Levator ani muscle avulsion and subsequent vaginal delivery: 8-year longitudinal follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the evolution of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion from 1 year to 8 years after first delivery in women with and those without subsequent vaginal delivery. In addition, to assess whether women with full or partial avulsion 8 years after first delivery have larger LAM hiatal area and more symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse compared to women with normal LAM insertion. METHODS: In this single-center longitudinal study, 195 women who were primiparous at the start of the study were included and underwent transperineal ultrasound examination 1 year and 8 years after first delivery. Muscle insertion was assessed by tomographic ultrasound imaging in the axial plane. Full LAM avulsion was defined as abnormal muscle insertion in all three central slices. Partial LAM avulsion was defined as abnormal muscle insertion in one or two central slices. Eight years after the first delivery, LAM hiatal area was assessed at rest, during maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction and on maximum Valsalva maneuver. To assess symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse, the vaginal symptoms module of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire was used. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, 25 (12.8%) women showed signs of LAM avulsion, of whom 20 fulfilled the sonographic criteria of full avulsion and five of partial avulsion. Eight years after the first delivery, 35 (17.9%) women were diagnosed with avulsion, of whom 25 were diagnosed with full avulsion and 10 with partial avulsion. No woman with partial or full avulsion at 1 year had improved avulsion status at 8-year follow-up. Of the 150 women who had subsequent vaginal delivery, 21 (14.0%) women were diagnosed with partial or full LAM avulsion 1 year after first delivery, and 31 (20.7%) women were diagnosed with partial or full avulsion 8 years after first delivery. Of the 45 women without subsequent vaginal delivery, one woman with partial avulsion 1 year after first delivery was diagnosed with full avulsion at 8-year follow-up. All women with full avulsion at 1-year follow-up were diagnosed with full avulsion at 8-year follow-up regardless of whether they had subsequent vaginal delivery. At 8-year follow-up, women with full avulsion had statistically significantly larger LAM hiatal area compared to women with normal muscle insertion. Mean ± SD vaginal symptom scores ranged between 5.5 ± 5.7 and 6.0 ± 4.0 and vaginal symptom quality of life scores ranged between 0.9 ± 1.4 and 1.5 ± 2.2 and did not differ significantly between women with normal muscle insertion and women with partial or full avulsion at 8-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: More LAM avulsions were present 8 years compared with 1 year after first delivery in women with subsequent vaginal delivery. Except for one primipara, all women without subsequent vaginal delivery had unchanged LAM avulsion status between 1 year and 8 years after their first delivery. Larger LAM hiatal area was found in women with full avulsion compared to those with normal muscle insertion at 8-year follow-up. Vaginal symptoms scores were low and did not differ between women with normal muscle insertion and those with partial or full avulsion at 8-year follow-up. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Incidence of shoulder dystocia and risk factors for recurrence in the subsequent pregnancy-A historical register-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder dystocia is a rare obstetric complication, and the risk of recurrence is important for planning future deliveries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The objectives of our study were to estimate the incidence and risk factors for recurrence of shoulder dystocia and to identify women at high risk of recurrence in a subsequent vaginal delivery. The study design was a nationwide register-based study including data from the Danish Medical Birth Registry and National Patient Register in the period 2007-2017. Nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation were included for analysis of risk factors in index and subsequent delivery. RESULTS: During the study period, 6002 cases of shoulder dystocia were reported with an overall incidence among women with vaginal delivery of 1.2%. Among 222 225 nulliparous women with vaginal births, shoulder dystocia complicated 2209 (1.0%) deliveries. A subsequent birth was registered in 1106 (50.1%) of the women with shoulder dystocia in index delivery of which 837 (77.8%) delivered vaginally. Recurrence of shoulder dystocia was reported in 60 (7.2%) with a six-fold increased risk compared with women without a prior history of shoulder dystocia (risk ratio [RR] 5.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.41 to 7.38; adjusted RR 3.06, 95% CI: 2.03 to 4.68). Low maternal height was a significant risk factor for recurrence of shoulder dystocia. In the subsequent delivery, significant risk factors for recurrence were birthweight >4000 g, positive fetal weight difference exceeding 250 g from index to subsequent delivery, stimulation with oxytocin and operative vaginal delivery. In the subsequent pregnancy following shoulder dystocia, women who underwent a planned cesarean (n = 176) were characterized by more advanced age and a higher prevalence of diabetes in the subsequent pregnancy. Furthermore, they had more often experienced operative vaginal delivery, severe perineal lacerations, and severe neonatal complications at the index delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of shoulder dystocia among nulliparous women with vaginal delivery was 1.0% with a 7.2% risk of recurrence in a population where about 50% had a subsequent birth and of these 78% had subsequent vaginal delivery. Important risk factors for recurrence were low maternal height, increase of birthweight ≥250 g from index to subsequent delivery and operative vaginal delivery.

The association between episiotomy or OASIS at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women and subsequent prelabor cesarean delivery: A nationwide observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Severe perineal injuries at childbirth affect women's postnatal health, including future childbirths. First births with vacuum extraction carry an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy at vacuum extraction may decrease the risk of OASIS. Our aim was to assess whether lateral or mediolateral episiotomy, or OASIS, at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women is associated with prelabor cesarean delivery in the subsequent childbirth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a nationwide observational study using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, including women having a first birth with vacuum extraction and a second birth in 2000-2014. Both births were live, single, cephalic, ≥34 gestational weeks without malformations. The association between episiotomy or OASIS in the first birth and prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, and interaction analysis. Main outcome measure was prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth. RESULTS: In total, 44 656 women with vacuum extraction at their first birth were included. The rate of prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was 5.9% (824 of 13 950) in women with episiotomy, compared with 6.0% (1830 of 30 706) in women without episiotomy. Thus, women with episiotomy did not have an increased risk of prelabor cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.83-1.20) compared with women without episiotomy. For comparison, the rate of prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was 20.6% (1275 of 6176) in women with OASIS, compared with 3.6% (1379 of 38 480) in women without OASIS (aOR 6.57, 95% CI 5.97-7.23). There was no interaction between episiotomy and OASIS. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women did not increase the risk of prelabor cesarean delivery in the subsequent childbirth. OASIS increased the odds of prelabor cesarean delivery more than sixfold.

Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to assess the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) of a subsequent delivery after the previous OASIS in countries with low (Finland) and high rates (Norway and Sweden) of OASIS. METHODS: This population-based case-control study included women who experienced OASIS 1997-2002. 26,598 women with OASIS were included from countries with low (Finland) and high (Norway and Sweden) OASIS incidences. Each case was matched with one background-adjusted control without OASIS. A follow-up data, including all subsequent deliveries between 1998 and 2011 were then collected. Statistics significances were calculated using chi-square test, test for relative proportions and Students t test, where appropriate. RESULTS: OASIS in the first birth was associated with increased recurrences in subsequent births, 6.9% vs. 1.7% in Norway (p < 0.001); 4.5% vs. 0.7 (p < 0.001) in Sweden; and 2.1% vs. 0.8% in Finland (p = 0.038). In Norway, more than two deliveries occurred in 4.8% of cases and 6.2% of controls (p = 0.001), 4.2% vs. 5.1% in Sweden (p < 0.001), and 5.7% vs. 6.3% in Finland (p = 0.572). For women with OASIS in a previous delivery, the rates of cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies were 16.4% (7.9% for controls) in Norway, and 16.3% (6.0% for controls) in Sweden, and 50.2% (14.2% for controls) in Finland. In all countries, the differences between cases and controls were significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Next deliveries after OASIS are associated with increased frequency of new OASIS, more cesarean deliveries, and less subsequent deliveries in the high-risk population than women without previous OASIS.

Term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have reported an increased risk for preterm delivery following a term cesarean delivery. However, these studies did not adjust for high-risk conditions related to the first cesarean delivery and are known to recur. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether there is an association between term cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and subsequent spontaneous or indicated preterm delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with the first 2 consecutive singleton deliveries (2007-2014) identified through a linked pregnancy database at a single institution. Women with a first pregnancy that resulted in cesarean delivery at term were compared with women whose first pregnancy resulted in a vaginal delivery at term. Exclusion criteria were known to recur medical or obstetrical complications during the first pregnancy. A propensity score analysis was performed by matching women who underwent a cesarean delivery with those who underwent a vaginal delivery in the first pregnancy. The association between cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and preterm delivery in the second pregnancy in this matched set was examined using conditional logistic regression. The primary outcome was overall preterm delivery <37 weeks in the second pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included type of preterm delivery (spontaneous vs indicated), late preterm delivery (34-36 6/7 weeks), early preterm delivery (<34 weeks), and small-for-gestational-age birth. RESULTS: Of a total of 6456 linked pregnancies, 2284 deliveries were matched; 1142 were preceded by cesarean delivery and 1142 were preceded by vaginal delivery. The main indications for cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy were dystocia in 703 (61.5%), nonreassuring fetal status in 222 (19.4%), breech presentation in 100 (8.8%), and other in 84 (7.4%). The mean (SD) gestational ages at delivery for the second pregnancy was 38.8 (1.8) and 38.9 (1.7) weeks, respectively, for prior cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery. The risks of preterm delivery in the second pregnancy among women with a previous cesarean and vaginal delivery were 6.0% and 5.2%, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.46, 95% confidence interval, [CI] 0.77-2.76). In an analysis stratified by the type of preterm delivery in the second pregnancy, no associations were seen between cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy and spontaneous preterm delivery (4.6% vs 3.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.40, 95% confidence interval, 0.59-3.32) or indicated preterm delivery (1.6% vs 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.21, 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.46). Similarly, no significant differences were found in late preterm delivery (4.6% vs 4.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.13, 95% confidence interval, 0.55-2.29), early preterm delivery (1.6% vs 1.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.25, 95% confidence interval, 0.59-2.67), or neonates with birthweight less than the fifth percentile for gestational age (3.6% vs 2.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.26, 95% confidence interval, 0.52-3.06). CONCLUSION: After robust adjustment for confounders through a propensity score analysis related to the indication for the first cesarean delivery at term, cesarean delivery is not associated with an increase in preterm delivery, spontaneous or indicated, in the subsequent pregnancy.

Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI) in women who have suffered anal sphincter injury in their previous pregnancy and analyse risk factors for recurrence through a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: A review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were made in Ovid MEDLINE (1996 to May 2015), PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar, including bibliographies and conference proceedings. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Observational studies (cohort/case-control) evaluating rOASI and risk factors were selected by two reviewers who also analysed methodological quality of those studies. Pooled odds ratios (OR) for rOASI and individual risk factors were calculated using RevMan 5.3. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: From the eight studies assessed, overall risk of rOASI was 6.3 % compared with a 5.7 % risk of OASI in the first pregnancy. The risk in parous women with no previous OASI was 1.5 %. Factors that increased the risk in a future pregnancy were instrumental delivery with forceps [OR 3.12, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.42-4.01) or ventouse (OR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.83-3.25), previous fourth-degree tear (OR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.24-2.36) and birth weight ≥4 kg (OR 2.29, 95 % CI 2.06-2.54). Maternal age ≥35 years marginally increased the risk (OR 1.16, 95 % CI 1-1.35). CONCLUSION: The overall rate of rOASI and associated risk factors for recurrence are similar to the rate and risk factors of primary OASI. Antenatal decisions could be based on assessment of foetal weight and intrapartum decisions based upon the requirement for an instrumental delivery.

Outcome of attempted vaginal delivery after a previous vacuum extraction: a population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have investigated long-term effects of a first vaginal instrumental delivery on subsequent mode of delivery. We investigated risks of repeat vacuum extraction and risk factors associated with a repeat vacuum extraction delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a population-based register study including 391 160 women with two consecutive singleton term (≥37 weeks) live births in cephalic presentation between/within the time period of 1992-2010 in Sweden. Rates and risk ratios of mode of delivery in second pregnancy in relation to primary mode of delivery were calculated using descriptive analyses and generalized linear models. Risk of repeat vacuum extraction was adjusted for maternal age and height, interpregnancy interval, gestational length, birthweight, induction, sex and occiput posterior position. RESULTS: Compared with women with a primary spontaneous vaginal delivery, women with a primary vacuum extraction had an almost five-fold risk of vacuum extraction delivery and nearly a three-fold risk of emergency cesarean section at second delivery. For women with a primary emergency cesarean section, corresponding risks were substantially higher. Risk factors for a repeat vacuum extraction were increasing maternal age and an interpregnancy interval >4 years, decreasing maternal stature, increasing gestation length and birthweight, induction, giving birth to a male infant and occiput posterior position. CONCLUSIONS: Nine of ten women who attempted a vaginal birth after a primary vacuum extraction succeeded in having a spontaneous vaginal delivery at second delivery. Compared with women with a primary spontaneous vaginal delivery, women with a primary vacuum extraction were at increased risk of repeat vacuum extraction and emergency cesarean section in subsequent delivery although their risk was not as high as that of women with a primary emergency cesarean section.

Recurrence risk of low Apgar score among term singletons: a population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of recurrence of low Apgar score in a subsequent term singleton pregnancy. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: The Netherlands. POPULATION: A total of 190,725 women with two subsequent singleton term live births between 1999 and 2007. METHODS: We calculated the recurrence risk of low Apgar score after adjustment for possible confounders. Women with an elective cesarean delivery, fetus in breech presentation or a fetus with congenital anomalies were excluded. Results were reported separately for women with a vaginal delivery or a cesarean delivery at first pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of birth asphyxia, a 5-min Apgar score <7. RESULTS: The risk for an Apgar score of <7 in the first pregnancy was 0.99% and overall halved in the subsequent pregnancies (0.50%). For those with asphyxia in the first pregnancy, the risk of recurrence of a low Apgar score in the subsequent pregnancy was 1.1% (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-3.3). This recurrence risk was present in women with a previous vaginal delivery (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.2-3.5) and in women with a previous cesarean delivery (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval 1.7-8.5). Among women with a small-for-gestational-age infant in the subsequent pregnancy and a previous vaginal delivery, the recurrence risk was 4.8% (adjusted odds ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 2.0-16.5). CONCLUSION: Women with birth asphyxia of the first born have twice the risk of renewed asphyxia at the next birth compared to women without birth asphyxia of the first born. This should be incorporated in the risk assessment of pregnant women.

Impacted fetal head extraction methods at second stage cesarean and subsequent preterm delivery: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Second-stage cesarean delivery (CD) is associated with subsequent preterm birth (PTB). It has been suggested that an increased risk of PTB after second-stage cesarean delivery could be linked to a higher chance of cervical injury due to the extension of the uterine incision. Previous studies have shown that reverse breech extraction is associated with lower rates of uterine incision extensions compared to the "push" method. We aimed to investigate the association between the method of fetal extraction during second-stage CD and the rate of spontaneous PTB (sPTB), as well as other maternal and neonatal outcomes during the subsequent pregnancy. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included women in their first subsequent singleton delivery following a second-stage CD between 2004 and 2021. The main exposure of interest was the method of fetal extraction in the index CD ("push" method vs. reverse breech extraction). The primary outcome of this study was sPTB <37 weeks in the subsequent pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were overall PTB, trial of labor, and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: During the study period, 2969 index CD during second stage were performed, of those 583 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 234 (40.1%) had fetal extraction using the reverse breech extraction method, while 349 (59.9%) had the "push" method for extraction. In univariate analysis, women in those two groups had statistically similar rates of sPTB (3.7% vs. 3.0%; odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% CI: 0.49-3.19) and overall PTB (<37, <34 and <32 weeks), as well as other maternal, neonatal, and trial of labor outcomes. This was confirmed by multivariate analyses with an adjusted OR of 1.27 (95% CI: 0.43-3.71) for sPTB. CONCLUSION: Among women with a previous second-stage CD, no significant difference was observed in PTB rates in the subsequent pregnancies following the "push" method compared to the reverse breech extraction method.

Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries and symptoms after subsequent deliveries: A 60 patient study.

INTRODUCTION: More than half of women with a history of prior obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) will have another pregnancy. Currently, little is known concerning post-partum perineal symptoms in cases of a subsequent vaginal delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of perineal functional symptoms following a vaginal delivery after OASIS while comparing them to patients who did not have a subsequent delivery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective cohort study between January 2000 and December 2011. A questionnaire was sent by post to all women who sustained an OASIS at the Poitiers University Hospital, France. Perineal functional symptoms and quality of life were assessed using validated self-administered questionnaires: Female Pelvic Floor Questionnaire, Pescatori anal incontinence score, EuroQoL five-dimension score, and pain visual analogue scale. RESULTS: 159 women of 237 contacted (67%) responded to the questionnaire, on average 46 months after the delivery complicated with OASIS. 135 (85%) of women had a 3rd degree laceration and 24% a 4th degree laceration. 99 women (63%) did not have an ensuing delivery since the event (OASIS - No Subsequent Delivery: SD-). 60 women (37%) had a subsequent delivery (OASIS -Subsequent Delivery: SD + ), with 53 (88%) having a vaginal birth. Among these women, 3 (6%) experienced a recurrent OASIS. The mean score for perineal symptoms (FPFQ) was 6.95 in the OASIS-SD (-) group and 7.40 in the OASIS-SD (+) group (p = 0.64). No significant difference in quality of life (EuroQol 5D) was found between the two groups (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: We did not observe a deterioration of perineal functional symptomatology after vaginal delivery in women with known prior OASIS, compared to women who did not have a subsequent delivery. Even if the risk of occurrence of these lesions is higher in women with history of previous OASIS compared to those without perineal injury, it is still comparable to incidence among primiparous women.

Previous cesarean delivery associated with subsequent preterm birth in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between previous cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth in the second pregnancy among women in the United States with registered birth records. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing United States birth certificate data to generate the study population, which consisted of women delivering a singleton infant in their second live birth (n = 1,076,517) in the year 2016. Preterm birth and previous cesarean delivery measures were derived from United States birth certificates. Covariates included maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, payer source for delivery, pre-pregnancy body mass index, previous preterm birth, interpregnancy interval, and factors in the second pregnancy such as hypertensive disorders, diabetes, and cigarette use, trimester prenatal care began, weight gain during pregnancy, and presence of congenital anomalies. Women who experienced a cesarean delivery in the first pregnancy were compared to those who did not. RESULTS: When controlling for all covariates, women who had a cesarean delivery in their first pregnancy were 14% more likely to have a preterm birth in their second pregnancy (OR = 1.137, 95% CI = 1.117-1.158) compared to women who had not previously experienced a cesarean delivery. When risk was analyzed by sub categories of preterm birth based on gestational age, a differential association was noted, with a 10% increased risk of delivering before 34 weeks, a 1% increased risk for delivery between 34-36 weeks and no increased risk for delivery after 36 weeks compared to delivery at 39-40 weeks. CONCLUSION: This small, but statistically significant association between previous cesarean section and subsequent preterm birth suggests that efforts to reduce the number of index cesarean sections may contribute to reducing the overall preterm birth rate in the United States.

Does anal sphincter injury preclude subsequent vaginal delivery?

OBJECTIVE: To assess continence and anal sphincter integrity during a subsequent pregnancy and delivery in women known to have a previous anal sphincter injury. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: The National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. POPULATION: Antenatal patients with a documented obstetric anal sphincter injury at a previous delivery. METHODS: Women underwent symptom scoring, endoanal ultrasound and manometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recommended and actual mode of delivery, continence scores and endoanal ultrasound findings after index delivery. RESULTS: 557 women were studied. 293 (53%) had no symptoms of faecal incontinence, 189 (34%) had mild symptoms and 75 (13%) moderate or severe symptoms. 408 (73%) had an endoanal ultrasound. 383(94%) had a normal or small (<1 quadrant) defect in the internal anal sphincter and 390 (96%) had a scar or small (<1e quadrant) defect in the external anal sphincter. 393 (70%) delivered vaginally. 164 (30%) were delivered by caesarean section. 197/557 (35%) returned for follow-up. There was no significant change in continence following either vaginal or caesarean delivery. 20 (5.1%) women had a recognised second anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women who sustain a third degree tear have minimal or no symptoms of faecal incontinence when assessed antenatally in a subsequent pregnancy. 70% go on to have a vaginal delivery, with little impact on faecal continence. These findings provide reassurance for patients and clinicians about the safety of vaginal delivery following anal sphincter injury in appropriately selected patients.

Anal incontinence in women with recurrent obstetric anal sphincter rupture: a case control study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of recurrent anal sphincter rupture (ASR), and compare the risk of anal incontinence (AI) after recurrent ASR, with that seen in women with previous ASR who deliver by caesarean section or vaginally without sustaining a recurrent ASR. METHODS: Women with recurrent ASR between January 2000 and June 2011 were identified at two delivery wards in Copenhagen. The women answered a questionnaire with a validated scoring system for AI (St. Mark`s score), and the results were compared with those obtained in two control groups: women with subsequent uncomplicated vaginal delivery or caesarean section. RESULTS: There were 93 437 vaginal deliveries. ASR occurred in 5.5% (n = 2851) of the nulliparous and 1.5% (n = 608) of the multiparous women. Recurrent ASR occurred in 8% (n = 49) of whom 50% reported symptoms of AI. We found no difference in the occurrence of AI between women with recurrent ASR, and those who delivered vaginally without repeat ASR (p = 0.37; OR = 2.0) or by caesarean section (p = 0.77; OR = 1.3). CONCLUSION: Women with a past history of ASR have an 8% risk of recurrence. AI affects half of the women with recurrent ASR. Larger studies are required to confirm our findings.

Does dystocia during labor pose a risk factor for another non-progressive labor during the subsequent delivery?

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether failure to progress during labor poses a risk factor for another non-progressive labor (NPL) during the subsequent delivery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including singleton pregnancies that failed to progress during the previous labor and resulted in a cesarean section (CS) was conducted. Parturients were classified into three groups for both previous and subsequent labors: CS due to NPL stage I, stage II and an elective CS as a comparison group. RESULTS: Of 202 462 deliveries, 10 654 women met the inclusion criteria: 3068 women were operated due to NPL stage I and 1218 due to NPL stage II. The comparison group included 6368 women. Using a multivariable logistic regression models, NPL stage I during the previous delivery was found as an independent risk factor for another NPL stage I in the subsequent labor (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.4-3.7; p < 0.001). Similarly, NPL at stage I or II was found to be an independent risk factor for a NPL stage II during the subsequent labor (adjusted OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.1-2.1; p = 0.033; adjusted OR = 5.3; 95% CI = 3.7-7.5; p < 0.001; respectively). CONCLUSION: A previous CS due to a NPL is an independent risk factor for another NPL in the subsequent pregnancy and for recurrent cesarean delivery.