Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 22(1): 25, 2022 01 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093042

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Assessing prognosis is challenging for many physicians in various medical fields. Research shows that physicians who perform disability assessments consider six areas when evaluating a prognosis: disease, treatment, course of the disease, external information, patient-related and physician-related aspects. We administered a questionnaire to evaluate how physicians rate the importance of these six prognosis areas during work disability evaluation and to explore what kind of support they would like during prognosis assessment. METHODS: Seventy-six physicians scored the importance of 23 prognostic aspects distributed over six prognosis areas. Participants scored the importance of each aspect both "in general" and from the perspective of a case vignette of a worker with a severe degenerative disease. The questionnaire also covered needs and suggestions for support during the evaluation of prognoses. RESULTS: Medical areas that are related to the disease, or the treatment or course of the disease, appeared important (scores of 7.0-9.0), with less differing opinions among participants (IQR 1.0-3.0). Corresponding verbatim remarks supported the importance of disease and treatment as prognostic aspects. In comparison, patient- and physician-related aspects scored somewhat lower, with more variability (range 4.0-8.0, with IQR 2.0-5.0 for patient- and physician-related considerations). Participants indicated a need for a tool or online database that includes prognostic aspects and prognostic evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some variation in scores, the physicians rated all six prognosis areas as important for work disability evaluations. This study provides suggested aids to prognosis assessment, including an online support tool based on evidence-based medicine features.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Médicos , Avaliação da Deficiência , Humanos , Prognóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Rev. Fac. Med. (Bogotá) ; 67(2): 201-208, Apr.-June 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1020396

RESUMO

Resumen Introducción. Cada día, 3 400 personas mueren en el mundo por un accidente de tránsito (AT); miles sufren lesiones o adquieren una discapacidad cada año por la misma causa. En Colombia, en 2016 se registró una tasa de 92.8 heridos y 14.9 muertes por cada 100 000 habitantes. Objetivo. Describir las características de los AT y el entorno de su atención en mayores de 60 años con lesiones moderadas o graves en Medellín, Colombia, durante el periodo 2015-2016. Materiales y métodos. Estudio descriptivo de las características de personas mayores de 60 años con lesiones moderadas y graves después de un AT. Resultados. Se evaluaron247 personas, 93.1% con lesiones moderadas; el 94.1% de las lesiones graves ocurrieron cuando se atropelló un peatón. En 60.7% de los AT una moto estuvo involucrada. El puntaje global del WHODAS-II fue de 40.6 y los dominios de funcionamiento más afectados fueron actividades domésticas, actividades fuera de la casa y movilidad; en cuanto a la calidad de vida, se afectó la función física, el desempeño físico y el cambio en salud. Conclusión. Los mayores de 60 años con lesiones por AT fueron, en su mayoría, peatones atropellados por motocicletas. El AT afectó la calidad de vida y el funcionamiento de los pacientes.


Abstract Introduction: Every day, 3 400 people are killed in road traffic accidents (RTA) in the world; thousands are injured or disabled each year from the same cause. In Colombia, a rate of 92.8 injured and 14.9 deaths per 100 000 inhabitants was reported in 2016. Objective: To describe the characteristics of RTA, clinical care and quality of life of people over 60 years of age with moderate or severe injuries in Medellín, Colombia, during the period 2015-2016. Materials and methods: Descriptive study of the characteristics of people over 60 years of age with moderate and severe injuries after a a RTA. Results: 247 people were included in the study, of which 93.1% had moderate injuries; 94.1% of the severe injuries occurred when a pedestrian was hit. In 60.7% of the RTA, a motorcycle was involved. The overall WHODAS-II Score was 40.6 and the most affected operational domains were domestic activities, activities outside the home and mobility. In terms of quality of life, physical function, physical performance and change in health were affected. Conclusion: People over 60 years of age with RTA injuries were mostly pedestrians and motorcycles were the most frequent vehicle involved. RTA affected patients' quality of life and functioning.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA