Treatment of tibial bone defects caused by infection: a retrospective comparative study of bone transport using a combined technique of unilateral external fixation over an intramedullary nail versus circular external fixation over an intramedullary nail.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to assess and compare the clinical efficacy of bone transport with either circular or unilateral external fixators over an intramedullary nail in the treatment of tibial bone defects caused by infection. METHODS: Between May 2010 and January 2019, clinical and radiographic data were collected and analyzed for patients with bone defects caused by infection. Thirteen patients underwent bone transport using a unilateral external fixator over an intramedullary nail (Group A), while 12 patients were treated with a circular external fixator over an intramedullary nail (Group B). The bone and functional outcomes of both groups were assessed and compared using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of the Ilizarov criteria, and postoperative complications were evaluated according to the Paley classification. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were successfully treated with bone transport using external fixators over an intramedullary nail, with a mean follow-up time of 31.63 ± 5.88 months. There were no significant statistical differences in age, gender, previous surgery per patient, duration of infection, defect size, and follow-up time between Group A and Group B (P > 0.05). However, statistically significant differences were observed in operation time (187.13 ± 21.88 min vs. 255.76 ± 36.42 min, P = 0.002), intraoperative blood loss (39.26 ± 7.33 mL vs. 53.74 ± 10.69 mL, P < 0.001), external fixation time (2.02 ± 0.31 month vs. 2.57 ± 0.38 month, P = 0.045), external fixation index (0.27 ± 0.08 month/cm vs. 0.44 ± 0.09 month/cm, P = 0.042), and bone union time (8.37 ± 2.30 month vs. 9.07 ± 3.12, P = 0.032) between Group A and Group B. The excellent and good rate of bone and functional results were higher in Group A compared to Group B (76.9% vs. 75% and 84.6% vs. 58.3%). Statistically significant differences were observed in functional results (excellent/good/fair/poor, 5/6/2/0 vs. 2/5/4/1, P = 0.013) and complication per patient (0.38 vs. 1.16, P = 0.012) between Group A and Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Bone transport using a combined technique of external fixators over an intramedullary nail proved to be an effective method in treating tibial bone defects caused by infection. In comparison to circular external fixators, bone transport utilizing a unilateral external fixator over an intramedullary nail resulted in less external fixation time, fewer complications, and better functional outcomes.

External fixator versus elastic stable intramedullary nail for treatment of metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the pediatric distal femur: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been used for the treatment of pediatric distal femoral fractures, such as elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), external fixator (EF) and plate osteosynthesis, but there has been no consensus about the optimal method. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between EF and ESIN techniques used in metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures of the pediatric distal femur. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed operatively treated MDJ fractures of pediatric distal femur between January 2015 and January 2022. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, injury and data of radiography. All of the patients were divided into EF and ESIN groups according to the operation techniques. Malalignment was defined as more than 5 degrees of angular deformity in either plane. Clinical outcomes were measured by Flynn scoring system. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in this study, among which, 23 were treated with EF, and 15 with ESIN. The mean follow-up time was 18 months (12-24 months). At the final follow-up, all of the fractures were healed. Although there were no statistical differences between the two groups in demographic data, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), rate of open reduction, time to fracture healing and Flynn score, the EF was superior to ESIN in operative time, fluoroscopic exposure and time to partial weight-bearing. The EF group had a significantly higher rate of skin irritation, while the ESIN had a significantly higher rate of malalignment. CONCLUSION: EF and ESIN are both effective methods in the treatment of MDJ fractures of the pediatric distal femur. ESIN is associated with lower rates of skin irritation. However, EF technique has the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced fluoroscopic exposure, and shorter time to partial weight-bearing, as well as lower incidence of malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

In vivo axial load-share ratio measurement using a novel hexapod system for safe external fixator removal.

BACKGROUND: External fixation is widely used in the treatment of traumatic fractures; however, orthopedic surgeons encounter challenges in deciding the optimal time for fixator removal. The axial load-share ratio (LS) of the fixator is a quantitative index to evaluate the stiffness of callus healing. This paper introduces an innovative method for measuring the LS and assesses the method's feasibility and efficacy. Based on a novel hexapod LS-measurement system, the proposed method is to improve the convenience and precision of measuring LS in vivo, hence facilitating the safe removal of external fixators. METHODS: A novel hexapod system is introduced, including its composition, theoretical model, and method for LS measurement. We conducted a retrospective study on 82 patients with tibial fractures treated by the Taylor Spatial Frame in our hospital from September 2018 to June 2020, of which 35 took LS measurements with our novel method (Group I), and 47 were with the traditional method (Group II). The external fixator was removed when the measurement outcome (LS < 10%) was consistent with the surgeon's diagnosis based on the clinical and radiological assessment (bone union achieved). RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the fracture healing time (mean 25.3 weeks vs. 24.9 weeks, P > 0.05), frame-wearing duration (mean 25.5 weeks vs. 25.8 weeks, P > 0.05), or LS measurement frequency (mean 1.1 times vs. 1.2 times, P > 0.05). The measurement system installation time in Group I was significantly shorter compared to Group II (mean 14.8 min vs. 81.3 min, P < 0.001). The LS value of the first measurement in Group I was lower than that of Group II (mean 5.1% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.011). In Group I, the refracture rate was 0, but in Group II it was 4.3% (2/47, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The novel hexapod LS-measurement system and involved method demonstrated enhanced convenience and precision in measuring the LS of the external fixator in vivo. The LS measurement indicates the callus stiffness of fracture healing, and is applicable to evaluate the safety of removing the fixator. Consequently, it is highly recommended for widespread adoption in clinical practice.

Magnetic resonance imaging quality in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator placed inside the MR bore: a literature review.

After emergent assessment of potentially limb-threatening injuries in knee dislocation or multi-ligament knee injury patients, magnetic resonance imaging is necessary to visualize ligamentous structures and plan for soft tissue repair. However, the application of a knee-spanning external fixator may introduce artifact and reduce overall image quality, which can limit the evaluation of soft tissue injury. As a result, the utility of MRI in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator has been called into question. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitative scales have been used to assess image quality of MRI in the context of a knee-spanning external fixator. Despite the potential for artifact, studies have demonstrated that useful diagnostic information may be obtained from MRI in the presence of an external fixator. This review examines the general principles of anatomical assessment, magnetic field strength, device composition and design, radiofrequency coil use, and MRI sequences and artifact reduction as they pertain to MRI in the presence of a knee-spanning external fixator.

Perspectives and institutional policies on patient safety and image quality regarding the use of knee-spanning external fixators in MRI: A survey study of the Society of Skeletal Radiology.

OBJECTIVE: Concerns regarding patient safety and image quality have made the use of knee-spanning external fixators in MRI a challenging clinical scenario. The purpose of our study was to poll practicing musculoskeletal radiologists on their personal experiences regarding the use of knee-spanning external fixators in MRI in an effort to consolidate practice trends for the radiologists' benefit. METHODS: A 27-item survey was created to address the institutional use, safety, adverse events, quality, and perspectives of the radiologist related to MRI of an externally fixated knee. The survey was distributed to 1739 members of the Society of Skeletal Radiology. RESULTS: A total of 72 members of the Society of Skeletal Radiology completed the survey. Most notably, 40 of 72 (55.56%) respondents are permitted to place a knee-spanning external fixator inside the MR bore at their institution, while19 of 72 (26.39%) respondents are not permitted to do so. Fourteen of 32 (43.75%) respondents have institutional guidelines for safely performing an MRI of an externally fixated knee. Twenty-five of 32 (78.13%) respondents are comfortable permitting an MRI of an externally fixated knee. CONCLUSION: We found a general lack of consensus regarding the decision to scan a patient with a knee-spanning external fixator in MRI. Many institutions lack safety guidelines, and providers rely upon a heterogeneous breadth of resources for safety information. A re-examination of the FDA device labeling nomenclature and expectations of the individual manufacturers may be needed to bridge this gap and help direct management decisions placed upon the provider.

Correction of Congenital Ring-Little Finger Metacarpal Synostosis Through Simultaneous Interpositional Allograft Bone After Split Osteotomy of the Synostosis Site and Distraction Lengthening of the Fifth Metacarpal.

PURPOSE: We attempted a technique for patients with congenital ring-little finger metacarpal synostosis involving simultaneous interpositional allograft bone after split osteotomy of the synostosis site and distraction lengthening of the fifth metacarpal along with correction of the metacarpal joint abduction contracture. The purpose of this study was to describe the surgical technique and its outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of children with congenital ring-little finger metacarpal synostosis treated surgically at our institute. Eight hands of six children with an average age of 5.0 (range, 1.7-9.3) years were treated by simultaneous interpositional allograft bone after split osteotomy, distraction lengthening, and tenotomy of abductor digiti minimi. We measured the metacarpal head-to-capitate area ratios from serial radiographs and analyzed them according to age. We also measured the change in the intermetacarpal angle (IMA) and metacarpal length ratio during an average of 8.1 (range, 1.4-16.8) years of follow-up. These changes were compared with changes in seven hands of five children with an average age of 8.1 (range, 1.5-15.6) years treated by the same method, but without a distraction lengthening of the fifth metacarpal and followed up for an of average 12.1 (range, 4.1-19.8) years, as a control group. RESULTS: Abnormal metacarpal head-to-capitate area ratio before surgery was normalized in all patients within the first 2 years after surgery. The IMA change averaged 39.8°, and the metacarpal length ratio changed by 17%. The control group showed an average IMA change of 36.6° and metacarpal length ratio change of 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous interpositional allograft bone after split osteotomy of the synostosis site and distraction lengthening of the fifth metacarpal with correction of metacarpal joint abduction contracture can restore the radiographic parameters in congenital ring-little finger metacarpal synostosis. The normalized ossification of the fifth metacarpal head indicates that the surgical procedure is probably safe. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Webplasty using an external fixator for complex syndactyly caused by Apert syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Webplasty can be conducted for complex syndactyly caused by Apert syndrome (also referred to as Apert hand) by extending the soft tissue in the lateral direction using an external fixator. This study aimed to verify the usefulness of webplasty without skin grafting. METHODS: Webplasty with lateral extension was conducted at a single institution from 2015 to 2023. The patients were four children with Apert hand aged 1-3 years. A custom-made small external fixator was used for all of the soft tissue extension. RESULTS: Webplasty without skin grafting was completed by the time all five patients were 5-6 years of age. CONCLUSION: Webplasty without skin grafting was possible with lateral extension of the soft tissue using a simple external fixator.

Is it possible to achieve multiplanar correction of complex deformities around the knee in children and adolescents using a monolateral external fixator?

PURPOSE: To present the technique of correction of multiplanar deformities around the knee in children and adolescents using the monolateral external fixator. Also, to evaluate the results of the technique regarding radiological correction, time to union, and possible complications. METHODS: A total of 29 patients (47 limbs) were prospectively included in the study (14 males and 15 females). Their median age was 13 years (range, 7-17). All patients had at least a 2-plane deformity around the knee which was corrected using a monolateral external fixator. The primary outcome measure was deformity correction (correction of mechanical axis deviation (MAD) in both the coronal and sagittal planes with correction of rotational deformities). The secondary outcome measures included bony union, radiographic, and functional results (assessed by using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) score). RESULTS: The median pre-operative MAD improved from 6.3 to 0.4 cm post-operatively. According to the ASAMI scoring system, the radiographic scoring was excellent in all cases (100%), and the functional scoring was excellent in 22 cases (89.7%) and good in three cases (10.3%). CONCLUSION: The simple monolateral fixator can be an effective tool for multiplanar correction of complex deformities around the knee without limb length discrepancy.

Comparing Outcomes of Acute Versus Gradual Surgical Correction in Brachymetatarsia.

Brachymetatarsia consists of a shortened metatarsal resulting in a shorter toe. Pain with shoe wear and cosmetic concerns are the main reasons for surgical intervention. Surgical techniques to increase metatarsal length include acute lengthening with interpositional bone grafting or gradual lengthening with callus distraction. We performed a retrospective cohort study for 1 surgeon's patients at 1 institution over 10 years. Twenty-nine feet in 22 patients met inclusion criteria for acute correction; 16 feet in 11 patients were included for gradual correction. Mean ages were 26.3 ± 12.1 and 27 ± 10.8 in the acute and gradual groups, respectively (p = .79). Most patients were female: 95.4% of acute cases and 90.1% of gradual cases. Most involved lengthening the fourth metatarsal: 86.7% and 100% of acute and gradual groups, respectively (p = .54). Correction obtained amounted to 14.4 ± 2.97 mm (range, 10-22 mm) in acute cases and 14.8 ± 2.39 mm (range, 10-20 mm) in gradual cases (p = .81). The mean percent increase in metatarsal length was 21.1 ± 14% for acute and 22.6 ± 12.4% for gradual (p = .72). Mean consolidation was 8.9 ± 2.51 weeks for acute and 21.4 ± 10.8 weeks for gradual (p = <.001). Nonunions were most common in the gradual group (37.5%) with need for more revisional surgery (43.5%) compared with the acute group; both were statistically significant. We conclude that acute brachymetatarsia correction can obtain correction similar to the gradual technique with fewer postoperative complications and less osseous consolidation time.

Functional and union outcome of combined column tibial plateau fracture treated with hybrid external fixator.

Objective: To determine the combined column tibial plateau fracture treated with a hybrid external fixator in terms of knee functionality, union outcome and complications. METHODS: The quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from July 5, 2019, to December 31, 2021, and comprised patients of either gender aged 20-50 years who presented with 2-column or 3-column fractures of proximal tibia classified according to the 3-column classification system after being diagnosed using radiographs and three-dimensional computed tomography scan. Knee function, union and complications, like neural, vascular, infection, delayed union, nonunion, malunion and implant failure, were evaluated. The Knee Society Score was used to assess knee function, and modified Rasmussen score for the union, while complications were assessed clinically on the 2nd, 6th, 12th, 16th, 24th, 36th weeks and one year post-operatively. Data was analysed using SPSS 26. RESULTS: Of the 113 patients, 91(80.53%) were males and 22(19.47%) were females. The overall mean age was 35.56±9.00 years. From the 12th week to the 24th week 45(39.83%) patients had good and 59(52.21%) patients had excellent functional outcomes. Union outcome in the 16th and 24th week was good in 57(50.44%) patients and excellent in 47(41.59%) patients. No neurovascular injury was observed. Superficial pin tract infection was observed in 21(18.6%) cases that healed with wound debridement and antibiotics. No delayed union, malunion and implant failure was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Good to excellent functional and union outcomes with minimum complications were observed with the hybrid external fixator.

Comparing the mechanical characteristics between leg lengthening using only an Ilizarov external fixator and leg lengthening over a nail using an external fixator manufactured in Vietnam.

PURPOSE: The mechanical characteristics of leg lengthening over a nail (LON) using an external fixator are not well known; specifically, the number of rings and K-wires required for this method has not been determined. This study aimed to compare the mechanical characteristics of leg LON using the simplest configuration for a domestic frame and those of leg lengthening using the Ilizarov frame alone. METHODS: The mechanical characteristics of cow tibial samples for lengthening over an intramedullary nail in combination with a domestic external fixator (LON samples) and for lengthening with the Ilizarov frame (Ilizarov samples) were evaluated by assessing axial compression, bending load, and torsional load. The research indices were compression stiffness, bending stiffness, torsion stiffness, yield axial load, ultimate axial load, yield bending load, and ultimate bending load. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the compression stiffness, ultimate axial load, bending stiffness, and ultimate, yield bending forces between the Ilizarov samples and LON samples. The compressive stiffness, yield axial load, and ultimate axial load of the LON samples were 98 ± 1.31 N/mm, 915 ± 23.89 N, and 1032 ± 29.86 N, respectively. The anterior-posterior bending stiffness and lateral bending stiffness of the LON samples were 122.48 ± 2.92 N/mm and 116.34 ± 3.95 N/mm, respectively. The yield anterior-posterior bending and ultimate anterior-posterior bending forces of the LON samples were 616.4 ± 3.64 N and 753.2 ± 3.49 N, respectively. The yield lateral bending and ultimate lateral bending forces of the LON samples were 624.6 ± 4.04 N and 759.0 ± 3.39 N, respectively. The axial torsional stiffness of the LON samples was 1.73 ± 0.05 N m/°, which was significantly lower than that of the Ilizarov samples (2.63 ± 0.03 N m/°). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were observed in the mechanical fixation characteristics of axial compression and bending between the Ilizarov samples and LON samples. However, the axial torsional stiffness of the Ilizarov samples was statistically greater than that of the LON samples. We recommend using the simplest configuration for domestic frames in combination with LON for limb lengthening. Partial weight-bearing is permitted in the distraction stage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study.

External fixation in intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: Is it a valid option as definitive treatment?

INTRODUCTION: The therapeutic management of calcaneal fractures is currently a major source of controversy in the literature. There is no consensus on the need to treat these injuries conservatively or surgically, nor on the criteria for deciding one option or the other. Although the gold standard has classically been the open approach and osteosynthesis, there are currently minimally invasive techniques that also report good results. Our objective is to present our results and experience with the MBA® Orthofix external fixator in a series of cases of calcaneal fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study in our center, between the years 2019 and 2021, of Sanders types II-IV calcaneal fractures operated with MBA® Orthofix external fixator. We recorded a total of 38 patients, 42 fractures. We registered demographic information, intraoperative, postoperative, radiological and functional parameters, using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), EQ-5D and VAS scales. RESULTS: A total of 26 men and 12 women were included, and the median age was 38 years. Mean follow-up was 24,4 months (6, 8-40, 1). The average time to surgery was 7 days and partial loading was started at 2.5 weeks after external fixation, which was removed at 9.2 weeks. The average Böhler angle correction was 7, 4°, Gissane - 12,2°, length 2 mm and calcaneal width was reduced by 5 mm. We recorded two superficial infections, one peroneal entrapment and three subtalar arthrodesis due to post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The AOFAS obtained was 79.1 + / - 15.7 points, MOXFQ 20.1 + / - 16.1 points, EQ-5D 0.84 + / - 0.2 and VAS 3.3 + / - 1.9. CONCLUSION: The external fixator is an excellent surgical alternative for complex articular fractures of the calcaneus, obtaining clinical and radiological results comparable to other osteosynthesis techniques and significantly reducing soft tissue complications.

Comparative analysis of external locking plate and combined frame external fixator for open distal tibial fractures: a comprehensive assessment of clinical outcomes and financial implications.

BACKGROUND: Open distal tibial fractures pose significant challenges regarding treatment options and patient outcomes. This retrospective single-centre study aimed to compare the stability, clinical outcomes, complications, and financial implications of two surgical interventions, namely the external locking plate and the combined frame external fixator, to manage open distal tibial fractures. METHODS: Forty-four patients with distal open tibial (metaphyseal extraarticular) fractures treated between 2020 and 2022 were selected and formed into two main groups, Group A and Group B. Group A (19 patients) are patients that underwent treatment using the external locking plate technique, while Group B (25 patients) received the combined frame external fixator approach. Age, gender, inpatient stay, re-operation rates, complications, functional recovery (measured by the Johner-Wrush score), pain ratings (measured by the Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), and cost analyses were evaluated for each group. Statistical analyses using SPSS were conducted to compare the outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: The research found significant variations in clinical outcomes, complications, and cost consequences between Group A and Group B. Group A had fewer hospitalisation periods (23.687.74) than Group B (33.5619.47). Re-operation rates were also considerably lower in Group A (26.3%) than in Group B (48%), owing to a greater prevalence of pin-tract infections and subsequent pin loosening in the combination frame external fixator group. The estimated cost of both techniques was recorded and analysed with the locking average of 26,619.69 ± 9,602.352 and the combined frame average of 39,095.64 ± 20,070.077. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that although the two approaches effectively manage open distal tibia fractures, the locking compression plate approach (Group A) has an advantage in treating open distal tibia fractures. Shorter hospitalisation times, reduced re-operation rates, and fewer complications will benefit patients, healthcare systems, and budget allocation. Group A's functional recovery results demonstrate the locking plate technique's ability to improve recovery and patient quality of life. According to the cost analysis, the locking plate technique's economic viability and cost-effectiveness may optimise healthcare resources for open distal tibia fractures. These findings might improve patient outcomes and inform evidence-based orthopaedic surgery.

Complications associated with single-level bone transport for the treatment of tibial bone defects caused by fracture-related infection.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of single-level bone transport with a unilateral external fixator for treatment of proximal, intermediate and distal tibial bone defects caused by fracture-related infection (FRI) and compare their complications. METHODS: The clinical records and consecutive X-ray photographs of patients with tibial bone defects treated by single-level bone transport using a unilateral external fixator (Orthofix Limb Reconstruction System) were analyzed retrospectively, from January 2012 to December 2018. Patients were divided into the proximal group (P, n = 19), intermediate group (I, n = 25), and distal group (D, n = 18) according to the location of the tibial bone defect. The Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard was applied to assess the bone and functional outcomes and postoperative complications evaluated by the Paley classification. RESULTS: A total of 62 participants were included in this study, with a median age of 36 ± 7.14 years. Sixty patients with tibial bone defects caused by FRI were successfully treated by single-level bone transport using a unilateral external fixator, with a mean bone union time (BUT) of 7.3 ± 1.71 months. According to the ASAMI criteria, there were statistical differences in bone and function results between the three groups (P vs. I vs. D, P < 0.001). The excellent and good rate of bone result in the intermediate group was higher than the other (P vs. I vs. D, 73.6% vs. 84% vs. 66.7%), and the excellent and good rate of function result in the proximal group was the highest (P vs. I vs. D, 84.2% vs. 80% vs. 73.3%). Complications were observed in 29 out of 62 patients (46.7%), with pin tract infection being the most common (14.8%), followed by axial deviation (14.8%), muscle contractures (12.7%), joint stiffness (12.7%), and soft tissue incarceration (12.7%). Other complications included delayed consolidation (12.7%), delayed union (6.3%), nonunion (4.2%), and neurological injury (8.5%). Two patients (3.2%) required below-knee amputation due to uncontrollable infection and previous surgery failure. CONCLUSIONS: Pin tract infection was the most common complication in tibial bone transport using an external fixator. Complications of distal tibial bone transport are more severe and occur at a higher rate than in other parts. Axial deviation mostly occurred in the intermediate tibial bone transport.

Biomechanical study of the stiffness of the femoral locking compression plate of an external fixator for lower tibial fractures.

BACKGROUND: A locking compression plate (LCP) of the distal femur is used as an external fixator for lower tibial fractures. However, in clinical practice, the technique lacks a standardized approach and a strong biomechanical basis for its stability. METHODS: In this paper, internal tibial LCP fixator (Group IT-44), external tibial LCP fixator (Group ET-44), external distal femoral LCP fixator (Group EF-44, group EF-33, group EF-22), and conventional external fixator (Group CEF-22) frames were used to fix unstable fracture models of the lower tibial segment, and anatomical studies were performed to standardize the operation as well as to assess the biomechanical stability and adjustability of the distal femoral LCP external fixator by biomechanical experiments. RESULTS: It was found that the torsional and flexural stiffnesses of group EF-44 and group EF-33 were higher than those of group IT-44 and group ET-44 (p < 0.05); the flexural stiffness of group EF-22 was similar to that of group IT-44 (p > 0.05); and the compressive stiffness of all three EF groups was higher than that of group ET-44 (p < 0.05). In addition, the flexural and compressive stiffnesses of the three EF groups decreased with the decrease in the number of screws (p < 0.05), while the torsional stiffness of the three groups did not differ significantly between the two adjacent groups (p > 0.05). Group CEF-22 showed the highest stiffnesses, while group ET-44 had the lowest stiffnesses (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the distal femoral LCP has good biomechanical stability and adjustability and is superior to the tibial LCP as an external fixator for distal tibial fractures, as long as the technique is used in a standardized manner according to the anatomical studies in this article.

Treatment outcomes of applying external fixator on distal radius fractures: a randomized clinical trial to compare between two directions of force exertion in parallel to radius shaft and perpendicular to the distal radius articular surface.

BACKGROUND: External fixation has been one of the conventional managements of unstable distal radius fracture. The main aim of this paper is to compare two methods of applying distractive force along the radius shaft versus perpendicular to the distal radius articular surface. DESIGN: Sixty patients with unstable distal radius fracture were included in present clinical trial and randomized in two groups, using block randomization method. In group A (first arm), distraction force was exerted parallel to the radius shaft. In group B (second arm), the external fixator was adjusted based on radial and palmar tilt of the mean population healthy wrist so that distraction was exerted perpendicular to the wrist articular surface. METHODS: Radiological and clinical parameters were evaluated in both groups of patients pre-operatively, immediately after surgery, and 6 weeks post-operatively. We also followed up patients clinically at 12 weeks after surgery. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Mayo wrist score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaires were used in order to assess patients' clinical and functional states. RESULTS: The method used in group B resulted in better improvement of palmar tilt both immediately (P = 0.007) and at 6 weeks follow up (P = 0.013) post-operatively in comparison with patients in group A. Radius height and radial inclination were also better restored when using the proposed modified method (P = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). There was no difference in any of clinical results (range of motion, grip strength, PRWE, Mayo, and DASH scores) between two groups of study, 12 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSION: Applying distractive force perpendicular to the distal radius articular surface seems to improve some radiological outcomes, probably due to better reduction maintenance, when compared with the technique of applying distraction force along distal radius shaft axis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I (clinical trial study). TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with approval code of IRCT20200313046759N1.

Osteochondral Autograft From the Hamate for Treating Partial Defect of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint.

PURPOSE: The management of a proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fracture dislocation becomes more challenging when the joint surface is damaged because of severe comminution or inadequate treatment in the acute phase. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of an osteochondral autograft for the reconstruction of the joint surface in patients with a partial PIP joint defect. METHODS: Twelve patients underwent osteochondral autograft surgery from May 2007 to July 2018. The average age at the time of surgery was 38 years (range, 21-67 years), and there were 10 men and 2 women. Plain radiographs and computed tomography scans showed a partial middle phalangeal base defect in all the cases. The surgeries were performed 2 weeks to 20 months after the fracture or a previous surgery. Partial hamate grafts were harvested to reconstruct volar lip (n = 7), middle portion (n = 2), and dorsal lip (n = 3) defects of the middle phalangeal base. Bone healing, postoperative range of motion, instability, and pain were evaluated. The average follow-up duration was 27.8 months (range, 12-53 months). RESULTS: Radiographic graft union was observed in all the patients 6-8 weeks after the surgery. The deformity was corrected in 11 patients. The active range of motion of the involved PIP joint was improved from 28.3° (range, 0°-60°) to 75.0° (range, 25°-95°). Complications were observed during follow-up, including degenerative arthritis (n = 2), instability (n = 3), and stiffness (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: Various types of partial joint defects of the middle phalangeal base following a PIP fracture dislocation can be reconstructed using an osteochondral autograft from the hamate. The functional recovery is generally acceptable, with a well-restored joint architecture. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Hydroxyapatite-coated compared with stainless steel external fixation pins did not show impact in the rate of pin track infection: a multicenter prospective study.

PURPOSE: Infection at the pin site remains the most common complication of external fixators (EFs). It is known that hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated pins increase bone adhesion and may lead to reduced rates of reported infections. The present study compares the rates of pin track infection associated with stainless steel and HA-coated pins. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, comparative intervention study among patients undergoing surgical treatment with EFs of any type between April 2018 and October 2021. Patients were followed up until the removal of the EF, or the end of the study period (ranging from 1 to 27.6 months). The definition of pin track infection was based upon the Maz-Oxford-Nuffield (MON) pin infection grading system. RESULTS: Overall, 132 patients undergoing external fixation surgery were included. Of these, 94 (71.2%) were male, with a mean age of 36.9 years (SD ± 18.9). Infection of any type (score > 1) was observed in 63 (47.7%) patients. Coated and uncoated-pin track-infection occurred in 45.7% and 48.5% of patients, respectively (P= 0.0887). The probability of developing infection (defined as a score ≥ 2) adjusted for comorbidities and follow-up time was not statistically higher among those who received uncoated pins compared to those who received pins coated with HA (odds ratio (OR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.67-3.67, p <0.05). CONCLUSION: In the present study, the external fixator pin infection rates were similar when using HA coating and standard steel pins.

Clinical trial of a low-cost external fixator for global surgery use.

PURPOSE: A low-cost modular external fixator for the lower limb has been developed for global surgery use. The purpose of this study is to assess outcome measures in the first clinical use of the device. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients recruited in two trauma hospitals. Initial clinical procedure data were collected, and patients were followed up every two weeks until 12 weeks or definitive fixation. Follow-up assessed infection, stability, and radiographic outcomes. In addition, patient-reported outcomes and surgeons' feedback on device usability were collected by questionnaires. RESULTS: The external fixator was used on 17 patients. Ten were mono-lateral, five were joint spanning, and two were delta configuration. One patient had a pin site infection at 12-week follow-up. All were stable when tested mechanically and using radiographic assessment, and 53% were converted to definitive fixation. CONCLUSION: The low-cost external fixator developed is appropriate for use in global surgery trauma centres with good clinical outcomes. PROSPECTIVE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: SLCTR/2021/025 (06 Sep 2021).

Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty: A Survivorship Review and Meta-Analysis.

Multiple treatments exist for ankle osteoarthritis. Ankle arthrodesis is the gold standard in late-stage osteoarthritis, but sacrifices range of motion and risks nonunion. Total ankle arthroplasty is typically reserved for low-demand patients as the long-term outcomes are poor. Ankle distraction arthroplasty is a joint sparing procedure which utilizes external fixator frame to unload the joint. This promotes chondral repair and improves function. This study aimed to organize clinical data and survivorship in published papers and direct further research efforts. Thirty-one publications were evaluated and 16 were included in the meta-analysis. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess quality of the individual publications. Random effects models were used to estimate the failure risk after ankle distraction arthroplasty. Ankle Osteoarthritis Score (AOS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), Van Valburg, and Visual Analog Scores (VAS) all improved postoperatively. Random effects model analysis revealed an overall failure ratio of 11% (95% CI: 7%-15%; p value ≤ .001; I2 = 87.01%) after 46.68 ± 7.17 months follow up, 9% (95% CI: 5%-12%; p value≤0.001 I2=81.59%) with less than 5 years follow-up and 28% (95% CI: 16%-41%; p value≤0.001 I2=69.03%) for patients with more than 5 years follow-up. Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty has promising short to intermediate term outcomes which makes this a reasonable treatment option to delay joint sacrificing surgery. The selection of the optimal candidates and consistent technique would improve research and subsequently outcomes. Based on our meta-analysis, negative prognostic factors include female sex, obesity, ROM < 20°, leg muscle weakness, high activity level, low preoperative pain levels, higher preoperative clinical scores, inflammatory arthritis, septic arthritis, and deformity.