Sex differences in outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with MitraClip improves outcomes among select patients with moderate-to-severe and severe mitral regurgitation; however, data regarding sex-specific differences in the outcomes among patients undergoing TEER are limited. METHODS: An electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, Central, and Web of Science databases for studies comparing sex differences in outcomes among patients undergoing TEER was performed. Summary estimates were primarily conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 24,905 patients (45.6% women) were included. Women were older and had a lower prevalence of comorbidities, including diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease. There was no difference in procedural success (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-1.05) and short-term mortality (i.e., up to 30 days) between women and men (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.97-1.39). Women had a higher incidence of periprocedural bleeding and stroke (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.15-1.56) and (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.10-2.25), respectively. At a median follow-up of 12 months, there was no difference in mortality (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.09) and heart failure hospitalizations (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.68-1.67). An analysis of adjusted long-term mortality showed a lower incidence of mortality among women (hazards ratio: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lower prevalence of baseline comorbidities, women undergoing TEER with MitraClip had higher unadjusted rates of periprocedural stroke and bleeding as compared with men. There was no difference in unadjusted procedural success, short-term or long-term mortality. However, women had lower adjusted mortality on long-term follow-up. Future high-quality studies assessing sex differences in outcomes after TEER are needed to confirm these findings.

Initial experience with percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) is a therapeutic option for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with heart failure due to differential aetiologies. However, only little is known about the safety and efficacy of this procedure in patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Five patients with cardiac amyloidosis and moderate to severe or severe MR undergoing PMVR were analysed retrospectively and compared to seven patients with cardiac amyloidosis and severe MR without intervention. Clinical and functional data, renal function and cardiac biomarkers as well as established risk scores for cardiac amyloidosis were assessed. Primary endpoint was the reduction in MR one year after PMVR. Secondary endpoints were safety, overall mortality after 12 months compared with the control group, as well as changes in clinical and functional parameters. RESULTS: Amyloidosis risk assessment documented amyloid cardiomyopathy at an advanced stage in all patients. Procedural, technical and device success of PMVR were all 100% and residual MR remained mild to moderate at 12 months follow-up (P = .038 vs before PMVR). Differences in survival compared with the control (no PMVR) group pointed to a possible survival benefit in the PMVR group (P = .02). CONCLUSION: PMVR is a feasible and safe procedure in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and might carry a possible survival benefit in this patient group.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair in adults with congenital heart disease: Report of the first case-series.

BACKGROUND: Systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation (AVVR) is frequently encountered in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). Surgical intervention is the mainstay of therapy, but in a specific high-risk subset, percutaneous valve repair might offer a lower-risk alternative. METHODS: Three patients with complex CHD and severe symptomatic AVVR underwent percutaneous mitral valve repair at a single center. All were deemed to be high-risk for surgery by a multidisciplinary CHD team and provided informed consent for the compassionate use of the MitraClip (Abbott, Santa Clara, CA). Three-dimensional heart models were generated for the procedure, which was performed by an adult CHD cardiologist (who provided imaging support) and an interventional cardiologist with expertise in CHD and percutaneous mitral valve repair. RESULTS: The first case was a 39 year-old-woman with [S,L,D] dextrocardia, double outlet right ventricle, mild tricuspid hypoplasia, and a secundum atrial septal defect, who was palliated at age 35 with a right bidirectional Glenn and later developed severe, symptomatic mitral regurgitation, and underwent placement of one MitraClip XTR device. Two patients with L-loop transposition of the great arteries each successfully underwent placement of two MitraClip XTR devices; one patient had a single-leaflet detachment of one of the clips with no change in regurgitation or clip position on follow-up. All patients had significant reduction of AVVR and improvement in NYHA functional class. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous atrioventricular valve repair in adults with CHD is feasible with the MitraClip but requires significant preprocedural planning and a multidisciplinary team that combines CHD and interventional therapeutic expertise.

Use of edge-to-edge percutaneous mitral valve repair for severe mitral regurgitation in cardiogenic shock: A multicenter observational experience (MITRA-SHOCK study).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of edge-to-edge PMVR on short and mid-term clinical outcomes in patients with CS and severe MR. BACKGROUND: Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with three times higher risk of 1-year mortality. In refractory CS, edge-to-edge percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) can be a potential therapeutic option. METHODS: We retrospectively included consecutive patients with refractory CS and concomitant severe MR treated with MitraClip® system. CS was defined according to the criteria used in the SHOCK trial and procedural success according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) criteria. The 30-day and 6-month mortality were the primary and secondary endpoints respectively. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (median age 73 years [interquartile range, IQR 66-78], 25.8% female), STS mortality score 37.9 [IQR 30.4-42.4]), with CS and concomitant severe MR treated with edge-to-edge PMVR were retrospectively enrolled. Procedural success was 87.1%. Thirty-day and 6-month survival rates were 78.4 and 45.2% respectively. Univariate Cox Regression Model analysis showed that procedural success was a predictor of both 30-day (HR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.55, p < .01) and 6-month survival (HR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.84, p = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Edge-to-edge PMVR in patients with CS and concomitant severe MR was associated with good procedural safety and success with acceptable short and mid-term survival rates. It could be considered a bailout option in this setting of patients.

Initial experience with the fourth generation MitraClip™: Outcomes, procedural aspects, and considerations for device selection.

OBJECTIVES: We present our initial experience with the fourth-generation MitraClip™ (G4) system and propose preliminary criteria for device selection. BACKGROUND: The MitraClip™ G4 system recently underwent a "controlled release" for transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. The four new devices include technical improvements such as controlled gripper actuation (independent leaflet capture) and continuous left atrial pressure monitoring. To date, a patient-specific device selection algorithm, and the technology's impact on procedural times and success, have not been described. METHODS: We present an initial multi-center experience and short-term outcomes with the new system, suggest procedural and imaging considerations, and propose initial guidance for device selection. RESULTS: Sixty-one procedures performed by three operators at two centers between November 2019 and May 2020 were analyzed. At 30-day follow-up, there were three deaths (4.9%), four neurological events (6.6%), and seven re-hospitalizations (11.5%). Fifty-nine patients achieved device and procedural success (96.7%), and there was one device-related technical issue (1.6%). Compared to the same operators utilizing the third generation MitraClip™, the G4 system resulted in a significant reduction in the median number of clips used per patient (1 IQR 1-2 vs. 2 IQR 1-3, p = .023) and a trend toward shorter device times. CONCLUSION: Based on our initial experience, we found that the MitraClip™ G4 system is associated with high procedural success and fewer devices needed per procedure. The expanded device options may allow a more targeted approach to the myriad of pathologic presentations of mitral regurgitation. This early experience should provide a foundational opportunity for further refinement.

Impact of cleft-like indentations on procedural outcome of percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve (MV) repair (PMVR) is broadly applied in high-risk patients with relevant mitral regurgitation (MR). We investigated the incidence of cleft-like indentations (CLI) and their impact on PMVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective single center analysis including 263 patients undergoing PMVR with the MitraClip®-system between 11/2012 and 7/2016, MV anatomy was assessed by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. CLI were present in 37/263 patients (14.1%). Of these, 62.2% had 1 CLI, 27% had 2 CLI, and 10.8% had 3 CLI, mostly concerning segment P2 or P2/3 of the MV. Baseline characteristics were similarly distributed. Interestingly, most patients with CLI suffered from secondary MR (n = 29, 78%). The number of deployed MitraClips was higher in patients with CLI (2 [1.25-2] vs. 2 [1, 2], p = .035), whereas procedural as well as clinical success was similar: MR grade (1.2 vs. 1.5, p = .061), vena contracta width (4.2 vs. 4.5 mm, p = .293), dPmean (4.2 vs. 4.0 mmHg, p = .618) at discharge and NYHA class at 30 days did not differ between groups. Periprocedural complications were rare and equally distributed between groups. At 30 days, MR reduction persisted in patients with CLI (95.8% of these selected patients had a MR grade ≤ 2). CONCLUSIONS: CLI of the MV are common in patients undergoing PMVR, also when presenting mainly with secondary MR. While the number of clips needed to address MR is slightly higher in patients with CLI, procedural success rates appear not to be affected. PMVR seems to be a safe treatment option for patients with CLI.

Use of MitraClip for mitral valve repair in patients with acute mitral regurgitation following acute myocardial infarction: Effect of cardiogenic shock on outcomes (IREMMI Registry).

OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes in patients with acute mitral regurgitation (MR) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who received percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) with the MitraClip device and to compare outcomes of patients who developed cardiogenic shock (CS) to those who did not (non-CS). BACKGROUND: Acute MR after AMI may lead to CS and is associated with high mortality. METHODS: This registry analyzed patients with MR after AMI who were treated with MitraClip at 18 centers within eight countries between January 2016 and February 2020. Patients were stratified into CS and non-CS groups. Primary outcomes were mortality and rehospitalization due to heart failure. Secondary outcomes were acute procedural success, functional improvement, and MR reduction. Multivariable Cox regression analysis evaluated association of CS with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Among 93 patients analyzed (age 70.3 ± 10.2 years), 50 patients (53.8%) experienced CS before PMVR. Mortality at 30 days (10% CS vs. 2.3% non-CS; p = .212) did not differ between groups. After median follow-up of 7 months (IQR 2.5-17 months), the combined event mortality/re-hospitalization was similar (28% CS vs. 25.6% non-CS; p = .793). Likewise, immediate procedural success (90% CS vs. 93% non-CS; p = .793) and need for reintervention (CS 6% vs. non-CS 2.3%, p = .621) or re-admission due to HF (CS 13% vs. NCS 23%, p = .253) at 3 months did not differ. CS was not independently associated with the combined end-point (hazard ratio 1.1; 95% CI, 0.3-4.6; p = .889). CONCLUSIONS: Patients found to have significant MR during their index hospitalization for AMI had similar clinical outcomes with PMVR whether they presented in or out of cardiogenic shock, provided initial hemodynamic stabilization was first achieved before PMVR.

In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from the national inpatient sample database.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the in-hospital outcomes in patients with mitral regurgitation treated with percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BACKGROUND: There is lack of data on the outcomes of PMVR for mitral regurgitation in patients with COPD. METHODS: We analyzed the national inpatient sample (NIS) database from January 2012 to December 2016. RESULTS: A total of 9125 patients underwent PMVR in the period between January 2012 and December 2016, of whom 2,495 (27.3%) patients had concomitant COPD. Comparing COPD patients to non-COPD patients, COPD patients had higher proportion of females (48.3% vs. 46.6%, p = .16), were younger (75.8 ± 10.0 years vs. 76.4 ± 12.2 years; p = .04), had higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease (17.4% vs. 13.5%; p < .01) and renal failure (39.3% vs. 37%; p < .01). After propensity matching, there was no significant difference in mortality among the COPD group versus non-COPD patients (2.6% vs. 2.9%; p = .6). Patients with COPD had higher proportion of in-hospital morbidities including St-segment elevation myocardial infarction (1.8% vs. 1.0%; p = .02), cardiogenic shock (1.4% vs. 0.4%; p < .01), vascular complications (2% vs. 0.8; p < .01), pneumothorax (1% vs. 0.4%; p < .01), and septic shock (1.2% vs. 0.4%; p < .01). Moreover, surrogates of severe disability (mechanical intubation and non-home discharges), cost of hospitalization, and length of stay were higher in the COPD group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in mortality between the COPD and non-COPD patients after PMVR. Moreover, we observed higher rates of in-hospital morbidities, surrogates of severe disability, and higher resources utilization by the COPD group.

In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve repair in patients with and without end stage renal disease: A national propensity match study.

OBJECTIVES: To study trends of utilization, outcomes, and cost of care in patients undergoing undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). BACKGROUND: Renal disease has been known to be a predictor of poor outcome in patients with mitral valve disease. Outcome data for patients with ESRD undergoing TMVr remains limited. Therefore, our study aims to investigate trends of utilization, outcomes, and cost of care among patients with ESRD undergoing TMVr. METHODS: We analyzed NIS data from January 2010 to December 2017 using the ICD-9-CM codes ICD-10-CM to identify patients who underwent TMVr. Baseline characteristics were compared using a Pearson 𝜒2 test for categorical variables and independent samples t-test for continuous variables. Propensity matched analysis was done for adjusted analysis to compare outcomes between TMVr with and without ESRD. Markov chain Monte Carlo was used to account for missing values. RESULTS: A total of 15,260 patients (weighted sample) undergoing TMVr were identified between 2010 and 2017. Of these, 638 patients had ESRD compared to 14,631 patients who did not have ESRD. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was lower in non-ESRD group (3.9 vs. <1.8%). Similarly, ESRD patients were more likely to have non-home discharges (85.6 vs. 74.9%). ESRD patients also had a longer mean length of stay (7.9 vs. 13.5 days) and higher mean cost of stay ($306,300 vs. $271,503). CONCLUSION: ESRD is associated with higher mortality, complications, and resource utilization compared to non-ESRD patients. It is important to include this data in shared decision-making process and patient selection.

Predictors of functional mitral regurgitation recurrence after percutaneous mitral valve repair.

We aimed to identify predictors of mitral regurgitation recurrence (MR) after percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Patients with FMR were enrolled who underwent PMVR using the MitraClip® device. Procedural success was defined as reduction of MR of at least one grade to MR grade ≤ 2 + assessed at discharge. Recurrence of MR was defined as MR grade 3 + or worse at one year after initially successful PMVR. A total of 306 patients with FMR underwent PMVR procedure. In 279 out of 306 patients (91.2%), PMVR was successfully performed with MR grade ≤ 2 + at discharge. In 11.4% of these patients, MR recurrence of initial successful PMVR after 1 year was observed. Recurrence of MR was associated with a higher rate of heart failure rehospitalization during the 12 months follow-up (52.0% vs. 30.3%; p = 0.029), and less improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class [68% vs. 19% of the patients presenting with NYHA functional class III or IV one year after PMVR when compared to patients without recurrence (p = 0.001)]. Patients with MR recurrence were characterized by a higher left ventricular sphericity index {0.69 [Interquartile range (IQR) 0.64, 0.74] vs. 0.65 (IQR 0.58, 0.70), p = 0.003}, a larger left atrium volume [118 (IQR 96, 143) ml vs. 102 (IQR 84, 123) ml, p = 0.019], a larger tenting height 10 (IQR 9, 13) mm vs. 8 (IQR 7, 11) mm (p = 0.047), and a larger mitral valve annulus [41 (IQR 38, 43) mm vs. 39 (IQR 36, 40) mm, p = 0.015] when compared to patients with durable optimal long-term results. In a multivariate regression model, the left ventricular sphericity index [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.120, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.039-1.413, p = 0.003)], tenting height (OR 1.207, 95% CI 1.031-1.413, p = 0.019), and left atrium enlargement (OR 1.018, 95% CI 1.000-1.038, p = 0.047) were predictors for MR recurrence after 1 year. In patients with FMR, baseline parameters of advanced heart failure such as spherical ventricle, tenting height and a large left atrium might indicate risk of recurrent MR one year after PMVR.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair: the necessity to redefine secondary mitral regurgitation.

Interest in percutaneous mitral valve repair has increased during recent years. This is mainly driven by the significant number of patients being declined for mitral valve surgery because of a high risk of surgery-related complications or death. In this subset of patients, percutaneous edge-to-edge repair using the MitraClip device (Abbott, Menlo Park, CA, USA) has become an established treatment option, proven to be safe, efficient and associated with improved functional status. In contrast to primary mitral regurgitation (MR), clinical outcomes after mitral valve surgery appear to be less favourable as regards secondary MR due to heart failure. In the MITRA-FR and COAPT trials, patients with moderate to severe and severe secondary MR with reduced left ventricular function received either medical treatment (control group) or MitraClip implantation plus medical treatment (device group). Results were conflicting, with only the COAPT trial showing better clinical outcomes in the device group. However, both trials are now seen as complementary and provide useful information especially regarding patient selection for MitraClip therapy. The goal of this review is to delineate which subset of patients with secondary MR will potentially benefit from percutaneous mitral valve repair.

Myocardial fibrosis predicts adverse outcome after MitraClip implantation.

BACKGROUND: High-risk patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) may be treated by a percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip, but identification of patients who may benefit remains difficult. We aimed to determine whether myocardial fibrosis predicts outcome in MR patients undergoing MitraClip implantation and is beneficial in clinical decision making. METHODS: Preprocedural to the MitraClip implantation, myocardial fibrosis was analyzed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) through late gadolinium enhancement. The CMR data were core-lab adjudicated measured before the MitraClip implantation. Adverse outcome was defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV after 1 month or death within 1 month after the MitraClip implantation. RESULTS: In total, 23 patients underwent preprocedural CMR, mean age 80 ± 9 years, 45% male, 64% atrial fibrillation and 73% NYHA class III or IV at baseline. Myocardial fibrosis was present in 55% of the patients with degenerative MR and in 64% of the patients with functional MR. An adverse outcome occurred in 69% of the patients with myocardial fibrosis and in 11% of the patients without myocardial fibrosis (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis-generating study showed that the presence of myocardial fibrosis predicts adverse outcome in patients undergoing MitraClip implantation. After confirmation with larger sample size, identification of myocardial fibrosis might contribute to assess prognosis and to clinical decision making.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip for the management of functional mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous mitral valve repair for the management of functional mitral insufficiency. BACKGROUND: Severe FMR is present in 25-30% of patients with heart failure and is an independent predictor of mortality and hospitalizations in patients with both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. MitraClip therapy has been approved for high surgical risk patients with primary mitral regurgitation. Recent studies including two randomized trials have yielded conflicting results in terms of its clinical efficacy and outcomes for FMR. A quantitative evaluation and synthesis of this information are essential in elucidating the role of MitraClip repair for FMR. METHODS: We performed a literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from September 2008 to September 2018. Studies comparing percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip device against conservative therapy for the management of functional mitral regurgitation were included. RESULTS: Seven studies with 1,174 patients in MitraClip group and 1,015 patients in medical therapy group met inclusion criteria. The 12-month mortality in the MitraClip group was 18.4% compared with 25.9% in the medical therapy group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65 [0.50, 0.86]; p < .002). The rate of readmission at 12 months was 29.9% in the MitraClip group compared with 54.1% in the medical therapy group (OR: 040 [0.32-0.49]; p < .0001. The prognostic efficacy of MitraClip repair appears to be more substantial over longer follow-up period over medical therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this meta-analysis, percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip appears to be superior to medical therapy for symptomatic moderate-to-severe functional mitral insufficiency. Further clinical research is needed to identify the ideal patient subgroups who receive maximum benefit with the MitraClip therapy.

Prognostic value of impaired hepato-renal function assessed by the MELD-XI score in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic value of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD)-XI score in patients undergoing PMVR with the MitraClip system. BACKGROUND: MELD-XI score, which was originally developed for prognostic assessment in patients with advanced liver disease, has been reported as a predictor of outcome in heart failure patients. METHODS: A total of 192 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) were included into final analysis. MELD-XI score was calculated on the day of the procedure and patients were categorized into three groups based on MELD-XI score and compared with regards to clinical characteristics and outcomes following PMVR. RESULTS: MELD-XI > 12 was associated with male gender, higher logistic EuroSCORE, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, enlarged right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, degree of mitral regurgitation, increased NT-proBNP serum levels and elevated right atrial pressures. Youden-Index revealed a cutoff of 16 in the MELD-XI score as best predictor of one-year all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test confirmed increased one-year mortality in patients with critically high score above 16 (mortality MELD-XI score > 16 vs 16-12 vs <12:39% vs 9%. vs 15%; P = 0.005). Compared to patients with lower MELD-XI score, these patients exhibited a more than 3-fold increased one-year mortality after PMVR. CONCLUSION: Given the high mortality in patients with a MELD-XI score > 16, these patients require a high-risk preoperative assessment and should undergo a careful discussion within the heart team for the best treatment option given the considerable one-year mortality following PMVR.

Reduction of sleep-disordered breathing following effective percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system.

PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that a reduction of pulmonary congestion achieved by a reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity in heart failure (HF) patients is associated with reduced event lengths of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 20 consecutive HF patients who underwent MitraClip implantation. Patients underwent cardiorespiratory polygraphic recording prior to and after percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR). Beyond routinely established indicators of apneas and hypopneas per hour (respiratory event index), we manually analyzed apnea event lengths. RESULTS: MitraClip implantation led to marked reduction of MR severity and a reduction in left atrial pressure. These hemodynamic changes were accompanied by changes in SDB: the subtype of SDB switched from CSA to OSA in 4 patients. Likewise, quantitative indicators of SDB were altered in both forms of SDB with a reduction in circulatory delay (CSA 38 ± 14 vs. 33 ± 15 s.; p = 0.002 and OSA 34 ± 9 vs. 28 ± 6 s.; p = 0.02) and a corresponding reduction in ventilation lengths in CSA patients (42 ± 15 vs. 37 ± 13 s.; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: A reduction of pulmonary congestion as achieved by a decrease of left atrial pressure through successful MitraClip implantation is associated with a reduction in respiratory event lengths, further pointing towards a relation between SDB and HF.

Left ventricular function after correction of mitral regurgitation: Impact of the clipping approach.

AIMS: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with poor outcome in systolic heart failure (HF) patients. Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PMVR) in Mitra-Fr study failed to prove any beneficial effect over optimal medical treatment (OMT) but win in COAPT study. Nevertheless, little is known about the effect of PMVR on LV performance and mechanics in HF patients with severe secondary MR. METHOD AND RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with severe FMR undergoing PMVR were included and compared (according to indices of LV myocardial function and the relationship between LV-size and the degree of regurgitation) to nineteen patients with FMR treated by OMT. Both groups were clinically comparable. At 6-month follow-up, cardiac index such as LV global constructive work (GCW) improved significantly in both groups (1.86 vs 2.13 L/min/m2 , P = .02, 1.73 vs 2.28 L/min/m2 P = .002 and 977 vs 1101 mm Hg.%, P = .003, 967 vs 1110 mm Hg.%, P = .002 for PMVR and OMT groups, respectively) whereas left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume index, LV ejection fraction, and global longitudinal strain were not different. Receiver operating characteristics in PMVR with LVEF ≤ 35% subgroup analysis demonstrated that global work index (GWI) had the best ability to identify patients with worse evolution (AUC = 0.882; P = .009), confirmed by univariable logistic regression, particularly for patients with GWI < 482 mm Hg.%. CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic characteristics at 6-month follow-up are not different when compare PMVR and OMT for HF patients with severe FMR. A low global work index might be a tool for discouraging the implantation of clips for this indication.

The acute effects of edge-to-edge percutaneous mitral valve repair on the shape and size of the mitral annulus and its relation to mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: The effects of edge-to-edge percutaneous mitral valve repair on the shape and size of the mitral annulus and its relation to mitral regurgitation (MR) have not been well characterized. We evaluated acute changes in mitral annular shape and dimensions, and their effect on MR severity, in patients with functional and degenerative MR following MitraClip® . METHODS: Patients that underwent MitraClip® between January 2013 and May 2016 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. EXCLUSIONS: inadequate images, prior mitral valve repair, and rapid atrial fibrillation. Intra-procedure TEE 3D images acquired prior to and after implantation of MitraClip® were analyzed using software to model the mitral valve apparatus. RESULTS: Of seventy-eight patients that underwent MitraClip® procedure, 60 were eligible. Mean age was 78.3 ± 11 years. Severe MR (4+) was present in 37 patients, moderately/severe MR (3+) in 23. All patients achieved MR reduction to ≤2. 3D annular circumference, bicommissural diameter, and anteroposterior diameter had a significant size reduction after MitraClip® . None of the mitral annular measures had significantly different mean change between the large and small MR change groups at the 0.05 significance level. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with functional or degenerative MR, the MitraClip® significantly affect mitral annular dimensions; however, these changes do not correlate with the immediate MR reduction.

The Year in Perioperative Echocardiography: Selected Highlights from 2018.

This article is the third of an annual series reviewing the research highlights of the year pertaining to the subspecialty of perioperative echocardiography for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The authors thank the editor-in-chief, Dr. Kaplan, and the editorial board for the opportunity to continue this series. In most cases, these will be research articles targeted at the perioperative echocardiography diagnosis and treatment of patients after cardiothoracic surgery; but in some cases, these articles will target the use of perioperative echocardiography in general.

[MITRA-FR and COAPT : Why are the results so different and what are the consequences for the daily routine?] / MITRA-FR und COAPT : Warum sind die Ergebnisse so unterschiedlich, und welche Konsequenzen ergeben sich für den Alltag?

Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip in the COAPT study significantly reduced overall mortality and hospitalization in patients with at least moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation, in comparison to guideline-compliant drug treatment alone. Consequently, the assumption that secondary mitral regurgitation is more a consequence than the cause of systolic heart failure needs to be revised; however, data from the simultaneously published MITRA-FR study showed no prognostic benefits for patients with advanced heart failure and severely enlarged left ventricle; therefore, MitraClip treatment should only be performed after careful patient selection and heart team decision. With respect to future patient selection further studies are needed to better define cut-offs for treatment or exclusion criteria and to identify patients who profit the most from treatment. Also, new catheter-based techniques and alternative approaches to treat functional mitral regurgitation need to be investigated.

Bartonella haenselae infective endocarditis following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair: A case report.

Infective endocarditis following a Mitraclip procedure might be an under-recognized complication. We describe the case of infective endocarditis by Bartonella henselae as a late complication in a patient with a previously implanted MitraClip system for mitral valve repair. Due to the severity of infection, surgical treatment was performed despite the high preoperative surgical risk, but recurrence of endocarditis of the biological valve implanted occurred. Although infection with Bartonella is known as a possible source of endocarditis, it has never been described before in relation to failed MitraClip therapy.