Patient attitudes towards and satisfaction with subcutaneous injection of progesterone versus vaginal administration in assisted reproductive technology treatment.

The hormones used in fertility treatment come in various forms. Progesterone used for luteal phase support is often administered vaginally as either suppositories, tablets or gel. However, in Denmark the administration of progesterone as a subcutaneous injection has newly been introduced. The aim of the study was to explore patient attitudes towards and satisfaction with subcutaneous injection of progesterone versus vaginal administration of progesterone in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A qualitative study with online and face to face interviews with a total of 19 women undergoing an ART treatment. Only women with at least one previous blastocyst transfer using vaginal progesterone or subcutaneous progesterone could be recruited. All participants were included from either the Fertility Clinic at Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte or from the Fertility Unit at Aalborg University Hospital. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in four themes: (1) medication, (2) everyday life, (3) bodily experiences and (4) infertility or hope. Most informants highlighted the administration of subcutaneous progesterone only once a day and avoidance of the vaginal discharge as clear advantages. Reasons for preferring the vaginal administration were inconvenience of bringing the subcutaneous medication along and resistance to inject oneself. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that the satisfaction with the subcutaneous progesterone is generally positive. However, valuable thoughts have given insights into possible areas, which could be improved. Further, that some women prefer vaginal progesterone. The results show that the women are interested in being included in the decision-making when choosing the administration form of progesterone.

Clinical use of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone compared with vaginal progesterone as luteal support in in vitro fertilization: A randomized controlled study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy, tolerability and patient satisfaction between aqueous subcutaneous progesterone (Prolutex, 25 mg/vial; IBSA) and vaginal progesterone (Crinone, 90 mg/tube; Merck) as luteal support for fresh embryo transfers in in-vitro fertilization (IVF). MATERIALS & METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, 65 patients who underwent IVF were recruited and randomly assigned to either the Prolutex (25 mg daily, n = 33) or Crinone (90 mg daily, n = 32) group. The luteal support regimens were given daily, starting from two days after oocyte pickup. If the serum pregnancy test was positive, luteal support was continued until 7 weeks of gestation. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate and serum progesterone level at the mid-luteal phase and at 4 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes were drug tolerability and patient satisfaction assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rates (Prolutex 25.0% versus Crinone 33.3%, p = 0.699), serum progesterone levels and patient satisfaction between Prolutex and Crinone group. Although the patients that had received Prolutex complained of more local pain at the injection sites, they also had less annoying vaginal discharges and vulvar discomforts. CONCLUSION: Prolutex is of comparable efficacy and patient satisfaction to Crinone, and its availability means patients have more options in regards to the routes of progesterone administration as luteal phase support during IVF.

Comparison of Subcutaneous and Vaginal Progesterone Used for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles.

OBJECTIVE: Luteal phase defect in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) is a sign of uterine failure due to insufficient progesterone effects on the endometrium. This study aims to compare the success rate and side effects of subcutaneous progesterone and vaginal progesterone to support the luteal phase in ART cycles. METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, we used the traditional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and we transferred one or two 4-8 cell fetuses based on the patient's age on the third day of inoculation. We started with luteal phase support from the day of oocyte recovery and the patients randomly received either a daily dose of 25mg subcutaneous progesterone (Prolutex, IBSA Switzerland) or a 400mg dose of vaginal progesterone (Cyclogest, Actoverco, United Kingdom) every 12 hours. If blood BHCG pregnancy test was positive, support for the luteal phase continued until week 10 of gestation. The measured outcomes were the clinical, chemical and ongoing pregnancy rates as well as the rate of early abortion, patients' acceptance, tolerance and satisfaction. RESULTS: The results of the present study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between clinical, chemical and ongoing pregnancy rates - as well as the rate of early abortion, and patients' satisfaction when comparing the two treatment Groups. CONCLUSIONS: it seems that the subcutaneous form of progesterone can be used in patients who are not willing to use vaginal progesterone, with similar treatment results and patient satisfaction, when compared to vaginal progesterone.