Birth plan - legal and medical aspects.

A birth plan is a document that defines mother's preferences and expectations regarding childbirth and early puerperium. The purpose of the birth plan is to establish communication about mother's birth wishes and to properly convey them to the health care providers. With increasing computerization of society, birth plan is currently the subject of heated debate. In this article, we present historical view of the birth plan, as well as current legislation regarding the birth plan, as we do not consider legal awareness of obstetricians to be sufficient at the moment. The purpose of this article is to appeal to the professional public so they have up-to-date information about the birth plan, especially in discussions with patients, but also during forensic procedures. The preservation of excellent perinatological results under our circumstances is only possible by providing professional, empathetic and very intimate health care in hospital institutions.

Cesarean delivery on maternal request in the United States from 1999 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: The rate of cesarean delivery has increased in the United States over the last several decades. However, the rate of cesarean delivery on maternal request remains undetermined, and recent data on cesarean delivery on maternal request are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the prevalence and temporal trends of cesarean delivery on maternal request in the United States and characterize the population of women who elect to undergo a cesarean delivery in the absence of fetal or maternal indications. Maternal outcomes between women who delivered by cesarean delivery on maternal request and those who did not were compared. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1999 to 2015. An algorithm based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes was created to identify patients who underwent a primary elective cesarean delivery in the absence of fetal or maternal indications. Maternal characteristics and outcomes between women who delivered by cesarean delivery on maternal request and those who did not were compared using descriptive and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 13,698,835 deliveries included throughout the study period, 228,586 were identified as cesarean delivery on maternal request. Rates of cesarean delivery on maternal request among all live births increased throughout the study period, from 1% in 1999 to 1.62% in 2015 (P<.0001). Women who delivered by cesarean delivery on maternal request were more likely to be >35 years of age, were in the highest income quartile, and have private insurance. Cesarean delivery on maternal request was associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.0), myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-10.4), sepsis (odds ratio, 5.6; 95% confidence interval, 4.7-6.6), disseminated intravascular coagulation (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-3.7), death (odds ratio, 14.5; 95% confidence interval, 11.4-18.6), and prolonged hospital stay (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.8-5.1) and a lower risk of postpartum hemorrhage (odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-0.7). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that cesarean delivery on maternal request accounts for a small but increasing proportion of all cesarean deliveries in the United States. Cesarean delivery on maternal request was more prevalent among women with certain demographic characteristics, indicating that the option of cesarean delivery on maternal request may be more appealing or more frequently offered to a certain population of women. Although the overall risk of adverse events is low for individual births, population effects can result in increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the rates of cesarean delivery on maternal request should be monitored on a national level. Study findings were limited by the absence of a specific diagnostic code for cesarean delivery on maternal request.

Giving birth in the Murrumbidgee region: A quantitative and qualitative approach to general practice obstetrics in a rural region.

OBJECTIVE: There is public concern regarding rural workforce shortages and closure of smaller obstetric centres. AIM: To identify whether safety is a concern for Murrumbidgee hospitals that fit primary medical care models and ascertain general practitioner (GP) obstetricians' perspectives regarding the benefits and challenges to practising in the region. DESIGN: Mixed-method retrospective analysis of selected outcomes in the NSW Mothers and Babies Reports 2012-2015 and semi-structured interviews with GP obstetricians. SETTING: Murrumbidgee Local Health District. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of the safety of smaller hospitals (i.e. discharge status at birth, neonatal resuscitation and admission to intensive care); and iterative thematic analysis. RESULTS: This study provides evidence that smaller hospitals are providing safe obstetric care. Fewer babies were transferred, with fewer stillbirths, at the smaller hospitals and no difference in newborn deaths. There were more normal vaginal births in the smaller hospitals (70.0%) than in Wagga Wagga Base Hospital (57.2%) or Griffith Base Hospital (58.6%). There were fewer neonatal resuscitations in the smaller hospitals than in Wagga Wagga Base Hospital or Griffith Base Hospital. More than one-quarter of babies were admitted into the special care/neonatal intensive care for both Wagga Wagga and Griffith Base Hospitals; however, the rate was <3% in the smaller hospitals (p < 0.001). GPs were overwhelmingly positive about the professional rewards of GP obstetric practice and the importance of continuity of care, despite barriers such as workforce shortages, loss of facilities and other staff (midwives and anaesthetists). Possible solutions included fostering support systems, proactive succession planning and improving training support. CONCLUSIONS: GP obstetricians are providing a valuable, safe service in MLHD with both personal and community benefits.

Balancing risks: making decisions for maternal treatment without data on fetal safety.

Challenges arise when treatment to improve maternal health brings the possibility of risk to fetal health. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is the most recent, but hardly the only, example. Because pregnant patients are often specifically excluded from trials of new therapies, this is often the dilemma that patients and providers face when considering new treatments. In this study, we used the COVID-19 vaccine as an exemplar to question the broader issue of how society, in general, and obstetricians, in particular, should balance obligations to pregnant women's right of access to new therapeutic agents with the physician's desire to protect the fetus from potential risks. We will argue that in almost all circumstances (with few exceptions, as will also be discussed), maternal benefit and respect for autonomy create the uncertainty that absent safety data bring. Consequently, if pregnant women choose to try new interventions and treatments, such as the COVID-19 vaccination, they should be offered those new regimens and their decision supported. In addition, we will argue that the right solution to avoid the dilemma of absent data is to include pregnant individuals in clinical trials studying new treatments, drugs, and other therapies. We will also discuss the basis for our opinion, which are mainstream obstetrical ethics, precedents in law (supreme court ruling that forbids companies to exclude women from jobs that might pose a risk to the fetus), and historic events (thalidomide). The ethical framework includes the supposition that sacrifice to improve fetal outcome is a virtue and not a mandate. Denying a pregnant patient treatment because of threats to their life can create absurd and paradoxical consequences. Either requiring abortion or premature delivery before proceeding with treatments to optimize maternal health, or risking a patient's own life and ability to parent a child by delaying treatment brings clear and significant risks to fetal and/or neonatal outcomes. With rare exceptions, properly and ethically balancing such consequential actions cannot be undertaken without considering the values and goals of the pregnant patient. Therefore, active participation of both the pregnant patient and their physician in shared decision making is needed.

Process lessons from evaluating a combined continuity of carer and home birth scheme.

INTRODUCTION: Continuity of midwifery carer improves outcomes, but there is significant variation in how such schemes are implemented and evaluated cross-culturally. The Angus home birth scheme in Scotland incorporates continuity of carer throughout pregnancy, labor, birth, and the postnatal period. METHODS: Manual maternity case note review to evaluate the 80% continuity of carer and 3% planned home birth rate targets. RESULTS: Of 1466 women booking for maternity care, 69 joined the scheme. Forty-four had a planned home birth (3% overall), of whom seven were originally deemed ineligible. Of the 44, eight (18%) also achieved 80% continuity of carer with the primary midwife; by including a home birth team colleague, the continuity rate rose to 73%. Women whose care achieved home birth and continuity targets had lower deprivation scores. Eligibility issues, women's changing circumstances, and data recording lapses were complicating issues. CONCLUSIONS: Targets must be both feasible and meaningful and should be complemented by assessing a broad range of outcomes while viewing the scheme holistically. By expanding eligibility criteria, the home birth rate target was met; including input from a home birth team colleague in the calculation meant the continuity target was nearly met. With dedicated and competent staff, adequate resource and political support, and when considered in the round, the scheme's viability within local services was confirmed. Other generalizable learning points included the need to standardize definitions and data recording methods. Comparability across schemes helps grow the evidence base so that the links between processes and outcomes can be identified.

The University of British Columbia.

This study is one of a series of recent publications that attempt to sort out the impact of mode of birth on maternal and newborn outcome. The focus on elective cesarean section compared to planned vaginal birth beginning in spontaneous labor is an improved methodology over the earlier comparisons that failed to be able to separate planned from unplanned cesarean section or vaginal birth. The retrospective case control methodology based on birth record data that is employed in this research is similar to others, though with more respectable numbers. Most suffer from the problem of ascertainment difficulties, failure to stratify by parity, and of course, the unavailability of randomization, which some consider the ideal methodology.

Using a scheduled caesarean birth plan: A cross-sectional exploration of women's perspectives.

PROBLEM: There is minimal evidence regarding the role or impact of birth plans from the perspective of women experiencing scheduled caesarean birth. BACKGROUND: Quality maternity care requires respect for women's preferences. Evidence suggests birth plans enable communication of women's preferences and may enhance agency when vaginal birth is intended, however there is limited evidence of how this translates in the perioperative environment where caesarean birth is the intended outcome. AIM: Explore the experiences and perspectives of women who had utilised a scheduled caesarean birth plan at an Australian tertiary maternity hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used; 294 participants completed the survey within two weeks post-birth. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data, qualitative responses were analysed using content analysis. FINDINGS: Over half of the women requested lowering of the surgical-screen at birth, most requested immediate skin-to-skin with their babies; around two-thirds of these preferences were met. Use of a birth plan for scheduled caesarean section supported women's ability to communicate their desires and choices, enhancing agency and reinforcing the significance of the caesarean birth experience. Qualitative data revealed two main categories: Perceptions and experiences; and Recommendations for improvement, with corresponding sub-categories. DISCUSSION: Findings provide unique opportunities to consider the provision of woman-centred care within the highly technocratic perioperative environment. CONCLUSION: All women, regardless of birth mode, have a right to respectful maternity care that prioritises their wishes and agency. This study provides evidence for the positive utility of birth plans in caesarean birth, local adaptation is encouraged.

Impact of cesarean delivery due to maternal choice on perinatal outcome in term nulliparous patients with a singleton fetus in a vertex presentation.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study were to: (1) evaluate the prevalence of cesarean delivery due to maternal request among nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) patients; (2) identify the clinical profile, if any, of these patients; and (3) compare the perinatal outcomes between NTSV patients who requested a cesarean delivery versus patients who did not request cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case control study performed at a single institution between November 2018 and July 2019. All NTSV patients who had a cesarean delivery due to maternal choice were identified and compared to the next two NTSV patients in labor who delivered vaginally or by medically indicated cesarean delivery following a cesarean delivery by maternal choice. The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcomes were individual components of composite neonatal and maternal morbidity. RESULTS: Of 1138 NTSV patients, 61 (5.4%) patients opted for cesarean delivery by maternal choice. There were significant differences in the demographic/clinical profile between cases and controls including BMI (35.3 kg/m2 vs. 32.7 kg/m2, p < .01), birthweight (3552 gr vs. 3333 gr, p < .001) and documented mental illness (41.0% vs. 22.1% respectively, p < .01). There was no significant difference in composite neonatal morbidity between cases and controls (6.6% vs. 5.7%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.25-3.61). The risk for postpartum hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion was higher (but not statistically significant) in the study group (5.0% vs. 0.0%, aOR 6.43, 95% CI: 0.65-63.24). Patients who chose cesarean delivery during the intrapartum period had a higher (but not statistically significant) composite neonatal morbidity (14.3% vs. 5.7%, aOR 2.24, 95% CI 0.52-9.78) and composite maternal morbidity (28.6% vs.11.8%, aOR 2.90, 95% CI 0.92-9.16) and significantly higher transfusion rate (aOR 16.93, 95% CI 1.53-187.74). CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery by maternal choice in NTSV patients is not associated with improved neonatal outcomes; in contrast, it is associated with increased composite maternal morbidity and increased transfusion rate.

Exploring the perspective of nursing staff or caregivers on birthing positions in Central India.

INTRODUCTION: Maternal birthing positions refer to the various physical postures a pregnant mother may assume at the time of delivery. The World Health Organisation recommends that woman should be given an opportunity to make a choice on the type of position to use during labour. Alternative birth positions are associated with lower incidence rates of performing episiotomy, less perineal tears and less use of instrumental deliveries. Nurses' perspective on women's positions has rarely been explored in India. Present study aims at assessing the knowledge regarding alternative birth positions among nursing officers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 52 nursing officers who were posted in the labour room. A pretested questionnaire was administered to them. Data analysis was done using SPSS software version 22. RESULTS: Majority (82.7%) of nursing officers felt that there is a need of giving a choice to the woman regarding alternate birth position. 76.9% of them were aware of position other than lithotomy. Around 48.1% would recommend squatting position to a woman in labour. Ease and convenience in conducting the delivery was the foremost reason chosen in advocating a birth position. Whereas overcrowding in the labour room, ignorance about alternate positions and difficulty in converting to instrumental delivery were cited as reasons of not recommending these positions. CONCLUSION: Educating nursing officers about emerging evidence regarding birthing positions will enable them to give accurate information to women.

Step 4: provides the birthing woman with freedom of movement to walk, move, assume positions of her choice: the coalition for improving maternity services:.

Step 4 of the Ten Steps of Mother-Friendly Care insures that women have the freedom to walk, move, and assume positions of their choice during labor and birth. The rationales and the evidence in support of this step are presented.