The influence of lymphadenectomy on the prognosis of small intestinal stromal tumors: a study based on the SEER database.

BACKGROUND: Small intestinal stromal tumors (SISTs) typically require surgical treatment. However, the impact of lymphadenectomy (LA) on long-term prognosis in patients remains unclear. Therefore, we plan to analyze the effect of LA on the prognosis of patients with SISTs using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: Data on SISTs patients between 2000 and 2019 were obtained from the SEER database. Multiple imputation (MI) was employed to handle missing data, while propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to mitigate selection bias in the comparative assessments between the LA group and the No-LA group. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: A total of 2412 patients diagnosed with SISTs were included in the study, with 879 undergoing LA and 1533 not undergoing LA. There were no significant differences observed between the two cohorts concerning long-term OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.13, P = 0.720) and CSS (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.86-1.29, P = 0.622). After PSM, 1596 patients (798 in the LA group and 789 in the No-LA group) were matched for comparison. There was also no difference in long-term OS and CSS between the two groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that in the age group > 60 years, the CSS in the No-LA group was superior to that in the LA group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, M stage, marital status, and mitotic rate are significant risk factors influencing OS and CSS. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting LA in patients with SISTs does not enhance long-term prognosis. For patients aged over 60 years, it may be more advisable to refrain from performing LA.

Association of Abdominal Aortic Calcification and Clinical Outcomes in LDH Patients Treated with Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.

INTRODUCTION: To determine any significant associations between abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and clinical manifestations of pain symptoms following endoscopic lumbar discectomy. METHODS: Patients sequentially presenting with a history of unilateral radiculopathy with or without back pain, and with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed diagnosis of posterolateral disc herniation between August 2021 and December 2023 were eligible for inclusion in the study. All patients underwent endoscopic discectomy at our center during the study period. AAC stages were classified based on the Kauppila classification system using lateral lumbar radiographs. RESULTS: Between August 2021 and December 2023 a total of 120 patients were included in the study for analysis, of whom 82 (68.3%) exhibited mild AAC and 38 (31.7%) had moderate-severe AAC. Analyses using the multivariate linear regression model revealed a significant correlation between AAC comorbidity and postoperative clinical outcomes. At 1 year post-surgery, the mean change in leg pain following endoscopic lumbar discectomy was significantly less for patients with moderate-severe AAC (5.0 points) than for patients with mild ACC (p < 0.001). Even after adjusting for relevant confounders, this difference remained significant. Similar results were also observed in the postoperative improvement of back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index score, and the physical functioning, role physical, and bodily pain components of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire. There was no significant difference in the rate of repeat surgery or post-surgical new-onset back pain between patients with different levels of severity of AAC at 1 year post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant association between the severity of AAC and clinical outcomes among patients with lumbar disk herniation who underwent endoscopic lumbar discectomy. AAC may serve as a prognostic factor in predicting surgical outcomes and guiding management strategies for patients with lumbar disk herniation following endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

The diagnostic accuracy of infrared thermography in lumbosacral radicular pain: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: To identify the sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy of infrared thermography in diagnosing lumbosacral radicular pain. METHODS: Patients sequentially presenting with lower extremity pain were enrolled. A clinical certainty score ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the likelihood of lumbosacral radicular pain, with higher scores indicating higher likelihood. Infrared Thermography scans were performed and the temperature difference (ΔT) was calculated as ΔT = T1 - T2, where T2 represents the skin temperature of the most painful area on the affected limb and T1 represents the skin temperature of the same area on the unaffected limb. Upon discharge from the hospital, two independent doctors diagnosed lumbosacral radicular pain based on intraoperative findings, surgical effectiveness, and medical records. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included in the study, with the adjudicated golden standard diagnosis revealing that 101 (62%) patients had lumbosacral radicular pain, while the lower extremity pain in 61 patients was attributed to other diseases. The optimal diagnostic value for ΔT was identified to fall between 0.8℃ and 2.2℃, with a corresponding diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 80%, 89%, and 66% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the clinical certainty score were reported as 69%, 62%, and 79% respectively. Combining the clinical certainty score with ΔT yielded a diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 84%, 77%, and 88% respectively. CONCLUSION: Infrared thermography proves to be a highly sensitive tool for diagnosing lumbosacral radicular pain. It offers additional diagnostic value in cases where general clinical evaluation may not provide conclusive results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2300078786, 19/22/2023.