Novel Clinical Trials and Approaches in the Management of Glioblastoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss a wide variety of novel therapies recently studied or actively undergoing study in patients with glioblastoma. This review also discusses current and future strategies for improving clinical trial design in patients with glioblastoma to maximize efficacy in discovering effective treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: Over the years, there has been significant expansion in therapy modalities studied in patients with glioblastoma. These therapies include, but are not limited to, targeted molecular therapies, DNA repair pathway targeted therapies, immunotherapies, vaccine therapies, and surgically targeted radiotherapies. Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults and unfortunately remains with poor overall survival following the current standard of care. Given the dismal prognosis, significant clinical and research efforts are ongoing with the goal of improving patient outcomes and enhancing quality and quantity of life utilizing a wide variety of novel therapies.

Revolutionizing cancer care strategies: immunotherapy, gene therapy, and molecular targeted therapy.

Despite the availability of technological advances in traditional anti-cancer therapies, there is a need for more precise and targeted cancer treatment strategies. The wide-ranging shortfalls of conventional anticancer therapies such as systematic toxicity, compromised life quality, and limited to severe side effects are major areas of concern of conventional cancer treatment approaches. Owing to the expansion of knowledge and technological advancements in the field of cancer biology, more innovative and safe anti-cancerous approaches such as immune therapy, gene therapy and targeted therapy are rapidly evolving with the aim to address the limitations of conventional therapies. The concept of immunotherapy began with the capability of coley toxins to stimulate toll-like receptors of immune cells to provoke an immune response against cancers. With an in-depth understating of the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis and their relationship to disease prognosis, molecular targeted therapy approaches, that inhibit or stimulate specific cancer-promoting or cancer-inhibitory molecules respectively, have offered promising outcomes. In this review, we evaluate the achievement and challenges of these technically advanced therapies with the aim of presenting the overall progress and perspective of each approach.

Top advances of the year: Neuro-oncology.

Management of brain tumors has been challenging given the limited therapeutic options and disabling morbidities associated with central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction. This review focuses on recent developments in the field, with an emphasis on clinical management. The growing clinical trials landscape reflects advanced insights into cancer immunology and genomics and the need to address molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Recent phase 3 trials investigating anti-PD-1 immunotherapies, particularly nivolumab, have failed to demonstrate improved survival in glioblastoma, underscoring the need to better understand the complexity of CNS immunologic surveillance. Conversely, targeted therapies have accounted for several US Food and Drug Administration approvals extended to brain tumors, particularly therapies directed to BRAF V600E mutations and TRAK fusions, underscoring a need to routinely screen patients for these rare molecular abnormalities. In primary CNS lymphoma, attention has turned to long-term outcomes of consolidation therapies, and recent studies have highlighted the excellent disease control afforded by high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Meningiomas remain a focus of investigations, with preliminary promising results observed with octreotide combined with mTOR inhibition, and immunotherapy with single-agent pembrolizumab. Finally, proton radiotherapy has emerged as a novel alternative for leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors, which can now be treated more safely with craniospinal irradiation and monitored by the enumeration of circulating tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid as a biomarker. Taken together, these incremental advances have improved outcomes in select brain tumor patient populations, whereas ongoing clinical trials hold the promise of meaningful advances and breakthroughs for larger proportions of patients with brain tumors.

Potential use of EGFR-targeted molecular therapies for tumor suppressor CYLD-negative and poor prognosis oral squamous cell carcinoma with chemoresistance.

BACKGROUND: Tumor suppressor CYLD dysfunction by loss of its expression, triggers malignant transformation, especially drug resistance and tumor invasion/metastasis. Although loss of CYLD expression is significantly associated with poor prognosis in a large variety of tumors, no clinically-effective treatment for CYLD-negative cancer patients is available. METHODS: We focused on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and sought to develop novel therapeutic agents for CYLD-negative cancer patients with poor prognosis. CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells by using CYLD-specific siRNA, were used to elucidate and determine the efficacy of novel drug candidates by evaluating cell viability and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like change. Therapeutic effects of candidate drug on cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) model and usefulness of CYLD as a novel biomarker using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model were further investigated. RESULTS: CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells were resistant for all currently-available cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents for OSCC, such as, cisplatin, 5-FU, carboplatin, docetaxel, and paclitaxel. By using comprehensive proteome analysis approach, we identified epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a receptor tyrosine kinase, played key roles in CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells. Indeed, cell survival rate in the cisplatin-resistant CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells was markedly inhibited by treatment with clinically available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), such as gefitinib. In addition, gefitinib was significantly effective for not only cell survival, but also EMT-like changes through inhibiting transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) signaling in CYLD-knockdown OSCC cells. Thereby, overall survival of CYLD-knockdown CDX models was significantly prolonged by gefitinib treatment. Moreover, we found that CYLD expression was significantly associated with gefitinib response by using PDX models. CONCLUSIONS: Our results first revealed that EGFR-targeted molecular therapies, such as EGFR-TKIs, could have potential to be novel therapeutic agents for the CYLD-negative OSCC patients with poor prognosis.

Adjuvant Therapy in Node-Positive Endometrial Cancer: A Focus on Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In advanced-stage and high-risk endometrial cancer, adjuvant treatment is the standard of care and typically includes chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Debate continues over the optimal use of these two treatment modalities together or separately. This review covers the historical literature leading to the current recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy, in addition to looking forward to the relatively new field of targeted molecular treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: The review covers recent phase III trials comparing chemotherapy to radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial cancer. Additionally, the era of genomic medicine has a new foothold in endometrial cancer, and the review covers new discoveries on molecular classification and prognostic implications. Fortunately, the majority of endometrial cancer has a good prognosis. For advanced-stage and high-risk histologies, the prognosis can be guarded, with adjuvant treatment improving outcomes. Gynecologic oncologists continue to debate the optimal treatment modality/modalities, a debate which will likely become more robust as the field of molecular treatment in endometrial cancer evolves.

Metastasectomy for melanoma is associated with improved overall survival in responders to targeted molecular or immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Metastasectomy for melanoma provides durable disease control in carefully selected patients. Similarly, BRAF-targeted and immune checkpoint inhibition has improved median overall survival (OS) in metastatic patients. We hypothesized that there is an increasing role for metastasectomy in melanoma patients responding to these therapies. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database identified 128 patients with stage IV melanoma who received targeted molecular and/or checkpoint inhibitors at an academic institution from 2006 to 2017. Records were reviewed to characterize clinicopathologic characteristics, response to treatment, and intent of surgery for those who underwent metastasectomy. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median OS from stage IV diagnosis was 31.3 months. A total of 81 patients received checkpoint inhibitors, 11 received targeted inhibitors, and 36 received both. A total of 73 patients underwent metastasectomy. Indications for surgery included the intent to render disease-free (54%), palliation (34%), and diagnostic confirmation (11%). Responders to systemic therapy who underwent metastasectomy had improved OS compared to responders who did not (84.3 vs. 42.9 months, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Metastasectomy for melanoma is associated with improved OS in patients that respond to targeted molecular or immunotherapy. Resection should be strongly considered in this cohort as multimodality treatment results in excellent OS.

Identification of targeted therapy options for gastric adenocarcinoma by comprehensive analysis of genomic data.

BACKGROUND: So far only trastuzumab, pembrolizumab and ramucirumab have been approved by the FDA for targeted therapy in gastric cancer (GC). Here we report on potential targeted therapy options for gastric adenocarcinoma based on a novel analysis of "The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)" database. METHODS: One hundred two FDA-approved targeted cancer drugs were compiled and molecular targets defined. Drugs were considered as potentially effective if targeted genes showed (1) an increase in copy number, (2) gain of function with oncogene activation, (3) specific alterations responsive to approved drugs. Additionally, genetic changes that confer drug resistance and/or sensitivity were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty percentage of patients with GC may be treatable with non-GC but FDA-approved targeted cancer therapies. The major drug identified in our in silico study for GC is copanlisib, a PI3K inhibitor. In the TCGA patient database, our genetically based drug response prediction identified more patients with alterations sensitive to copanlisib compared to the already-GC-approved drug trastuzumab (20%, 78 out of 393 patients, vs. trastuzumab: 13%, 52 of 393 patients), which is mainly due to the high incidence of PIK3CA gain of function mutations within mutation hot spots. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that various currently FDA-approved drugs might be candidates for targeted therapy of GC. For clinical trials, cancer patients should be selected based on the genomic profile of their tumor.

Addition of docosahexaenoic acid synergistically enhances the efficacy of apatinib for triple-negative breast cancer therapy.

The current study aimed to investigate the antitumor and antiangiogenesis effects of apatinib in triple-negative breast cancer in vitro and also whether the combination of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and apatinib is more effective than apatinib monotherapy. The cell counting kit-8 assay was used to measure cell proliferation. Flow cytometry was utilized to determine the cell apoptosis rate. A wound healing assay was utilized to assess cell migration. Western blot analysis was carried out to determine the effects of apatinib and DHA on Bcl-2, BAX, cleaved caspase-3, caspase-3, phosphorylated protein kinase B (p-Akt), and Akt expression. DHA in combination with apatinib showed enhanced inhibitory effects on cell proliferation and migration compared with apatinib or DHA monotherapy. Meanwhile, DHA combined with apatinib strongly increased the cell apoptosis percentage. DHA was observed to enhance the antitumor and antiangiogenesis effects of apatinib via further downregulation of p-Akt expression.Abbreviations: FITC: fluorescein isothiocyanate; PI: propidium iodide.

Update on advanced melanoma treatments: small molecule targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and future combination therapies.

Early stage melanomas can achieve remarkable outcomes with surgery alone, but stage IV metastatic melanoma requires significant intervention and has poor outcomes. Here we present evidence on the latest advances in melanoma treatment, discuss the scientific concepts behind new therapies, and analyze the potential of future treatment combinations.

Effect of pathological high-risk features on cancer-specific mortality in non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a tool for optimizing patient selection for adjuvant therapy.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant therapies for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (nmRCC) are being tested to improve outcomes in patients with high-risk (hR) nmRCC. The objective of the current study is to test the ability of three hR features to identify patients who are at the highest risk of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after partial or radical nephrectomy. METHODS: Within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2013), we identified 23,632 nm "clear cell" RCC partial or radical nephrectomy patients with hR features: Fuhrman grade (FG) 3 or 4 or pathological classifications T3a or T3b or lymph node invasion (LNI), or combination of these. Kaplan-Meier analyses (KM) and multivariable Cox's regression models (CRM) evaluated the effect of hR features on CSM. RESULTS: Overall 11,568 (48.9%) patients harbored FG3-4, 5575 (23.6%) pT3a/b, 140 (0.6%) LNI, 5366 (22.7%) FG3-4 and pT3a/b, 183 (0.8%) LNI and pT3a/b, 203 (0.9%) LNI and FG3-4 and 597 (2.5%) LNI, FG3-4 and pT3a/b. Median CSM-free survival was 51, 58 and 22 months for LNI and pT3a/b, for LNI and FG3-4 and for LNI, FG3-4 and pT3a/b and was not reached for the other groups. These results remained unchanged in multivariable CRMs, where all hR features represented independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with combination of LNI with FG3-4 or pT3a/b and patients with all three hR features are at highest risk of CSM. In consequence, these patients may represent ideal candidates for adjuvant therapy either in clinical practice or future prospective trials.

Uveoretinal Adverse Effects Presented during Systemic Anticancer Chemotherapy: a 10-Year Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The present study describes our 10-year experience with uveoretinal adverse events that manifest because of chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who presented to the ophthalmologic department while undergoing systemic chemotherapy between July 2005 and June 2015. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (mean age, 51.2 years, 38 women [69.1%]) suspected of having uveoretinal disease owing to the use of chemotherapeutic agents alone were enrolled. Breast cancer was the predominant disease (36.4%); noninfectious anterior uveitis (21.8%) was the most common condition. Bilateral involvement was observed in 16 patients (29.1%). Although cisplatin (21.8%) was the most commonly used drug, daunorubicin, cytarabine, tamoxifen, toremifene, and imatinib were also frequently used. The median duration until ophthalmologic diagnosis was 208.5 days (range, 19-5,945 days). The proportion of patients with final visual acuity (VA) < 20/40 Snellen VA (0.5 decimal VA) was 32.7%. However, no relationship was observed between final VA < 20/40 and age, sex, therapeutic agents, and metastasis. CONCLUSION: Uveoretinal complications were mostly mild to moderate and exhibited a favorable response to conservative therapy. A considerable number of patients exhibited significant irreversible loss of vision after cessation of the causative chemotherapeutic agent. Ophthalmological monitoring is required during chemotherapy.

Limited benefit of targeted molecular therapy for inferior vena cava thrombus associated with renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of targeted molecular therapy (TMT) for an inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus associated with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is unclear. The aim of the present study was to assess the change in IVC thrombus height during TMT and to identify the factors associated with the effect of TMT on an IVC thrombus in RCC patients. METHODS: The present study retrospectively analyzed 21 patients with an IVC thrombus who were treated with TMT at our hospital. Thrombus height and level before and after TMT were assessed using CT or MRI. Furthermore, we examined the factors associated with the effect of TMT on the IVC thrombus. RESULTS: The tumor thrombus level before TMT was I in 2 patients (10%), II in 10 (47%), III in 4 (19%), and IV in 5 (24%). Following TMT, the tumor thrombus height decreased in 16 patients (76%), and the mean decrease was 17 mm. The tumor thrombus height increased in 5 patients (24%), and the mean increase was 30 mm. The tumor thrombus level decreased in 4 patients (19%), remained stable in 15 patients (71%), and increased in 2 patients (10%). We found that the clinical nodal stage (p = 0.025) was significantly associated with and the serum neutrophil count (p = 0.067) tended to be associated with the reduction in the IVC thrombus. CONCLUSION: The clinical benefit of TMT for an IVC thrombus associated with RCC is limited.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy with thrombectomy before targeted therapy improves survival for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) with thrombectomy before targeted molecular therapy (TMT) on survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with venous tumor thrombus. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 47 patients treated in our center from April 2008 to October 2014. In the study, 20 patients underwent CN with thrombectomy followed by targeted therapy (group 1); 15 patients received targeted therapy alone (group 2); and 12 patients underwent CN with thrombectomy alone (group 3). The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier survival curve method, and prognostic variables were assessed by Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up times of group 1, group 2, and group 3 were 24.5, 12, and 6.5 months, respectively. During follow-up, in both group 1 and group 3, 12 patients died. In group 2, 14 patients died. The median OS of group 1, group 2, and group 3 was 22, 12, and 6 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared with surgery alone and targeted therapy alone, patients with cytoreductive surgery before targeted therapy had statistically better survival benefits (P < 0.001, P = 0.009, respectively). On univariate analysis, the number of metastatic sites (P = 0.004) was a statistically significant prognostic factor influencing OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our single-center experience showed that CN with thrombectomy before targeted therapy improved the survival of patients with mRCC with venous tumor thrombus. The number of metastatic sites was an independent prognostic factor influencing OS.

Mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Mucinous tumours involving the ovary may be benign, borderline, or malignant. Malignant tumours may be primary or metastatic. Differentiation between primary and metastatic involvement of the ovary is critical for optimal patient management. Even among skilled pathologists, this distinction can be problematic, as can the distinction between borderline ovarian tumour of intestinal type and well-differentiated invasive primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Primary invasive mucinous ovarian carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma metastatic to the ovary do have distinct patterns of macroscopic and microscopic involvement which will reveal the correct diagnosis in many cases. There are also well-recognized patterns of immunohistochemical staining that can further assist in this differentiation. As a result of the application of these histopathological techniques, the incidence of primary invasive mucinous epithelial carcinoma has fallen over recent years from ∼12% to ∼3%. However, even in recent multicentre clinical trials such as GOG 182, expert pathological review suggests that ∼60% of tumours originally classified as primary invasive mucinous carcinomas were in fact metastatic tumours to the ovary. Review of outcome data for patients with mucinous carcinoma entered into multicentre trials suggests that this subtype of disease has a particularly poor prognosis in comparison with other subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. Historically, patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (mEOC) have been treated in the same way as other subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. While there is undoubtedly a response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy, retrospective reviews of individual centre experience suggest that this is substantially lower than for high-grade papillary serous carcinoma and in the order of only 30%-40%. The mEOC trial was established to investigate the possibility that the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (chemotherapy drugs more commonly used in colorectal carcinoma) may be superior to conventional carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, there was also a randomization to bevacizumab. Unfortunately, this trial closed early, 5 years after initiation having recruited just 50 of a proposed 322 patients. mEOC is now characterized as a type I tumour with an identifiable stepwise progression from a premalignant lesion, through non-invasive, to invasive malignancy. Molecular characterization of mEOC reveals it to be distinct from other subtypes of the disease with a KRAS mutation occurring in 40%-50% of patients. Other gene abnormalities including HER2 amplification in ∼19% also occur. This raises the possibility of the use of targeted molecular therapies which with molecular analysis of individual patient tumours could form the basis of a future clinical trial. It is, however, clear that if trials are to be conducted in this rare subtype of disease, they will need to be truly international in nature and carefully designed, possibly using an adaptive stepwise approach and will require an appropriate level of funding with a realistic assessment of likely recruitment. Associated translational research will clearly be essential.

Clinical utility and treatment outcome of comprehensive genomic profiling in high grade glioma patients.

Genomic research of high grade glioma (HGG) has revealed complex biology with potential for therapeutic impact. However, the utilization of this information and impact upon patient outcome has yet to be assessed. We performed capture-based next generation sequencing (NGS) genomic analysis assay of 236/315 cancer-associated genes, with average depth of over 1000 fold, to guide treatment in HGG patients. We reviewed clinical utility and response rates in correlation to NGS results. Forty-three patients were profiled: 34 glioblastomas, 8 anaplastic astrocytomas, and one patient with anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Twenty-five patients were profiled with the 315 gene panel. The median number of identified genomic alterations (GAs) per patient was 4.5 (range 1-23). In 41 patients (95 %) at least one therapeutically-actionable GA was detected, most commonly in EGFR [17 (40 %)]. Genotype-directed treatments were prescribed in 13 patients, representing a 30 % treatment decision impact. Treatment with targeted agents included everolimus as a single agent and in combination with erlotinib; erlotinib; afatinib; palbociclib; trametinib and BGJ398. Treatments targeted various genomic findings including EGFR alterations, mTOR activation, cell cycle targets and FGFR1 mutations. None of the patients showed response to respective biologic treatments. In this group of patients with HGG, NGS revealed a high frequency of GAs that lead to targeted treatment in 30 % of the patients. The lack of response suggests that further study of mechanisms of resistance in HGG is warranted before routine use of biologically-targeted agents based on NGS results.

Dual-Phase Dual-Energy CT in Patients Treated with Erlotinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Possible Benefits of Iodine Quantification in Response Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship of dual-phase dual-energy CT (DE-CT) and tumour size in the evaluation of the response to anti-EGFR therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Dual-phase DE-CT was performed in 31 patients with NSCLC before the onset of anti-EGFR (erlotinib) therapy and as follow-up (mean 8 weeks). Iodine uptake (IU; mg/mL) was quantified using prototype software in arterial and venous phases; arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) was calculated. The change of IU before and after therapy onset was compared with anatomical evaluation in maximal transverse diameter and volume (responders vs. non-responders). RESULTS: A significant decrease of IU in venous phase was proved in responders according to all anatomical parameters (p=0.002-0.016). In groups of non-responders, a significant change of IU was not proved with variable trends of development. The most significant change was observed using the anatomical parameter of volume (cut-off 73 %). A significant difference of percentage change in AEF was proved between responding and non-responders (p=0.019-0.043). CONCLUSION: Dual-phase DE-CT with iodine uptake quantification is a feasible method with potential benefit in advanced assessment of anti-EGFR therapy response. We demonstrated a decrease in vascularization in the responding primary tumours and non-significant variable development of vascularization in non-responding tumours. KEY POINTS: • Dual-phase DE-CT is feasible for vascularization assessment of NSCLC with anti-EGFR therapy. • There was a significant decrease of iodine uptake in responding tumours. • There was a non-significant and variable development in non-responding tumours. • There was significant difference of AEF percentage change between responders and non-responders.

Genotyping of EGFR Mutations from Bronchial Cytological Specimens in Slovakian Lung Cancer Patients.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a histologically and molecularly heterogeneous disease predominating in Slovakia among newly diagnosed oncological disorders and leading in the number of associated deaths. NSCLC diagnostics has advanced especially in molecular typing of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and subsequent targeted molecular therapy using tyrosine-kinase inhibitor(s) (TKI). The selection of patients for targeted therapy, we describe in this study, is mostly guided through bronchial smears rather than more invasive biopsies. We identified 32 adenocarcinomas, 40 squamous-cell carcinomas, 12 large-cell carcinomas, along with two unspecified carcinomas, in the NSCLC group who had bronchial smears taken. The assessment of tumor cell number, and genomic DNA allowed for screening of clinically relevant somatic EGFR mutations in 86 patients. Using quantitative PCR, 12 patients (14 %) were recommended for EGFR-TKI therapy. The most prevalent EGFR HIT-a in the somatosome, terms introduced and defined in this study, were exon 19 deletions, which were found in combination with the TKI-resistant p.T790M mutation in exon 20 in one patient. The study describes a method that is minimally invasive, reliable, and meets all criteria of routine molecular diagnostics. A multidisciplinary approach of EGFR genotyping from bronchial smears implemented in the study allows expanding targeted molecular therapy in NSCLC patients.

A Prospective Multicenter Trial of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Neoadjuvant Sunitinib for Inoperable Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 2-cycled neoadjuvant sunitinib therapy (NST) in patients with inoperable metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Between 2009 and 2012, 14 patients with inoperable mRCC from 5 Korean academic centers were prospectively enrolled after collecting their clinicopathological data and completing health-related questionnaires. The best overall response (BOR), safety profile, and changes in quality of life during NST were assessed using the RECIST criteria (version 1.0), CTCAE criteria (version 4.0), and the Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Among the 14 patients, 9 patients (64.3%) experienced partial response or stable disease state, and 5 patients (35.7%) did not complete treatment, with 1 case of disease progression (7.1%), 3 grade 3 adverse events (21.4%), and 1 voluntary withdrawal (7.1%). Four patients (28.6%) were successfully converted to an operable state and underwent surgery after NST. The BOR for the primary renal lesions was 22.2%, with a median 1.3-cm diameter reduction (range: 0-2.8 cm) from a baseline diameter of 10.3 cm (range: 6.6-15.8 cm). The other 18 measurable metastatic lesions exhibited a BOR of 55.6%. The QLQ-C30 questionnaire results revealed significant improvements in the quality of life domain, although we observed significant increases in the scores for fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and the financial effects of NST (P < 0.05). Two-cycle NST provided limited efficacy for resectability of inoperable mRCC, despite mild improvements in the BOR of the primary lesion and quality of life (Clinical Trial Registry 1041140-1).

[Study results of primary therapy for head and neck tumors : Highlights of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting]. / Studienergebnisse zur Primärtherapie von Kopf-Hals-Tumoren : Highlights der ASCO-Jahrestagung 2016.

At the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2016, results of current trials dealing with primary therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) were presented. Current trials investigate in particular therapy regimens for the treatment of locally advanced HNSCC. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains the standard therapy approach. Current trials focus on sequential chemoradiation with modifications in induction chemotherapy (ICT) or the subsequent CRT schedule. Studies investigating the combination of targeted therapy with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab and concomitant, sequential, or adjuvant therapy were presented. The most important trials are summarized in this article.