Clinical application of centrifugal-membrane hybrid plasmapheresis in the treatment of hyperlipidemia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify the clinical application of centrifugal-membrane hybrid plasmapheresis (CMHP) in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 48 patients who were diagnosed with hyperlipidemia and had received CMHP treatment. Serum total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were monitored, and adverse reactions to the treatment were observed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with hyperlipidemia received CMHP over 59 sessions. The average age of the 48 patients with hyperlipidemia, including 32 males (66.67%) and 16 females (33.33%), was 44.23 ± 12.02 years. Twenty-nine outpatients (60.42%) and 19 inpatients (39.58%) were included. Hypertriglyceridemia was diagnosed in 16 cases (33.33%), mixed hyperlipidemia in 31 cases (64.58%), and hypercholesterolemia in one case (2.08%). The pretreatment blood lipid concentrations were significantly different after the 59 CMHP treatments (p < .001). The concentrations of TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C decreased significantly after the treatment, and the median ratios of reduction were 67.06% (range: 58.97%-71.87%), 63.33% (range: 55.20%-74.86%), 45.87% (range: 35.86%-52.95%), and 66.09% (range: 44.37%-73.94%), respectively. Three adverse reactions (5.08%) were recorded. No differences were detected in therapeutic parameters, effects, or adverse reactions between the two blood cell separators, there was no difference in Lipoprotein apheresis efficacy. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study demonstrated the clinical application of CMHP in patients in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. However, further studies are needed applying CMHP with hyperlipidemia.

Lipoprotein apheresis: an established therapeutic modality for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients refractory to PCSK9 inhibitors: a case report and literature review.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), is a rare genetic disorder characterized by dual mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, leading to dysfunctional or absent LDLRs, often accompanied by severe premature Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) and exhibiting refractoriness to aggressive pharmacological interventions. Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), a form of lipoprotein apheresis (LA), has been effectively utilized as an adjunctive treatment modality to reduce serum LDL-C levels in refractory cases of HoFH. Here, we report a case of a 36-year-old female with HoFH who developed xanthomas on her limbs and waist at age 7. Despite maximum-tolerated doses of statins from age 32, combined with ezetimibe and evolocumab, her LDL-C levels remained critically elevated at 12-14 mmol/L. Her genetic testing confirmed a homozygous LDLR mutation. At 35 years old, she experienced exertional chest pain, and percutaneous coronary intervention revealed severe calcific left main stenosis, necessitating stent implantation. Subsequently, she initiated once every 1-2 months DFPP. Pre-DFPP, her LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels were 13.82 ± 3.28 and 15.45 ± 0.78 mmol/L, respectively. Post-DFPP, her LDL-C and TC levels significantly decreased to 2.43 ± 0.33 mmol/L (81.76 ± 4.11% reduction) and 3.59 ± 0.41 mmol/L (76.76 ± 2.75% reduction), respectively. Lipoprotein (a) and triglycerides also decreased by 89.10 ± 1.39% and 42.29 ± 15.68%,respectively. Two years later, there was no progression of coronary artery disease, and her symptoms and xanthomas regressed significantly. Collectively, DFPP effectively reduces LDL-C levels in refractory cases of HoFH and contributes to delaying ASCVD progression, representing an efficacious adjunctive therapeutic modality.

Minimal impact of low-density lipoprotein apheresis on vancomycin serum concentration: A case report.

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) is a blood purification therapy used to treat refractory ulcers in patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans. We describe a case of vancomycin treatment in a patient undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and LDL-A therapy and assess its impact on serum vancomycin concentration. The patient underwent LDL-A twice a week (Mondays and Fridays) and maintenance dialysis three times a week (Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays) for diabetic nephropathy associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Following the wound culture results, vancomycin was initiated with a 1.75 g administration post-dialysis. Serum vancomycin levels before and after LDL-A, measured on the subsequent day, exhibited only slight fluctuations within the intermeasurement variability range. Despite continuing vancomycin administration at the standard dose in patients undergoing hemodialysis, the serum concentration remained consistent, suggesting a minimal impact of LDL-A on vancomycin pharmacokinetics.

Application of Lipid Apheresis in Acute Lipogenic Pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia-associated pancreatitis (HTG-AP) has been increasing. The pathogenesis of lipogenic pancreatitis is not fully understood. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the laboratory data, clinical manifestations, and prognosis of patients with lipid-derived pancreatitis who received lipid purification, to explore whether lipid purification is a better treatment for acute hyperlipidemic pancreatitis. METHODS: In this study, we enrolled five subjects diagnosed with HTG-AP at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between 2021 and 2022. We collected demographic data, medical histories, clinical manifestations, and laboratory data. All patients received routine therapy. Blood lipid purification was conducted using the double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) method. Plasma was separated from blood cells and purified to remove cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). SPSS was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Following a single lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment, significant improvements in serum lipid levels were observed. Three patients achieved triglyceride levels below 5.65 mmol/L within 24 h, while the remaining 2 patients experienced reductions of 82% and 78%, respectively. The average triglyceride level decreased from 36.82 to 7.27 mmol/L, representing an 80% reduction from baseline. Total cholesterol decreased by 59% on average, and LDL levels decreased by 69%. Statistically significant differences were observed in triglyceride and cholesterol levels before and after treatment. Four patients exhibited increased HDL levels posttreatment, while 1 patient showed a decrease. The average HDL/TC level was 21% higher after treatment. CONCLUSION: LA in HTG-AP effectively improves clinical symptoms, rapidly lowers lipid levels, and achieves good therapeutic outcomes.

Comorbidity in lipoprotein apheresis: Their role in the era of new lipid-lowering therapies.

BACKGROUND: Despite advance in pharmacotherapy of lipid disorders, lipoprotein apheresis (LA) plays a leading role in the management of severe hypercholesterolemia and in atherosclerosis prevention. METHODS: Aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), presence of major comorbidity, and/or concomitant polypharmacy (definite as 5+ drugs daily) in patients with inherited dyslipidemias on chronic LA. RESULTS: Since 1994, we performed more than 500 LA treatment/year and followed a total of 83 patients (age 56 [47-65] years, male 75%). In subjects with more than 5 years of LA treatment (38 patients, age 54 [45-62] years, male 66%), at the end of the observation time (9 [7-16] years), patients had higher CCI, polypharmacy, anemia, heart failure, peptic ulcer disease, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. DISCUSSION: Even in the era of new lipid-lowering therapies, the LA treatment established itself as a safe and lifesaving intervention. Patients on chronic LA require a multidisciplinary approach to address their comorbidity and the apheresis unit's medical staff (doctors and nurses) play a pivotal role creating a bridge toward the general practitioner and other specialists for overcoming clinical issues.

PCSK9 inhibitor use during pregnancy in a case of familial hypercholesterolemia complicated with coronary artery disease.

Limited data have been reported on the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK 9) inhibitors during pregnancy in women with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Here, we present the first case of initiating evolocumab (PCSK9 inhibitor) in a compound heterozygous FH mother. The patient was a 34-year-old primipara with severe dyslipidemia and a history of coronary artery bypass surgery. An elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level of 420 mg/dL was detected in the first trimester and persistently increased throughout pregnancy. Evolocumab was administered at 31 and 35 weeks of gestation, showing a positive effect on stabilizing LDL-C levels. Planned delivery with labor analgesia was performed at 38 + 4 weeks. Both the mother and infant were discharged without any notable complications. Hence, evolocumab, an IgG2 monochromatic antibody with little placental permeability, may be an alternative medication with limited influence on infants. Further studies are needed to assess the safety of evolocumab administration during pregnancy.

Apheresis: What Should a Clinician Know?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Apheresis is a treatment option for severe dyslipidemia which has been introduced approximately 40 years ago to clinical practice. This article reviews recent apheresis research progresses, including apheresis for elevated LDL-cholesterol and elevated lipoprotein(a). RECENT FINDINGS: While the role of apheresis in treating more common forms of LDL-hypercholesterolemia has been reduced due to the development of new, very potent LDL-lowering drugs, it still plays an important role in treating patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and patients with severe lipoprotein(a) elevation. One apheresis session can decrease LDL-cholesterol, apoB, and lipoprotein(a) by approximately 65%, which results in a time averaged reduction of 30-50%. Although time-consuming, and expensive regular apheresis is very well tolerated and has been proven safe for decades. Apheresis remains a treatment option for severe dyslipidemia, especially in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a), if other forms of therapy fail to achieve targets.

Lipoprotein Apheresis: Current Recommendations for Treating Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Elevated Lipoprotein(a).

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and hyperlipoproteinemia(a) are relatively common disorders, posing a significant health burden due to increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Development of electronic health record-based strategies with a linkage to the genetic test results has increased awareness, detection, and control of heritable lipid disorders. This review attempts to critically examine available data to provide a summary of the current evidence for lipoprotein apheresis in FH and elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)). REVIEW FINDINGS: Availability and indications for lipoprotein apheresis vary across the globe. On average, greater than 60% of atherogenic apoB-containing lipoproteins are immediately reduced following a single procedure, translating in substantial reduction of incident ASCVD events, and preventing accelerated vascular aging. Simultaneous lipid-lowering therapy targeting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and Lp(a) enhances the efficacy of lipoprotein apheresis. Lipoprotein apheresis alters the proteomics of the lipoprotein particles, including reduction in the concentration of the oxidized-LDL and Lp(a) particles, and proinflammatory apoE bound to HDL particles and remnant lipoproteins. Other effects attributed to lipoprotein apheresis include improvement in blood rheology, endothelial function, microvascular flow, myocardial perfusion, reduction in circulating inflammatory markers. Development of lipoprotein apheresis registries provides data on benefits, challenges, and barriers to inform pertinent healthcare policies. Lipoprotein apheresis is a safe and effective procedure for lowering cholesterol in patients with combined and isolated FH and elevated Lp(a). It reduces the burden of ASCVD and improves long-term prognosis. A team approach is required by the patient, medical staff, and healthcare provider to initiate and maintain a lipoprotein apheresis program.

Alirocumab in lipoprotein apheresis: A synergy for patients with high-Lp(a).

Until today lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is considered the most effective treatment for patients with high-Lp(a) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are often combined with LA to dampen the rebound in lipoprotein concentrations. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the effect of dose-adjustment strategy for alirocumab in a small cohort of high-Lp(a) subjects with ischemic heart disease and in chronic LA treatment. Chronic LA effect on Lp(a) levels is a significant reduction in pre-LA Lp(a) concentrations compared to native Lp(a) value (118 [116-119] mg/dl vs 150 [137-155] mg/dl; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the administration of Arilocumab 75 mg after 7 days from LA shows a significant pre-LA reduction in the Lp(a) concentrations respect to those obtained with administration immediately after the LA treatment. In high-Lp(a) patients treated with chronic LA the deferred addition of alirocumab, resulted in lower LDL-cholesterol and Lp(a) values.

Tandem hemodialysis and DFPP: Procedure, safety and cost-effectiveness in patients requiring chronic hemodialysis and lipid apheresis.

INTRODUCTION: Certain patients require simultaneous lipoprotein apheresis (LA) and intermittent hemodialysis (HD). Instead of undergoing 2 consecutive treatment sessions, a double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and HD tandem procedure could be offered to reduce treatment times and costs. Our study evaluated the performance, safety and cost of this tandem procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three patients underwent 168 HD and DFPP tandem sessions in a tertiary center from August 2018 to November 2020, using a Fresenius 5008 generator for HD and an InfomedHF440 for DFPP. The system's efficacy was assessed by lipid subtraction performance for DFPP. Efficacy of 2 blood line connection configurations (parallel or sequential) was compared in terms of Kt/V and matched against an HD control session for each patient. Clinical and biological safety and the differential cost between tandem and consecutive procedures were evaluated. RESULTS: Throughout the tandem sessions, DFPP lasted 85 to 120 minutes, overlapping the 240-minute HD. Blood flow for HD and Kt/V were significantly lower during the tandem procedure with a parallel configuration compared to sequential or control paired HD. DFPP efficacy was comparable between all groups: over 60% reduction in cholesterol and over 50% for triglycerides. Symptomatic hypotension depended on the patients, not the procedure. The tandem procedure revealed an acceptable benefit-cost ratio. CONCLUSION: HD-DFPP tandem with a sequential blood line connecting system (derivation installed on the HD venous line) is effective and well-tolerated with a good cost-benefit ratio. Tandem reduces hospitalization and treatment session times and can be offered to patients requiring simultaneous HD and DFPP.

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis for recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis post renal transplant in pediatric patients.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis has been shown to improve remission in patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Here, we report a case study of two patients who failed apheresis treatment for SRNS and required transplant with subsequent recurrence of nephrotic syndrome and response to apheresis treatment. Two patients were treated with 12 sessions of LDL apheresis for SRNS without improvement and subsequently required renal transplantation. The first patient received an ABO-incompatible kidney transplant requiring plasma exchange (PE) with subsequent recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The second patient also received a renal transplant after treatment failure and subsequently developed recurrence of nephrotic syndrome in the transplanted kidney. Both patients underwent repeat therapy with lipoprotein apheresis. The first patient underwent lipoprotein apheresis after completing PE with significant improvement in serum creatinine and urine protein creatinine ratio. Three years later, he continued to do well and remains in remission. The second patient also responded well to repeat therapy with lipoprotein apheresis and had significant improvement with a urine protein creatinine ratio of 0.8 and a serum creatinine of 0.9 mg/dL 6 months after transplant. Lipoprotein apheresis was able to result in remission of nephrotic syndrome in these patients with posttransplant recurrence of disease. This is the first report of patients not responding to treatment pretransplant but responding posttransplant. Lipoprotein apheresis should be considered in patients with recurrence of nephrotic syndrome after renal transplantation even with a history of treatment failure prior to transplantation.

Lipoprotein (a): When to Measure and How to Treat?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to review current evidence for lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) as a risk factor for multiple cardiovascular (CV) disease phenotypes, provide a rationale for Lp(a) lowering to reduce CV risk, identify therapies that lower Lp(a) levels that are available clinically and under investigation, and discuss future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Mendelian randomization and epidemiological studies have shown that elevated Lp(a) is an independent and causal risk factor for atherosclerosis and major CV events. Lp(a) is also associated with non-atherosclerotic endpoints such as venous thromboembolism and calcific aortic valve disease. It contributes to residual CV risk in patients receiving standard-of-care LDL-lowering therapy. Plasma Lp(a) levels present a skewed distribution towards higher values and vary widely between individuals and according to ethnic background due to genetic variants in the LPA gene, but remain relatively constant throughout a person's life. Thus, elevated Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) is a prevalent condition affecting >20% of the population but is still underdiagnosed. Treatment guidelines have begun to advocate measurement of Lp(a) to identify patients with very high levels that have a family history of premature CVD or elevated Lp(a). Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) efficiently lowers Lp(a) and was recently associated with a reduction of incident CV events. Statins have neutral or detrimental effects on Lp(a), while PCSK9 inhibitors significantly reduce its level by up to 30%. Specific lowering of Lp(a) with antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) shows good safety and strong efficacy with up to 90% reductions. The ongoing CV outcomes study Lp(a)HORIZON will provide a first answer as to whether selective Lp(a) lowering with ASO reduces the risk of major CV events. Given the recently established association between Lp(a) level and CV risk, guidelines now recommend Lp(a) measurement in specific clinical conditions. Accordingly, Lp(a) is a current target for drug development to reduce CV risk in patients with elevated levels, and lowering Lp(a) with ASO represents a promising avenue.

Current Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heterozygote and Homozygous FH Children and Adolescents.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To elucidate the current approach of care in pediatric patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We sought an answer to the question whether the advances and major changes in lipid management are relevant and apply to children and adolescents. RECENT FINDINGS: Latest research findings clearly demonstrate that lowering cholesterol levels at a young age prevents vascular atherosclerotic changes and decreases cardiovascular events in adulthood and emphasizes the importance of early detection and intervention in the pediatric FH patients group. FH is a common genetic disease caused by mutations in genes associated with the metabolism of low-density lipoproteins (LDL). The hallmark of FH is elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels from birth and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Often FH is either undiagnosed or diagnosed with a considerable delay, leading to vascular atherosclerotic changes and cardiovascular disease. Prompt identification of FH subjects is essential, to initiate early preventive measures. Safe and efficient pharmacological agents are approved for use in children and adolescents. Statins are the first line of therapy, in combination of ezetimibe. Unfortunately, these drugs do not warrant the achievement of therapeutic target, especially in HoFH patient. In the latter, lipoprotein apheresis (LA), which has been shown to be safe and effective, is strongly recommended. Finally, the new drugs still under study will allow a multimodal customized treatment. Lowering cholesterol levels at a young age hinders vascular atherosclerotic changes decreasing cardiovascular events in adulthood. Therefore, early detection, diagnosis, and intervention in FH patients are priority objectives.

Is treating severe He FH so easy? A combined treatment between lipoprotein apheresis and PCSK9 inhibitors.

Despite advance in pharmacotherapy of lipid disorders, many heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia patients do not achieve a desirable lipid target to significantly reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the interaction between Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) and PCSK9i in a small FH cohort in which the guidelines therapeutic target is not achieved. During one year, together with a complete adherence to PCSK9i therapy, we recorded a 3 to 5 LA sessions less per year in each patient. This therapeutic approach suggests: i) the possibility of increasing the number of patients treated with LA, ii) the improvement of their quality of life, and iii) the costs reduction for the single patient-treatment.

Clinical hemocompatibility of double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis comparing polyethersulfone and ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer membranes.

Activation of the complement system and leukocytes by blood-membrane interactions may further promote arteriosclerosis typically present in patients on lipoprotein apheresis. As clinical data on the hemocompatibility of lipoprotein apheresis are scarce, a controlled clinical study comparing two different types of plasma separation and fractionation membranes used in double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis was urgently needed, as its outcome may influence clinical decision-making. In a prospective, randomized, crossover controlled trial, eight patients on double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis were subjected to one treatment with recent polyethersulfone (PES) plasma separation and fractionation membranes and one control treatment using a set of ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVAL) membranes. White blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PC) counts, complement factor C5a and thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) concentrations were determined in samples drawn at defined times from different sites of the extracorporeal blood and plasma circuit. With a nadir at 25 minutes, WBCs in EVAL decreased to 33.5 ± 10.7% of baseline compared with 63.8 ± 22.0% at 20 minutes in PES (P < .001). The maximum C5a levels in venous blood reentering the patients were measured at 30 minutes, being 30.0 ± 11.2 µg/L with EVAL and 12.3 ± 9.0 µg/L with PES (P < .05). The highest C5a concentrations were found in plasma after the plasma filters (EVAL 56.1 ± 22.0 µg/L at 15 minutes vs PES 23.3 ± 15.2 µg/L at 10 minutes; P < .001). PC did not significantly decrease over time with both membrane types, whereas TAT levels did not rise until the end of the treatment without differences between membranes. Regarding lipoprotein(a) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol removal, both membrane sets performed equally. Compared with EVAL, PES membranes cause less leukocyte and complement system activation, the classical parameters of hemocompatibility of extracorporeal treatment procedures, at identical treatment efficacy. Better hemocompatibility may avoid inflammation-promoting effects through blood-material interactions in patients requiring double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis.

Establishing low-density lipoprotein apheresis tolerability in patients with prior anaphylactoid reactions to lipoprotein apheresis using magnesium sulfate.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) tolerability is a key factor for the utilization of this therapy. Common reactions to LA are hypotension and nausea. Serious reactions include severe hypotension and anaphylactoid reactions (0.13%-1.3% and 0.2%-0.4%, respectively). The bradykinin response drives these reactions and can worsen with the use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. Efforts to mitigate these reactions are necessary for the tolerability of LA with a dextran sulfate-adsorption (DSA) system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an effort to increase apheresis tolerability, seven patients at The University of Kansas, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, who had prior anaphylactoid reactions (defined as general cutaneous flushing, nausea/vomiting, tongue swelling, lightheadedness, and hypotension) to the DSA despite pharmacologic intervention, were treated with pre-LA intravenous magnesium adapted from a protocol developed by co-author Eliaz. This protocol consists of 1.5 g of magnesium sulfate administered over 45 minutes. All seven patients were treated with intravenous magnesium sulfate immediately before LA. RESULTS: No episodes of anaphylactoid reactions during LA have been reported to date. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium infusion before DSA can be utilized to establish tolerability in patients with prior anaphylactoid reactions to LA. Proposed mechanisms include temporary stabilization of the negative-positive interactions of the dextran sulfate filter leading to a reduction of circulating bradykinin, reduction of nitric oxide, and reduction of the sympathetic response to LA.

Lipoprotein apheresis and PCSK9 inhibitors for severe familial hypercholesterolaemia: Experience from Australia and New Zealand.

INTRODUCTION: Severe familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) causes premature disability and death due to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and is refractory to standard lipid-lowering therapies. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) has long been a standard of care for patients with severe FH, but is invasive, expensive and time-consuming for patients and their caregivers. Newer drug therapies, including the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, may reduce the need for LA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We audited the records of 16 patients (eight homozygous, eight heterozygous) treated with LA in Australia and New Zealand, 14 of whom subsequently commenced PCSK9 inhibitor therapy. LA was performed by cascade filtration in all centres. RESULTS: LDL-cholesterol was acutely lowered by 69 ± 7% in patients with homozygous FH and by 72 ± 9% in those with heterozygous FH, representing time-averaged reductions of 36 ± 12% and 34 ± 5%, respectively. LA was well-tolerated, and patients reported comparable quality of life to population and disease-related norms. After commencement of PCSK9 inhibitors, four of seven patients with homozygous FH had meaningful biochemical responses, with a reduction in the frequency of LA permitted in one patient and complete cessation in another. Four of seven patients with heterozygous FH were able to be managed without LA after commencing PCSK9 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: While PCSK9 inhibitors have reduced the need for LA, some patients with severe FH continue to require LA, and will require it for the foreseeable future. However, emerging therapies, including angiopoetin-like 3 inhibitors, may further reduce the need for LA.

LDL apheresis as an alternate method for plasma LPS purification in healthy volunteers and dyslipidemic and septic patients.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a key player for innate immunity activation. It is therefore a prime target for sepsis treatment, as antibiotics are not sufficient to improve outcome during septic shock. An extracorporeal removal method by polymyxin (PMX) B direct hemoperfusion (PMX-DHP) is used in Japan, but recent trials failed to show a significant lowering of circulating LPS levels after PMX-DHP therapy. PMX-DHP has a direct effect on LPS molecules. However, LPS is not present in a free form in the circulation, as it is mainly carried by lipoproteins, including LDLs. Lipoproteins are critical for physiological LPS clearance, as LPSs are carried by LDLs to the liver for elimination. We hypothesized that LDL apheresis could be an alternate method for LPS removal. First, we demonstrated in vitro that LDL apheresis microbeads are almost as efficient as PMX beads to reduce LPS concentration in LPS-spiked human plasma, whereas it is not active in PBS. We found that PMX was also adsorbing lipoproteins, although less specifically. Then, we found that endogenous LPS of patients treated by LDL apheresis for familial hypercholesterolemia is also removed during their LDL apheresis sessions, with both electrostatic-based devices and filtration devices. Finally, LPS circulating in the plasma of septic shock and severe sepsis patients with gram-negative bacteremia was also removed in vitro by LDL adsorption. Overall, these results underline the importance of lipoproteins for LPS clearance, making them a prime target to study and treat endotoxemia-related conditions.

Therapeutic Apheresis for Management of Lp(a) Hyperlipoproteinemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: High lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) level is an independent cardiovascular risk factor with higher prevalence among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The actual problem is that most currently available lipid-lowering drugs are unable to abolish Lp(a) pathogenicity. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is an effective method for elimination of atherogenic lipoproteins, but it is approved only in some countries for treatment of elevated Lp(a) level in the presence of progressive ASCVD. In recent years, new studies on LA were published and the purpose of this review is to present the information on optimal management of Lp(a) hyperlipoproteinemia by LA in the modern era. RECENT FINDINGS: Most clinical studies designed to treat Lp(a) hyperlipoproteinemia with different LA systems are small in size but demonstrate that the elimination of Lp(a) from bloodstream leads to reduction of inflammatory and prothrombotic process in a few months and to atherosclerotic plaques regression in 1.5 years. Treatment with LA for 2 to 5 years in terms of clinical trials and in real-world setting provides further evidence that Lp(a) reduction by 60-80% is associated with proportional decreasing of rate and risk of cardiovascular events. Specific Lp(a) apheresis is the only possible method that solely targets Lp(a). In most countries, non-specific LA is used for treatment Lp(a) hyperlipoproteinemia in very high-risk subjects with progressive ASCVD. PCSK9 inhibitors have only modest effect on significantly elevated Lp(a), whereas large population-based studies requested sustained and prolonged reduction of Lp(a) levels by 50-100 mg/dL to gain proportional decreasing of major adverse cardiovascular events.

Lomitapide-a Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein Inhibitor for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare, genetic condition characterized by high levels of Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); overt, early-onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); and premature cardiovascular events and mortality. Lomitapide is a first-in-class microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor for the treatment of HoFH. This review provides an update on data emerging from real-world studies of lomitapide following on from its pivotal phase 3 clinical trial in HoFH. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent registry data have confirmed that HoFH is characterized by delayed diagnosis, with many patients not receiving effective therapy until they are approaching the age when major adverse cardiovascular events may occur. Data from case series of varying sizes, and from a 163-patient registry of HoFH patients receiving lomitapide, have demonstrated that lomitapide doses are lower and adverse events less severe than in the phase 3 study. Lomitapide enables many patients to reach European Atherosclerosis Society LDL-C targets. Some patients are able to reduce frequency of lipoprotein apheresis or, in some cases, stop the procedure altogether-unless there is significant elevation of lipoprotein (a). Modelling analyses based on historical and clinical trial data indicate that lomitapide has the potential to improve cardiovascular outcomes and survival in HoFH. Real-world clinical experience with lomitapide has shown the drug to be effective with manageable, less marked adverse events than in formal clinical studies. Event modelling data suggest a survival benefit with lomitapide in HoFH.