Evaluation of CPAP adherence in bariatric patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea: outcomes of a multicenter cohort study.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent but mostly undiagnosed in obese patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. To prevent cardiopulmonary complications, many clinics perform preoperative OSA screening. Consequently, adequate adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is essential but challenging. We aimed to evaluate CPAP adherence and its influence on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter cohort study, we compared different perioperative strategies for handling undiagnosed OSA in bariatric patients. In this subgroup analysis, patients newly diagnosed with OSA were compared to those with pre-existing OSA. We assessed inadequate CPAP adherence, defined as < 4 h/night, between the preoperative period and 6 months postoperative. Cardiopulmonary complications and (un)scheduled ICU admissions were also evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 272 patients with newly diagnosed OSA (67.4%) and 132 patients with pre-existing OSA (32.6%) were included. Before surgery, 41 newly diagnosed patients used CPAP inadequately, compared to 5 patients with pre-existing OSA (15% vs. 4%, p = 0.049). Six months after surgery, inadequate CPAP use increased to 73% for newly diagnosed patients and 39% for patients with pre-existing OSA, respectively (p < 0.001). Incidences of cardiopulmonary complications, scheduled, and unscheduled ICU admissions were similar in the two study groups (p = 0.600, p = 0.972, and p = 0.980, respectively). CONCLUSION: Inadequate CPAP adherence is higher in bariatric patients newly diagnosed with OSA when compared to patients with pre-existing OSA. Strategies to increase CPAP adherence may be valuable when considering routine OSA screening and CPAP therapy in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Further studies are needed to improve current guidelines on perioperative OSA management of obese patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: POPCORN study, registered at Netherlands Trial Register, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6805 . ID no: 6805.

Complications and predictors associated with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea in bariatric surgery: Evaluation of routine obstructive sleep apnoea screening.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a breathing disorder resulting in blockage of airflow and hypo-oxygenation. The incidence of OSA in patients with class 2 or 3 obesity (Body Mass index, BMI >35) is 60-70%. Unfortunately, most bariatric patients are unaware they suffer from OSA. Untreated OSA can lead to perioperative cardiopulmonary complications. The aim of this study was to identify predictors associated with moderate to severe OSA and asses the incidence of OSA-related complications in a large cohort of patients who underwent OSA-screening and treatment if indicated before bariatric surgery. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery between September 2013 and September 2019 were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential predictors for moderate to severe OSA using sleep studies. RESULTS: A total of 2872 patients who underwent bariatric surgery were included for analysis. Overall, OSA was identified in 62.5% of all patients and moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥15) in 28.6%. Independent predictors for moderate to severe OSA were male gender (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), preoperative BMI (p < 0.001), preoperative waist circumference (p < 0.001), hypertension (p < 0.001), and dyslipidaemia (p = 0.046). The incidence of OSA-related complications was low (0.8%) and not significantly different among the different OSA severity classes. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to assess OSA presence and OSA-related complications in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The incidence of potential OSA-related complications was low (0.8%). We believe focus could be shifted towards more cost-efficient strategies where OSA screening is omitted such as perioperative continuous monitoring.

Validation of a Scoring System to Distinguish Uncomplicated From Complicated Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that uncomplicated appendicitis can be treated conservatively with antibiotics. It is important to select only those patients with uncomplicated appendicitis when considering conservative management. Recently, a scoring system based on clinical evaluation and ultrasound was developed to improve this selection and aid in shared decision making when considering an antibiotics-first strategy. The aim of this study was to externally validate the scoring system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all adult patients presenting to the emergency department between January 2014 and January 2017 with suspected acute appendicitis based on clinical evaluation and ultrasound was performed. For every patient, a score was calculated using the previously described scoring system. A final diagnosis, subdivided into complicated appendicitis, uncomplicated appendicitis, complicated alternative disease, and uncomplicated alternative disease, was assigned to every patient based on operative findings. RESULTS: A total of 678 patients with suspected acute appendicitis based on clinical and ultrasonography findings were identified, of whom 175 (25.8%) had complicated appendicitis, 491 (72.4%) had uncomplicated appendicitis, and 12 (1.8%) had an alternative disease. Of the 678 patients, 272 had a score of five points or less, of whom 17 (6.2%) had complicated appendicitis, giving a negative predictive value of 93.8%. CONCLUSIONS: With the scoring system based on clinical and ultrasonography features, 93.8% of patients predicted to have uncomplicated appendicitis were correctly identified. The scoring system could help identify patients suitable for conservative management in future studies.

Multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing ferric(III)carboxymaltose infusion with oral iron supplementation in the treatment of preoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: At least a third of patients with a colorectal carcinoma who are candidate for surgery, are anaemic preoperatively. Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In general practice, little attention is paid to these anaemic patients. Some will have oral iron prescribed others not. The waiting period prior to elective colorectal surgery could be used to optimize a patients' physiological status. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of preoperative intravenous iron supplementation in comparison with the standard preoperative oral supplementation in anaemic patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, patients with an M0-staged colorectal carcinoma who are scheduled for curative resection and with a proven iron deficiency anaemia are eligible for inclusion. Main exclusion criteria are palliative surgery, metastatic disease, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy = no exclusion) and the use of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin within three months before inclusion or a blood transfusion within a month before inclusion. Primary endpoint is the percentage of patients that achieve normalisation of the haemoglobin level between the start of the treatment and the day of admission for surgery. This study is a superiority trial, hypothesizing a greater proportion of patients achieving the primary endpoint in favour of iron infusion compared to oral supplementation. A total of 198 patients will be randomized to either ferric(III)carboxymaltose infusion in the intervention arm or ferrofumarate in the control arm. This study will be performed in ten centres nationwide and one centre in Ireland. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of preoperative iron supplementation in exclusively anaemic patients with a colorectal carcinoma. Our trial hypotheses a more profound haemoglobin increase with intravenous iron which may contribute to a superior optimisation of the patient's condition and possibly a decrease in postoperative morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov: NCT02243735 .

Evaluation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score for patients with acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is still a difficult diagnosis. Scoring systems are designed to aid in the clinical assessment of patients with acute appendicitis. The Alvarado score is the most well known and best performing in validation studies. The purpose of the present study was to externally validate a recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score and compare it to the Alvarado score. METHODS: The present study selected consecutive patients who presented with suspicion of acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2009. Variables necessary to evaluate the scoring systems were registered. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. RESULTS: The present study included 941 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis. There were 410 male patients (44%) and 531 female patients (56%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AIR score was 0.96 and significantly better than the area under the curve of 0.82 of the Alvarado score (p < 0.05). The AIR score also outperformed the Alvarado score when analyzing the more difficult patients, including women, children, and the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: This study externally validates the AIR Score for patients with acute appendicitis. The scoring system has a high discriminating power and outperforms the Alvarado score.

Risk Factors Associated with Prolonged Hospital Stay and Readmission in Patients After Primary Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has resulted in a decrease in length of hospital stay of patients after bariatric surgery. The general length of hospital stay is 1 day. Some bariatric patients stay longer after an uncomplicated procedure or are readmitted for varying reasons. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to identify risk factors associated with prolonged hospital stay and readmissions. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients who underwent a primary procedure (i.e. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) between January 2016 and January 2019 was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1669 patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (70.7%) or sleeve gastrectomy (29.3%) were included. The median length of stay was 1 day (range 1-69 days). In 138 patients (8.3%), a postoperative complication was diagnosed and 89 patients were readmitted (5.3%) within 30 days after discharge. Overall, 348 patients (20.9%) stayed longer than 1 day. Univariable analysis showed that depression, ASA III, sleeve gastrectomy and a perioperative and/or postoperative complication were significantly (p value < 0.05) associated with a prolonged stay. In the multivariable model depression, sleeve gastrectomy and postoperative complication were independent risk factors for prolonged stay. Univariable analysis of risk factors associated with readmission identified depression and perioperative and postoperative complications. Multivariable analysis for readmission demonstrated only presence of a postoperative complication was an independent risk factor. CONCLUSION: Depression, sleeve gastrectomy and postoperative complications were independent risk factors for prolonged stay. Postoperative complication was an independent risk factor for readmission.

Feasibility of Postoperative Home Monitoring Using Video Consultation and Vital Sign Monitoring of Bariatric Patients.

RATIONALE: The length of hospital stay after bariatric surgery has decreased rapidly in recent years to an average of 1 day (one midnight). The transition from a controlled hospital environment to home environment may be a big step for patients. For these patients, home monitoring can be a substitute. METHODS: A pilot study of 84 morbidly obese patients undergoing either laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LGS) was performed. Home monitoring consisted of daily contact via video consultation and measurement of vital signs at home. The primary outcome was feasibility of home monitoring. Secondary outcomes were complications and patient satisfaction measured with a questionnaire (PSQ-18). RESULTS: In 77 of the 84 patients (92%), videoconference was possible on day 1, 74 patients (88%) on day 2 and 76 patients (90%) on day 3. Four patients (5%) were never reached. On day 1, 52 patients (62%) performed all instructed measurements, on day 2, 49 patients (58%) and on day 3, 63 patients (75%). Only 47 out of 84 patients (56%) measured the instructed amount of times on all 3 days. High satisfaction rates were reported in the patients receiving home monitoring. CONCLUSION: Our first experience with home monitoring was disappointing since home monitoring of vital signs had poor compliance and not all patients were able to use the application. Further refinement of the home monitoring tool is needed to increase compliance and utility of the tool.

The Influence of Body Contouring Surgery on Weight Control and Comorbidities in Patients After Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: A considerable number of patients experience some long-term weight regain after bariatric surgery. Body contouring surgery (BCS) is thought to strengthen post-bariatric surgery patients in their weight control and maintenance of achieved improvements in comorbidities. OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of BCS on long-term weight control and comorbidities after bariatric surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in a prospective database. All patients who underwent primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and presented for preoperative consultation of BCS in the same hospital were included in the study. Linear and logistic mixed-effect model analyses were used to evaluate the longitudinal relationships between patients who were accepted or rejected for BCS and their weight loss outcomes or changes in comorbidities. RESULTS: Of the 1150 patients who underwent primary RYGB between January 2010 and December 2014, 258 patients (22.4%) presented for preoperative consultation of BCS. Of these patients, 126 patients eventually underwent BCS (48.8%). Patients who were accepted for BCS demonstrated significant better ∆body mass index (BMI) on average over time (- 1.31 kg/m2/year, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.52 - -0.10, p = 0.034) and percent total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly different at 36 months (5.79, 95%CI 1.22 - 10.37, p = 0.013) and 48 months (6.78, 95%CI 0.93 - 12.63, p = 0.023) after body contouring consultation. Patients who were accepted or rejected did not differ significantly in the maintenance of achieved improvements in comorbidities. CONCLUSION: BCS could not be associated with the maintenance of achieved improvements in comorbidities after bariatric surgery, whereas it could be associated with improved weight loss maintenance at 36 and 48 months after body contouring consultation. This association should be further explored in a large longitudinal study.

Validation of a nomogram for predicting survival after resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Nomograms are statistical tools providing the overall probability of a specific outcome; they have shown better individual discrimination than the tumour node metastasis staging system in several cancers. The pancreatic nomogram, originally developed in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in the USA, combines clinicopathological and operative data to predict disease-specific survival at 1, 2 and 3 years from initial resection. METHODS: An external patient cohort from a retrospective pancreatic adenocarcinoma database at the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam was used to test the validity of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma nomogram. The cohort included 263 consecutive patients who had surgery between January 1985 and December 2004. RESULTS: Data for all the necessary variables were available for 256 patients (97.3 per cent). At the last follow-up, 35 patients were alive, with a median follow-up of 27 (range 3-114) months. The 1-, 2- and 3-year disease-specific survival rates were 60.8, 30.4 and 16.0 per cent respectively. The nomogram concordance index was 0.61. The calibration analysis of the model showed that the predicted survival did not significantly deviate from the actual survival. CONCLUSION: The MSKCC pancreatic cancer nomogram provided an accurate survival prediction. It may aid in counselling patients and in stratification of patients for clinical trials.

Evaluation of POSSUM for patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Comparison of operative morbidity rates after pancreatoduodenectomy between units may be misleading because it does not take into account the physiological variable of the condition of the patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) for pancreatoduodenectomy patients and to look for risk factors associated with morbidity in a high-volume center. METHODS: Between January 1993 and April 2006, 652 patients underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy, 502 of them for malignant disease. POSSUM performance was evaluated by assessing the "goodness-of-fit" with the linear analysis method. RESULTS: Overall, 332 of the 652 patients (50.9%) had one or more complication after pancreatoduodenectomy, and 9 patients (1.4%) died. POSSUM had a significant lack of fit using goodness-of-fit analysis. In multivariate analysis, one statistically significant factor associated with morbidity and not incorporated in POSSUM (P < 0.05) was identified: ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.07-2.80). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is a lack of calibration of POSSUM among patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy.

POSSUM predicts survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and to analyze whether POSSUM can predict the long-term outcome in these patients. Such a scoring system could be useful to aid in the decision between surgical and endoscopic palliation. METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 2004, 241 patients were found to have unresectable pancreatic cancer during exploratory laparotomy and underwent a double bypass procedure consisting of a gastrojejunostomy and a hepaticojejunostomy. RESULTS: Overall, 64 of 240 patients (27%) had one or more complications after bypass surgery and 4 patients (2%) died. POSSUM predicted morbidity in 114 patients (47%). The observed:predicted (O:P) ratio for morbidity was 0.56 and the model had a significant lack of fit (p < 0.001) using a goodness-of-fit analysis. The overall median survival was 7 months. The POSSUM scoring system was, however, an independent predictor of survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, POSSUM overpredicted morbidity but was an independent predictor of survival.

Pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy versus standard pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and polyps in the duodenum.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy (PPTD) was introduced as a replacement for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study analysed the results of PPTD in the Netherlands and reviewed the relevant literature. METHODS: All 26 patients who underwent PPTD for FAP in four centres in the Netherlands between January 2000 and January 2007 were compared with a group of 77 patients who had PD for ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma at one centre during the same interval. RESULTS: Morbidity rates were similar after PPTD for FAP (16 patients, 62 per cent) and PD for ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma (44 patients, 57 per cent) (P = 0.694). One patient (4 per cent) died after PPTD and two (3 per cent) after PD. A review of the literature, including patients from the present study, found that 71 patients had PPTD, with postoperative morbidity in 36 (51 per cent) and one death (1 per cent). In publications containing a total of 94 patients who underwent PD for FAP, 43 (46 per cent) developed complications and three (3 per cent) died. CONCLUSION: PPTD has similar short-term results to PD in terms of morbidity and mortality.

A systematic review of the efficacy of gum chewing for the amelioration of postoperative ileus.

BACKGROUND: Recent trials have shown promising results for the efficacy of gum chewing for the amelioration of postoperative ileus. This finding could have a major clinical impact since gum chewing is relatively harmless and cheap while postoperative ileus has a significant impact on healthcare. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of gum chewing after colorectal surgery to a standard control for the amelioration of postoperative ileus, expressed as time to flatus, time to defecation and overall hospital stay. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials with a total number of 158 patients were found. The studies were homogeneous and a meta-analysis was performed. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) of time to flatus was significantly shorter for the gum-chewing group (20 h with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 13-27). The pooled WMD of time to defecation was significantly shorter (29 h, 95% CI of 19-39). There was a non-significant trend towards a shorter postoperative hospital stay (1.3 days shorter, 95% CI of 3.2 days shorter to 0.6 days longer). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows a favorable effect of gum chewing on time to flatus and defecation but no significant effect on the hospital stay.

Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: Tumour node metastasis (TNM) staging predicts survival on the basis of the pathological extent of a tumour. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model with improved survival prediction after oesophagectomy. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had potentially curative oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction were included. Cox regression analyses were performed to examine the association between risk factors and time to death from oesophageal cancer. The concordance index, calculated after bootstrapping, was used to measure accuracy. A nomogram was designed for use in clinical practice. RESULTS: Oesophageal cancer-specific survival rates for the 364 included patients who underwent oesophagectomy between 1993 and 2003 were 75.8, 54.9 and 39.2 per cent at 1, 2 and 5 years respectively. A prognostic model using all prognostic variables outperformed TNM staging (concordance index 0.79 versus 0.68 respectively; P < 0.001). A reduced model derived after backward elimination, containing only T stage, lymph node ratio and extracapsular lymph node involvement, also outperformed TNM staging (concordance index 0.77; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A prognostic model developed to predict disease-specific survival after oesophagectomy was superior to TNM staging. More reliable prognostic information might lead to different approaches to patient follow-up.

Evaluation of O-POSSUM in predicting in-hospital mortality after resection for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were to validate the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality adjusted for oesophagogastric surgery (O-POSSUM). METHODS: Data on patients who underwent potentially curative oesophagectomy in a tertiary referral centre for adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus were analysed. The in-hospital mortality predicted by O-POSSUM was compared with the actual value by linear analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-four (3.6 per cent) of 663 patients died in hospital. The observed : predicted ratio for in-hospital mortality was 0.29. The model had a poor fit (P < 0.001). The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve was 0.60 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.47 to 0.72); P = 0.113). O-POSSUM score was not related to the severity of complications. CONCLUSION: O-POSSUM overpredicted in-hospital mortality threefold and could not identify patients at higher risk of death. O-POSSUM needs substantial modification before it can be used for comparison of treatment outcomes between centres.

Initial and long-term outcome after palliative surgical drainage of 269 patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

AIMS: This study aimed to analyse the current outcome after palliative surgical drainage of malignant biliary obstruction. METHOD: From 1992 to 2003, perioperative parameters and the incidence and indications of readmissions were analysed in 269 patients who underwent a palliative biliary bypass for periampullary carcinoma. RESULTS: Hospital mortality occurred in seven patients and median postoperative stay was 10 days. Anastomotic leakage occurred in three patients and intraabdominal haemorrhage in eight patients. Overall 75 patients experienced a complication. Nine patients underwent a relaparotomy during initial hospital admission. Overall, 142 patients were readmitted, 13 for indications related to the biliary bypass, 11 for surgery-related indications. Twenty-five patients were readmitted for radiochemotherapy, 112 for progressive disease and 23 for indications not related to the disease. Median survival was 7.5 months and the 3-year survival 3%. Survival was significantly lower in patients with metastases and in those who underwent elective bypass for gastric outlet obstruction. CONCLUSION: Current hospital mortality after palliative biliary bypass as well as readmission rates for complications related to the biliary bypass or surgical procedure are low. Surgical biliary bypass is a safe and effective palliative treatment for patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

[Centralisation of pancreatic resection: a systematic review and evaluation in the Netherlands]. / Centralisatie van pancreasoperaties: een systematische review en evaluatie in Nederland.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the volume-outcome effect of pancreatic surgery by means of a systematic review, and to determine the effect of the ongoing plea for centralisation of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Systematic review and retrospective evaluation. METHOD: A systematic search for studies comparing hospital mortality rates after pancreatic resection in high- and low-volume hospitals was conducted. The studies were independently assessed regarding design, inclusion criteria, threshold value for high and low volume and primary hospital mortality outcome. Data were obtained from the Dutch nation-wide registry on the mortality outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1994-2003. Hospitals were divided into 4 categories based on the number of pancreaticoduodenectomies performed. The effect of the ongoing plea for centralisation was analysed. RESULTS: Twelve observational studies comprising a total of 19,688 patients were included. Because the studies were too heterogeneous to allow a meta-analysis, a qualitative analysis was performed. The relative risk of dying in a high-volume hospital compared with a low-volume hospital was between 0.07 and 0.76 and was inversely proportional to the arbitrarily defined volume cut-off values. Various analyses conducted over a to-year period in the Netherlands reported mortality rates of 14-17% in hospitals that performed fewer than 5 pancreaticoduodenectomies per year, compared with rates of 0.0-3.50 degrees h in hospitals that performed more than 24 pancreaticoduodenectomies per year. The percentage of patients undergoing surgery in hospitals with a volume less than ro pancreaticoduodenectomies per year was 57% in 2000-2003 (454/792), compared with 65% (280/428) in 1994-1995. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provided evidence of an inverse relationship between hospital volume and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy and confirmed the value of centralisation of this procedure in high-volume hospitals. The 10-year-long plea of the Dutch surgical community for quality assessment and, if necessary, centralisation has not resulted in a reduction in mortality rates after pancreatic resection or a change in referral patterns in The Netherlands.

Do Complications Alter Postoperative Weight Loss 1 Year After Primary and Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass?

BACKGROUND: Around 10 % of the bariatric surgery patients experience postoperative complications (<30 days). It could be hypothesized that complications influence postoperative weight loss, which is one of the most important endpoints of bariatric surgery. Therefore, this study inventoried the effect of complications on postoperative weight loss. METHODS: A consecutive database including patients who were operated from November 2007 onwards was retrospectively reviewed. All short-term complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Weight loss was assessed at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 1130 patients underwent either primary (n = 907, 80.3 %) or revisional (n = 233, 19.7 %) surgery till October 2013. Short-term complications occurred in 115 (10.2 %) patients, of whom 48 (41.7 %) had a severe (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) complication. One year post surgery, 184 patients (16.3 %) were lost to follow-up. Patients with a short-term complication had a higher percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 6 months (58.6 (SD 16.6) versus 52.9 (SD 17.6), p = 0.003) and 1 year (71.9 (SD 22.3) versus 65.9 (SD 21.3), p = 0.017) of follow-up. Although a trend was seen toward higher BMI loss and total weight loss (TWL) after 6 months, no effect was seen 1 year postoperatively. In multivariable linear regression analysis, complications were not a significant predictor for 1-year %EWL. CONCLUSIONS: Although short-term complications alter 1-year %EWL, no effect was seen on BMI loss and TWL. In addition, complications were not a predictor in a multivariable linear regression model for 1-year %EWL. It can be concluded that short-term complications do not impair weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma; actual survival and prognostic factors in 343 patients.

Survival data of patients with pancreatic carcinoma are often overestimated because of incomplete follow-up. Therefore, the aim of this study was to approach complete follow-up and to analyse survival and prognostic factors of patients who underwent surgical treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Between 1992 and 2002, 343 patients underwent surgical treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. One hundred and sixty patients underwent a resection with a curative intention and 183 patients underwent bypass surgery for palliation. Follow-up was complete for 93% of patients. Median survival after resection and bypass was 17.0 and 7.5 months, and 5-year survival was 8% and 0, respectively. In multivariate analysis, tumour-positive lymph nodes, non-radical surgery, poor tumour differentiation, and tumour size were independent prognostic factors for survival after resection. For patients treated with bypass surgery, metastatic disease and tumour size independently predicted survival. In conclusion, actual survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is disappointing compared with the actuarial survival rates reported in the literature. The independent prognostic factors for survival of patients who underwent surgical treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma are tumour-related.