Staging's determinants in early intervention youth: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Since 2019 our early intervention unit has assessed help-seekers, mainly referred by psychiatric departments, and we have conducted a descriptive retrospective study. Our objective was to identify clinical determinants associated to staging at assessment for our three groups: "no psychosis", "ultra-high risk" and "first episode psychosis". METHODS: One hundred and thirteen participants (mean age 20.05±3.28) were enrolled, mainly referred by adult psychiatry (81.4%). We tested the association of each group with the following determinants: age, gender, family history of psychosis, referral (adolescent or adult psychiatry), cognitive, depressive complaint, cannabis active consumption, and current activity (scholar or employment). RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed significant association with depressive symptoms (P=0.019) but an absence of family history of psychosis (P=0.002) or current activity (P=0.09) for "no psychosis" group. "Ultra-high risk" was significantly correlated with a family history of psychosis (P=0.001) and adolescent psychiatry referral (P=0.044) but an absence of depressive complaint (P=0.04). As for "first episode psychosis", we found significant cognitive complaint (P=0.026), family history (P=0.024) and current activity (0.026). CONCLUSIONS: As all our participants were seen in tertiary care, adolescent psychiatrists were more efficient in detecting a high-risk state. "No psychosis" help-seekers presented in fact mood issues, which have been confused with attenuated psychotic symptoms by their addressers, who have probably been misled by their absence of activity integration. High-risk and characterized psychotic episodes were logically correlated with family history. Surprisingly, "first episode psychosis" youth were currently integrated in scholarly or professional life despite an active cognitive complaint. Robust studies, especially prospective cohorts, are needed to test these associations.

[Validation of a French version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (fPQ16) in adolescents and young adults seeking help]. / Validation d'une version française du 16-items Prodromal Questionnaire (fPQ16) chez des adolescents et jeunes adultes consultant en psychiatrie.

INTRODUCTION: The duration of untreated psychosis has been largely associated with poor outcomes in psychosis. Actual diagnostic tools may be used by very specialized teams and need sustained evaluation. We present a French version of a self-report questionnaire: the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (fPQ16). Our objective was to evaluate its predictive value for an ultra-high-risk state (UHR) or psychosis. The population enrolled was consulting in a young adults and adolescents center in Sainte-Anne hospital, Paris, France. METHODS: PQ16 had first been translated into French and independently back translated and validated by the original authors. Between November 2016 and May 2018, every C'JAAD consulting patient was proposed to fill in the fPQ16. Each patient was next evaluated with the French version of the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental state (CAARMS), which detects UHR or psychosis. Statistical analysis of fPQ16 concurrent validity was performed using ROC curves. fPQ16 acceptability was studied by four additional questions especially designed for that purpose. RESULTS: One hundred participants were included. Mean age was 19.85years (SD 3.3 y). Fifty-eight percent of patients included were diagnosed with UHR (40%) or psychotic (18%) state after CAARMS evaluation. Mean score at fPQ16 was 5.7 (SD 3.8). Best cut-off score was 4 positive items, with excellent sensibility (91%) and correct specificity (60%). Positive predictive value of fPQ16 was 76%. Area under the curve was 0.85 (P<0.0001). fPQ16 showed good acceptability. DISCUSSION: fPQ16 had good screening performances in our population. Cut-off score was lower than in previous studies, but performances were equal or better. As a well-accepted and short questionnaire, the fPQ16 could be a great screening tool in primary care. A version with 18-items, including two items focused on thought content and disorganization that are missing in PQ16, is under evaluation.

[Management of cardiovascular co-morbidities in young patients with early onset psychosis: State of the art and therapeutic perspectives]. / Prise en charge des comorbidités cardio-vasculaires chez les jeunes patients souffrant d'une psychose débutante : état des lieux et perspectives thérapeutiques.

Patients with psychiatric disorders have a decrease in their life expectancy. Excess mortality of patients with schizophrenia was demonstrated by a meta-analysis in the late 1990s and has not decreased for the past 30years. A recent meta-analysis including nearly 250,000 patients with schizophrenia found an average decrease in life expectancy of 14.5years (CI95: 11,2-17,8), more important for men than for women: 15.9 (CI95: 13,8-18,0) vs 13.6 (CI95: 11,4-15,8). A closer look at the somatic comorbidities, including metabolic syndrome, and investigation of causes of death of these patients highlighted already well-known factors, namely late diagnosis and insufficient treatment of physical diseases, side effects of antipsychotics, unhealthy lifestyle (poor diet, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and lack of exercise), and higher risk of suicide and accident. Concerning ultra-high risk (UHR) patients, a 2016 meta-analysis of 47 studies evaluated the cardiovascular risk factors. They reported a higher prevalence of smoking in UHR (odds ratio 2,3) and a lower level of physical activity associated with a normal BMI (Body Mass Index) compared to the control population. A meta-analysis about patients with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) found reduced total and LDL cholesterol levels and an increased triglyceride level compared to the control population. One study found alteration of the fasting plasmatic levels of glucose and insulin, as well as insulin resistance in FEP patients, compared to controls albeit the HbA1c level was not significantly different. A meta-analysis reported a prevalence of metabolic syndrome of 10 % in FEP or drug naïve patients versus 35 % and 20 % in treated and untreated patients with chronic schizophrenia respectively. Somatic comorbidities usually appear during the first two years of the disease. Some interventions have proven their efficacy in reducing the occurrence of metabolic syndrome and other cardiovascular risk factors. For instance, metformin, a treatment for type 2 diabetes that is allowed from the age of 10, has shown benefits in children and adolescents receiving second-generation antipsychotics in a recent meta-analysis, with a mean weight loss of 3.23kg (IC95 % -5.59 -0.86) after 16 weeks. Dietary-hygienic interventions are also effective in reducing cardiovascular risk. Other interventions such as omega-3 supplementation, vitamin D, N-acetylcysteine, and fasting have not proven to be effective. Comprehensive care programs have been developed to promote somatic care in psychiatric patients, such as the Canadian HeAL (Healthy Active Lives) program. These programs are more effective when proposed from the beginning of the disease and the introduction of antipsychotics. In this review, because there is no French recommendation, we translate a tool for the prescription of metformin and the Canadian recommendations from the HeAL program. Generalization of these programs to all young psychotic patients could improve their life expectancy and reduce the overall mortality. Prevention of cardiovascular risk factors and cardio-metabolic monitoring of treatments must be part of the standard of care in early psychosis. These programs aim at providing patients with the quality of somatic and mental care they are entitled to. This requires the involvement of all stakeholders, including patients and their families but also psychiatrists and other caregivers.

[Suicidal risk during the first psychotic episode]. / Risque suicidaire lors du premier épisode psychotique.

Suicide is the most common cause of early mortality during the course of schizophrenia. The most recent data in the literature show that the risk of suicide is greater at the beginning of the course of schizophrenia. The risk of suicide during the first year is 12 times higher than that of the general population. Specifically, 2-5 % of people with first-episode psychosis will die by suicide in long-term follow-up studies. Regarding the presence of suicidal ideation that are a major factor of suicide in subjects suffering from psychotic disorders, their prevalence remains extremely worrying, since they are substantial and persistent. Consequently, suicide prevention should be a major and immediate objective in the management of the disease, as soon as the diagnosis has been made. Suicidal ideas are a potential precursor to the evolution towards acting out. Their evolution must be specifically assessed in each individual. Indeed, in the influential Danish OPUS study the authors reported heterogeneity in suicidal ideations in young patients with first episode of psychosis and identified three prototypical trajectories of suicidal ideations over the first 2 years in treatment. Particularly, nearly 40 % of patients with first-episode psychosis have persisting suicidal thoughts over the initial treatment period. Consequently, the authors recommend routine screening for suicidality when providing treatment for first-episode psychosis. The main risk factors for suicidal behavior in patients with a first episode are classical ones. Previous research has suggested that, in addition to young age and early course of illness, other important clinical predictors of suicide in individuals with schizophrenia include presence of depressive symptoms and misuse of substances, which are very common conditions in these patients. Lack of social support, loss, rejection, stigma, insight, fear of future losses, are all negative experiences experienced by patients starting a psychotic disorder. Negative connotations of the diagnosis of psychotic disorders, feelings of being trapped that can be directly related to feeling a burden can lead to suicidal crisis in these individuals. Then, the painful experience of the disease and its consequences associated with self-stigmatization and social rejection may induce hopelessness and suicidal thoughts in these young subjects. The quality of the insight and its evolution may worsen the depressive experience and suicidal risk and they therefore also require to be measured regularly. Thus, the clinical evaluation of patients entering psychosis should focus on those dimensions that are not directly related to the psychotic symptoms. At the precise evaluation of each patient must be associated personalized measures of prevention. It is now proposed that prevention strategies targeting suicidal behaviour in first-episode psychosis should not be universal. On a more general level, evidence-based data to support specific care programs are still lacking, and only few data are in favor of integrated care in patients presenting with first episode. It should also be kept in mind that the risk of suicide is extraordinarily high for all psychiatric patients during the first few months after discharge from hospital. This should encourage caregivers to offer intensive follow-up programs to their patients and to embrace recontact and follow-up initiatives using the tools of e-health. Last, programs for the early detection of schizophrenia seem to be beneficial for the prevention of suicide in these subjects.

[Specific treatment of the first psychotic episodes]. / Prise en charge spécifique des premiers épisodes psychotiques.

Early detection and early intervention programs in early adolescent and young adult psychosis have developed in many countries and have shown their effectiveness. The main lesson of these programs is to have demonstrated that the progression of at-risk mental state into to a full-blown psychosis or of a psychotic episode to a chronic schizophrenic disorder is evitable. They have also shown that the earlier appropriate care is set up the better the functional remission and that the period of "early psychosis" encompassing the period preceding the emergence of psychosis and the first months after the first psychotic episode, is a period of opportunity for a preventive or curative intervention. Specialized therapeutic strategies shall include patient's centered integrative care. According to international recommendations, early intervention provides an extensive multidisciplinary assessment in search of possible organic etiologies and in instrumental to adapt care strategies to the person's need. It helps to identify levers for a psychosocial approach (psychoeducation, cognitive and behavioral therapies, cognitive remediation, case management) and for adressing aggravating factors (substance use, family interventions, educational support, etc.). A second-generation antipsychotic should be introduced, at lower doses than for a chronic disorder. The young patient must be accompanied until recovery by a specialized multidisciplinary team, usually for a period of 2 to 3 years. Deployment of such programs is a societal challenge and represents a paradigm shift: it questions the practices and organization of the healthcare system, but also the way healthcare professionals and the general public look at these diseases. In France, the Transition Network, a founding member of the French-speaking branch of IEPA, aims to facilitate the dissemination of these practices on a National scale, and to help to harmonize emerging initiatives.

[What support of young presenting a first psychotic episode, when schooling is being challenged?] / Quelle prise en charge du jeune présentant un premier épisode psychotique, quand la scolarité est mise à mal ?

Psychiatric disorders (more specifically mood disorders and psychosis) represent the 1st cause of disability among young people. Unemployment rate between 75 to 95% for the person with schizophrenia. It is correlated to poor social integration and bad economic status, worse symptomatology loss of autonomy as well as global bad functioning. It is responsible of more than half of the overall cost of psychosis. The onset of most of psychiatric disorders occur between the age of 25 and 35 years old, a critical time in young adult life when they should build their professional as well as social future. Without appropriate care, young adult are unable to build satisfactory emotional relationships, continue their studies, live independently or fit into life. They are frequently dependent on their environment. They also have an increased suicide rate and frequent comorbid substance abuse. Despite this context, their care pathway is often marked by a delay or premature stop of care, drug treatments not always suitable and a lack of specific relay post-hospitalization regarding continuity of professional training or studies. All factors impacting future employability of adolescents. Furthermore they spend most of their time in school and school plays a key part in an individual's development including peer relationships, social interactions, academic attainment, cognitive progress, emotional control, behavioral expectations and physical and moral development. These areas are also reciprocally affected by mental illness. The initial phases of FEP are characterized by impaired academic performance, change in social behaviors and increasing absences from school, reflecting the prodrome of the illness that leads to disengagement from education. Functional decline often precedes onset of clinical symptoms and many adolescents and young adults are therefore isolated from school before their illness is recognized. School support staff may fail to recognize those who are functionally impaired because of evolving FEP although school is a key setting for promoting positive mental health, fostering resilience, detecting and responding to emerging mental ill health. So, people with psychotic illness have low levels of secondary school completion. School dropout has been defined as leaving education without obtaining a minimal credential, most often a higher secondary education diploma. In France, the school is compulsory up to the age of 16. Consequences are significant: among young people without a degree out of initial training for one to four years and present on the labour market, 47% are unemployed. School dropout depends on a number of factors, including grades, family and social environment and the relationship with the school, but also the emergence of psychiatric disorders. For first episode psychotic patients, age of onset, lack of family support, longer duration of psychosis, levels of premorbid global functioning and education, negative and cognitive symptoms, addictions, depressive comorbidities and stigma plays an important role in school dropout. However, young adults have historically received less treatment than expected considering prevalence of mental illness at that age. In the last few decades, early intervention programs for psychosis have been developed all around the world in order to promote rehabilitation and prevent long-term disabilities. Early intervention programs focus on the special needs of young people and their families and engage in some form of assertive community treatment, which attempts to treat patients in the community rather than using inpatient services. For early intervention in psychosis programs, the goal is to keep patients engaged with treatment, prevent them from further psychotic episodes and hospitalizations and promote rehabilitation. The additional services of an early intervention program include staff specialized in psychosis treatment, family/group/individual counseling sessions, assertive case management, and low-dose second generation anti-psychotics. In these programs, psychiatric rehabilitation practitioners already use individual counseling and supported education programs (SEd) to improve postsecondary educational outcomes. The goals of SEd are for individuals with serious mental illness to successfully be able to set and achieve an educational goal (e.g., training certificate or degree), to improve educational competencies (literacy, study skills, time management), to navigate the educational environment (e.g., applications, financial assistance), and to improve motivation toward completing educational goals. These approaches are often combined with efforts to support transitions to sustainable employment. Current evidence of these interventions are weak with limited information on specific difficulties experienced by young adults with FEP in educational tasks. Adaptive strategies are needed by young adults with FEP to succeed in educational settings but most studies do not explore it with rigorous methodology. However, common SEd components emerge: specialized and dedicated staffing, one-on-one and group skill-building activities, assistance with navigating the academic setting and coordinating different services, and linkages with mental health counseling. Continued specification, and testing of SEd core components are still needed. It is important that occupational therapy researchers and practitioners develop, and evaluate effective interventions to improve education outcomes for young adults with FEP. The objective of this work is to define school dropout, assess causes and consequences of FEP. How to help young people to maintain education? We will detail measures to support the academic re-insertion in France.

[Duration of untreated psychosis: A state-of-the-art review and critical analysis]. / Durée de psychose non traitée : état des lieux et analyse critique.

INTRODUCTION: Prognosis of schizophrenia has not significantly improved despite extensive research. There is often a relatively long delay between onset of symptoms and treatment initiation. Lately, duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), the time between the onset of psychosis and initiation of treatment, has been one of the most studied variables in patients presenting for a first psychotic episode in order to evaluate the impact of early intervention on the prognosis of schizophrenia. In the literature, a variety of criteria have been used to define both transition to psychosis and initiation of treatment. Furthermore, the dating of both of these variables is usually retrospective, further complicating the measurement of DUP. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review about DUP using Pubmed and Google Scholar databases up to January 2015 using the following keywords "schizophrenia", "duration of untreated psychosis", "duration of untreated illness" and "early intervention". Papers were included if they were published in French or English. RESULTS: The mean DUP was found to be 2 years but it can vary according to multiple factors such as denial of illness by the patient and family, withdrawal and isolation from friends and relatives, diagnostic errors, paranoid views of the mental health treatment systems, or negative symptoms. Long DUP may also be a correlate of poor premorbid functioning or of an insidiously unfolding psychosis. Considerable discrepancies exist in the way that DUP is estimated in different studies. Although the clinical interview remains the most common way of measuring DUP, so far there is no evidence for favoring one method over another. Regardless of measurement method, a longer DUP is found to be associated with poorer outcome in schizophrenia in both the short and long-term across a number of domains: symptoms severity, remission rates, the risk of relapse, global functioning and quality of life. Its role in functional outcome appears to be mediated largely by negative symptoms, for which there is still no effective treatment. A recent meta-analysis has shown that shorter DUP is associated with less severe negative symptoms at short and long-term follow-up, especially when DUP is shorter than 9 months. The mechanism of the relationship between DUP and outcome is still undefined. A hypothesis is that the shorter the DUP, the more likely the intervention is being applied during the period in which neurobiological deficit processes in schizophrenia are most active. DISCUSSION: A study of the duration of untreated illness (DUI), which is defined as the DUP and the prodromal phase, seems necessary because results of studies evaluating the effect of early detection and intervention in individuals with clinical high risk for psychosis are promising. A number of interventions such as omega 3 fatty acids and integrated psychosocial interventions seem to delay transition in the at-risk population. However, replication studies are lacking, and a great proportion of at high-risk individuals will spontaneously remit or develop diseases other than chronic psychosis, making us question the advantages and disadvantages of a treatment. Taking into consideration the high prevalence of comorbidities in individuals referred for clinical high-risk state and their effect on the individual's functioning, future interventions in the field need to address not only the preventative efficacy on psychosis transition but also their effectiveness in improving the functioning of this population and their effect on the outcome of schizophrenia when transition to psychosis has occurred. CONCLUSION: Despite the huge advances in the field of schizophrenia, many questions remain unanswered and huge efforts are still necessary to understand the pathophysiology of this illness in order to improve its outcome.

[Challenge of social reintegration after a first-episode psychosis]. / Enjeu de la réinsertion sociale après un premier épisode psychotique.

One of the main issues of early intervention in first-episode psychosis is to prevent social exclusion, or at least to seek to reduce it as soon as possible. The aim is not only symptom remission and relapse prevention, it is also to optimize the social and functional outcome of the illness. Social exclusion is not only one the disabling consequences of the illness, it is also, due to a negative circularity, an aggravating factor. Therefore, alongside the healthcare strategy aiming at the remission and relapse prevention, it will be useful to set up, at an early stage, a strategy aiming at maintaining or restoring social inclusion, and more generally to support the social recovery. We will specify the factors conditioning such prospects for recovery, and the variety of measures to support this strategy.

[Guidelines on long-acting injectable atypical antipsychotics for first-episode schizophrenia]. / Guidelines sur les antipsychotiques atypiques d'action prolongée (APAPs) dans les premiers épisodes psychotiques.

The current review raises the question of the place of long-acting injectable (LAI) atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia in current and future guidelines. After exposing the different points of view adopted in the former, the author presents the clinical trials conducted with LAI atypicals in this indication, as well as the surveys related to psychiatrists'opinion regarding the use of these drugs in early schizophrenia. Pros and cons of this therapeutic option are discussed and suggestions are made for further guidelines.

[First-episode psychosis as primary manifestation of medical disease: An update]. / Premier épisode psychotique révélant une affection médicale générale : mise au point pour l'interniste.

A huge variety of medical diseases may potentially present with isolated psychotic symptoms, and disease-specific treatment or management is available for a significant part of them. The initial medical work-up of a first-episode psychosis (FEP) is of crucial importance. This literature review aimed to identify medical conditions potentially revealed by FEP, to list the warning signs of secondary psychosis, and to discuss a screening strategy. Underlying organic conditions may be drugs and medications, neurologic diseases, infections, inflammatory and/or autoimmune pathologies, and metabolic disorders whether of hereditary origin. Each patient presenting with a first-episode psychosis should be evaluated with a precise anamnesis, a careful clinical examination, and routine laboratory tests. Brain imaging and tests (depending on the context) should be performed in the presence of atypical clinical features or "red flags", leading to suspect an organic disease.