Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Dysphagia ; 31(2): 180-7, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26803774

RESUMO

This study analyzed the effect that dysphagia etiology, different observers, and bolus consistency might have on the level of agreement for measurements in FEES images reached by independent versus consensus panel rating. Sixty patients were included and divided into two groups according to dysphagia etiology: neurological or head and neck oncological. All patients underwent standardized FEES examination using thin and thick liquid consistencies. Two observers scored the same exams, first independently and then in a consensus panel. Four ordinal FEES variables were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using a linear weighted kappa coefficient and Bayesian multilevel model. Intra- and interobserver agreement on FEES measurements ranged from 0.76 to 0.93 and from 0.61 to 0.88, respectively. Dysphagia etiology did not influence observers' agreement level. However, bolus consistency resulted in decreased interobserver agreement for all measured FEES variables during thin liquid swallows. When rating on the consensus panel, the observers deviated considerably from the scores they had previously given on the independent rating task. Observer agreement on measurements in FEES exams was influenced by bolus consistency, not by dysphagia etiology. Therefore, observer agreement on FEES measurements should be analyzed by taking bolus consistency into account, as it might affect the interpretation of the outcome. Identifying factors that might influence agreement levels could lead to better understanding of the rating process and assist in developing a more precise measurement scale that would ensure higher levels of observer agreement for measurements in FEES exams.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Deglutição/diagnóstico por imagem , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Teorema de Bayes , Deglutição/fisiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/fisiopatologia , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Feminino , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 50(3): 462-4, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25746708

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The risk of malignant transformation of sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) and of presacral teratoma in Currarino syndrome (CS) may differ despite the similar position and appearance. METHODS: Malignant transformation and teratoma recurrence were assessed in a national retrospective comparative analysis of 205 SCT and 16 CS patients treated in one of the six pediatric surgical centers in the Netherlands between January 1981 and December 2010. RESULTS: The malignancy free survival of patients with SCT was lower than for patients with a presacral teratoma associated with CS (80% and 58% after one and two years in SCT versus 100% after two years in CS, p=0.017) CONCLUSIONS: In SCT, malignancy and recurrence risk are high. Therefore, early and complete resection is mandatory. Our data show that the risk of malignant transformation of a presacral teratoma in CS is small.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/anormalidades , Anormalidades do Sistema Digestório , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Reto/anormalidades , Sacro/anormalidades , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/patologia , Siringomielia , Teratoma/patologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Países Baixos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Região Sacrococcígea/patologia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Teratoma/mortalidade , Teratoma/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA