Contemporary outcomes of surgical decompression for functional popliteal entrapment syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Functional popliteal entrapment syndrome (FPES) is an under-recognized source of leg pain caused by dynamic compression of the popliteal vessels by surrounding musculature in the absence of anatomic abnormality. Late recognition and difficulty capturing this entity across imaging modalities can lead to significant morbidity in an often young and active patient population. Surgical outcomes and optimal diagnostic strategies remain uncertain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing surgical decompression for FPES at an academic medical center between 2018 and 2022. Preoperative symptoms, patient characteristics, imaging, operative details, and follow-up were captured. The primary outcome was symptomatic improvement at last clinic visit. Secondary outcomes included symptomatic improvement at 6 months and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 24 extremities (16 patients) were included. The mean ± standard deviation age was 23.3 ± 6.4 years and 75.0% of patients were female. The median symptom duration before decompression was 27 months (interquartile range, 10.7-74.6 months). Preoperative symptom severity in the affected extremity was as follows: 33.3% limited from peak exercise, 25% unable to exercise, and 41.7% with debilitating symptoms that affected activities of daily living. Preoperative imaging with provocative maneuvers included duplex ultrasound (87.5%), magnetic resonance angiography (100%), and digital subtraction angiography (100%). Using digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard, the sensitivity for detection of FPES was 85.7% for duplex examination and 58.3% for magnetic resonance angiography. The median follow-up was 451 days (interquartile range, 281-635 days). Most patients demonstrated durable improvement in the affected extremity, with 29.2% realizing complete resolution of symptoms and 37.5% reporting symptomatic improvement at last clinic visit for a total of 66.7%; 20.8% had initial improvement, but developed recurrent symptoms and were found to have elevated compartment pressures consistent with chronic exertional compartment syndrome and were treated with formal fasciotomy. Repeat decompression was required in one extremity (4.2%) owing to recurrent symptoms. Two patients (8.3%) had minimal or no improvement in their affected extremity and workup for the cause of continued discomfort was ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Delays in diagnosis of FPES are common. Provocative maneuvers until replication of symptoms across multiple imaging modalities may be necessary to reliably identify the disease process. Surgical decompression improved or completely resolved symptoms in two-thirds of extremities. Treating physicians should maintain suspicion for comorbid chronic exertional compartment syndrome, especially if symptoms recur or persist after decompression.

Sex disparities in popliteal artery aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Only 5% of patients with popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are female. Evidence on PAA treatment and outcomes in women is therefore scarce. The POPART Registry provides one of Europe's largest data collections regarding PAA treatment. Data on clinical presentation, aneurysm morphology, and perioperative outcomes after open surgical PAA repair in women will be presented. METHODS: POPART is a multicenter, noninterventional registry for open and endovascular PAA repair, with 42 participating centers in Germany and Luxembourg. All patients aged >18 years who have been treated for PAA since 2010 are eligible for study inclusion. Data collection is based on an online electronic case report form. RESULTS: Of the 1236 PAAs, 58 (4.8%) were in women. There were no significant differences in age or cardiopulmonary comorbidities. However, female patients had a lower prevalence of contralateral PAAs and abdominal aortic aneurysms (P < .05). PAAs in women were more likely to be symptomatic before surgery (65.5% vs 49.4%; P = .017), with 19% of women presenting with acute limb ischemia (vs 11%; P = .067). Women had smaller aneurysm diameters than men (22.5 mm vs 27 mm; P = .004) and became symptomatic at smaller diameters (20 mm vs 26 mm; P = .002). Only 8.6% of women and 11.6% of men underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (P > .05); therefore, the perioperative outcome analysis focused on open surgical repair. In total, 23.5% of women and 16.9% of men developed perioperative complications (P > .05). There were no differences in major cardiovascular events (P > .05), but women showed a higher incidence of impaired wound healing (15.7% vs 7.2%; P = .05) and major amputation (5.9% vs 1.1%; P = .027). Female sex was significantly associated with the need for nonvascular reinterventions within 30 days after surgery (odds ratio: 2.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.26-4.88), whereas no significant differences in the odds for vascular reinterventions were observed (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-5.77). In the multiple logistic regression model, female sex, symptomatic PAAs, poor quality of outflow vessels, and graft material other than vein graft were independently associated with perioperative reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: Women have smaller PAAs, are more likely to be symptomatic before treatment, and are more often affected by nonvascular reinterventions in the perioperative course. As our understanding of aneurysmatic diseases in women continues to expand, sex-specific treatment strategies and screening options for women in well-selected cohorts with modified screening protocols should be continuously re-evaluated.

A Hybrid Approach That May Facilitate the Repair of Traumatic Popliteal Artery Pseudoaneurysms.

PURPOSE: Traumatic popliteal pseudoaneurysms may occur in accidents or as an iatrogenic complication of a total knee arthroplasty. Complications often arise in open repair because of distorted anatomy. Up to 22% of the patients may suffer above-knee amputation. Endovascular treatment has proven to be an effective solution. However, the long-term performance of stents at the hinge point of the popliteal artery is questionable. We present a hybrid technique that was used successfully in 2 cases. TECHNIQUE: Our approach takes advantage of both open and endovascular techniques. At first, we apply a stent graft at the side of the injury to cover the arterial trauma and stop blood leakage to the aneurysm sac. This allows for a safer dissection and open repair. We clamp the artery proximally and distally, open the sac, extract the stent graft, and extend to a longitudinal arteriotomy. We then reconstruct the entire area with a standard in lay end-to-end anastomosis using a vein graft. This hybrid technique may reduce the risk of uncontrollable bleeding and allow for a safer nerve decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of such injuries is technically demanding. A hybrid approach may reduce the risk of complications and offer excellent long-term outcomes. CLINICAL IMPACT: The hybrid approach to the treatment of traumatic popliteal pseudoaneurysms combines the advantages of both open and endovascular approaches. It may be possible to make an acute operation just as safe as an elective operation by implementing the proposed strategy. The procedure can be performed by surgeons of all levels, and patients may benefit from a safer surgical dissection with fewer complications and blood loss. This smart combination of standard techniques may prove invaluable in a hostile surgical environment where limb loss is likely.

Deformed Popliteal Artery Due to Highly Flexed Knee Position Can Cause Kinks, Creating an Unfavorable Hemodynamic State.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment devices of the femoropopliteal artery have evolved, improving clinical results. However, the effects of dynamic changes in the popliteal artery during knee flexion have not been sufficiently investigated. In this study we performed a 3-dimensional analysis to clarify the dynamic changes in the popliteal artery during knee flexion and their effects on hemodynamics.Methods and Results: To analyze dynamic changes in the popliteal artery in the knee flexion position, a computed tomography protocol was developed in the right-angled and maximum flexion knee positions. Thirty patients with lower extremity artery disease were recruited. V-Modeler software was used for anatomical and hemodynamic analyses. Various types of deformations of the popliteal artery were revealed, including hinge points and accessory flexions. Kinks can occur in the maximum flexion position; however, they rarely occur in the right-angled flexion position. In addition, hemodynamic analysis revealed a tendency for lower minimum wall shear stress and a higher maximum oscillatory shear index at the maximum curvature of the popliteal artery. CONCLUSIONS: Kinks in the maximum flexion position suggested that the outcome of endovascular treatment may change in areas such as Japan, where knee flexion is customary. Hemodynamics at the maximum curvature of the popliteal artery indicated that the luminal condition was unfavorable for endovascular treatment.

Popliteal artery aneurysm ultrasound criteria for reporting characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is the modality of choice for surveillance of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs). However, noninvasive vascular laboratories have no standard guidelines for reporting results. This study assessed reports of PAA DUS for inclusion of information pertinent to operative decision-making and timing of surveillance. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of a multi-institutional repository that was queried for all patients with a PAA from 2008 to 2022 and confirmed via manual chart review. DUS reports were abstracted and images were individually annotated for features of interest including dimensions, flow abnormalities, and percent thrombus burden. RESULTS: A total of 166 PAAs in 130 patients had at least one DUS available for viewing. Postoperative surveillance of PAAs was performed at several intervals: the first at 30 months (IQR 3.7-113, n = 44), the second at 64 months (IQR 20-172, n = 31), and the third at 152 months (IQR 46-217, n = 16) after the operation. The largest diameter of operative PAAs (median 27.5 mm, IQR 21.8-38.0) was significantly greater than nonoperative PAAs (median 20.9 mm, IQR 16.7-27.3); p < 0.01. Fewer than 33 (21%) reports commented on patency of distal runoff. We calculated an average percent thrombus of 60% (IQR 19-81) in nonoperative PAAs, which is significantly smaller than 75% (IQR 58-89) in operative PAAs; p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, PAAs are often not followed at intervals recommended by the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines and do not include all measurements necessary for clinical decision-making in the multi-institutional repository studied. There should be standardization of PAA DUS protocols performed by all noninvasive vascular laboratories to ensure completeness of PAA DUS images and inclusion of characteristics pertinent to clinical decision-making in radiology reports.

Safety and effectiveness of the phoenix atherectomy device for endovascular treatment of common femoral and popliteal arteries: Results of the EN-MOBILE trial.

Background: This study aimed to assess the peri- and postprocedural outcomes of atherectomy-assisted endovascular treatment of the common femoral (CFA) and popliteal arteries. Methods: Phoenix atherectomy was used for the treatment of 73 and 53 de novo CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, in 122 consecutive patients. Safety endpoints encompassed perforation and peripheral embolization. Postprocedural endpoints included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and clinical success (an improvement of ⩾ 2 Rutherford category [RC]). In addition, 531 patients treated for popliteal artery stenosis or occlusion without atherectomy were used as a comparator group. Results: Procedural success (residual stenosis < 30% after treatment) was 99.2%. The need for bail-out stenting was 2 (2.7%) and 3 (5.7%) in CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively. Only one (1.4%) embolization occurred in the CFA, which was treated by catheter aspiration. No perforations occurred. After 1.50 (IQR = 1.17-2.20) years, CD-TLR occurred in seven (9.2%) and six (14.6%) patients with CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, whereas clinical success was achieved in 62 (91.2%) and 31 (75.6%), respectively. Patients treated with atherectomy and DCB in the popliteal artery after matching for baseline RC, lesion calcification, length, and the presence of chronic total occlusion, exhibited higher freedom from CD-TLR compared to the nondebulking group (HR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.1-8.5, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Atherectomy can be used safely and is associated with low rates of bail-out stenting in CFA and popliteal arteries. CD-TLR and clinical success rates are clinically acceptable. In addition, for the popliteal artery, atherectomy combined with DCB demonstrates lower CD-TLR rates compared to a DCB alone strategy. (German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00016708).

Improving duplex ultrasound methods for diagnosing functional popliteal artery entrapment syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES) is a rare condition where musculoskeletal structures compress the popliteal artery (POPA) leading to vascular compromise. This study investigates the effect of dynamic plantar- and dorsi-flexion loading on POPA hemodynamic parameters to develop a robust diagnostic ultrasound-based protocol for diagnosing functional PAES. METHODS: Healthy individuals (n = 20), recreational athletes (n = 20), and symptomatic (n = 20) PAES patients were consented. Triplex ultrasound imaging of lower limb arteries was performed (n = 120 limbs). Proximal and distal POPA's in dorsi-/plantar-flexion, in prone and erect positions, were imaged at rest and flexion. Peak systolic velocities (cm/s) and vessel diameter (antero-posterior, cm) was measured. RESULTS: Distal vessel occlusion was noted across all three groups whilst prone during plantar-flexion (62.7%). POPA occlusion was only noted in the proximal vessel within the patient group (15.8%). When prone, 50% of control (n = 40 limbs), 70% of athletes (n = 40 limbs), and 65% of patients (n = 40 limbs) had distal POPA occlusion in plantar-flexion. When prone, recreational athletes (5%), and patients (12.5%) had distal POPA compression under dorsi-flexion. POPA occlusions with the patient in erect position were only noted in the symptomatic patient group under both dorsi-flexion (15.8%) and plantar-flexion (23.7%). CONCLUSION: Compression of the POPA on ultrasound should not be the sole diagnostic criteria for PAES. POPA compression exists in asymptomatic individuals, primarily under prone plantar-flexion. To reduce false positives, ultrasound-based protocols should focus on scanning patients in the erect position only to diagnose PAES, rather than asymptomatic POPA compression. A distinction should be made between the two.

Exercise transcutaneous oximetry in functional popliteal artery entrapment syndrome diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: Functional popliteal artery entrapment syndrome is a subtype of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES) without vascular disease or musculotendinous anomaly behind the knee. Symptoms are induced by popliteal artery extrinsic compression, leading to calf pain during lower limbs exercise. Non-invasive tests are still required to improve the diagnostic management of functional PAES. Exercise transcutaneous oxygen pressure (Ex-tcpO2) is of interest to provide objective arguments for the presence of regional blood flow impairment. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyze whether Ex-tcpO2 could serve as a non-invasive technique for detecting ischemia resulting from PAES. METHODS: Patients with suspected PAES were recruited between 2017 and 2020. The diagnosis was confirmed or rejected, according to the surgical decision based on our diagnosis management involving a multidisciplinary team. Each patient underwent Ex-tcpO2 with specific maneuvers. The decrease from rest of oxygen pressure (DROP) index served for the interpretation of exercise results. RESULTS: Sixty-five legs with suspected PAES were recruited. Diagnosis was confirmed in 34 (52.3%) and rejected in 32 (47.7%). The average DROP values found in confirmed and rejected group at left leg were - 21.6 ± 15.4 mmHg and - 10.9 ± 11.1 mmHg, respectively (p for Mann-Whitney 0.004), and - 15.8 ± 11 mmHg and - 11.1 ± 7.5 mmHg, respectively, at right leg (p = 0.088). Ex-tcpO2 sensitivity and specificity were 52.9% and 78.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ex-tcpO2 is an original non-invasive investigation for patients with claudication of doubtful arterial origin. The sensitivity and specificity are 52.9% and 78.1% in functional PAES diagnosis using 15 mmHg as threshold to detect ischemia during tiptoeing elevations.

Usage of rotational atherectomy and drug-coated balloon angioplasty for isolated popliteal artery lesions: two-year results of a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, perioperative properties and early and mid-term clinical outcomes of endovascular revascularization with a combined usage of rotational atherectomy (RA) and drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) angioplasty for isolated popliteal artery lesion were reported. METHODS: A total of 28 patients with isolated popliteal artery stenosis who underwent combined RA and DCB angioplasty between December 2018 and September 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Temren atherectomy system (Invamed, Ankara, Turkey) and Extender paclitaxel-coated drug-coated balloon catheter (Invamed, Ankara, Turkey) were used in all cases. The main outcome was primary patency; secondary outcomes were technical success, freedom from amputation, and mortality. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 64.2 ± 9.1 years and the majority of the patients were male (n = 20; 71.4%). Types of the lesions were total occlusion in 24 limbs and critical stenosis in 4 limbs. The mean total occlusion length was 65.2 ± 14.2 mm. Flow-limiting dissection was seen in lesions of 2 patients (7.1%) and treated with prolonged balloon dilatation without bail-out stenting requirement. Technical success defined as an adequate vascular lumen (less than 30% stenosis) was achieved in 26 (92.8%) with a mean follow-up of 17.2 ± 8.2 months. The mean primary patency rates at 12 months and 24 months were 92.3% ± 3.2 and 81.2% ± 3.2, respectively. Complications included 1 distal embolization following RA, 2 flow-limiting dissections, and 3 puncture site hematomas. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular procedures using combined RA and DCB angioplasty seem to be effective alternative treatment modalities for the treatment of popliteal artery lesions with high rates of primary patency and freedom from TLR.

Investigation of Optimal Needle Position for Radiofrequency Ablation-Based Blockade of Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Posterior Capsule of the Knee: A Cadaveric Study.

Background and Objectives: The interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) block has been widely used in perioperative settings to control posterior knee pain and can additionally be used for chronic knee pain. In this cadaveric study, we aimed to investigate the needle tip position and its proximity to the articular branch of the tibial nerve (ABTN) during an iPACK-targeted radiofrequency procedure. Materials and Methods: An ultrasound-guided iPACK block was performed on 20 knees of 10 cadavers. We injected 0.1 mL each of blue and green gelatinous dye near the tibial artery (point A) and posterior knee capsule (point B), respectively, and evaluated the spread of both around the ABTN. For a hypothetical conventional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) lesion (diameter, 2.95 mm) and cooled RFA lesion (diameter, 4.9 mm), we counted the number of specimens in which the ABTNs would be captured. Results: The percentage of specimens in which the ABTN would be captured by a cooled RFA lesion was 64.71% at point A and 43.75% at point B (p = 0.334). Meanwhile, the percentage of specimens in which the ABTN would be captured by a conventional RFA lesion was 58.82% from point A and 25% from point B (p = 0.065). Conclusions: When performing an RFA-based iPACK block, the needle tip may be positioned either lateral to the tibial artery or in the space between the posterior knee capsule and the tibial artery. However, more studies with larger samples are needed to verify these results before the clinical use of this procedure can be recommended.

Anatomical quantitative evaluation of popliteal artery visualization during medial approach in supine position.

PURPOSE: The medial approach to the popliteal artery has been less commonly used than the posterior approach in surgical repair of traumatic popliteal injury. This study was performed to quantitatively evaluate the visual field of the popliteal artery obtained by staged myotendotomy in the medial approach to the popliteal artery. METHODS: Twenty legs of fresh-frozen adult cadavers were dissected using the medial approach to the popliteal artery. In stage 1, the popliteal artery was exposed between the vastus medialis and sartorius muscles without myotendotomy. In stage 2, the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle was dissected. In stage 3, the tendons of the sartorius and semimembranosus muscles were dissected. In stage 4, the tendons of the gracilis and semitendinosus muscles were dissected to fully expose the popliteal artery. The length of the popliteal artery that could be visualized in each stage was measured. RESULTS: The anatomical length of the popliteal artery from the hiatus of the adductor magnus to the tendinous arch of soleus muscle ranged from 15 to 20 cm (mean, 16.3 cm). On average, 45%, 59%, 72%, and 100% of the popliteal artery were visualized in stage 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The medial approach to the popliteal artery has the advantage of being performed in the supine position, but it requires multiple myotendotomies around the knee. The results of this study may serve as a reference for myotendotomy depending on the site of injury to the popliteal artery.

Investigation of center-specific saphenous vein utilization rates in femoral popliteal artery bypass and associated impact of conduit on outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate variation in great saphenous vein (GSV) use among the various centers participating in the Vascular Quality Initiative infrainguinal bypass modules. Further, differences in outcomes in femoral-popliteal artery bypass with single segment GSV conduit vs prosthetic conduit will be documented. Center GSV use rate impact on outcomes will be investigated. METHODS: Primary exclusions were patients undergoing redo bypass, urgent or emergent bypass, and those in whom prosthetic graft was used while having undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting. The distribution of GSV use across the 260 centers participating in Vascular Quality Initiative infrainguinal bypass module was placed into histogram and variance in mean GSV use evaluated with analysis of variance analysis. Centers that used GSV in >50% of bypasses were categorized as high use centers and centers that used the GSV in <30% of cases were categorized as low use centers. Baseline differences in patient characteristics and comorbidities in those undergoing bypass with GSV vs prosthetic conduit were analyzed with χ2 testing and the Student t test, as were those undergoing treatment in high vs low use centers. Multivariable time-dependent Cox regression analyses were then performed for the primary outcomes of major amputation ipsilateral to the operative side and mortality in long-term follow-up. High vs low use center was a dichotomous variable in these regressions. Secondary outcomes of freedom from graft infection and freedom from loss of primary patency were performed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Among centers with >50 patients meeting inclusion criteria for this study, GSV use ranged from 15% to 93% (analysis of variance P < .001). When considering all centers irrespective of number of patients, the range was 0% to 100%. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, GSV conduit use was associated with improved freedom from loss of primary or primary assisted patency, improved freedom from major amputation after index hospitalization, improved freedom from graft infection after the index hospitalization, and improved freedom from mortality in long-term follow-up (log-rank P < .001 for all four outcomes). Both low use center (hazard ratio, 1.35; P < .001) and prosthetic graft use (hazard ratio, 1.24; P < .001) achieved multivariable significance as risks for mortality in long-term follow-up. Other variables with a multivariable mortality association are presented in the manuscript. Low use center and prosthetic bypass were significant univariable but not multivariable risks for major amputation after index hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: There is remarkably wide variation in GSV use for femoral popliteal artery bypass among various medical centers. GSV use is associated with enhanced long-term survival as well as freedom from loss of bypass patency and graft infection. The data herein indicate institutional patterns of prosthetic conduit choice, which has the potential to be altered to enhance outcomes.

Different endovascular modalities of treatment for isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions (EMO-POP) registry.

BACKGROUND: The mid-term results after treatment of isolated popliteal lesions have been limited. The aim of the present study was to report the mid-term outcomes after endovascular treatment of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions. METHODS: A multicenter (15 hospitals in five countries) retrospective cohort study was performed. Between June 2016 and June 2021, 651 consecutive patients who had been treated for isolated popliteal lesions using endovascular methods exclusively were included in the present study. Six techniques were identified, including plain balloon angioplasty (PTA; n = 286; 43.9%), drug-coated balloon angioplasty (n = 98; 15.1%), stenting with low-chronic outward force (COF) stents (n = 84; 12.9%), stenting with high-COF stents (n = 76; 11.7%), atherectomy alone (n = 17; 2.6%), and directional atherectomy with drug-coated balloons (n = 90; 13.8%). The primary outcomes measures were primary and secondary patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (F-CDTLR). RESULTS: The mean patient age was 74.5 years. Most of the patients (n = 409; 62.9%) had had chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Popliteal occlusion was found in 400 cases (61.4%). High-grade calcification was present in 36.7% of cases. Immediate technical success was 94.8%. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 6-42 months). The actuarial rate for all patients at 26 months (per outcome measure) was as follows: primary patency, 73.9%; secondary patency, 88%; and F-CDTLR, 76.5%. When comparing PTA vs all other treatments in an adjusted regression analysis, the F-CDTLR was 75.2% for PTA vs 76.5% for all other treatment (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.48; P = .46, adjusted regression). The difference in secondary patency also was not statistically significant (85.7% for PTA vs 88%; P = .20). Adjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the estimated primary patency was inferior for PTA in pairwise comparisons vs other treatments (P < .001 vs atherectomy; P = .002 vs directional atherectomy with drug-coated balloons; and P = .002 vs low-COF stenting). CONCLUSIONS: The results from our study have shown that endovascular treatment of isolated popliteal lesions is safe and associated with acceptable patency and F-CDTLR in the mid-term.

Bypass vs endovascular treatment for occluded femoro-popliteal stents in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the early and medium-term outcomes of bypass vs endovascular treatment of occluded femoro-popliteal stents in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (the OUT-STEPP multicentric registry). METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2021, 317 patients in 14 centers underwent treatment for a symptomatic occlusion of femoro-popliteal stent/stents. One hundred sixty-one patients were included into the present study: 46 (28.6%) underwent open bypass surgery (Group OPEN), and 115 (71.4%) underwent endovascular revascularization (Group ENDO). Early (30 days) results were assessed and compared between the two groups. Estimated 5-year outcomes were evaluated and compared with the log rank test. RESULTS: At 30 days, no differences were found in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, reinterventions, major amputation, and all-cause mortality between the two groups. The need for blood transfusions was higher for patients in Group OPEN (17; 36.9% vs 13; 11.3%; P < .001). The mean length of intensive care unit stay and the mean hospital stay were higher for patients in Group OPEN ([0.3 ± 0.9 vs 0 days; P < .001] and [9.7 ± 5.8 vs 3.3 ± 1.4 days; P < .001], respectively). The overall median duration of follow-up was 33.1 months (interquartile range, 14-49.5 months). At 5 years, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of survival (68.7% Group OPEN vs 68.8% Group ENDO; P = .27; log-rank, 1.21), primary patency (56.3% Group OPEN vs 67.8% Group ENDO; P = .39; log-rank, 0.75), secondary patency (59.1% Group OPEN vs 77.8% Group ENDO; P = .24; log-rank, 1.40), absence of target lesion restenosis (56.8% Group OPEN vs 62.7% Group ENDO; P = .42; log-rank, 0.65), and limb salvage (77.2% Group OPEN vs 90.4% Group ENDO; P = .17; log-rank, 1.87). CONCLUSIONS: Both bypass and endovascular treatment provided safe and effective restoration of patency for femoro-popliteal in-stent occlusion in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Open surgery was associated with longer stay in hospital and increased use of blood transfusions. At 5 years, no significant differences were found in the rates of overall patency or limb salvage between bypass and endovascular treatment.

The Vascular Quality Initiative assessment of the Bard Lifestent for the treatment of popliteal artery occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: The Bard LifeStent self-expanding stent is approved for the treatment of occlusive disease involving the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery. We conducted a post-market trial of treatment of the popliteal artery above and below the knee (P1, P2, and P3 segments) within the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Peripheral Vascular Intervention registry. METHODS: A single-arm, prospective trial was conducted at 29 VQI sites in the United States, enrolling 74 patients from November 2016 to May 2019. The primary safety outcome was freedom from major adverse events including device-/procedure-related mortality and major amputation at 1 year. The primary efficacy outcomes were freedom from target vessel revascularization and freedom from target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included lesion success; procedural success; primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency; and sustained clinical (improvement in Rutherford class) and hemodynamic success (increase in ankle brachial index >0.10). Outcomes were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Arteriogram of patients undergoing target lesion revascularization were assessed for stent fracture by a core laboratory. RESULTS: The mean age was 71 years, with 63.5% male and 55% with diabetes. The indication was claudication 28% and chronic limb-threatening ischemia in 72%. The superficial femoral artery-popliteal artery was stented in 38% and the popliteal artery alone in 62%. The majority of stents were placed in the P1 + P2 (39%) or P1 + P2 + P3 (37%) segments of the popliteal artery. The composite primary endpoint of freedom from major adverse events was 82% and 74% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Freedom from mortality was 100% and 97%, and freedom from major amputation was 100% and 90% at 1 and 12 months, with all deaths and major amputations occurring in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. freedom from target lesion revascularization was 86%, and freedom from target vessel revascularization was 84% at 12 months. At discharge, lesion treatment success was 99%, and procedural success was 82%. Primary patency was 80% and 72%, primary-assisted patency was 80% and 72%, and secondary patency was 89% and 82% at 12 and 24 months. Sustained clinical success was 98% and 95%, and sustained hemodynamic success was 100% and 79% at 12 and 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-center, registry-based, single-arm prospective study the Bard LifeStent self-expanding stent demonstrated favorable performance in the challenging anatomy of the P2 and P3 popliteal segment. Post-market studies for label expansion of peripheral vascular intervention devices can be successfully conducted within the Society for Vascular Surgery VQI registry.

Optimized drug-coated balloon angioplasty of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries using the Tack Endovascular System: Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) III 24-month results in standard and long lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The Tack Endovascular System is a minimal-metal dissection repair device that is purpose-built to treat post-percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) arterial dissections in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) III trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Tack Endovascular System in patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery (PPA) dissection after PTA with a drug-coated balloon (DCB). The objective of this study is to report the results in the standard- (SL) and long-lesion (LL) cohorts through 24 months. DESIGN: The TOBA III study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study including patients suffering from Rutherford category 2-4 PAD. Outcomes were assessed according to pre-specified lesion length in SL ( ≥ 20 mm and ≤150 mm) and LL ( > 150 mm and ≤250 mm) cohorts. Follow-up was through 24 months. RESULTS: TOBA III enrolled 201 patients, 169 patients in the SL cohort and 32 in the LL cohort. At 24 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from major adverse events were 91.7% and 82.6% for the SL cohort and LL cohort, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from clinically driven-target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were 92.3% in the SL cohort and 82.6% in the LL cohort. At 24 months, 78.8% of SL patients and 69.2% of LL patients experienced an improvement of >2 Rutherford categories (both cohorts p < 0.001). The baseline ankle-brachial index improved from 0.68 ± 0.18 to 0.93 ± 0.16 in the SL (p < 0.001) and from 0.62 ± 0.23 to 0.87 ± 0.15 in the LL cohort (p < 0.001) at 24 months. CONCLUSION: The 24-month results of the TOBA III trial support the safety and effectiveness of the Tack Endovascular System in patients who required post-PTA dissection repair in the SFA and PPA following DCB angioplasty for claudication and rest pain. In both the SL and LL cohorts, Tack placement was associated with sustained freedom from CD-TLR through 24 months as well as sustained improvements in Rutherford categories, ankle-brachial index, and quality of life.

Association Between Conduit Type and Outcomes After Open Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have demonstrated acceptable midterm outcomes with prosthetic conduits for above-knee bypass for occlusive disease in patients with inadequate segment great saphenous vein (GSV). In this study we aimed to investigate whether this holds true for open repair of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA). METHODS: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative data for patients who underwent open PAA repair (OPAR). We divided the cohort into three groups based on the conduit used: GSV, other autologous veins, or prosthetic graft. Study outcomes included primary patency, freedom from major amputation, amputation-free survival, and overall survival at 1 y. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression were used to compare outcomes between study groups. RESULTS: A total of 4016 patients underwent bypass for PAA from January 2010 to October 2021. The three cohorts were significantly different in many demographic and clinical characteristics. The adjusted odds of postoperative amputation among symptomatic patients were 3-fold higher for prosthetic conduits compared to the GSV (odds ratio, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.72-5.92; P < 0.001). For the 1-y outcomes, the adjusted risk of major amputation was almost 3-fold higher for patients with symptomatic disease undergoing bypass with prosthetic conduits (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; 95% CI, 1.35-6.52; P = 0.007). When compared with GSV, prosthetic conduits were associated with 96% increased risk of death when used for repair in symptomatic patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.96; 95% CI, 1.29-2.97; P = 0.002) but no significant association with mortality in asymptomatic patients (aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.37-1.87; P = 0.652). When compared with GSV, prosthetic conduits were associated with a 2-fold increased risk of 1-y major amputation or death when used for repair in symptomatic patients (aHR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.40-2.94; P < 0.001) but no significant association with mortality in asymptomatic patients (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.42-1.98; P = 0.816). Comparing bypass with other veins to the GSV among patients with symptomatic disease, there was no statistically significant difference in major amputation risk (HR; 2.44; 95% CI, 0.55-10.82; P = 0.242) and no difference in the adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.26-2.44; P = 0.653). There were no differences in the adjusted risk of loss of primary patency comparing other veins to GSV (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.85-2.76; P = 0.154) and prosthetic conduits to GSV (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.57-1.26; P = 0.422). CONCLUSIONS: This large study shows that among patients undergoing OPAR, 1-y primary patency does not differ between conduit types. However, prosthetic conduits are associated with significantly higher risk of amputation and death compared to GSV among symptomatic patients. Though non-GSV autologous veins are less often used for OPAR, they have comparably acceptable outcomes as GSV.

Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy Versus PTA/Supera Stenting for Popliteal Artery Lesions: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: This study examines the use and impact of directional atherectomy with antirestenotic therapy (DAART) versus angioplasty plus Supera stent implantation on the outcomes during endovascular treatment of popliteal lesions in clinical practice. METHODS: Overall 143 consecutive patients (mean age 75.0±12.2 years, 72% male), with isolated atherosclerotic disease of the popliteal artery who underwent endovascular treatment using DAART therapy or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/Supera stenting of the popliteal artery between January 2016 and December 2021 were identified from a retrospectively database. Patient and plaque characteristics were collected. A propensity-score matched, case-control analysis was conducted to balance covariates between the group of patients who underwent DAART and the one treated by PTA/Supera stenting. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (35.7%) showed severe claudication and 92 (64.3%) critical limb ischemia. There was a trend toward longer treated lesions (90.4±81 vs 72.5±5.3 mm, p=0.089) and more chronic total occlusions (60.5% vs 46.8%, p=0.058) in the PTA/Supera stenting group, although not reaching statistically significance. Moderate-to-severe calcification was present in most lesions treated (75.8% of DAART group, 80.2% of PTA/Supera stenting group, and 78.3% of total cohort). Among the 53 case-matched pairs of patients treated with DAART or PTA/Supera stenting, there were no significant differences in short-term outcomes, including rate of technical success (96.2% vs 98.1%, p=0.232), procedural success (88.7% vs 90.1%, p=0.251), distal embolization (1.9% vs 1.9%, p=0.178), dissection (5.7% vs 1.9%, p=0.268), perforation (3.8% vs 5.6%, p=0.163), hospital discharge (1.2±0.1 vs 1.0±0.1, p=0.325), 30 day minor (28.3% vs 32.1%, p=0.264) or major amputation rates (7.5% vs 3.8%, p=0.107), and 30 day mortality (1.9% vs 1.9%, p=0.173). At 1 year, there was no difference in primary patency (73.6% vs 77.4%, p=0.233), primary assisted patency (81.3% vs 84.9%, p=0.167), secondary patency (86.8% vs 92.5%, p=0.094), ipsilateral minor (35.8% vs 39.6%, p=0.472) or major amputation (9.4% vs 7.5%, p=0.186), ankle brachial index improvement (0.32±0.12 vs 0.37±0.37, p=0.401), or mortality (5.7% vs 5.7%, p=0.121) rate between patients who underwent DAART or PTA/Supera stenting for popliteal lesions. CONCLUSION: Twelve-month results following DAART technique or PTA/Supera stenting of atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery are not different, regardless of patient and plaque characteristics. CLINICAL IMPACT: The DAART technique for the treatment of popliteal artery atherosclerotic disease is presented as a "leave nothing behind" strategy with on-year clinical outcomes similar to ATP/Supera stenting.

Surgical Treatment for Popliteal Artery Entrapment Syndrome in Japan: a Retrospective, Multicentre Study Using a National Clinical Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment is an established method for popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES), which, however, mainly derives from single centre experiences where PAES cases are centralised and treated periodically. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for PAES in a clinical setting where PAES cases were not centralised. METHODS: Multicentre, retrospective cohort study using a national clinical registry. From a Japanese nationwide clinical registry, data for patients who underwent surgical treatment for PAES between 2013 and 2018, including 58 limbs from 41 institutes, were retrieved and evaluated. Patency was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 36 ± 19 years, 78% were male, and the incidence of PAES was 0.24 limbs/centre/year, reflecting a clinical setting where PAES cases are not centralised. The most frequent arterial symptom was intermittent claudication (90%). Computed tomography was performed in 57 limbs (98%) for the diagnosis, however active manoeuvres such as dorsiflexion and plantarflexion during the examination was performed in only 13 limbs (22%), and occlusion of the popliteal artery was present in 38 limbs (66%) at diagnosis. Regarding surgical treatment, myotomy alone was performed in only seven limbs (12%), and other limbs were revascularised. Mean follow up was 26 ± 20 months, and surgical treatment was effective as it relieved symptoms in > 96% of limbs, with five year primary and secondary patency of the surgical treatment for PAES of 72% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of surgical treatment were acceptable even in a clinical setting where PAES cases were not centralised. However, a low incidence of active manoeuvres performed during the examination and a high incidence of occlusion at diagnosis suggests there may be delayed or underdiagnosis of PAES in Japan, and increased awareness for PAES is warranted.

Multicenter, retrospective registry of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal arteries treated with endovascular revascularization.

Isolated atherosclerotic popliteal lesions (IAPLs) have been considered challenging. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) using the newer devices for IAPLs. This retrospective multicenter registry analyzed patients with lower extremity artery disease having IAPLs who underwent EVT using the newer devices between 2018 and 2021. The primary outcome was primary patency 1 year after EVT. A total of 392 consecutive patients undergoing EVT for IAPLs were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the primary patency and the freedom from target lesion revascularization were 80.9% and 87.8% 1 year after EVT, respectively. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the clinical features that were independently associated with restenosis risk were drug-coated balloon (DCB) use for younger age (< 75 years old; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.08 [95% confidence interval 1.08-8.74]; P = 0.035), non-ambulatory status (2.74 [95% confidence interval 1.56-4.81]; P < 0.001), cilostazol use (0.51 [95% confidence interval 0.29-0.88]; P = 0.015), severe calcification (1.86 [95% confidence interval 1.18-2.94]; P = 0.007), and small external elastic membrane (EEM) area measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (< 30 mm2) (2.07 [95% confidence interval 1.19-3.60]; P = 0.010). From the univariate analysis, among patients treated with DCB, younger patients (n = 141) were associated with more comorbidities including smoking (P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), end-stage renal disease (P < 0.001), history of revascularization (P = 0.046) and small EEM area (P = 0.036), compared to older patients (n = 140). Moreover, smaller post-procedural minimum lumen area measured by IVUS after DCB dilatation was observed in younger patients (12 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 4 mm2, P = 0.033). This retrospective study demonstrated that the current EVT provided an acceptable 1-year primary patency rate in patients with IAPLs. The primary patency was lower following DCB in younger patients, likely due to the higher rates of comorbidities in this patient population.