[Cost-effectiveness analysis of apixaban versus acetylsalicylic acid in the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain]. / Análisis coste-utilidad de apixabán frente al ácido acetilsalicílico en la prevención del ictus en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular en España.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with contraindications of vitamin K antagonists in Spain. METHODS: A Markov model was adapted, simulating the patient's lifetime. The safety and efficacy of the drugs were obtained from AVERROES clinical trial. The analysis was done from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) and societal perspective. The cost of drugs was calculated according to the recommended doses. The cost of NVAF complications and disease management was obtained from Spanish sources. RESULTS: In a cohort of 1,000 patients with NVAF, during their lifetime numerous complications could be avoided with apixaban versus ASA (48 ischemic strokes, 10 systemic embolism and 53 related deaths). In each patient treated with apixaban more life-years (0.303 LYG) and more quality-adjusted life-years (0.277 QALYs) could be gained. Apixaban would generate more costs per patient for the NHS (€1,742 per patient) but savings would result from the social perspective (€2,887 saved per patient). The cost per LYG and QALY gained would be of €5,749 and €6,289 for the NHS. Apixaban would be dominant (more effective with less costs than ASA) from the societal perspective. The results were stable in both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: According to this model, when costs and estimated lifetime outcomes achieved with apixaban are compared with those of ASA, apixaban was assessed to be a cost-effective treatment for the prevention of stroke in patients with NVAF in Spain.

[Economic evaluation studies in diagnostic imaging: justification and critical reading]. / Estudios de evaluación económica en diagnóstico por imagen. Justificación y lectura crítica.

First, this article describes the concepts and tools most widely used for economic evaluation in healthcare. Second, it discusses some elements that must be taken into account in the social decision about how much we are willing to spend to prolong a person's life by one year. Third, it describes the criteria recommended for the critical analysis of publications that evaluate the economic aspects of health interventions. Finally, several studies about ultrasound screening for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta are used as illustrative examples to show how these elements and criteria can be applied.

[Is the morbid obesity surgery profitable in times of crisis? A cost-benefit analysis of bariatric surgery]. / ¿Es rentable operar a los obesos mórbidos en tiempos de crisis? Análisis coste-beneficio de la cirugía bariátrica.

Morbid obesity is a serious health problem whose prevalence is increasing. Expensive co-morbidities are associated to these patients, as well as a reduction in the survival. Bariatric surgery resolves the co-morbidities (type 2 diabetes mellitus, 86.6%; cardiovascular risk, 79.0%; obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, 83.6%; hypertension, 61.7%), reduces the mortality rate (among 31-40%), and increases the morbid obese patients survival over a 10-years period. It provides significant savings for the National Health System. The obese patients consume a 20% plus of health resources and 68% plus of drugs than general population. Bariatric surgery requires an initial investment (diagnosis-related group cost: 7,468 €), but it is recovered in a cost-effectiveness ratio of 2.5 years. Significant savings are obtained from the third year. To the direct economic benefits associated with reduced health expenditures it should be added an increase in tax collection (sick leave and unemployment reduction is estimated in 18%, with a productivity increase of 57% for self-employed people). Bariatric surgery is one of the most cost-effective procedures in the healthcare system.

Cost-utility model of new intravitreous units vs. current patient journey model in Spain.

AIM: To compare the effectiveness and costs of the implementation of the Intravitreal Therapy Unit Model, endorsed by the SERV, SECA, SEO and SEDISA, compared to the usual procedure. METHOD: Analytical decision model that compares an UTI-type healthcare organization with 4 usual practice scenarios in Spain, in terms of quality-of-life results due to loss of visual acuity and the use of resources. The probability, cost, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated for each scenario proposed. A univariate sensitivity analysis was performed for each of the parameters used in the model. RESULT: The model showed that from any of the initial scenarios of the usual practice, transitioning to the UTI-type implementation improves the quality of life of patients and requires lower cost. UTI-type is dominant respect usual practice. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results would not change sign with the variation of any starting variable. CONCLUSIONS: Shorten suspicion-needle times is key to maintaining functional vision in patients requiring intravitreal treatment. The UTI-type model seeks the efficiency of ophthalmology services and can produce savings that vary between Є175 and Є85 per patient attended per year.

Stratified cost-utility analysis of total hip arthroplasty in displaced femoral neck fracture.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a stratified cost-utility analysis of total versus partial hip arthroplasty as a function of clinical subtype. METHOD: All cases of this type of intervention were analysed between 2010 and 2016 in the Basque Health Service, gathering data on clinical outcomes and resource use to calculate the cost and utility in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at individual level. The statistical analysis included applying the propensity score to balance the groups, and seemingly unrelated regression models to calculate the incremental cost-utility ratio and plot the cost-effectiveness plane. The interaction between age group and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk class was assessed in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The study identified 5867 patients diagnosed with femoral neck fracture, of whom 1307 and 4560 were treated with total and partial hip arthroplasty, respectively. In the cost-utility analysis based on the seemingly unrelated regression, total hip arthroplasty was found to have a higher cost and higher utility (2465€ and 0.42 QALYs). Considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €22,000 per QALY, total hip arthroplasty was cost-effective in the under-80-year-old subgroup. Among patients above this age, hemiarthroplasty was cost-effective in ASA class I-II patients and dominant in ASA class III-IV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroup analysis supports current daily clinical practice in displaced femoral neck fractures, namely, using partial replacement in most patients and reserving total replacement for younger patients.

Application of two-part models and Cholesky decomposition to incorporate covariate-adjusted utilities in probabilistic cost-effectiveness models.

This study aimed to explain a joint statistical procedure (two-part models and Cholesky decomposition) to incorporate second-order uncertainty from covariate adjusted mean utility functions in probabilistic cost-effectiveness models. First, two-part models were applied to obtain parameters for the utility function. Second, a new set of correlated parameters for each simulation was obtained by Cholesky decomposition. The procedure was applied to EuroQol5D-5L in the Spanish Health Survey (21,007 adults). An example for the first simulation showed that 71% of men aged 60 years, high social status and normal weight were in perfect health, and in those not in perfect health, the expected utility was 0.8474 (= 1 - 0.1526). Therefore, their estimated mean utility value was 0.9559. Mean utility values in the interval (- ∞1] were calculated and their associated uncertainty incorporated in the cost-effectiveness models, based on the uncertainty related to correlated parameters in the utilities function.

Cost-effectiveness of a primary care-based exercise intervention in perimenopausal women. The FLAMENCO Project.

OBJECTIVE: Adequate physical activity levels and a healthy lifestyle may prevent all kinds of non-communicable diseases, promote well-being and reduce health-care costs among perimenopausal women. This study assessed an exercise programme for perimenopausal women. METHOD: A total of 150 women (aged 45-64 years) not engaged in regular physical activity were randomly assigned to either a 16 week exercise intervention or to the control group. The study was conducted from the perspective of the National Health System. Health outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), measured by the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. The total direct costs of the programme were the costs of visits to primary care, specialty care, emergency, medicines, instructor cost and infrastructure cost. The results were expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken to test the robustness of the analysis. RESULTS: Mean QALYs over 16 weeks were.228 in the control group and.230 in the intervention group (mean difference: .002; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: -0.005 to 0.009). Improvements from baseline were greater in the intervention group in all dimensions of the EuroQol-5D-5L but not statistically significant. The total costs at the end of the intervention were 160.38 € in the control group and 167.80 € in the intervention group (mean difference: 7.42 €; 95%CI: -47 to 62). The exercise programme had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 4,686 €/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: The programme could be considered cost-effective, although the overall difference in health benefits and costs was very modest. Longer term follow-up is needed.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sensor-augmented pump therapy with low glucose-suspend in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and high risk of hypoglycemia in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of sensor-augmented pump therapy (SAP) [continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) plus real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM)] with low glucose suspend (MiniMed™ Veo™) and CSII alone in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) at high risk of hypoglycemia in Spain. METHODS: The IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model was used to estimate healthcare outcomes as life-years gained (LYGs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and to project lifetime costs. Information about efficacy, resource utilization, and unit costs (€2016) was taken from published sources and validated by an expert panel. Analyses were performed from both the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective and the societal perspective. RESULTS: From the NHS perspective, SAP with low glucose suspend was associated to a €47,665 increase in direct healthcare costs and to increases of 0.19 LYGs and 1.88 QALYs, both discounted, which resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €25,394/QALY. From the societal perspective, SAP with low glucose suspend increased total costs (including direct and indirect healthcare costs) by €41,036, with a resultant ICER of €21,862/QALY. Considering the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000/QALY in Spain, SAP with low glucose suspend represents a cost-effective option from both the NHS and societal perspectives. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model. CONCLUSIONS: From both the Spanish NHS perspective and the societal perspective, SAP with low glucose suspend is a cost-effective option for the treatment of T1DM patients at high risk of hypoglycemia.

Stratified cost-utility analysis of total hip arthroplasty in displaced femoral neck fracture / Análisis de coste-utilidad estratificado de la prótesis total de cadera en la fractura de cuello de fémur desplazada

Objective: To conduct a stratified cost-utility analysis of total versus partial hip arthroplasty as a function of clinical subtype. Method: All cases of this type of intervention were analysed between 2010 and 2016 in the Basque Health Service, gathering data on clinical outcomes and resource use to calculate the cost and utility in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at individual level. The statistical analysis included applying the propensity score to balance the groups, and seemingly unrelated regression models to calculate the incremental cost-utility ratio and plot the cost-effectiveness plane. The interaction between age group and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk class was assessed in the multivariate analysis. Results: The study identified 5867 patients diagnosed with femoral neck fracture, of whom 1307 and 4560 were treated with total and partial hip arthroplasty, respectively. In the cost-utility analysis based on the seemingly unrelated regression, total hip arthroplasty was found to have a higher cost and higher utility (2465€ and 0.42 QALYs). Considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of €22,000 per QALY, total hip arthroplasty was cost-effective in the under-80-year-old subgroup. Among patients above this age, hemiarthroplasty was cost-effective in ASA class I-II patients and dominant in ASA class III-IV patients. Conclusions: Subgroup analysis supports current daily clinical practice in displaced femoral neck fractures, namely, using partial replacement in most patients and reserving total replacement for younger patients. (AU)

Objetivo: Realizar un análisis de coste-utilidad de la prótesis total de cadera frente a la prótesis parcial. Método: Se analizaron todos los casos intervenidos desde 2010 hasta 2016 en el Servicio Vasco de Salud, recogiendo resultados clínicos y uso de recursos para calcular individualmente el coste y la utilidad en años de vida ajustados por calidad (AVAC). El análisis estadístico incluyó el pareamiento por puntaje de propensión para balancear los grupos y modelos de regresión aparentemente no relacionados para calcular la razón de coste-utilidad incremental y el plano de coste-efectividad. La interacción de grupo de edad y riesgo según la American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) se incluyó en el análisis multivariante. Resultados: Se identificaron 1307 pacientes con prótesis total y 4560 con prótesis parcial. Al hacer el análisis de coste-utilidad con modelos de regresión aparentemente no relacionados el resultado fue mayor coste y mayor utilidad para la prótesis total (2465 € y 0,42 AVAC). Para un umbral de 22.000 € por AVAC, la prótesis total fue coste-efectiva en el subgrupo de menores de 80 años. En el grupo de mayores de 80 años la parcial fue coste-efectiva en los casos con riesgo ASA I-II y dominante en los ASA III-IV. Conclusiones: El análisis de subgrupos ratifica la práctica clínica habitual en las fracturas de cuello de fémur desplazadas de intervenir a la mayoría de los pacientes mediante prótesis parcial y reservar la prótesis total para los pacientes más jóvenes. (AU)

[Quality of life of patients with asthma on beclomethasone/formoterol. Cost-utility analysis]. / Calidad de vida del paciente asmático con beclometasona/formoterol. Análisis de coste-utilidad.

AIM: To perform a cost-utility analysis on asthmatic patients on beclomethasone/formoterol fixed combination in Primary Health Care. Material and methods Non-probability sampling was used to select a group of asthmatic patients with moderate/severe persistent severity (GEMA 2009), treated with beclomethasone/formoterol fixed combination, over 18 years, had given their informed consent. The study observation period was 6 months. The variables studied were: age, sex, duration of disease, health resources used, analysis of health related quality of life by EQ-5D and SF-36, and the specific Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. For the qualitative variables, the frequency and percentages were calculated, and for the quantitative variables, the mean, SD and 95% CI. Chi-square, Student t-test and ANOVA were used for statistical inference. Comparisons were made with a statistical significance of 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 64 patients that completed the study, 59.4% were female. The mean age was 49 years, and mean disease duration was 93 months. For asthma control, 53% of patients had a prescription pattern of one/12h. All health related quality of life scales were modified with respect to the baseline and the differences were statistically significant. Our patients had a better health related quality of life than Spanish asthma cohort. The incremental cost utility beclomethasone/formoterol versus usual treatment option was € 6,256/QALY.

Efficiency of naproxen/esomeprazole in association for osteoarthrosis treatment in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, from the perspective of the National Healthcare System, the efficiency of a fixed-dose combination of naproxen and esomeprazole (naproxen/esomeprazole) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) compared to other NSAID, alone or in combination with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). METHODS: A Markov model was used; it included different health states defined by gastrointestinal (GI) events: dyspepsia, symptomatic or complicated ulcer; or cardiovascular (CV) events: myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure. The model is similar to the one used by NICE in its NSAID evaluation of OA published in 2008. The total costs (€, 2012), including drug and event-related costs, and the health outcomes expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were estimated in patients with increased GI risk, aged 65 or over, for a 1-year time horizon and a 6-month treatment with celecoxib (200mg/day), celecoxib+PPI, diclofenac (150mg/day)+PPI, etoricoxib (60mg/day), etoricoxib+PPI, ibuprofen (1,800mg/day)+PPI, naproxen (1,000mg/day)+PPI or naproxen/esomeprazole (naproxen 1,000mg/esomeprazole 40mg/day). The selected PPI was omeprazole (20mg/day). RESULTS: Naproxen/esomeprazole was a dominant strategy (more effective and less costly) compared to celecoxib, etoricoxib and diclofenac+PPI. Celecoxib+PPI and etoricoxib+PPI were more effective. Considering a cost-effectiveness threshold of €30,000 per additional QALY, naproxen/esomeprazole was cost-effective compared to ibuprofen+PPI and naproxen+PPI with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of €15,154 and €5,202 per additional QALY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-dose combination of naproxen and esomeprazole is a cost-effective, and even dominant, alternative compared to other options in OA patients with increased GI risk.

Lifestyle interventions for diabetes mellitus type 2 prevention.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transferring the results from clinical trials on type 2 diabetes prevention is the objective of the Diabetes in Europe-Prevention using Lifestyle, Physical Activity and Nutritional intervention (DE-PLAN) project in Catalonia, whose cost-effectiveness analysis is now presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in primary care involving individuals without diagnosed diabetes aged 45-75 years (n=2054) screened using the questionnaire Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) and a subsequent oral glucose tolerance test. Where feasible, high-risk individuals who were identified (n=552) were allocated sequentially to standard care (n=219), a group-based (n=230) or an individual-level (n=103) intensive (structured programme of six hours using specific teaching techniques) lifestyle intervention (n=333). The primary outcome was the development of diabetes (WHO). We evaluated the cost of resources used with comparison of standard care and the intervention groups in terms of effectiveness and quality of life (15D questionnaire). RESULTS: After 4.2-year median follow-up, the cumulative incidences were 18.3% (14.3-22.9%) in the intensive intervention group and 28.8% (22.9-35.3%) in the standard care group (36.5% relative-risk-reduction). The corresponding 4-year HR was 0.64 (0.47-0.87; P<.004). The incremental cost induced by intensive intervention compared with the standard was 106€ per participant in the individual level and 10€ in the group-based intervention representing 746€ and 108€ per averted case of diabetes, respectively. The estimated incremental cost-utility ratio was 3243€ per quality-adjusted life-years gained. CONCLUSION: The intensive lifestyle intervention delayed the development of diabetes and was efficient in economic analysis.

Análisis coste-utilidad del modelo de unidad de terapia intravítrea (UTI) frente a la administración tradicional de terapia intravítrea / Cost-utility model of new intravítreous units vs. current patient journey model in Spain

Objetivo Comparar la efectividad y los costes de la implantación del Modelo de Unidad de Terapia Intravítrea (UTI), avalado por la Sociedad Española de Retina y Vítreo (SERV), Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial (SECA), Sociedad Española de Oftalmología (SEO) y Sociedad Española de Directivos Sanitarios (SEDISA) vs. el procedimiento habitual. Método Modelo de decisión analítico que compara una organización asistencial tipo UTI con cuatro escenarios de práctica habitual en España, en cuanto al resultado en la calidad de vida por pérdida de agudeza visual y la utilización de recursos. Se estimó la probabilidad, el coste y los años de vida ajustados por calidad (AVAC) para cada escenario planteado. Se realizó un análisis de sensibilidad univariante para cada uno de los parámetros empleados. Resultado Se observó que la implantación del modelo UTI mejora la calidad de vida de los pacientes y presenta un menor coste frente a la práctica habitual. Se produjo ahorro de costes y ganancia de AVAC. El análisis de sensibilidad mostró que el resultado no cambiaría de signo con la modificación de ninguna variable de partida. Conclusiones En las patologías oculares con indicación de tratamiento intravítreo, cualquier reducción en el tiempo que transcurre desde la sospecha diagnóstica hasta la primera inyección intravítrea disminuye la pérdida de agudeza visual. Así, actuar para acortar los tiempos sospecha-aguja es clave para mantener la visión funcional de los pacientes. La mejora de la eficiencia de los servicios de oftalmología que se organizan siguiendo el modelo UTI puede generar ahorros que varían entre los 175 € y 85 € por paciente atendido y año (AU)

Aim To compare the effectiveness and costs of the implementation of the intravitreal therapy unit model, endorsed by the SERV, SECA, SEO and SEDISA, compared to the usual procedure. Method Analytical decision model that compares an UTI-type healthcare organization with four usual practice scenarios in Spain, in terms of quality-of-life results due to loss of visual acuity and the use of resources. The probability, cost, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated for each scenario proposed. A univariate sensitivity analysis was performed for each of the parameters used in the model. Result The model showed that from any of the initial scenarios of the usual practice, transitioning to the UTI-type implementation improves the quality of life of patients and requires lower cost. UTI-type is dominant respect usual practice. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results would not change sign with the variation of any starting variable. Conclusions Shorten suspicion-needle times is key to maintaining functional vision in patients requiring intravitreal treatment. The UTI-type model seeks the efficiency of ophthalmology services and can produce savings that vary between €175 and €85 per patient attended per year (AU)

Papel de la diálisis peritoneal en el tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardíaca / Role of peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of heart failure / Papel da diálise peritoneal no tratamento da insuficiência cardíaca

Introducción. La insuficiencia cardíaca (IC) es una patología progresiva incluso con tratamiento adecuado. La eliminación de líquido ayuda en el manejo de estos pacientes. Evaluamos la eficacia de la diálisis peritoneal (DP) para tratar la IC refractaria. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio prospectivo no randomizado en pacientes con IC refractaria a dosis máximas toleradas de fármacos. Todos fueron tratados con DP. Se analizaron datos clínicos y estado funcional. Para determinar su eficacia se comparó el estado de salud percibido en los pacientes con DP respecto a los reportes de aquéllos que utilizaban tratamientos conservadores. Finalmente, se realizó un estudio de coste-utilidad. Resultados. Fueron incluidos 25 pacientes (68% varones, 66±10 años) y 16 siguieron en DP a la finalización del período de seguimiento (20±9 meses). Realizaron un solo intercambio nocturno 21 pacientes; el resto 2 ó 3 en relación al grado de insuficiencia renal. Todos mejoraron su estado funcional (4% tres grados, 64% dos y 32% uno; P<0,001); se redujo la presión sistólica en la arteria pulmonar (46±12 vs 25±9 mm Hg; P=0,007). Las tasas de hospitalización disminuyeron de forma importante (de 65±16 a 9±5 días/paciente/año; P=0,002). La expectativa de vida fue del 84% al año de tratamiento y del 72% y 58% tras 18 y 24 meses, respectivamente. La DP se asoció a mejor percepción del estado de salud que los tratamientos conservadores (0,6978 vs 0,4104; P<0,01). La DP es coste-efectiva comparada con los regímenes diuréticos. Conclusiones. La DP es una buena opción para el manejo del paciente con IC refractaria; mejora el grado funcional y la calidad de vida y reduce la hospitalización, mortalidad y los costes sanitarios.

Background. Heart failure (HF) is a progressive disorder even with adequate treatment. Fluid removal may aid in the management of these patients. We evaluated the efficacy of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the treatment of refractory HF. Patients and methods. Prospective, non-randomized study involving patients with congestive HF refractory to maximum tolerable drug treatment. All of them were treated with PD. We analysed clinical data and functional status. To determine efficacy we compared the perceived state of health to PD patients respect to those reported with conservative therapies. Finally, we carried out a cost-utility evaluation. Results. Twenty-five patients (68% men, 66±10 years) were included and 16 were still undergoing PD at the end of the follow-up period (20±9 months). Twenty-one patients underwent only one daily nocturnal exchange; the rest, 2 or 3 exchanges due to different degrees of renal failure. All of them improved their NYHA functional status, (4% three classes, 64% two, 32% one; P<0.001), with a reduction in their pulmonary artery systolic pressure (46±12 vs 25±9 mm Hg; P=0.007). Hospitalization rates underwent a dramatic reduction (from 65±16 to 9±5 days/patient/year; P=0.002). PD life expectancy was 84% after 12 months of treatment, and 72% and 58% after 18 and 24 months. PD was associated with a higher perception state of health than the conservative therapy, (0.6978 vs 0.4104; P<0.01). PD is cost-effective compared with the diuretic regimens. Conclusions. PD is a good option for patients with refractory HF; it improves the functional status and quality of life, reduces morbidity, mortality and health care costs.

Introdução. A insuficiência cardíaca (IC) é uma patologia progressiva, mesmo com tratamento adequado. A remoção do líquido pode auxiliar no tratamento desses pacientes. Nós avaliamos a eficácia da diálise peritoneal (PD) no tratamento da insuficiência cardíaca refratária. Pacientes e métodos. Estudo prospectivo, não randomizado envolvendo pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca congestiva refratária ao tratamento medicamentoso máximo tolerado. Todos foram tratados com DP. Nós analisamos dados clínicos e estado funcional. Nós determinamos a eficácia, comparando o estado de saúde em PD em comparação com relação aos relatados com tratamento conservador. Finalmente, foi realizada uma avaliação de custo-utilidade. Resultados. Foram incluídos 25 pacientes (68% homens, 66±10 anos) e 16 estavam ainda em fase de PD no final do período de follow-up (20±9 meses). Vinte e um pacientes foram submetidos a apenas uma troca diária noturna, o resto, as trocas de 2 ou 3 devido a diferentes graus de insuficiência renal. Todos melhoraram seu status funcional da NYHA (4% três graus, 64% dois y 32% um; P<0,001); com uma redução da sua pressão sistólica da artéria pulmonar (46±12 vs 25±9 mm Hg; P=0,007). As taxas de hospitalização decresceram significativamente (de 65±16 a 9±5 dias/paciente/ano; P=0,002). A expectativa de vida era de 84% por ano de tratamento e 72% e 58% após 18 e 24 meses, respectivamente. PD foi associada com um estado de maior percepção de saúde do que o tratamento conservador (0,6978 vs. 0,4104; P<0,01). O DP é custo-utilidade em comparação com os regimes de diuréticos. Conclusàµes. O DP é uma boa opção para o manejo de pacientes com IC refratária, que melhora o estado funcional e qualidade de vida, reduz a internação, mortalidade e custos de saúde.