Risk stratification of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed after cervical conization.

BACKGROUND: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnosis is based on colposcopy-aided histological examination. However, its accuracy in CIN diagnosis is limited. Some invasive cervical cancers (ICCs) are diagnosed after cervical conization. Therefore, risk stratification of undetected ICC is particularly important for the management of patients with CIN. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for undetected ICC. We especially focused on the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological characteristics (including age, parity, and preoperative diagnosis) and HPV genotypes of 348 patients diagnosed with CIN or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) who underwent cervical conization at our hospital between 2008 and 2016. The relationship between preoperative factors, including HPV genotypes and post-conization ICC, was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 348 patients, 322, 7, and 19 had preoperative CIN3, CIN2, and AIS, respectively; 181 were nulliparous. The median patient age was 41 (23-83) years. HPV genotyping was performed on 237 patients. Overall, post-conization ICC was detected in 16 patients (4.6%). Multivariate analysis showed that nulliparity and HPV16 positivity were the independent risk factors for post-conization ICC (OR: 6.01, P = 0.0302; OR: 5.26, P = 0.0347, respectively). The combination of HPV16 status and parity improved diagnostic accuracy. Seven of 53 HPV16-positive cases (13%) without childbirth history were diagnosed with post-conization ICC. In contrast, none of the HPV16-negative cases with childbirth history was diagnosed with post-conization ICC. CONCLUSION: HPV16 positivity and nulliparity were identified as risk factors for undetected ICC. Careful treatment selection and preoperative scrupulous examination are especially important in these cases.

Extensive lesions and a positive cone margin are strong predictors of residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for squamous intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or 3 study design.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for post-conization of residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3. METHODS: This retrospective study included 267 patients with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 who underwent hysterectomy within 7 months after conization. Clinical data (e.g., age, menopausal status, gravidity, parity, type of transformation zone, conization method) as well as pathological data pertaining to conization and hysterectomy were collected from medical records. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationship between the variables and risk of residual lesions in hysterectomy samples. RESULTS: Overall, 70 (26.2%) patients had residual lesions in their hysterectomy specimens. Univariate analyses revealed that age ≥ 50 years (p=0.019), endocervical gland involvement(p=0.013), positive margin(p < 0.001), and involvement of 3-4 quadrants(p < 0.001) were risk factors for residual lesions. Conversely, postmenopausal status, gravidity ≥ 3, parity ≥ 2, loop electrosurgical excision procedure, and type III transformation zone were not risk factors for residual lesions. A positive margin(p < 0.001) and multiple-quadrant involvement(p < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for residual lesions on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple-quadrant involvement and a positive cone margin were reliable predictive factors for residual disease. Total hysterectomy or repeated cervical conization should be considered for patients with these two risk factors. The identification of high-risk patients with extensive lesions by colposcopic examination before conization is indispensable, as it will enable surgeons to perform conization with consideration of risk factors and possibly improve the approach used for the excisional procedure. For high-risk patients, colposcope-guided cold-knife conization is preferred when resources permit.

Fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: A case series study on the efficacy and feasibility of cervical conization followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the oncologic and obstetric outcomes of cervical conization followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy, which is used as a fertility-sparing procedure, in reproductive-aged patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer who underwent cervical conization followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy from 2011 to 2020 at Kumamoto University Hospital. RESULTS: In total, eight patients underwent conization followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy. The median age of the patients was 33 (range: 28-36) years. Four (50.0%) patients were nulliparous. Seven (87.5%) patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (87.5%) and one (12.5%) with adenocarcinoma. Five (62.5%), two (25.0%), and one (12.5%) presented with stage IA1, IA2, and IB1 disease, respectively. Five (62.5%) patients had lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) based on the assessment of specimens obtained via conization. However, none had lymph node metastasis based on pelvic lymphadenectomy. Regarding long-term oncologic outcomes, recurrence was not observed at a median follow-up of 60 (range: 8-107) months. In addition, obstetric outcomes were consistently favorable in terms of achieving pregnancy, preterm delivery, and live birth. During the study period, two patients who actively attempted to conceive had four pregnancies, resulting in full-term deliveries, and one was on her first trimester of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Cervical conization combined with pelvic lymphadenectomy represents a feasible conservative management for histologically well-selected patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Furthermore, an optimal histopathological evaluation of conization specimens will contribute to decision-making regarding the use of this fertility-sparing procedure.

Burden of CIN2+ diagnoses and conizations in women aged 18-45 years-a retrospective secondary data analysis of German statutory health insurance claims data.

PURPOSE: High grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) may progress to cervical cancer. They may be detected by screening and are usually treated by conization. This study aimed at assessing annual proportions of screening, prevalent and incident CIN2+ diagnoses, as well as proportions of (re-)conizations during 24 months follow-up after conization in Germany. METHODS: A descriptive retrospective claims data analysis of the years 2013-2018 was conducted using the InGef Research Database. Women aged 18-45 years with CIN2+ diagnoses were identified by ICD-10-GM codes (N87.1, N87.2, D06.-, and C53.-). Cervical conizations were identified by OPS codes (5-671.0* or 5-671.1*). Screening participation was identified by EBM codes (01730, 01733, 32819 or 32820). Annual proportions were calculated as women with the respective documented codes divided by all women in the respective age group per calendar year. RESULTS: Overall annual proportions of screened women spanned from 60.01 to 61.33% between 2013 and 2018. The overall annual prevalence of CIN2+ diagnoses (regardless of screening participation) ranged from 0.72 to 0.84% between 2013 and 2018, with highest proportions observed in women aged 27-45 years. Also, CIN2+ incidence was highest in women 27-45 years. Annual proportion of women undergoing conization was 0.24% in 2013 and 0.21% in 2018. During a 24-month follow-up period after conization, 2.91% of women underwent a re-conization 3 months or later after the initial conization. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates a considerable burden of CIN2+, conizations and re-conizations in Germany, especially in women aged 27-45 years. This highlights the need for intensified prevention efforts such as expanding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination.

Laser vaporization of the cervix is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and rapid labor progression in subsequent pregnancies.

PURPOSE: Laser vaporization of the cervix is an established method of treating cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia, but its effect on subsequent pregnancies remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate pregnancy outcomes after laser vaporization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study involving women who delivered live singletons between 2012 and 2019 in a tertiary hospital. The risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes after laser vaporization of the cervix were assessed using a multivariate regression model. The primary outcome was the adjusted odds ratio for preterm births. We also evaluated the course of labor progression, duration of labor, risk of emergency cesarean deliveries, and the risk of cervical laceration as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 3359 women were analyzed in this study. The risk of preterm birth was significantly higher in pregnancies after laser vaporization of the cervix (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.06-3.20; p = 0.030). The duration of the first stage of labor was significantly shorter in the post-treatment group (median 255 min vs. 355 min; p = 0.0049). We did not observe significant differences in the duration of the second stage of labor (median 21 min vs 20 min; p = 0.507) or the rates of other obstetric events, including emergency cesarean deliveries (AOR 0.736; 95% CI 0.36-1.50; p = 0.400) and cervical laceration (AOR 0.717; 95% CI 0.22-2.35; p = 0.582). CONCLUSION: Laser vaporization of the cervix is associated with an increased risk of preterm births and a shorter duration of the first stage of labor in subsequent pregnancies. Careful consideration is necessary when selecting a method of treatment for the uterine cervix of patients wishing future pregnancies.

Is large loop excision of the transformation zone depth a risk factor for affected endocervical margins?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine if the depth of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) is a risk factor for presenting affected endocervical margins. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study was performed on 353 patients that underwent LLETZ after presenting cervical biopsies with CIN grade 2 and grade 3 or persistent CIN grade 1 at Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain, from November 2011 to December 2016. Automatized measurement of the LLETZ depth was performed in microns and added to cervical canal extensions when these were performed. Other variables studied in positive endocervical margins were age (under or over 35 years), premenopause/postmenopause, number of affected quadrants, CIN grading, the presence of HPV 16 before LLETZ, parity (nulliparous vs multiparous) and the location where the LLETZ was performed (operating room vs consultation room). RESULTS: Our multivariant analysis showed that LLETZ depth ≤ 10 mm did not increase the risk in affected endocervical margins (P = 0.366) and no statistically significant difference between the two groups (affected and nonaffected margins) was found. CIN grading and parity did prove a statistically significant association (P = 0.039 and P = 0.011, respectively). Age, menopause, number of affected quadrants, HPV 16 and the location did not show statistical association with positive endocervix margins. CONCLUSIONS: LLETZ depth equal to or lower than 10 mm was not proven to be a risk factor to have affected endocervical margins after the treatment. Therefore, higher LLETZ depth would not be justified to ensure oncological results.

Development of endometrioma after cervical conization.

The association between cervical conization and subsequent development of endometriosis is uncertain. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence rate of ovarian endometrioma after cervical conization and to determine factors associated with the development of endometrioma. One hundred forty-two patients who underwent cervical conization at the University of Tokyo Hospital between January 2006 and December 2013 were included in the study. Their medical records were retrospectively studied until April 2015. The incidence rate of postconization endometrioma was calculated. Patients' characteristics (age, parity, preoperative and postoperative diagnosis and observation period) were analyzed. Six patients developed endometrioma after the cervical conization, and the incidence rate of endometrioma among patients who underwent cervical conization was 10.8 per 1000 person-year (95%CI 3.6-20.5). Patients' age, percent of nulliparous, postoperative diagnosis and observation period were not associated with the development of postconization endometrioma. A preoperative diagnosis with invasive cancer (p < 0.05) was significantly associated with the development of postconization endometrioma. The incidence rate of endometrioma among patients who underwent cervical conization in the current study was higher than that reported population.

Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a surgeon's training level influences the rate of incomplete resections or the amount of resected cervical tissue in women treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). METHODS: The present study is a retrospective analysis of the data of women who had undergone LLETZ for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) within the years 2004-2008 at the Medical University of Vienna. Women were grouped according to the level of training of the operating surgeon (i.e, resident or staff gynecologist) and univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for excessive cone volume, depth and incomplete resection (i.e., positive resection margin). RESULTS: Data of 912 women were analysed. Residents had a significantly larger cone volume [median 2681 (interquartile range 1472-4109) mm3] than staff gynecologists [2094 (1309-3402) mm3] (p = 0.001) in univariate analysis. The depth of resection and the rate of incomplete resection were comparable between both groups. In a binary logistic multivariable analysis, the level of training as well as patient's age was significantly associated with a cone volume larger than 2500 mm3. CONCLUSION: Conization performed by residents as opposed to staff gynecologists does not compromise the procedure's effectiveness but may expose women to a potential additional risk for adverse obstetrical outcomes due to excessive resection of cervical tissue.

Short- and long-term complications and the impact on quality of life after cervical conization by harmonic scalpel.

AIM: The incidence of non-obstetrical complications after cervical conization is low, and women receive minimal postsurgical attention. In this study, we investigated whether women felt any discomfort after undergoing conization by harmonic scalpel, one of the hot-knife devices widely used in Japan. METHODS: Eighty-eight women aged 20-47 years who were still experiencing menstrual cycles and had undergone harmonic conization participated in a questionnaire survey regarding perisurgical complications and postsurgical changes in gynecological issues. Correlations between the occurrence of postoperative complications and clinical characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Regarding the complications immediately after the surgery, 37 women (45.1%) complained of postoperative bleeding that was heavier than their usual menstrual bleeding, and 14 (18.2%) reported that the postsurgical bleeding was greater than they had expected. Regarding long-term gynecological changes after conization, 27 women (30.7%) reported that the duration of menstrual bleeding had increased after the surgery, 20 (22.7%) indicated that pain during menstruation had changed, and 40 (45.5%) stated that the amount of menstrual bleeding had changed. Irregular genital bleeding outside of menstruation appeared in 23 women (26.4%). Additionally, 24 (27.6%) of the women reported that the conization procedure negatively impacted their quality of life. Finally, the occurrence of long-term atypical bleeding after the surgery was significantly correlated with the thickness and circumference of the tissue specimen. CONCLUSION: Several women experienced a significant change in quality of life after harmonic conization. Women who undergo conization should receive a comprehensive preoperative overview of the procedure and attentive postsurgical care.

Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies.

STUDY QUESTION: Does cervical conization add an additional risk of preterm birth (PTB) in assisted reproduction technology (ART) singleton and twin pregnancies? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very PTB in ART twin pregnancies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ART and cervical conization are both risk factors for PTB. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this national population-based controlled cohort study, we included all ART singletons and twin deliveries from 1995 to 2009 in Denmark by cross-linkage of maternal and child data from the National IVF register and the Medical Birth register. Furthermore, control groups of naturally conceived (NC) singletons and twins were extracted. Cervical diagnoses were obtained from the Danish Pathology register. Cervical conization included both cold knife cone and LEEP (loop electrosurgical excision procedure) but not cervical biopsies. The main outcomes measures were PTB (PTB ≤ 37 + 0 gestational weeks), very preterm birth (VPTB ≤ 32 + 0 gestational weeks) and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In all 16 923 ART singletons and 4829 ART twin deliveries were included. A random sample of NC singletons, 2-fold the size of the ART singleton group matched by date and year of birth (n = 33 835) and all NC twin deliveries (n = 15 112), was also extracted. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for the following confounders: maternal age, parity, year of child birth and sex of child. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Cervical morbidity (dysplasia and conization) was more often observed in ART pregnancies (6.2% of ART singletons and 5.4% ART twins) than in NC pregnancies (4.2% for NC singletons and 4.5% for NC twins), both for singletons and twins. In ART singleton deliveries, the PTB rate was 13.1 versus 8.2% in women with and without conization, respectively, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-2.01]. In ART twin deliveries, the prevalence of PTB was 58.2 versus 41.3% in women with and without conization, respectively, with an aOR 1.94 (95% CI 1.36-2.77), and the risk of VPTB was also doubled. Furthermore, previous dysplasia (without conization) increased the risk of VPTB in ART twins (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04-2.94). Cervical dysplasia did not increase the risk of any of the other adverse outcomes in ART singletons or twins. The risk of PPROM was increased in both in ART and NC singleton deliveries with conization versus no conization; however, this increased risk of PPROM after conization was not observed in either ART or NC twin pregnancies. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We were not able to adjust for the height of the cervical cone or the severity of the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or the time window between diagnosis of CIN and ART treatment. The finding on an increased risk of VPTB in ART twin pregnancies after dysplasia without conization may be random as we found no other increased risk after dysplasia alone either in singletons or in twins. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: After ART and prior conization, 58% of twin pregnancies versus 13% of ART singleton pregnancies result in PTB. There is a doubled risk of preterm delivery in ART twins with conization versus ART twins with no prior conization. Single-embryo transfer should always be recommended in women with prior conization irrespective of female age, embryo quality and prior number of ART attempts. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was achieved for this project.

Anaphylactic Shock After Cervical Conization Hemostasis With a Packing Soaked in Monsel's Solution.

Anaphylactic shock is a life-threatening medical emergency, and its successful approach depends on early recognition and treatment. We present a case report of a 54-year-old female, with the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status Classification III, admitted for cervical conization. She presented with known allergies to paracetamol, diclofenac, and nimesulide, and a history of nickel contact dermatitis, with no reports of complicated anesthesia. During conization, adrenaline was infiltrated in the cervix, and hemostasis was performed with packing soaked in Monsel's solution. The immediate postoperative period in the post-anesthesia care unit was uneventful, and no drugs were administered during this period. Three hours after discharge to the ward, the patient had progressive dyspnea with desaturation and maculopapular exanthema. Anesthesia medical emergency was activated. Upon arrival of the emergency team, the patient presented: marked edema of the lips and tongue, respiratory distress, SpO2 82% (under non-rebreathing high concentration oxygen mask), audible vesicular murmur but diminished in all lung fields (without bronchospasm), blood pressure of 60/40 mmHg, increased capillary refill time (4-5 seconds), Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14, as well as generalized maculopapular exanthema and eyelid edema. Gas analysis revealed the following: pH 7.36, pO2 150, pCO2 33, HCO3 22, and lactate 2.2 mmol/L. Anaphylactic shock was immediately diagnosed without an identified causative agent. Intramuscular adrenaline (0.5mg), endovenous hydrocortisone (200 mg), clemastine (2 mg), and profuse fluid therapy were administered. There was an initial slight improvement followed by subsequent worsening. Additional administration of 0.5 mg intramuscular adrenaline and endovenous methylprednisolone (125 mg) provided similar results. Considering that no other drugs were administered in the ward, the emergency team and the attending gynecologist assumed an association between nickel allergy and the chemical composition of Monsel's solute. Thus, it was decided to remove the packing soaked in Monsel's solute from the vaginal cavity and wash it with saline solution. After removing the packing and further administration of 0.5 mg intramuscular adrenaline, there was progressive improvement in the blood pressure and SpO2. Tryptase samples collected one hour later were increased (23.9 ug/L; normal: <11.4 ug/L). The patient was shifted to the intensive care unit for surveillance, from which she was discharged after 2 days, with scheduled immunoallergology consultation, which is waiting. This case highlights the importance of causative agent identification as a key point for anaphylactic shock resolution, as well as a multidisciplinary discussion among professionals.

Prophylactic Cervical Cerclage in Cases Following Cervical Conization at a Japanese Perinatal Center.

The objective of this study was to re-examine the effect of cerclage on the possible factors associated with preterm delivery in women who had cervical conization. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing the obstetric outcomes of women with or without prophylactic cervical cerclage in pregnancy following a prior conization and managed at our institute between 2004 and 2023. In this study, there were 75% of pregnant women with a history of cervical conization. In 13 women of these (17%), prophylactic cervical cerclage was performed at 12-17 weeks' gestation. The incidence of preterm delivery was 15 (9/62) and 31% (4/13, p = 0.38) in cases with and without cervical cerclage, respectively. The prevalence of histological chorioamnionitis (CAM) in cases of preterm delivery following cervical cerclage was 100%. Prophylactic cervical cerclage in the cases following conization did not contribute to the prevention of preterm delivery associated with the development of CAM.

A study on the correlation between the prognosis of HPV infection and lesion recurrence after cervical conization.

Introduction: Persistent human papillomavirus infection is an important factor in the development of cervical cancer, which is usually a long process evolving from the development of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL), also referred to as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Local treatment of advanced squamous intraepithelial lesions, also regarded as High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, may be effective in preventing cancer. Objective: To promptly identify high-risk patients with a tendency to recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 300 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from 2019 to 2020 to investigate the relationship between recurrence of cervical lesions and postoperative regression of HPV infection, as well as other related risk factors. Results: We found that the HPV-negative rates were 81.81, 85.71, and 90.91% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and the average lesion recurrence rate was 8.16%, with a median time to recurrence of 14 months in patients undergoing CKC for HSIL. The risk of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions was highest in patients with HPV16. Patients over 61 years of age had the lowest postoperative HPV-negative rate. The conversion rate was significantly lower in patients with multiple HPV genotypes than in those with single HPV infection (p < 0.05). The probability of recurrence was higher in patients with the same HPV infection genotype before and after surgery than in patients with different infection genotypes before and after surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Combined with the literature review, we believe that patients aged ≥50 years, with ≥3 pregnancies and births, a history of smoking, and consistent genotypes of preoperative and postoperative HPV infection in cervical conization have more HPV re-infection or persistent infection, and that these factors may be high-risk factors for lesion recurrence. For patients with possible potential high-risk factors, we need to carry out individualized follow-up and focused management, take timely and effective management measures, optimize the treatment plan, reduce the recurrence rate, prevent HSIL and cervical cancer, improve the quality of patient's survival, and improve the prognosis.

Cardiopulmonary Adverse Events of Remimazolam versus Propofol During Cervical Conization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the cardiopulmonary safety of remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing cervical conization. Methods: This was a single-blind, parallel, randomized controlled study. A total of 204 patients scheduled for day surgery of cold knife cervical conization received either remimazolam-alfentanil anesthesia (remimazolam group) or propofol-alfentanil anesthesia (propofol group). The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative cardiopulmonary adverse events (a composite outcome of hypotension, bradycardia and hypoxemia). The occurrence of hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxemia and the degree of body movement were secondary outcomes, as well as the moment at which consciousness was lost, the interval between the end of anesthesia and the operating room's release of the patient, and the overall dosage of alfentanil administered during the procedure. Results: The incidence of intraoperative cardiopulmonary adverse events was 45 (44.1%) in the remimazolam group and 72 (70.6%) in the propofol group (absolute risk difference [95% CI], -26.47% [-39.55% to -13.39%]; odds ratio (OR) [95% CI], 0.43 [0.28 to 0.65]; P < 0.001). The remimazolam group showed lower incidences of hypotension and hypoxemia compared to the propofol group (P = 0.01 for both). No significant differences were observed in the overall alfentanil dosages administered, bradycardia, bodily movement, or time to losing consciousness between the two groups. Conclusion: In patients who underwent cold knife cervical conization, remimazolam-alfentanil anesthesia was associated with a reduced incidence of intraoperative cardiopulmonary adverse events compared with propofol-alfentanil anesthesia.

Laryngeal mask general anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for promoting early recovery of cervical conisation: A randomised, controlled clinical study.

Background: Although both spinal and general anaesthesia provides good anaesthesia for cervical conization, spinal anaesthesia delays the return of lower limb movements and urinary function, whereas general anaesthesia requires the patient to be unconscious. It is unclear which anaesthetic technique is more conducive to early postoperative recovery in patients undergoing cervical conization. Patients and methods: 140 patients undergoing cervical conization underwent either laryngeal mask general anaesthesia (LMA, n = 70) or spinal anaesthesia (SA, n = 70). In the LMA group, an i-gel mask was used for airway management. In the SA group, spinal anaesthesia was received with 0.75% ropivacaine (15 mg) in the L3-4 interval. The quality of recovery score (QoR-15) was the primary endpoint of the study. Secondary endpoints included incidence of adverse 24-h analgesia (NRS>3); return of lower limb activity; first bed activity and feeding; and the number of catheters removed at 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively. Result: The LMA group significantly improved QoR-15 scores (136.62 ± 11.02 vs 119.97 ± 12.75; P < 0.001); and reduced the incidence of poor analgesia (NRS >3) within 24 h postoperatively (20% vs 42.8%, P = 0.006); reduced time in bed (15.62 ± 3.83 h vs 18.27 ± 5.57 vs, P = 0.001); improved patient satisfaction (86% vs 27%; P < 0.001); and catheters removal within 24 h (70/70 vs 42/70, P < 0.001). Conclusion: LMA general anaesthesia can facilitate early postoperative recovery in patients undergoing cervical conization compared with conventional spinal anaesthesia. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR1800019384), http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx (08/11/2018).

Healthcare Costs and Resource Use Associated With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Conization: A Retrospective Study of German Statutory Health Insurance Claims Data.

Background: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) can be a consequence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. High-grade CIN (CIN2/CIN3) may develop from persistent HPV infection and progress to cervical cancer if left untreated. Management of CIN includes conservative surveillance or ablation and excision by conization. Internationally, CIN and its treatment generate a considerable economic burden, but no current data regarding costs and resource use from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance exist. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the health economic burden in women with CIN diagnoses who either underwent cervical conization or were managed conservatively. Methods: We conducted a retrospective claims data analysis using the InGef Research Database from 2013 to 2018. Healthcare costs and resource utilization in a 24-month observation period (1:1:1 matching) were compared in 18- to 45-year-old women with CIN (1-3) who underwent a conization procedure (study cohort 1) and in women with CIN (1-3) who did not undergo conization (study cohort 2) to women with neither CIN nor conization (control group). Results: For each group, 2749 women were identified. Mean total healthcare costs after 24 months were higher in study cohort 1 (€4446, P<.01) and study cohort 2 (€3754, P=.09) compared with the control group (€3426). Comparing study cohort 1 and 2 to controls, mean differences were highest in age groups 41-45 years (cohort 1: €5115 vs €3354, P<.01; cohort 2: €4152 vs €3354, P=.14). Significantly more women were hospitalized at least once in study cohort 1 (57.46%, P<.01) and study cohort 2 (38.74%, P<.01) compared with the control group (31.14%). Frequency of outpatient physician visits was significantly higher in both study cohorts (43.23 visits, P<.01 and 38.60 visits, P<.01) compared with the control group (32.07 visits). Conclusion: Our results revealed 30% and 10% increased total healthcare costs in women with CIN undergoing invasive treatment (study cohort 1) and conservative management (study cohort 2), respectively, compared with a control group of women with no CIN in a 2-year follow-up period.

Modified method of cervical conization with hybrid use of a cold knife and an electric knife for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and surgical outcome of the modified method of cervical conization with hybrid use of a cold knife and an electric knife. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of cervical conization for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions was performed between January 2020 and December 2020. Traditional cold knife conization and modified conization were used. The clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between these methods. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were included. Traditional conization was performed in 46 patients, and the modified method was used in 46 patients. There were no differences in clinical characteristics, such as age, menopausal status, and conization height, between the methods. Intraoperative blood loss with the modified method was significantly lower than that with traditional conization (27.6 ± 4.7 vs 51.3 ± 18.3 mL). Postoperative vaginal bleeding requiring emergent measures, such as prolonged gauze compression, sutures, or electrocautery, was significantly less with the modified method than with traditional conization (4.3% vs 17.4%). A median follow-up of 10.2 months showed no significant difference in persistence or recurrence between the methods. CONCLUSIONS: The modified method of cervical conization with hybrid use of cold and electric knives may be a good alternative to traditional cold knife conization.

Comparison of Monopolar Electrosurgical Conization and the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in the Management of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.

Objectives: To compare the performance and outcomes of monopolar electrosurgical conization (MESC) or the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in the treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Methods: This retrospective study included 554 patients diagnosed with HSIL through biopsy. The study used either LEEP or MESC for cervical conization. Additionally, the medical records of these patients, including the basic information, status of the excision margin, cone depth, cone width, fragmentation, complication, and the results of a 6-month follow-up after conization, were reviewed. Results: Compared to MESC, LEEP had a significantly higher rate of positive endocervical margin (3.77 vs. 8.65%; p = 0.018), burn injury of the margin (4.90 vs. 10.38%; p = 0.016) and a lower rate of adequate cone depth (83.40 vs. 89.62%; p = 0.034). In addition, LEEP was significantly more likely to cause fragmentation (p = 0.000). There was, however, no significant difference in the rate of abnormal cervical cytology and positive high-risk HPV (hrHPV) between these two groups, 6 months after cervical conization. Conclusion: Both LEEP and MESC appeared to be equally effective in the clinical treatment of HSIL. Nonetheless, MESC resulted in a better pathological outcome with regard to the status of the margin, tissue fragmentation, and cone depth.

Can prophylactic transvaginal cervical cerclage improve pregnancy outcome in patients receiving cervical conization? A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Cervical conization could increase the risk of cervical insufficiency. This study systematically evaluated the value of prophylactic transvaginal cervical cerclage following cervical conization with regards to pregnancy outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature, using Web of Science, and Embase, the published time ranged from the date that database established to December 2019. Pregnant patients, who had a previous history of cervical conization for CIN or early cervical cancer, were enrolled. Two researchers searched these databases and estimated the included studies' quality independently, depending on the same criteria. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis is incorporate 3560 cases eventually. Meta-analysis showed that when compared to the no-cerclage group, the risk ratio (RR) of preterm birth in the prophylactic transvaginal cervical cerclage group was 1.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-2.80; p = 0.004]; the RR of premature rupture of membranes was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.17-1.93; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of preterm birth were significantly higher in women following cervical conization with transvaginal cerclage than those without cerclage.

Optimizing the Detection of Occult Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Multicentre Study in China.

PURPOSE: Early-stage cervical cancer is usually diagnosed by colposcopy-directed biopsy (CDB) and/or endocervical curettage (ECC), but some neglected lesions must be detected by conization because they are occult. This study aimed to explore the optimal method for detecting these "occult" cervical cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1299 patients who were high-risk for early-stage cervical cancer from five centres in China were prospectively included. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of cytology, HPV testing, colposcopy and CDB&ECC for detecting "occult" cervical cancer and discussed the diagnostic importance of transformation zone (TZ) type, conization length and the proportion of cervical cone excision. RESULTS: The diagnostic agreement between colposcopy impression and conization was 64.5% and 72.4% between CDB&ECC and conization. Forty-two patients were finally diagnosed with pathologic cancer, and the sensitivities of cytology, colposcopy, CDB&ECC were 4.8%, 7.1%, and 47.4%, respectively. Twenty cases were neglected by CDB&ECC but further diagnosed as cancer by conization, considered to be occult cervical cancer, accounting for 1.6%. Cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)+, positive HPV, biopsy HSIL+ and cervical TZ type 3 were considered risk factors for developing HSIL+, while colposcopy impression HSIL+ was not. There was a significant difference between cancerous and HSIL patients in the proportion of cervical cone excision (P<0.001), which was recognized as a risk factor (P<0.001) for detecting cancer, while the length of cervical cone excision was not. The average proportion was 0.62, and the minimal effective proportion was 0.56. CONCLUSION: Since the incidence of occult cervical cancer neglected by CDB&ECC, colposcopy and cytology was far beyond expectations, conization is necessary, especially in patients with TZ type 3, high-grade cytology and biopsy results. As the cervical length varies in patients, the proportion of cervical cone excision might be a better indicator for detecting occult cervical cancer.