Penile Doppler ultrasound study in priapism: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Penile Doppler ultrasound (PDU) is suggested to be an alternative to blood gas analysis (BGA) from the corpora cavernosa in differentiating between high- and low-flow priapisms, with limited supportive evidence. AIM: To compare penile Doppler ultrasound study and blood gas analysis in the diagnosis of priapism, through a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: Studies were identified by literature search of Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.Gov. Studies were included if their participants had priapism evaluated by Penile Doppler ultrasound, and reported data on the blood gas analysis or pudendal artery angiography (PAA). Two authors independently extracted the articles using predetermined datasets, including indicators of quality. OUTCOMES: Correlation of penile Doppler ultrasound with blood gas analysis and pudendal artery angiography. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. Three studies compared Penile Doppler ultrasound to blood gas analysis and pudendal artery angiography. Penile Doppler ultrasound was used as adjunctive to blood gas analysis to differentiate low flow from high flow priapism, guidance for embolization, etiological diagnosis in three studies. Compared to pudendal artery angiography, penile Doppler ultrasound had a sensitivity of 40-100% and a specificity of 73%, to localize vascular injury and anatomical abnormalities (two studies). Penile Doppler ultrasound was also used for the follow-up after the treatment of priapism (two studies). No study reported an impact on functional results or a delay of management due to penile Doppler ultrasound use. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: We reviewed evidence on penile Doppler ultrasound study in priapism. Penile Doppler ultrasound study performance was comparable to blood gas from corpus cavernosum. It is recommended to use doppler as an alternative diagnostic tool. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Our systematic review had limitations. Firstly, the number of cases in the included studies was small. Secondly, these studies were all retrospective. Lastly, few data were reported with regards to hemodynamic parameters of penile Doppler ultrasound, and the majority of studies did not describe these in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supports that penile Doppler ultrasound is a reliable way for differentiating high-flow and low-flow priapism. We recommend penile Doppler ultrasound study as an alternative of blood gas analysis from corpus cavernosum, especially when the latter is not available. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Ileal conduit vs orthotopic neobladder: Which one offers the best health-related quality of life in patients undergoing radical cystectomy? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Orthotopic neobladder (ONB) and ileal conduit (IC) are the most commonly practiced techniques of urinary diversion (UD) after radical cystectomy (RC) in bladder cancer patients. Data in the literature is still discordant regarding which UD technique offers the best HR-QoL. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare HR-QoL in patients undergoing ONB and IC after RC, through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, CochraneLibrary and ClinicalTrials.Gov in September 2017 according to the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes. The studies were evaluated according to the "Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine" criteria. The outcome measures evaluated were subdomains' scores of Bladder Cancer Index BCI: urinary function (UF), urinary bother (UB), bowel function (BF), bowel bother (BB), sexual function (SF) and sexual bother (SB). Continuous outcomes were compared using weighted means differences, with 95% confidence intervals. The presence of publication bias was examined by funnel plots. RESULTS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results demonstrated better UF and UB scores in IC patients: differences were -18.17 (95% CI: -27.49, -8.84, P=0.0001) and -3.72 (95% CI: -6.66, -0.79, P=0.01) respectively. There was no significant difference between IC and ONB patients in terms of BF and BB. SF was significantly better in ONB patients: the difference was 12.7 (95% CI, 6.32, 19.08, P<0.0001). However no significant difference was observed regarding SB. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of non-randomized studies demonstrated a better HR-QoL in urinary outcomes in IC patients compared with ONB patients.

[Does chewing gum improve postoperative results in patients undergoing radical cystectomy? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis]. / Le chewing-gum améliore-t-il les résultats postopératoires chez les patients opérés d'une cystectomie radicale ? Revue systématique de la littérature et méta-analyse.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative ileus occurs in different degrees, in the majority of patients undergoing radical cystectomy, which may increase the length of hospital stay. The use of chewing gum has demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing time-to-bowel function and the length of hospital stay in several surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of post-operative chewing gum use in patients undergoing radical cystectomy through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a literature search of MedLine, Scopus, CochraneLibrary and ClinicalTrials.Gov in March 2017 according to the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes. The studies were evaluated according to the "Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine" criteria. The outcome measures evaluated were time-to-flatus, time-to-defecation, length of the hospital stay, and the rates of general and gastrointestinal postoperative complications. Continuous and dichotomous variables were compared respectively using weighted means differences and odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals. The presence of publication bias was examined by funnel plots. RESULTS: Three studies (including 274 patients in total) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results demonstrated a 11.82hour reduction in time-to-flatus (95 % CI : -15.43, -8.22h, P <0.00001), and 19.57hours in time-to-defecation (95 % CI : -29.33, -9.81h, P <0.0001), and a decreasing trend of 2.85 days in the length of the hospital stay (95 % CI : -6.13, -0.43, P=0.09), by the use of chewing gum. There was no significant difference between the "chewing gum" and "control" groups in terms of general and gastrointestinal complications (Peto Odds ratio 1.04 [0.60, 1.79], 95 % CI, P=0.89 and Peto Odds ratio 0.65 [0.26, 1.61], 95 % CI, P=0.35 respectively). CONCLUSION: Chewing gum may be recommended postoperatively in patients undergoing radical cystectomy to improve time-to-bowel function.

[Retroperitoneal leiomyoma: a case report]. / Léiomyome rétro-péritonéal: à propos d'un cas.

Retroperitoneal leiomyoma is a rare benign tumor of the retroperitoneum. We report a clinical case of a 43-year-old patient, who suffered from back pain and weight loss. Imaging revealed a retroperitoneal mass, then the patient had a total excision of the tumor. Histological examination of the surgical specimen concluded to retroperitoneal leiomyoma. The evolution was good without recurrence after 12 months.

[History of pelvic prolapse]. / L'histoire de prolapsus pelviens.

The history of pelvic prolapse back to the era of the pharaohs, about 1500 years before Christ. Hippocrates practiced succussion. Grenades, pieces of soaked linen were used as pessaries.Over the centuries, the eolution in understanding of this female pathology led to different treatment modalities, some of which we can currently seem strange.

Is there a role for radical prostatectomy in the management of oligometastatic prostate cancer? A systematic review.

CONTEXT: There is a growing interest about the role of radical prostatectomy (RP) in local cancer control in oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). PURPOSE: To evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of RP in the management of oligometastatic PCa through a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review search was performed and the following bibliographic databases were accessed: PubMed, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched from January 2000 to November 2022. This was carried out by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Based on the literature search of 384 articles, 11 (511 patients) met the inclusion criteria (mean age: 65.5 yr.). Positive surgical margins were 59%. Median follow-up ranged from 13 to 64 months. Clinical progression-free survival ranged from 56% at 3 years to 45% at 7 years. Specific and overall survival rates ranged from 60 to 80.5% and 78 to 80% at 5 years, respectively. Clavien ≥3 complications ranged from 0 to 21%. The urinary incontinence rate was 14.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to published studies, RP of oligometastatic PCa appears to be safe with acceptable morbidity in selected patients. The lack of a consensual definition, the low level of evidence and the bias of the comparative and retrospective studies available do not allow practical recommendations to be made. There is currently no place for metastatic surgery outside of participation in a clinical trial.