Use of sulthiame as add-on therapy in children with non-self-limited focal epilepsies of childhood.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sulthiame (STM) as an add-on treatment in 49 patients with non-self-limited focal epilepsies of childhood (non-SeLFE) resistant to other antiseizure medications (ASM) and/or non-pharmacological treatment. METHODS: Patients with non-SeLFE who had failed to respond to at least five previous ASM, alone or in combination, were included in the study. All patients underwent neurological examination, brain magnetic resonance imaging repeated prolonged electroencephalography (EEG) or video-EEG studies, and neurometabolic studies. School achievements and/or performance on neuropsychological tests were also assessed. Sulthiame was added in doses ranging from 10 to 40 mg/kg/day. Efficacy was measured by comparing seizure frequency before and after initiating STM therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 49 patients (59.1%) who received STM as add-on therapy had a greater than 50% decrease in seizures after a mean follow-up of 35 months. One patient (2%) became seizure-free. Fourteen patients (40%) had a 25-50% seizure reduction. The mean time of response was 5 months (range, 3.5 to 6 months). No differences were found either between patients with a response of more or less than 50% or between the response of the focal seizure types (motor or non-motor, with or without consciousness impairment). CONCLUSION: In our study, STM was found to be effective and well-tolerated in children and adolescents with non-SeLFE. In the patients who responded, improvement in the EEG was seen.

Use of sulthiame as add-on therapy in children with myoclonic atonic epilepsy: A study of 35 patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of sulthiame (STM) as add-on treatment in 35 patients with myoclonic atonic epilepsy (MAE) resistant to other antiseizure medications (ASMs) and/or non-pharmacological treatment. METHODS: Patients were selected according to the diagnostic definition of MAE and were resistant to at least four previous to ASM, alone or in combination. Neurologic examinations, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and repeated prolonged electroencephalography (EEG) or video-EEG studies as well as neurometabolic studies were performed in all cases. Genetic studies were performed in 15 patients. Data on school achievements and/or neuropsychological evaluations were obtained over a mean follow-up of 30 months. Sulthiame was added in doses ranging from 10 to 30 mg/kg/day. Efficacy was assessed by comparing seizure frequency before and after initiating STM therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 35 patients (60%) who received STM as add-on therapy had a greater than 50% seizure decrease after a mean follow-up of 30 months. Complete seizure freedom was achieved in two patients (5.8%). The remaining 14 patients (40%) had a 25-50% seizure reduction. Adverse effects, consisting of hyperpnea and dyspnea, decreased appetite, nausea, drowsiness, headache, and irritability, were observed in 11 (31.4%). The adverse effects were mild and transient in all cases. Discontinuation of STM was not necessary. CONCLUSION: Add-on STM led to a more than 50% seizure reduction in 21 of 35 patients with MAE with only mild or moderate adverse effects.

Effects of sulthiame on seizure frequency and EEG in children with electrical status epilepticus during slow sleep.

OBJECTIVE: It is argued that early and adequate treatment of electrical status epilepticus in sleep (ESES) is essential to preserve cognitive functions and possibly recovering lost skills. Although antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are effective in ESES, there is not much experience in the use of sulthiame. In this study, we aimed to examine the efficiency and tolerability of sulthiame in ESES. METHODS: The data of 39 patients diagnosed as ESES and who received sulthiame as an additional treatment between 2016 and 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Electroencephalographic (EEG) findings and seizure rates were compared before and after the sulthiame treatment. RESULTS: The mean age was 8.5 ±â€¯4.1 (1.5-16 years). Nine out of 39 patients had benign childhood focal epilepsies. Structural causes were identified in 13 patients. The mean duration of sulthiame use was 32.5 ±â€¯13.7 months. After sulthiame treatment, 25 patients (64.1%) were seizure free, and 8 (20.5%) had more than a 50% decrease in seizure frequency. The mean seizure-free time after the sulthiame treatment was 27.8 ±â€¯17.9 months. Nineteen patients (48.7%) had complete, and nine patients (23.1%) had partial EEG improvement. Complete seizure control was significantly higher in benign focal epilepsy of childhood (p = 0.01). Significant neurocognitive and behavioral recovery, improvement in school performance was observed following sulthiame treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sulthiame was found to be effective in seizure control and EEG improvement in ESES. We think that the use of sulthiame alone can be a good choice with high efficacy and tolerability in ESES.

Sulthiame add-on treatment in children with epileptic encephalopathy with status epilepticus: an efficacy analysis in etiologic subgroups.

PURPOSE: Sulthiame (STM) has been recommended as an effective antiepileptic drug (AED) in children with epileptic encephalopathy with status epilepticus in sleep (ESES). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of STM add-on treatment in children with pattern of ESES with respect to the etiologic subgroup. METHODS: Twenty-nine children with ESES pattern with three different etiologic subgroups (epileptic syndromes: 14, structural/infectious: 9, unknown: 6) who were given STM as add-on treatment were included into the study. The efficacy of STM was evaluated in terms of seizure control, electroencephalography (EEG) findings, need of the new AEDs after add-on STM, and behavioral and cognitive improvement. RESULTS: The range of the follow-up duration after add-on STM treatment was between 5 and 51 months. At the end of 1 year of STM treatment, the most successful electrophysiologic improvement was identified in the well-defined epileptic syndrome group; epileptic syndrome, 71.4% (10/14); structural/infectious, 33.3% (3/9); and unknown, 0% (0/6). Patients who had complete response or persistent ESES pattern at the 3rd month were still in the same condition at the 6th and 12th months. However, the ESES pattern reappeared in 35.2% of the patients who had partial electrophysiological improvement at the 3rd month. In the epilepsy syndrome group, eight out of ten patients who had either complete or partial EEG response after 1 year of STM treatment displayed behavioral and cognitive improvement. CONCLUSION: Sulthiame might be a valid add-on treatment of ESES especially in children with epilepsy syndromes.

A fully validated HPLC-UV method for determination of sulthiame in human serum/plasma samples.

Sulthiame is an old antiepileptic medicine with controversial history, whose effectiveness and safety in use have been stated in some current studies. However, there is still a need for further clinical examinations for confirmation of its usefulness and tolerability in monotherapy and add-on therapy for epilepsy of various etiologies. A fully validated RP HPLC-UV method for determination of sulthiame in serum/plasma samples using desethylatrazine as the internal standard was developed. The biological fluid was prepared for analysis by a simple precipitation method with acetonitrile. The following validation parameters of the method were determined: selectivity/specificity, linearity range (0.2-50.0 µl/ml, R2 > 0.9999), limits of detection (0.19 µl/ml) and quantification (0.58 µl/ml), precision (intra-day CV 1.06% and inter-day CV 1.25%), extraction recovery (~100%), accuracy (bias, -4.61-0.80%), carryover and ruggedness. Moreover, the stability of the medicine in plasma samples under different storage conditions was also tested. The usability of the method for clinical examinations was checked by analysis of serum samples originating from 19 patients treated with sulthiame. The proposed method is appropriate for determination of sulthiame in serum/plasma samples for drug monitoring purposes, as well as for pharmacokinetic studies.

Interaction between sulthiame and clobazam: sulthiame inhibits the metabolism of clobazam, possibly via an action on CYP2C19.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sulthiame (STM) on the pharmacokinetics of clobazam (CLB) by determining the concentration to dose (CD) ratio (serum level (ng/ml) divided by dose (mg/kg)) of CLB and that of N-desmethyl-clobazam (DMCLB). We evaluated five patients (an adult and four children) whose serum CLB and DMCLB concentrations were monitored after the addition or discontinuation of STM. Four of the five patients were CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers, and one patient was an extensive metabolizer. When the patients were taking STM (100-275 mg/day), the mean CD ratio of DMCLB increased by 82.6 to 248.5%, which was higher than when they were not using STM. The increase was dose-dependent. In contrast, the CD ratio of CLB remained stable after addition or discontinuation of STM. These data suggest that STM has the potential to inhibit CYP2C19 enzyme activity. During combination therapy with STM and CLB in patients with CYP2C19 intermediate or extensive metabolizer phenotypes, monitoring of DMCLB concentrations may be helpful in ascertaining CLB-related adverse effects.

Modification of Endotypic Traits in OSA by the Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor Sulthiame.

BACKGROUND: The carbonic anhydrase inhibitor sulthiame reduces OSA severity, increases overnight oxygenation, and improves sleep quality. Insights into how sulthiame modulates OSA pathophysiologic features (endotypic traits) adds to our understanding of the breathing disorder itself, as well as the effects of carbonic anhydrases in respiratory regulation. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does sulthiame treatment modify endotypic traits in OSA? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Per-protocol tertiary analysis of a randomized controlled trial with the inclusion criteria as follow: BMI, ≥ 20 to ≤ 35 kg/m2; age, 18-75 years; apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/h; Epworth sleepiness scale score, ≥ 6; as well as nonacceptance or nontolerance of positive airway pressure treatment. Patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 22), sulthiame 200 mg (n = 12), or sulthiame 400 mg (n = 24) during 4 weeks of treatment. Polysomnography was applied twice at baseline and follow-up. Endotypic traits were determined from polysomnography tracings (PUPBeta). Sulthiame plasma concentration was analyzed. Differences from baseline to follow-up (Δs) were analyzed with the analysis of covariance or Kruskal-Wallis H test and Pearson (r) or Spearman correlations (rs). RESULTS: Sulthiame (200-mg and 400-mg groups) consistently reduced loop gain (response to a 1-cycle/min disturbance, LG1; mean, -0.16 [95% CI, -0.18 to -0.13]; P < .05) in addition to increased ventilation at lowest decile of ventilatory drive (Vmin; median, +12 [95% CI, 4-20]; P < .05) and median ventilation at eupneic ventilatory drive (Vpassive; median, +4 [95% CI, 0-5]; P < .05). ΔLG1 correlated with ΔAHI percentage (200 mg: r = 0.65; P < .05). Vmin and Vpassive correlated with ΔAHI (all sulthiame: rs = -0.59 and rs = -0.65; P < .05 for all). The reduction of LG1 was seen already in the lower sulthiame concentration range, whereas changes in Vmin peaked in the higher range. INTERPRETATION: The effect of sulthiame in OSA may be explained by a reduction of ventilatory instability (LG1) as well as upper airway collapsibility (Vmin and Vpassive). TRIAL REGISTRY: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database; No.: EudraCT 2017-004767-13; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu.

Successful Treatment of a Child With Epileptic Encephalopathy With Spike-Wave Activation in Sleep and GRIN2A Variant Using Sulthiame.

Epileptic encephalopathy with spike-wave activation in sleep (EE-SWAS) and developmental EE-SWAS (DEE-SWAS) are characterized by variable combinations of cognitive, language, behavioral, and/or motor regression associated with continuous or near-continuous diffuse spike-and-wave complexes during sleep. Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2A (GRIN2A) variants have been associated with EE-SWAS. It encodes the most relevant GluN2 subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR). Sulthiame reduces NMDAR-mediated neuronal excitability and has been progressively used as monotherapy in self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (SeLECTS) or as add-ontherapy in EE-SWAS/DEE-SWAS. A five-year-old female, with family history of epilepsy, was initially diagnosed with SeLECTS and medicated with valproic acid (VPA). One year later, she presented a focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure during sleep and learning difficulty. The electroencephalogram revealed continuous spike-and-wave during sleep leading to the diagnosis of EE-SWAS. Prednisolone was effective, but there was repeated recurrence after its discontinuation and associated adverse effects. As an alternative, sulthiame was added to VPA. Four years later, she remains clinically stable. Genetic testing revealed a GRIN2A missense variant, C.3228C>A (p.Asn1076Lys). Sulthiame appeared effective in this recurrent EE-SWAS child, who presented a GRIN2A missense variant with possible NMDAR gain-of-function and adverse effects of corticosteroids. Functional studies​​​​​​​ of GRIN2A variants might become a future tool for individualized therapies.

Clonic seizures, continuous spikes-and-waves during slow sleep, choreoathetosis and response to sulthiame in a child with FRRS1L encephalopathy.

BACKGROUND: Ferric chelate reductase 1 like (FRRS1L) encephalopathy is a rare cause of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Only a few cases have been reported thus far and seizures tend to be drug refractory. We report an additional case to highlight the good seizure response to sulthiame. CASE REPORT: A boy from non-consanguineous parents presented with history of 'abnormal movements' from 7 months of age. At one year of age, video electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring demonstrated the 'abnormal movements' to be clonic seizures. Valproate, lamotrigine and clobazam combination were only partially effective at reducing the seizures. Repeat EEG at 1 year 8 months old revealed a continuous spikes-and-waves during slow sleep (CSWS) pattern, prompting a trial of sulthiame. After 2 weeks of sulthiame, seizures ceased completely. The clonic seizures recurred at age 4 years when sulthiame supply was interrupted, but the seizures promptly remitted following sulthiame's resumption. Subtle choreiform movements appeared from age one year and later became more prominent. Whole exome sequencing (WES) identified a homozygous novel variant (nonsense) in the FRRS1L gene (NM_014334.3: c.670C>T:p.Gln224*). He has been seizure free since 4 years of age but remained profoundly delayed. CONCLUSION: Sulthiame may have a role in the early treatment of seizures in children with refractory epilepsy due to FRRS1L mutation.

Sulthiame impairs mitochondrial function in vitro and may trigger onset of visual loss in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is the most common mitochondrial disorder and characterized by acute or subacute painless visual loss. Environmental factors reported to trigger visual loss in LHON mutation carriers include smoking, heavy intake of alcohol, raised intraocular pressure, and some drugs, including several carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. The antiepileptic drug sulthiame (STM) is effective especially in focal seizures, particularly in benign epilepsy of childhood with centrotemporal spikes, and widely used in pediatric epileptology. STM is a sulfonamide derivate and an inhibitor of mammalian carbonic anhydrase isoforms I-XIV. RESULTS: We describe two unrelated patients, an 8-year-old girl and an 11-year-old boy, with cryptogenic focal epilepsy, who suffered binocular (subject #1) or monocular (subject #2) visual loss in close temporal connection with starting antiepileptic pharmacotherapy with STM. In both subjects, visual loss was due to LHON. We used real-time respirometry in fibroblasts derived from LHON patients carrying the same mitochondrial mutations as our two subjects to investigate the effect of STM on oxidative phosphorylation. Oxygen consumption rate in fibroblasts from a healthy control was not impaired by STM compared with a vehicle control. In contrast, fibroblasts carrying the m.14484T>C or the m.3460G>A LHON mutation displayed a drastic reduction of the respiration rate when treated with STM compared to vehicle control. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations point to a causal relationship between STM treatment and onset or worsening of visual failure in two subjects with LHON rather than pure coincidence. We conclude that antiepileptic medication with STM may pose a risk for visual loss in LHON mutation carriers and should be avoided in these patients.

Effects of Levetiracetam and Sulthiame on EEG in benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes: A randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: BECTS (benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes) is associated with characteristic EEG findings. This study examines the influence of anti-convulsive treatment on the EEG. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial including 43 children with BECTS, EEGs were performed prior to treatment with either Sulthiame or Levetiracetam as well as three times under treatment. Using the spike-wave-index, the degree of EEG pathology was quantified. The EEG before and after initiation of treatment was analyzed. Both treatment arms were compared and the EEG of the children that were to develop recurrent seizures was compared with those that were successfully treated. RESULTS: Regardless of the treatment agent, the spike-wave-index was reduced significantly under treatment. There were no differences between the two treatment groups. In an additional analysis, the EEG characteristics of the children with recurrent seizures differed statistically significant from those that did not have any further seizures. CONCLUSION: Both Sulthiame and Levetiracetam influence the EEG of children with BECTS. Persistent EEG pathologies are associated with treatment failures.

Sulthiame add-on therapy in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A study of 44 patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of sulthiame as an add-on treatment in 44 patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) refractory to other antiepileptic drugs and/or non-pharmacological treatment. METHODS: Patients were selected according to the following criteria: (1) age 4 years or older, (2) a diagnosis of LGS refractory to at least four previous antiepileptic drugs, alone or in combination. Neurologic examinations, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and repeated prolonged electroencephalography (EEG) or video-EEG studies were performed in all cases. Data on school achievements and/or neuropsychological evaluations were obtained during the follow-up of 1-3 years. Sulthiame was added in doses ranging from 5 to 30 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 44 patients (61%) who received sulthiame as add-on therapy had a greater than 50% seizure decrease after a mean follow-up period of 20 months. Complete seizure freedom was achieved in one patient (2%). Four patients (9%) had a 25-50% seizure decrease, while seizure frequency remained unchanged in 12 (25%), and was increased in one (2%). Hyperpnoea and dyspnoea were observed in four patients, and nausea, drowsiness, and headache were seen in one patient each; however, these manifestations were transient and discontinuation of sulthiame was not necessary. Two other patients had decreased appetite, skin rash, and irritability. The adverse effects were mild and transient in these nine cases. CONCLUSION: Sulthiame as an adjunctive therapy achieved a more than 50% seizure reduction in 27 of 44 patients with LGS with only mild or moderate adverse effects.

Effect of anticonvulsive treatment on neuropsychological performance in children with BECTS.

INTRODUCTION: Benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) is a common epilepsy syndrome in childhood. Besides the occurrence of seizures, mild cognitive impairments and behavioral problems affecting language skills, spatial perception, memory, executive function, and academic achievement might be present. There is no international consensus about the decision whether or not to treat affected children. The influence of treatment on cognitive functions is debated. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with BECTS were assessed in short term auditory memory, long-term verbal memory, intelligence and behavior using the "number recall" test from the Kaufman assessment battery for children, the "verbal learning memory test", the "culture free intelligence test" and the "child behavior checklist" prior to a randomized controlled antiepileptic therapy and after a treatment period of 6 months with either sulthiame or levetiracetam. RESULTS: 43 of 44 randomized patients were analyzed. One patient had to be excluded due to protocol violation. Patients who completed the study showed a non-significant improvement in parent-reported behavioral problems under therapy. Cognitive skills were not affected. CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that antiepileptic drug treatment of children with BECTS with either sulthiame or levetiracetam does not affect cognitive performance. Behavior improved in a subset of patients though not reaching statistical significance.

Sulthiame-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare and potentially life-threatening acute drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) predominantly aromatic AEDs are commonly reported in DRESS. To date there are no reports of sulthiame AED causing DRESS syndrome. METHOD: We report a 10-year-old girl of Indian descent with AED resistant epilepsy on maintenance sodium valproate and clonazepam. Sulthiame AED was initiated to try to improve her seizure control. Five weeks after commencing sulthiame, she developed fever with a diffuse erythematous morbilliform maculopapular rash, elevated transaminases and atypical lymphocytes. At day 3 of illness, she deteriorated with worsening elevation of liver transaminases, thrombocytopenia, progression of rash, hepatosplenomegaly, pneumonitis and markedly elevated inflammatory markers. Immunomodulatory treatment of pulse methylprednisolone was given from day 7 which was associated with improvement inflammatory markers and complete resolution of rash from day 30 of illness. RESULTS: The diagnosis of sulthiame-induced DRESS syndrome was made based on clinical, laboratory and skin histology findings. She was HLA-B heterozygous for HLA-B∗15:123 and 15:240 and HLA-A homozygous for HLA-A∗11:01:09. Both these HLA-A and HLA-B typing has not been reported before in cutaneous drug reactions. CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of sulthiame-induced DRESS syndrome. Our case expands the list of possible susceptible HLA alleles associated with cutaneous drug reactions. It also raises the awareness of possible DRESS syndrome among patients commenced on sulthiame who will require immediate discontinuation of sulthiame and consideration of prompt treatment of corticosteroids.

Stability-Indicating High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Assay for the Determination of Sulthiame in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms.

A stability-indicating assay by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography method was developed and validated for the determination of sulthiame (STM). The chromatographic separation was achieved on a reversed-phase NovaPack C18 column and an isocratic mobile phase consisting of deionized water:methanol (70:30, v/v). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min (ultraviolet detection at 210 nm). The STM was separated within 2.83 min. The linearity of the method was demonstrated in the range of 20.0-200.0 µg/mL and a coefficient of determination of r (2) = 0.9999. The limits of detection and quantification were 4.2 and 9.5 µg/mL, respectively. The intraday and interday precisions were less than 1%. Accuracy of the method ranged from 98.3% to 101.7%, with a relative standard deviation of <1%. STM was degraded by accelerated breakdown in alkaline, acidic, or oxidative stress conditions. This method allows accurate and reliable determination of STM for drug stability assay in pharmaceutical studies.

Sultiame revisited: treatment of refractory absence seizures.

Sultiame is recommended for the treatment of benign epilepsy of childhood with centrotemporal spikes, electrical status epilepticus during slow-wave sleep, as well as other genetic (idiopathic) focal epilepsies. Sultiame is not traditionally considered a treatment choice for idiopathic generalised epilepsy, and it does not appear on the list of drugs recommended for treatment of absence seizures. We report the efficacy of sultiame in treating three children with drug-resistant absence seizures and discuss the potential use of sultiame beyond the idiopathic focal epilepsies.

Levetiracetam vs. sulthiame in benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes in childhood: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial (German HEAD Study).

OBJECTIVE: To show non-inferiority of levetiracetam to sulthiame with respect to efficacy, tolerability and safety in benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes in a prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. METHODS: A sample size of 60 subjects (treatment group) was calculated to show reliable statistical results for non-inferiority. A total of 44 patients could be randomly allocated to either (LEV or STM) treatment group. Explorative data analysis was performed to investigate differences in the number of treatment failure events (occurrence of a seizure during the observation period of 6 months) and total dropouts. In addition, information of the occurrence of adverse events was collected. RESULTS: 43 patients were analyzed. One patient had to be excluded due to protocol violation. Treatment failure events occurred in four patients (19.0%) in the LEV treatment group and in two patients (9.1%) in the STM treatment group, respectively, (p = 0.412). The number of dropouts due to adverse reactions was five in the LEV treatment group and one in STM treatment group (23.8% vs. 4.5%, respectively, p = 0.095). Severe adverse events occurred in patients treated with LEV (n = 2, 9.5%). The total number of dropouts due to either seizure recurrence or adverse events was significantly higher in the LEV group (n = 9, 42.9%) compared to the STM group (n = 3, 13.6%, p = 0.03). INTERPRETATION: The study results concerning non-inferiority were not conclusive, as the calculated sample size was not reached to support sufficient statistical power due to limited recruitment in a 26 months period. The rates of seizure free patients were [relatively] high in both groups. However, the results indicate that termination of drug treatment due to seizure recurrence or adverse events occurred more frequently in the LEV group compared to STM. Behavioral disturbances were the most common adverse event causing study termination.

A randomized controlled multicenter clinical study on sulthiame in the treatment of GTCS / 临床神经病学杂志

0 05), and the adverse reaction for sulthiame was mild and no necessary to cure.Conclusion It is effective and safe in the treatment for GTCS with sulthiame.