three mild-moderate and one severe). Overall, 4 out of 20 patients with at least 24 weeks of follow-up (20%) were considered "non responders". CONCLUSION: This study provides a real-world experience on the use of ANI in refractory SLE patients, confirming its rapid effectiveness and an overall acceptable safety profile.

Early characterization of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis by suboptimal initial management: a multicentre cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that unsuccessful treatment optimization in early disease is associated with difficult-to-treat RA (D2T-RA). METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre cohort study conducted from 09/2021-03/2022, we enrolled individuals fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR RA criteria diagnosed 2000-2019. The outcome was D2T-RA by the EULAR definition. We used robust regression to examine the associations with delay, dose, duration of methotrexate and discontinuation of glucocorticoids. We tested through multinomial regression which factors were associated with persistent inflammatory refractory RA (PIRRA) or non-inflammatory refractory RA (NIRRA). Sensitivity analysis included a case-control study matching the year of diagnosis. RESULTS: We enrolled 48 D2T-RA patients and 145 non-D2T-RA controls. Methotrexate was started within 3 months in 16.7% of D2T-RA vs 33.1% of non-D2T-RA (P = 0.011). Adequate duration of methotrexate was obtained in significantly fewer D2T-RA patients (70.8% vs 85.5%). Glucocorticoids were continued beyond 6 months in a higher proportion of D2T-RA patients (70.8% vs 33.8%, P < 0.001). In multiple regression, treatment delay beyond 3 months (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1, 0.9) and non-discontinuation of glucocorticoids after 6 months (OR 4.6; 95% CI 2.2, 9.5) were significantly associated with D2T-RA. Treatment delay was significantly associated with PIRRA only, while non-discontinuation of glucocorticoids was significantly associated with PIRRA and NIRRA. Results were replicated in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Failure to start methotrexate within 3 months and not being off glucocorticoids within 6 months are early predictive features of D2T-RA.

Systemic lupus erythematosus incidence and prevalence in a large population-based study in northeastern Italy.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed at estimating the incidence and prevalence of SLE in northeastern Italy over the period 2012-20. METHODS: A retrospective population-based study was conducted in Veneto Region (4.9 million people) using the population registry, an administrative health database where all residents are recorded. Between 2012 and 2020, SLE prevalence was defined by a healthcare co-payment exemption for SLE (national registry code 028) or any hospital diagnosis of SLE (International Classification of Disease , Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification 710.0), whichever came first. Incident SLE was defined from 2013 to 2020 to exclude prevalent cases. Standardized incidence and prevalence rates were reported by age and sex. RESULTS: During the study period, we identified 4283 SLE patients (85% female), with 1092 incident cases. Across the study period, SLE standardized point prevalence increased from 63.5 (95% CI 61.2, 65.8) to 70.6 (95% CI 68.3, 73.0) per 100 000 residents, corresponding to an annual increment of 1.14% (P < 0.0001). The highest prevalence was observed in females aged 60-69 years. SLE incidence corresponded to 2.8 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 2.6, 2.9), with an annual decline of 7.3% (P < 0.0001). Incidence was 5-fold higher in females (female-to-male incidence rate ratio: 5.00, 95% CI 4.25, 5.87; P < 0.0001), with a peak among women aged 30-39 years. At diagnosis, women were significantly younger (45 years, IQR 33-58) than men (52 years, IQR 38-64). CONCLUSIONS: Over the last decade, SLE prevalence has increased, while incidence has stably declined. In view of the introduction of new high-cost drugs, a clear definition of the epidemiology of SLE is crucial for all healthcare stakeholders.

Antiphospholipid antibody carriers and patients with quiescent antiphospholipid syndrome show persistent subclinical complement activation.

OBJECTIVES: Complement activation has been advocated as one mechanism by which antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) can induce thrombosis. In patients with catastrophic aPL syndrome or re-thrombosis, enhanced complement activation was shown, even in quiescent phase of the disease. We aimed to assess complement activation and to investigate its association to clinical variables in aPL positive patients with a favorable disease course. METHODS: Subjects with at least two consecutive positive aPL antibody results obtained ≥12 weeks apart were enrolled. They were subjects without history of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity (aPL carriers), patients with pregnancy morbidity alone (OAPS), and/or with arterial, venous, or small-vessel thrombosis (TAPS); all patients should have been free of symptoms for ≥2 years. Patients affected with systemic autoimmune diseases were excluded. Healthy age and sex-matched subjects were included as controls. Plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels were assessed by commercially available ELISA assays. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and Spearman's correlation were applied. RESULTS: Thirty-seven OAPS, 38 TAPS, 42 aPL carriers, and 30 healthy subjects were enrolled. Median C5a and C5b-9 levels were significantly higher in quiescent aPL positive patients (OAPS, TAPS, aPL carriers) compared with controls: C5a ng/ml 10.61 (IQR 6.87-15.46) vs 4.06 (2.66-7.35), p< 0.001; C5b-9 ng/ml 283.95 (175.8-439.40) vs 165.90 (124.23-236.8), p< 0.001. Similar C5a and C5b-9 levels were observed in OAPS and TAPS patients and aPL carriers. A positive correlation between C5b-9 median levels and the number of aPL positive tests was found (p= 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The persistence of aPL antibodies is associated to a persistent subclinical activation of the complement cascade.

New onset and flare of rheumatic diseases following COVID-19 vaccination are mild and respond well to treatment: 9-month follow-up data from a single centre cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-COVID-19 vaccines have proved to be effective and well tolerated. Great attention is now being paid to the characterisation of possible adverse events associated to their administration. We report a case series of suspected rheumatic diseases (RDs) following anti-COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: We included patients evaluated at first-aid rheumatologic consultancy and at rheumatologic outpatient and inpatient clinic at Padova University Hospital between May and September 2021 presenting with a RD within 30 days after an anti-COVID-19 vaccine dose. Our selection was in accordance with the World Health Organisation guidelines for adverse event following immunisation (AEFI) surveillance. Patients were regularly re-evaluated by telemedicine or face-to-face visit. RESULTS: We identified 30 cases of RD following vaccination: 24 (80.0%) new onsets and 6 (20.0%) flares. Most of patients (76.6%) received the BNT162b2 vaccine. The mean time to RD onset/flare was 12±9 days. The most common manifestations were inflammatory arthritis (40.0%), rheumatic polymyalgia (33.3%) and adult-onset Still's disease (13.3%). At the last FU visit (9.6±2.2 months), 83.3% of patients showed complete response to first- or second-line therapy, 13.3% a partial response and one patient (3.3%) was still experiencing an active disease. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the amount of vaccine doses administered during the evaluation period we overall detected a limited number of cases. We noted a clear prevalence of autoinflammatory conditions and seronegative manifestations. The great majority of patients had mild features and showed a good response to therapy.

Anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis: an update from bench to bedside.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the recent developments about anti-MDA5 antibody positive dermatomyositis with a focus on its pathogenesis, clinical features and treatment options of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, its most ominous complication. RECENT FINDINGS: Anti-MDA5+ dermatomyositis has a heterogeneous clinical spectrum with different patient subsets exhibiting widely different outcomes; severe acute interstitial lung disease is the main factor impacting prognosis. The pathogenetic role of anti-MDA5 antibodies is an active area of investigation. SUMMARY: Anti-MDA5+ dermatomyositis has a wider spectrum of manifestations than previously thought. A high index of suspicion is needed not to miss atypical presentations. In the setting of acute interstitial lung involvement, once a confident diagnosis is made, an aggressive approach with early combined immunosuppression affords the best chances of survival.

Immunosuppressive therapy withdrawal after remission achievement in patients with lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: Whether immunosuppressive therapy may be safely withdrawn in lupus nephritis (LN) is still unclear. We assessed rate and predictors of flare after IS withdrawal in patients with LN in remission. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven LN treated with immunosuppressants (IS) between 1980 and 2020 were considered. Remission was defined as normal serum creatinine, proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h, inactive urine sediment, and no extra-renal SLE activity on stable immunosuppressive and/or antimalarial therapy and/or prednisone ≤5mg/day. IS discontinuation was defined as the complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy, flares according to SLEDAI Flare Index. Predictors of flare were analysed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 513 SLE patients included in our database, 270 had LN. Of them, 238 underwent renal biopsy and were treated with IS. Eighty-three patients (34.8%) discontinued IS, 46 (30) months after remission achievement. During a mean (s.d.) follow-up of 116.5 (78) months, 19 patients (22.9%) developed a flare (8/19 renal) and were re-treated; 14/19 (73.7%) re-achieved remission after restarting therapy. Patients treated with IS therapy for at least 3 years after remission achievement had the lowest risk of relapse (OR 0.284, 95% CI: 0.093, 0.867; P = 0.023). At multivariate analysis, antimalarial maintenance therapy (OR 0.194, 95% CI: 0.038, 0.978; P = 0.047), age at IS discontinuation (OR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.868, 0.997; P = 0.040), remission duration >3 years before IS discontinuation (OR 0.231, 95% CI: 0.058, 0.920; P = 0.038) were protective against disease flares. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of IS is feasible in LN patients in remission for at least 3 years and on antimalarial therapy. Patients who experience flares can re-achieve remission with an appropriate treatment.

High plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels during quiescent phases are associated to severe antiphospholipid syndrome subsets.

OBJECTIVES: High plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels are considered a clear sign of complement activation. We aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of these two complement activation products during quiescent phases of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) by comparing their plasma levels in the different clinical subsets and relating them to the clinical characteristics and antiphospholipid antibody profile of the patients. METHODS: The three patient subsets studied were: i) thrombotic patients responsive to anti-vitamin K therapy (TAPS); ii) patients with refractory to vitamin K antagonists recurrent thrombosis (RAPS); iii) patients diagnosed with catastrophic APS (CAPS). Plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels were assessed using commercial ELISA assays. RESULYTS: Sixty-two quiescent APS patients were recruited: 40 were affected by TAPS, 13 by RAPS and 9 by CAPS. Data analysis showed that the TAPS patients had significantly lower levels of both complement activation products with respect to the RAPS and CAPS patients. In addition, C5a and/or C5b-9 significantly prevailed in the patients with small-vessel thrombosis, just as C5b-9 did in the triple antiphospholipid antibody positive patients. The ROC curve showed that the best cut-offs for C5a and C5b-9 levels had a higher sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio in the CAPS and RAPS groups than they did in the TAPS subset. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the persistence of high plasma C5b-9 and C5a levels during quiescent phases identifies APS patients with more severe disease who may develop rethrombosis and benefit from complement inhibition treatment during an acute disease phase.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) enables accurate and user-friendly definitions of clinical remission and categories of disease activity.

OBJECTIVES: There is an unmet need for accurate and user-friendly definitions of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and remission. We aimed to derive and validate the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) definitions for disease activity categories and clinical remission state. METHODS: Derivation was conducted at Padova Lupus Clinic (Italy). Validation was prospectively performed at Cochin Lupus Clinic (France) and by post hoc analysis of BLISS-76 trial. At each clinic, an expert classified patients in three categories: remission, mild or moderate/severe activity. The SLE-DAS cut-offs were derived using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in Padova cohort; its performance was assessed against expert classification in Cochin cohort and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index in BLISS-76. Gold standard for clinical remission state was the fulfilment of Definition Of Remission In SLE. A Boolean and an index-based definitions of remission were sustained by chi-square automatic interaction detection algorithm. An SLE-DAS online calculator was developed and tested. RESULTS: We included 1190 patients with SLE: 221 in the derivation cohort and 969 in the validation cohorts (150 from Cochin; 819 from BLISS-76). Derived cut-offs were: remission, SLE-DAS ≤2.08; mild activity, 2.087.64. Regarding validation in Cochin cohort, sensitivity and specificity are above 90%, 82% and 95% for remission, mild and moderate/severe activity, respectively. The SLE-DAS Boolean-based and index-based remission showed sensitivity of 100% and specificity above 97%. CONCLUSION: The SLE-DAS is an accurate and easy-to-use tool for defining SLE clinical remission state and disease activity categories, validated against expert assessment and BILAG.

Durable renal response and safety with add-on belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis in real-life setting (BeRLiSS-LN). Results from a large, nationwide, multicentric cohort.

BACKGROUND: Belimumab was recently approved for treatment of lupus glomerulonephritis (LN). AIM: To evaluate renal response and its predictors in LN patients receiving belimumab in real-life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We considered all patients fulfilling the SLEDAI-2K renal items and/or having estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)≤60 ml/min/1.73 m2, with positive anti-dsDNA and/or low C3/C4 enrolled in the multicentre Italian lupus cohort BeRLiSS (BElimumab in Real LIfe Setting Study), treated with monthly IV Belimumab 10 mg/kg over standard treatment. Primary efficacy renal response (PERR), defined as proteinuria ≤0.7 g/24 h, eGFR≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 without rescue therapy, was considered as primary outcome. Complete renal response (CRR; proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h, eGFR≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2) was considered as secondary outcome. Prevalence and predictors of PERR were evaluated at 6, 12, 24 months by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 466 SLE patients of BeRLiSS, 91 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 79 females, median age 41.0 (33.0-47.0) years, median follow-up 22.0 (12.0-36.0) months. Sixty-four (70.3%) achieved PERR, of whom 38.4% reached CRR. Among patients achieving PERR at 6 months, 86.7% maintained response throughout the follow-up. At multivariable analysis, hypertension (OR [95%CI]: 0.28 [0.09-0.89], p = 0.032), high baseline serum creatinine (0.97 [0.95-0.99], p = 0.01) and high baseline proteinuria (0.37, [0.19-0.74], p = 0.005) negatively predicted PERR. Positive predictors of PERR at 12 and 24 months were baseline anti-Sm positivity (OR [95%CI]: 6.2 [1.21-31.7], p = 0.029; 19.8 [2.01-186.7], p = 0.009, respectively) and having achieved PERR at 6 months (14.4 [3.28-63.6]; 11.7 [2.7-48.7], p = 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Add-on therapy with belimumab led to durable renal response in patients with LN in a real-life setting.

Prevalence, outcome and management of patients with SLE and secondary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome after aPL seroconversion.

OBJECTIVE: The withdrawal of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with SLE and secondary aPL syndrome (SAPS) who become seronegative has not been clearly investigated to date. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of aPL seroconversion and the prognosis of SLE patients with SAPS who withdrew OAC after aPL negativization. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of all SLE patients (ACR criteria) with SAPS (Sydney criteria) prospectively followed-up in our clinic. aPL seroconversion was defined as negativization of lupus anticoagulant, aCL, and anti-ß2glycoprotein-1 antibodies on two or more consecutive measurements, at least 12 weeks apart. OAC discontinuation was defined as the definitive withdrawal of all anticoagulants. RESULTS: Fifty-five out of 513 (10.7%) SLE patients had vascular SAPS. Sixteen patients (29.1%) became aPL seronegative during follow-up. Immunosuppressive therapy predicted aPL negativization (odds ratio 5.211, 95%CI 1.341, 20.243), whereas APS diagnosis prior to that of SLE (odds ratio 0.078, 95%CI 0.008, 0.799) and triple-positive profile (odds ratio 0.264, 95%CI 0.115, 0.609) were negative predictors of aPL negativization. OAC was discontinued in 13/55 patients (23.6%), after a median follow-up of 45 months (range 1-276) from aPL seroconversion. SLE-related modifiable risk factors for thrombosis were observed in 10/13 patients (77%) at the time of the thrombotic event. No thrombotic recurrences were observed during a mean follow-up time of 44 (19) months from OAC discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that OAC can be safely discontinued in SLE patients who became persistently seronegative for aPL, at least when aPL-related thrombotic events occurred in presence of other thrombotic risk factors.

Baseline characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus patients included in the Lupus Italian Registry of the Italian Society for Rheumatology.

OBJECTIVE: To report baseline data of SLE patients enrolled in the Lupus Italian Registry (LIRE). METHODS: Patients affected by SLE aged ≥ 16 years were consecutively recruited in a multicenter prospective study comparing two cohorts: patients starting biologic immunosuppressants (BC) and patients starting non-biologic immunosuppresants (NBC). RESULTS: 308 patients were enrolled, 179 in NBC and 129 in BC. Mean age at disease onset and at diagnosis was significantly higher in NBC (p = 0.023, p = 0.045, respectively). Disease duration was longer in BC (p = 0.022). Patients in BC presented arthritis more frequently (p = 0.024), those in NBC nephropathy (p = 0.03). Quality of life was worse in BC (p = 0.031). Anti-dsDNA, low C3, were significantly more frequent in BC (p < 0.001, p = 0.009, respectively). Mycophenolate, methotrexate and azathioprine were the drugs more frequently prescribed in NBC, Belimumab and Rituximab in BC. CONCLUSION: The predominant organ involvement was different in the two cohorts: kidney involvement predominated in NBC, joint involvement in BC. Despite the younger age at disease onset, patients of the BC had a longer disease duration and more frequently had taken a cumulative prednisone dosage greater than 10 g. Even the pattern of clinical manifestations inducing to prescribe biological rather than conventional immunosuppressants was quite different.Keywords: Autoantibody(ies), autoimmune disease, belimumab, cohort studies, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, rituximab, systemic lupus erythematosus.

Remission in systemic lupus erythematosus: testing different definitions in a large multicentre cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Remission in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is defined through a combination of 'clinical SLE Disease Activity Index (cSLEDAI)=0', 'physician's global assessment (PGA) <0.5' and 'prednisone (PDN) ≤5 mg/day'. We investigated the performance of these items, alone or in combination, in defining remission and in predicting SLICC/ACR Damage Index. METHODS: We tested seven potential definitions of remission in SLE patients followed-up for ≥5 years: PDN ≤5 mg/day; PGA <0.5; cSLEDAI=0; PGA <0.5 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day; cSLEDAI=0 plus PGA <0.5; cSLEDAI=0 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day; cSLEDAI=0 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day plus PGA <0.5. The effect of these definitions on damage was evaluated by Poisson regression analysis; the best performance was identified as the lowest Akaike and Bayesian information criterion (AIC and BIC). Positive and negative predictive values in identifying no damage increase were calculated. RESULTS: We included 646 patients (mean±SD disease duration 9.2±6.9 years). At multivariate analysis, ≥2 consecutive year remission according to all definitions protected against damage (OR, 95% CI: PGA <0.5 0.631, 0.444 to 0.896; cSLEDAI=0 0.531, 0.371 to 0.759; PGA <0.5 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day 0.554, 0.381 to 0.805; cSLEDAI=0 plus PGA <0.5 0.574, 0.400 to 0.826; cSLEDAI=0 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day 0.543, 0.376 to 0.785; cSLEDAI=0 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day plus PGA <0.5 0.532, 0.363 to 0.781, p<0.01 for all), except PDN ≤5 mg/day, which required four consecutive years (OR 0.534, 95% CI 0.325 to 0.877, p=0.013). Positive and negative predictive values were similar; however, cSLEDAI=0 showed the best performance (AIC 1082.90, BIC 1109.72, p<0.0001). Adding PGA <0.5 and/or PDN ≤5 mg/day to cSLEDAI=0 decreased remission duration (-1.8 and -1.5 year/patient, respectively) without increasing cSLEDAI=0 performance in predicting damage accrual. CONCLUSIONS: cSLEDAI=0 is the most attainable definition of remission, while displaying the best performance in predicting damage progression in the short-to-mid-term follow-up.

Prevalence and predictors of flare after immunosuppressant discontinuation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in remission.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with SLE are often exposed to prolonged immunosuppression since few data on flare recurrence in remitted patients who discontinued immunosuppressants are available. We aimed to assess the rate and predictors of flare after immunosuppressant withdrawal in SLE patients in remission. METHODS: SLE patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2018 (according to the ACR criteria), ever treated with immunosuppressants and currently in follow-up were considered. Immunosuppressant discontinuation was defined as complete withdrawal of any immunosuppressive drug. Reasons for discontinuation were remission, defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K = 0 on a stable immunosuppressive and/or antimalarial therapy and/or on prednisone ⩽5 mg/day, or poor adherence/intolerance. Flares were defined according to the SLEDAI Flare Index. Predictors of a subsequent flare were analysed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 319 eligible patients out of 456 (69.9%). Of the 319 patients, 139 (43.5%) discontinued immunosuppressants, 105 (75.5%) due to remission, 34 (24.5%) due to poor adherence/intolerance. The mean (s.d.) follow-up time after immunosuppressant withdrawal was 91 (71) months (range 6-372). Among the patients who discontinued immunosuppressants, 26/105 remitted (24.7%) and 23/34 unremitted patients (67.6%) experienced a flare (P < 0.001) after a median (range) follow-up of 57 (6-264) and 8 months (1-72), respectively (P = 0.009). In patients who discontinued immunosuppressants due to remission, maintenance therapy with antimalarials (OR 0.243, 95% CI 0.070, 0.842) and the duration of remission at immunosuppressant discontinuation (OR 0.870, 0.824-0.996) were independent protective factors against disease flare. CONCLUSION: SLE flares are not uncommon after immunosuppressant discontinuation, even in remitted patients; however, antimalarial therapy and durable remission can significantly reduce the risk of flare.

Derivation and validation of the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS): a new SLE continuous measure with high sensitivity for changes in disease activity.

OBJECTIVES: To derive and validate a new disease activity measure for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS), with improved sensitivity to change as compared with SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), while maintaining high specificity and easiness of use. METHODS: We studied 520 patients with SLE from two tertiary care centres (derivation and validation cohorts). At each visit, disease activity was scored using the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and SLEDAI 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). To construct the SLE-DAS, we applied multivariate linear regression analysis in the derivation cohort, with PGA as dependent variable. The formula was validated in a different cohort through the study of: (1) correlations between SLE-DAS, PGA and SLEDAI-2K; (2) performance of SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS in identifying a clinically meaningful change in disease activity (ΔPGA≥0.3); and (3) accuracy of SLEDAI-2K and SLE-DAS time-adjusted means in predicting damage accrual. RESULTS: The final SLE-DAS instrument included 17 items. SLE-DAS was highly correlated with PGA (r=0.875, p<0.0005) and SLEDAI-2K (r=0.943, p<0.0005) in the validation cohort. The optimal discriminative ΔSLE-DAS cut-off to detect a clinically meaningful change was 1.72. In the validation cohort, SLE-DAS showed a higher sensitivity than SLEDAI-2K (change ≥4) to detect a clinically meaningful improvement (89.5% vs 47.4%, p=0.008) or worsening (95.5% vs 59.1%, p=0.008), while maintaining similar specificities. SLE-DAS performed better in predicting damage accrual than SLEDAI-2K. CONCLUSION: SLE-DAS has a good construct validity and has better performance than SLEDAI-2K in identifying clinically significant changes in disease activity and in predicting damage accrual.

Lupus low disease activity state is associated with a decrease in damage progression in Caucasian patients with SLE, but overlaps with remission.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, duration and effect on damage accrual of the 'Lupus Low Disease Activity State' (LLDAS) in a monocentric cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: We studied 293 Caucasian patients with SLE during a 7-year follow-up period. Disease activity was assessed by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and SELENA-SLEDAI physician global assessment (PGA), and damage by Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). We considered the following definition of LLDAS: SLEDAI-2K ≤4 without major organ activity, no new disease activity, PGA (0-3)≤1, prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day and well-tolerated immunosuppressant dosages. The effect of LLDAS on SDI was evaluated by multivariate regression analysis. We also evaluated remission defined as clinical SLEDAI-2K=0 and prednisone ≤5 mg/day in patients treated with/without stable immunosuppressants and/or antimalarials. RESULTS: LLDAS lasting 1, 2, 3, 4 or ≥5 consecutive years was achieved by 33 (11.3%), 43 (14.7%), 39 (13.3%), 31 (10.6%) and 109 (37.2%) patients, respectively. Patients who spent at least two consecutive years in LLDAS had significantly less damage accrual compared with patients never in LLDAS (p=0.001), and they were significantly less likely to have an increase in SDI (OR 0.160, 95% CI 0.060 to 0.426, p<0.001). On average, 84% of patients in LLDAS also fulfilled the criteria for remission. CONCLUSIONS: LLDAS was associated with a decrease in damage progression in Caucasian patients with SLE. The majority of patients in LLDAS were in remission, which can largely contribute to the protective effect of LLDAS on damage accrual.

Changing patterns in clinical-histological presentation and renal outcome over the last five decades in a cohort of 499 patients with lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in demographic, clinical and histological presentation, and prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied a multicentre cohort of 499 patients diagnosed with LN from 1970 to 2016. The 46-year follow-up was subdivided into three periods (P): P1 1970-1985, P2 1986-2001 and P3 2002-2016, and patients accordingly grouped based on the year of LN diagnosis. Predictors of patient and renal survival were investigated by univariate and multivariate proportional hazards Cox regression analyses. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A progressive increase in patient age at the time of LN diagnosis (p<0.0001) and a longer time between systemic lupus erythematosus onset and LN occurrence (p<0.0001) was observed from 1970 to 2016. During the same period, the frequency of renal insufficiency at the time of LN presentation progressively decreased (p<0.0001) and that of isolated urinary abnormalities increased (p<0.0001). No changes in histological class and activity index were observed, while chronicity index significantly decreased from 1970 to 2016 (p=0.023). Survival without end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was 87% in P1, 94% in P2% and 99% in P3 at 10 years, 80% in P1 and 90% in P2 at 20 years (p=0.0019). At multivariate analysis, male gender, arterial hypertension, absence of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, increased serum creatinine, and high activity and chronicity index were independent predictors of ESRD. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical presentation of LN has become less severe in the last years, leading to a better long-term renal survival.