Autonomic nervous system involvement in autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

In autoimmune neurological diseases, the autonomic nervous system can be the primary target of autoimmunity (e.g. autoimmune autonomic ganglionopathy), or, more frequently, be damaged together with other areas of the nervous system (e.g. Guillain-Barré syndrome). Patients with autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) often develop dysautonomia; however, the frequency and spectrum of autonomic signs and symptoms remain ill defined except for those scenarios in which dysautonomia is a core feature of the disease. Such is the case of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, Morvan syndrome or anti-NMDAR encephalitis; in the latter, patients with dysautonomia have been reported to carry a more severe disease and to retain higher disability than those without autonomic dysfunction. Likewise, the presence of autonomic involvement indicates a higher risk of death due to neurological cause in patients with anti-Hu PNS. However, in anti-Hu and other PNS, as well as in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitors' toxicities, the characterization of autonomic involvement is frequently overshadowed by the severity of other neurological symptoms and signs. When evaluated with tests specific for autonomic function, patients with autoimmune encephalitis or PNS usually show a more widespread autonomic involvement than clinically suggested, which may reflect a potential gap of care when it comes to diagnosing dysautonomia. This review aims to revise the autonomic involvement in patients with autoimmune encephalitis and PNS, using for that purpose an antibody-based approach. We also discuss and provide general recommendations for the evaluation and management of dysautonomia in these patients.

Evaluation of interictal autonomic function during attack and remission periods in cluster headaches.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate which part of the autonomic system is mainly involved and assess the sensitivity of face sympathetic skin response in cluster headache. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of 19 drug-free cluster headache patients (16 males, three females) and 19 healthy volunteers. Demographic features and pain characteristics were thoroughly identified. Dysautonomic symptoms were evaluated during attack and remission periods of cluster headache patients. Orthostatic hypotension, R-R interval variation and sympathetic skin responses obtained from the face and four extremities were evaluated and the sensitivity of face sympathetic skin responses was assessed in contrast to extremity sympathetic skin responses. RESULTS: All sympathetic skin responses of face and extremities could be obtained during attack and remission periods. On the symptomatic side, mean latency of face sympathetic skin responses was longer compared to the asymptomatic side and controls (p = 0.02, p = 0.004). There were no differences in latency or amplitude of extremity sympathetic skin responses between symptomatic and asymptomatic sides and controls. No significant relationship was determined between sympathetic skin responses, R-R interval variation, orthostatic hypotension and cluster headache clinical features. CONCLUSION: Sympathetic hypoactivity of the face seems to predominate the pathophysiology of cluster headache. Face sympathetic skin responses might be more sensitive compared to extremity sympathetic skin response in demonstrating dysautonomic symptoms in cluster headache patients.