Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 67(2): 182-8, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23871753

RESUMO

Hazard characterisation is largely based on an approach of (statistically) comparing dose groups with the controls in order to derive points of departure such as no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) or lowest-observed-adverse-effect levels (LOAELs). This approach suggests the absence of any relevant effect at the NOAEL. The NOAEL approach has been debated for decades. A recent Scientific Opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded that the Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach should be preferred over the NOAEL approach for deriving human (health-based) limit or guidance values. Nonetheless, the BMD approach is used infrequently within European regulatory frameworks. The reason for this may lie in legislation or guidelines requiring the use of the NOAEL approach. In this context, various EU regulatory frameworks were examined on such demands. Interestingly, no single legislation was identified containing statutory requirements in conflict with the use of the BMD approach.


Assuntos
Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Regulamentação Governamental , Animais , Cosméticos/toxicidade , Desinfetantes/toxicidade , União Europeia , Aditivos Alimentares/toxicidade , Nível de Efeito Adverso não Observado , Praguicidas/toxicidade , Medição de Risco/legislação & jurisprudência , Drogas Veterinárias/toxicidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA