Awareness among patient at risk of developing Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) - A primary prevention strategy.

The quality of life, in itself, in cancer patients or in osteoporotic individuals, without even considering the side effects of the medication in the first place, has a considerable negative impact on the clinical outcome. The Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ), in the maxillofacial region, although rare, needs to be addressed with the prime importance. One of the key components of any given preventive treatment strategy is to, create awareness about the medication related unwanted effects, among health care professionals and patients. OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to explore and assess the awareness level among dental patients about MRONJ, the risk factors, and the high-risk category (who are prone to develop MRONJ). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective interviewer administered research electronic data capture (REDCap) survey. The sample included 68 patients, who are currently taking or will be taking Bisphosphonate (BP), and/or Denosumab, and anti-Angiogenic agent. Data have been analyzed using IBM SPSS software. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (18 males and 50 females), participated in this study. Only 23 subjects (33.82%) were aware about the MRONJ. Females were more aware about the complications than males. The awareness among the subjects with education at college level appears to be higher than the subjects having education less than high school level. Even though, a dental check- up, is mandatory, prior to starting these medications, to see if any dental treatment is required, only slightly more than half of the patients (54.72%) had a dental checkup. CONCLUSION: This is a novel study in the Middle- East, used to assess awareness about the MRONJ including three type of related medications. Low awareness of MRONJ is alarming. The results of the study will help to initiate the process of providing the education materials, about the side effects and importance of oral hygiene maintenance, giving priority to improve the quality of life in such patients. Awareness of patients regarding the complications must be an important part of health care practice guidelines.

Spontaneous reshaping of vertebral fractures in an adolescent with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Background: Vertebral compression fractures (VFs) are a common and severe finding in patients with osteoporosis. In children, VFs have the unique potential to reshape and regain their original configuration. Spontaneous vertebral body reshaping (i.e., medication-unassisted) has been reported in secondary osteoporosis. Here we describe a previously unreported spontaneous vertebral reshaping in an adolescent with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) with multiple vertebral fractures. Case report: A 17-year-old female was diagnosed with OI type I at 5 years of age caused by a novel frameshift variant in COL1A1 (NM_000088.4: c.540delC; p.Met181TrpfsTer84). Due to parental reservations about medication, she had never received bisphosphonate or any other bone active therapy. A lateral spine X-ray demonstrated transparent bones and no VF. However, previous spine X-rays taken at age of 6 years at an external institution showed VFs in T5-7 (Genant semiquantitative method grade I-II). The two lateral spine x-rays, taken 11 years apart, demonstrate that substantial spontaneous vertebral reshaping occurred without bone active therapy during puberty. Discussion: Vertebral reshaping is explained by the stabilization of bone mineral density (BMD) and the remaining growth capacity the children. We hypothesize that spontaneous reshaping may occur in milder forms of OI, and that puberty may be a key mediator of the phenomenon. In all children with OI and vertebral fractures, we nevertheless recommend bisphosphonate therapy since it improves bone mass, BMD, vertebral shape, physical activity and reduces fracture rates.

Experience with denosumab (XGEVA®) for prevention of skeletal-related events in the 10 years after approval.

Skeletal-related events (SREs) are complications of bone metastases and carry a significant patient and economic burden. Denosumab is a receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) inhibitor approved for SRE prevention in patients with multiple myeloma and patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. In phase 3 trials, denosumab showed superiority to the bisphosphonate zoledronate in reducing the risk of first on-study SRE by 17% (median time to first on-study SRE delayed by 8.2 months) and the risk of first and subsequent on-study SREs by 18% across multiple solid tumor types, including some patients with multiple myeloma. Denosumab also improved pain outcomes and reduced the need for strong opioids. Additionally, a phase 3 trial showed denosumab was noninferior to zoledronate in delaying time to first SRE in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Denosumab has a convenient 120 mg every 4 weeks recommended dosing schedule with subcutaneous administration. Rare but serious toxicities associated with denosumab include osteonecrosis of the jaw, hypocalcemia, and atypical femoral fracture events, with multiple vertebral fractures reported following treatment discontinuation. After a decade of real-world clinical experience with denosumab, we are still learning about the optimal use and dosing for denosumab. Despite the emergence of novel and effective antitumor therapies, there remains a strong rationale for the clinical utility of antiresorptive therapy for SRE prevention. Ongoing studies aim to optimize clinical management of patients using denosumab for SRE prevention while maintaining safety and efficacy.

The progress of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw with conservative initial treatment: A 12-year retrospective study of 129 patients.

This retrospective study aimed to examine the course and prognosis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) initially treated conservatively and the effects of various factors affecting treatment outcomes. We evaluated 129 patients with MRONJ between January 2008 and December 2018 at a university hospital. The factors examined included sex, age, stage of MRONJ (1-3), type of bone modifying agents (bisphosphonate or denosumab), primary disease (osteoporosis or malignant tumor), medical history (diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis), use of corticosteroids, the trigger of MRONJ (teeth extraction or others), and separation of sequestrum, using logistic regression analysis. Patients with MRONJ were treated conservatively as the initial treatment in accordance with the position paper of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Of the 129 patients, 59 (45.7%) were cured, and the condition of 70 (54.3%) remained unchanged or worsened. The overall cure rates at 12, 36, and 60 months were 25.8%, 50.8%, and 72.4% respectively. The cure rate of stage 1 was lower than that of stages 2 and 3 at 80 months. In multivariate analysis, it was found that 37 (64.9%) of 57 patients with osteoporosis as a primary disease were cured (odds ratio [OR], 7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-24.4). In addition, 40 (69.0%) of 58 patients with separation of sequestrum were cured (OR, 8.9; 95% CI, 3.4-23.5). The cure rate was significantly higher in patients with osteoporosis than in those with cancer when the treatment outcomes of primary disease were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method (p < 0.01). It was also significantly higher in patients who had separation of sequestrum than in those who did not (p < 0.05). Our results suggest that primary disease and separation of sequestrum were associated with favorable outcomes in patients with MRONJ initially treated conservatively. MRONJ had a poor prognosis with conventional treatment carried according to the stage of the disease. This was especially prominent when conservative treatment was employed for mild cases.

Patterns of care for patients with metastatic bone disease in solid tumors: A cross-sectional study from Switzerland (SAKK 95/16).

BACKGROUND: Bone-targeted agents (BTAs) are widely used in the management of patients with bone metastases from solid tumors, but knowledge of their routine care use and the therapeutic implications remains limited. This non-interventional study aimed to characterize real-world BTA patterns of care in Switzerland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-interventional, cross-sectional study involving oncologists from across Switzerland who completed a Treating Physician questionnaire, providing data on their clinical setting and BTA-related practices, and a Patient Characteristics and Treatment questionnaire, providing data on their patients' disease status, risk of bone complications, BTA regimen and related outcomes. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, with solid tumors and at least one bone metastasis and were receiving routine management at the participating physician's center over the 3-month study period. RESULTS: A total of 86 oncologists recruited 417 patients from across 18 centers in Switzerland (80% public hospitals; 20% private clinics). The majority of physicians (70.9%) reported prescribing BTAs in line with international guidelines; denosumab was the treatment of choice in 78.5% of patients. BTAs were widely administered (94.2%) according to a 3-4-weekly dosing regimen; 33.7% of physicians reported extending intervals to 12 weeks after an initial 2 years of treatment. Physicians appeared to use clinical judgement, as well as formal risk assessment, to guide treatment for symptomatic skeletal events. No association was seen between either BTA use, or risk of complications, and incidence of skeletal complications. Only 4.3% of patients were reported to be experiencing severe bone pain at the time of the study. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional, non-interventional study found high implementation of guideline-recommended BTA prescribing, good pain control and low incidence of skeletal-related events. Long-term BTA randomized controlled trials have the potential to further optimize routine care outcomes for patients.

Atypical femoral fractures from bisphosphonate in cancer patients - Review.

Bisphosphonates are commonly used in patients with metastatic bone disease to prevent skeletal related events. Atypical femur fracture is a known complication of long-term bisphosphonate use but the incidence in cancer patients and pathogenesis are not well known. Several mechanisms of pathogenesis have been proposed including altered angiogenesis, altered bone mechanical properties, micro damage and bone remodeling suppression. Atypical femur fractures are atraumatic or minimally traumatic fractures in the sub trochanteric region or the femoral shaft. Awareness of atypical femur fractures is critical to diagnose and treat them in a timely manner. There is a paucity of data regarding the management of atypical femur fracture in patients with malignancy. Management options of atypical femur fractures include stopping bisphosphonates, initiating calcium/vitamin D supplementation and either surgery with internal fixation or conservative management. In the future, it will be important to explore the effect of continuous vs. intermittent exposure, cumulative dose and length of exposure on the incidence of this complication. Herein, we review the epidemiology, risk factors, management options and proposed mechanisms of pathogenesis of atypical femur fractures.

Increased risk of SSEs in bone-only metastatic breast cancer patients treated with zoledronic acid.

BACKGROUND: Bone represents one of the most common sites to which breast cancer cells metastasize. Patients experience skeletal related adverse events (pathological fractures, spinal cord compressions, and irradiation for deteriorated pain on bone) even during treatment with zoledronic acid (ZA). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the predictive factors for symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) in bone-metastasized breast cancer (b-MBC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on b-MBC patients treated with ZA. Patient characteristics, including age, subtype, the presence of non-bone lesions, the presence of multiple bone metastases at the commencement of ZA therapy, duration of ZA therapy, the time interval between breast cancer diagnosis and the initiation of ZA therapy, and type of systemic therapy, presence of previous SSE were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The medical records of 183 patients were reviewed and 176 eligible patients were analyzed. The median age was 59 (range, 30-87) years. Eighty-seven patients were aged ≥60 years and 89 patients were aged < 60 years. The proportions of patients with estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease were 81.8%, 63.1%, and 17.6%, respectively. Fifty-three patients had bone-only MBC at the commencement of ZA therapy. SSEs were observed in 42 patients. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, bone-only MBC but not a breast cancer subtype was an independent risk factor for an SSE during ZA therapy (odds ratio: 3.878, 95% confidence interval: 1.647-9.481; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Bone-only MBC patients are more likely to experience an SSE even after treatment with ZA.

Correlation of baseline biomarkers with clinical outcomes and response to fulvestrant with vandetanib or placebo in patients with bone predominant metastatic breast cancer: An OCOG ZAMBONEY sub-study.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are common in women with breast cancer and often result in skeletal related events (SREs). As the angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regulates osteoclast activity and is associated with more extensive bone metastases and SRE risk in metastatic breast cancer, we hypothesized that blockade of VEGF signaling could be a therapeutic strategy for inhibiting bone metastases progression and possibly prolonging overall (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). The Zamboney trial was a randomized placebo-controlled study designed to assess whether patients with bone predominant metastatic breast cancer benefited from addition of the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) targeting agent, vandetanib, to endocrine therapy with fulvestrant. As a companion study, evaluation of biomarkers and their potential association with response to vandetanib or SRE risk was performed. METHODS: Baseline overnight fasted serum from enrolled patients was analyzed for levels of various putative biomarkers including; VEGF-A, soluble (s)VEGFR2, sVEGFR3, transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 and activinA by ELISA. Spearman correlation coefficients and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to investigate potential relationships between biomarker values and baseline clinical parameters. Prognostic and predictive ability of each marker was investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustments for treatment and baseline strata of serum CTx (<400 versus ≥400 ng/L). RESULTS: Of 129 enrolled patients, serum was available for analysis in 101; 51 in vandetanib and 50 in placebo arm. Mean age amongst consenting patients was 59.8 years. Clinical characteristics were not significantly different between patients with or without serum biomarker data and serum markers were similar for patients by treatment arm. Baseline sVEGFR2 was prognostic for OS (HR=0.77, 95% CI=0.61-0.96, p=0.020), and although a modest association was observed, it was not significant for PFS (HR=0.90, 95% CI=0.80-1.01, p=0.085) nor time to first SRE (HR=0.82, 95% CI=0.66-1.02, p=0.079). When interaction terms were evaluated, sVEGFR2 was not found to be predictive of response to vandetanib, although a modest association remained with respect to PFS (interaction p=0.085). No other marker showed any significant prognostic or predictive ability with any measured outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical trial, sVEGFR2 appeared prognostic for OS, hence validation of sVEGFR2 should be conducted. Moreover, the role of sVEGFR2 in breast cancer bone metastasis progression should be elucidated.