Medial-pivot design does not provide superior clinical results compared to posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty despite kinematic differences during step-up and lunge activities: A prospective randomized controlled trial under medial tight soft tissue balance.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare in vivo kinematics during weight-bearing daily activities and determine the relationship with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a medial-pivot (MP, Evolution™) versus a posterior-stabilized (PS, Persona®) design under constant conditions of intraoperative soft tissue balance. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing MP or PS-TKA under similar conditions of soft tissue balance were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Outcome measures included clinical knee society scores (KSS) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores (KOOS). A kinematic assessment was conducted while the participants performed lunge and step-up activities under fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Eighteen patients in each arm completed 1-year follow-up and were included in the analysis. All patients experienced pain relief and satisfactory knee function postoperatively. In kinematics, in the MP arm, the medial femoral condyle remained consistent, whereas the lateral femoral condyle gradually shifted posteriorly with increasing knee flexion. Conversely, in the PS arm, paradoxical anterior movement of the medial femoral condyle accompanied the lateral pivot motion. During lunge and step-up activities, a medial-pivot motion was observed in 83% and 72% of knees in the MP arm, respectively, compared with 22% and 11% in the PS arm. Despite these differences in kinematics, there were no statistically significant differences in the KSS and KOOS between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Under weight-bearing conditions during flexion, knees that underwent Evolution™ MP-TKA did not show superior clinical results compared to Persona® PS-TKA, despite exhibiting in vivo kinematics closely resembling the normal in vivo pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic studies-Level I.

Ultracongruent Polyethylene Liners Do Not Affect Survival of Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Valgus knee deformity is observed in nearly 10% of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The degree of polyethylene constraint required to balance a valgus knee remains controversial, and historically, posterior-stabilized (PS) designs have been favored. This study evaluated the survivorship of TKA done in valgus knees based on implant design and specifically compared posterior-stabilized (PS) and ultracongruent (UC) liners. METHODS: A total of 549 primary TKAs performed on valgus knees by fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, degrees of preoperative deformity, implants used, and all-cause revisions until final follow-up were recorded. Cox regression analyses evaluated survival to all-cause revision in each cohort. The mean follow-up was 4.9 years (range, 2 to 9). RESULTS: There were 403 UC liners compared to 146 PS liners. There was no difference in patient age (68 versus 67 years; P = .30), body mass index (30.9 versus 30.4; P = .36), or degree of deformity (8.6 versus 8.8 degrees; P = .75) between the cohorts. At final follow-up, there were 5 revisions in the PS cohort (3.4%) versus 11 revisions in the UC cohort (2.7%) (P = .90). The most common reason for revision in both cohorts was periprosthetic joint infection (4 PS; 8 UC). Multivariable regression analyses controlling for age, body mass index, Elixhauser comorbidity score, sex, and degree of deformity demonstrated UC polyethylene liners were not associated with revision (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 2.21; P = .62). There was no difference in eight-year survivorship to all-cause revision, including aseptic and septic failure. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative polyethylene liners from the historically utilized PS liners for TKA for valgus deformity did not reduce survivorship. With modern polyethylene designs, UC inserts can be utilized for this deformity without increasing the risk of failure.

The Impact of Patellar Position on Mediolateral Joint Gap in Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of patellar position (ie, eversion, lateralization, and reduction) on medial and lateral gap measurements during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in both cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA designs. METHODS: The present work analyzed 50 knees with primary osteoarthritis that underwent TKA between July and November 2019. Medial and lateral gaps were measured at different knee flexion angles (0°, 45°, 90°, and 120°) in 3 patellar positions after sequentially inserting CR type and PS type trial component in the same knee. RESULTS: In CR TKA, medial gaps in patellar reduction showed significantly smaller gaps at 90° and 120° of knee flexion compared to those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). Lateral gaps in patellar reduction were also significantly larger than those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). The mediolateral gap difference in patellar reduction was significantly greater at all flexion angles compared to those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). In PS TKA, similar patterns were observed for medial gaps, lateral gaps, and mediolateral gap differences (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The ligament balancing with the patella everted or subluxed may lead to an overly tight medial gap and/or loose lateral gap in the knee with a closed arthrotomy, which has potential consequences for knee function in both CR and PS TKA designs. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering patellar position to ensure optimal soft-tissue balance and joint stability in TKA.

Better Flexion but Unaffected Satisfaction After Treatment With Posterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty - 2-year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Both the cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) implant systems are commonplace in modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) practice. However, there is controversy regarding functional outcomes and survivorship. The aim of the underlying study was to evaluate differences between CR and PS TKA regarding knee function, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as well as complication rates. METHODS: 140 patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for an unconstrained TKA were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. Patients received either a CR or PS implant. Range of motion and PROMs (Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score, European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level, University of California Los Angeles Activity scale and subjective satisfaction) were assessed prior to, 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: We found minor differences between treatment groups regarding demographic factors. Within the PS group duration of surgery was longer (mean PS 81.4 min vs CR 76.0 min, P = .006). We observed better flexion (median PS 120.0° vs CR 115°, P = .017) and an overall better range of motion (median PS 120.0° vs CR 115.0°, P = .008) for the PS group. PROMs did not differ between groups. At 2-year follow-up there were no revisions in either cohort. Five patients needed reoperations. Three patients needed manipulation under anesthesia, 2 in the CR and one in the PS group. CONCLUSION: While PS TKA achieved a better flexion capability, PROMs were similar in CR and PS TKA. The CR implant design continues to be a reliable option for patients with an intact posterior cruciate ligament.

Muscle Activity and Biomechanics While Descending a Staircase After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study Comparing Different Posterior Stabilized and Medial Ball-and-Socket Designs.

BACKGROUND: Many patients report more difficulty when descending stairs compared to level walking after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different implant designs can affect knee biomechanics and muscle activity during gait, but their effect during stair descent is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate knee biomechanics and muscle activations of quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius muscles during a stair descent task in patients who underwent TKA with either a posterior stabilized (PS) or medial ball-and-socket (MBS) implant and to compare them to a group of healthy controls. METHODS: There were 28 TKA patients who were randomized to either an MBS (n = 14) or PS (n = 14) implant and were compared with 14 controls. Patients visited the biomechanics lab approximately 12 months after TKA, where knee biomechanics and muscle activity were measured as they descended a 3-step staircase. RESULTS: Compared to the MBS and control groups, the PS group descended the stairs with a reduced knee flexion angle and greater hamstring muscle activation throughout single limb support. Knee joint moments and power were similar between the MBS and PS groups, but neither reached the level of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Lower knee flexion angles and increased hamstring muscle activity indicated that the PS group descended the stairs with a stiffer knee gait pattern than the MBS group. The MBS implant design may provide additional stability as patients require less muscle activity than the PS group.

Comparative analysis of medial pivot vs. posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty in patients with valgus deformed osteoarthritic knees: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is highly effective for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, providing long-term benefits and anticipated increased prevalence. The study compares Medial Pivot TKA's (MP-TKA) historical success for varus deformities with recent findings suggesting comparable outcomes for valgus deformities. Despite prevalent use of Posterior Stabilized TKA (PS-TKA) for valgus deformities, this research explores the unexplored comparative efficacy of MP-TKA vs. PS-TKA in knee osteoarthritis patients with valgus deformity. METHODS: This single-centre cohort study focused on 57 knees in 53 patients undergoing TKA for knee osteoarthritis with valgus deformity. Conducted between January 2013 and April 2021, the study compared MP-TKA and PS-TKA. Surgeries adhered to a medial parapatellar approach and modified gap technique, with perioperative interventions for pain, bleeding, and swelling. Outcome measurements included knee joint range of motion, radiographic evaluation, patients-reported outcomes, operative time, blood laboratory tests, estimated blood loss, and postoperative adverse events, and analyzed between the two groups. RESULTS: Postoperative hip-knee-ankle angles showed no significant difference between MP-TKA and PS-TKA. The pie crust technique was similarly used in both groups, and deformity correction showed no significant difference. Range of motion and clinical outcomes, measured by WOMAC and JOA scores, were comparable postoperatively. MP-TKA had a shorter surgical duration (p = 0.01), and PS-TKA exhibited higher estimated blood loss (p = 0.01) without significant complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This pioneering study compares the outcomes of MP TKA and PS TKA in patients with valgus-deformed osteoarthritic knees. Compared to PS TKA, MP TKA shows a prolonged operative duration and increased blood loss, likely due to the requirement for patellar replacement. However, postoperative range of motion and clinical outcomes are similar. Both groups exhibit favorable midterm clinical results, supporting the viability of MP TKA for valgus deformed knees. The study, consistent in surgical approach, highlights MP TKA's effectiveness for valgus deformities.

Saw-box osteotomy versus reamer-box osteotomy in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of an average five year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the difference of results between two methods of femoral box osteotomy adopted by two designs of posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the results of two groups of patients operated upon using two primary PS TKA systems, PFC Sigma (DePuy Synthes, Johnson and Johnson®) and Genesis II prosthesis (Smith and Nephew®), with an average of five year follow-up was done. Group 1 included 152 knees in 121 patients and group 2 included 122 knees in 111 patients. The average follow-up period in both groups was five years. The box osteotomy method depends on bone saw in group 1, and bone reamer in group 2. RESULTS: The KSS score of group 2 was better in the first six months postoperatively. Then, no significant differences were seen in the remaining follow-up visits. The risk of periprosthetic fractures was significantly higher in group 1 (p-value 0.040). Survival analysis showed a significantly shorter time for reoperation in group 1 than in group 2 as described by log-rank test, (p < 0.006). CONCLUSION: The method of box cutting has an impact on the function and longevity of posterior stabilized primary knee implants. The risk of periprosthetic fractures can be reduced by proper patient selection, decreasing the box sizes, and development of more "controlled" box osteotomy instruments.

Comparison of revision rates and epidemiological data of a single total knee arthroplasty system of different designs (cruciate retaining, posterior stabilized, mobile bearing, and fixed bearing): a meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical trials and national arthroplasty registries.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to meta-analyze epidemiological data, revision rates, and incidences of different designs of a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System and compare these factors across different countries. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on clinical studies and arthroplasty registries of ATTUNE TKA from 1999 to 2020. The main endpoints analyzed were revision rates and epidemiological data. RESULTS: The average age of patients was 67.8 years, with a gender distribution of 60% female and 40% male. The pooled average BMI was 29.4 kg/m2. Eight clinical studies showed a pooled revision rate per 100 observed CY of 0.5 (n = 1343 cases). Cumulative revision rates after 1, 3, and 5 years varied among registries, with the Swiss registry having the highest revision data (after 5 years: 6.3%) and the American registry having the lowest revision data (after 5 years: 1.7%). A comparison of the revision rates of mobile bearing and fixed bearing (41,200 cases) as well as cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized (n = 123,361 cases) showed no significant advantage in the first 5 years after implantation. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, pooled data from 41,200 cases of TKA with a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System in two arthroplasty registries revealed that there was no significant difference in revision rates between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing design within the first 5 years after implantation. In addition, a comparison of the revision rates in n = 123,361 cases showed no significant advantage for cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized in the first 5 years after implantation.

Performance of medial pivot, posterior stabilized and rotating platform total knee arthroplasty based on anteroposterior stability and patient-reported outcome measures; a multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled trial of 210 knees.

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 10-20% of patients remain dissatisfied after surgery. Improved anteroposterior (AP) stability provided by medial pivot (MP) implants may theoretically lead to higher patient satisfaction. METHODS: AP stability and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at one-year postsurgery were compared between patients who underwent TKA with MP- (n = 121), posterior stabilized (PS; n = 53) and rotating platform (RP; n = 57) implants in a double-blind multicentre randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register: NL6856, 21-02-2018). AP stability was assessed at 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion using a KT-2000 arthrometer. PROMs were measured preoperative and one-year postsurgery. RESULTS: MP-TKA provided significant better AP stability at early flexion (30°) compared to PS- and RP-TKA (median [IQR]; 1.79 [1.14-2.77] mm vs. 3.31 [2.51-4.08] mm vs. 2.82 [1.80-4.03] mm, p < 0.001). Additionally, MP-TKA provided significant better AP stability at mid-flexion (60°) compared to PS-TKA (1.75 [1.23-2.36] mm vs. 2.14 [1.49-2.83] mm, p = 0.014). PROM improvements were comparable between implant designs. AP laxity of ≥ 4 mm at early flexion was independently of implant design associated with significantly worse Kujala scores. The incidence of ≥ 4 mm AP laxity at any knee angle was however not significantly different between implant designs. CONCLUSION: MP-, PS- and RP-TKA all provide excellent and comparable results. Although MP-TKA provided better AP stability at early flexion compared to PS- and RP-TKA, this was found to be unrelated to improved PROMs in favour of MP-TKA. More studies focusing on early and mid-flexion performance based differences between MP and other TKA designs are required to confirm our findings. Other non-implant related factors may play a more important role in the performance of TKA and are potentially worthwhile examining.

Similar survival rate but lower functional outcomes following TKA in the elderly people compared to younger patients: analysis of a posterior stabilised implant with minimum 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Literature regarding outcomes in patients over 80 years old after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is inconsistent. We aimed to compare implant survivorship and functional outcomes between elderly patients (≥ 80 years) and younger patients (< 80 years) following TKA, using a single modern posterior-stabilized (PS) prosthetic design. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 80 patients over 80 years old who underwent TKA between January 2015 and December 2016, who were compared with younger patients (60-75 years old) operated during the same period. Patients were matched with a ratio of 1:3 based on logistic regression analysis of gender and body mass index. All patients received the same cemented PS prosthesis with a fixed bearing polyethylene insert, with or without patellar resurfacing. Implant survival and patient-reported outcome measurements were compared between the two groups. At last follow-up, data were available for 41 knees in the elderly group (including 17 patients who died before 5-year follow-up) and 123 knees in the younger group. RESULTS: Functional results were better at final follow-up in the group < 80 years with a significantly higher Knee Society Function Subscore (88.6 ± 16.9 vs 79.4 ± 22.1, p < 0.01), but no significant differences in Knee Subscore and global Knee Society Score (p > 0.05), nor regarding maximum flexion (121° ± 12 and 117° ± 13, p = 0.08). The implant survivorship was 100.0% after a mean 64.4-month follow-up (range 60-78), without revision requiring removal of the implant in any group. The survival rate without any reoperation was 97.6% (95% CI 93.0-100.0) in the elderly group and 95.9% (95% CI 92.5-99.5) in the younger group (p = 0.64). CONCLUSION: At a minimum of 5-year follow-up, there was no revision surgery and a very low rate of complications requiring reoperations both in the group over 80 years of age and in the younger population, with the use of a PS prosthesis. The functional results were slightly lower for elderly patients and correlate with the lower functional demands of this population. The indication for TKA, especially with a PS implant, may be encouraged in appropriately selected elderly patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (retrospective cohort study).

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty non-inferior to posterior-stabilized prostheses after 5 years: a randomized, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) prostheses may improve satisfaction of patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether BCR prostheses provide better clinical outcomes than posterior-stabilized (PS) prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a randomized single-blind control trial involving a total of 77 patients with knee osteoarthritis, randomly assigned to undergo TKA with a BCR or PS implant between 2015 and 2019. Mean follow-up period was 39 months. Clinical and demographic data were extracted manually from medical records. Data acquisition included patient demographics, knee range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes via KSS, KOOS, WOMAC, and SF-12 scores. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were randomized to the PS group and 39 to the BCR group. At the 5-year follow-up, no statistical differences were noted for knee range of motion or patient-reported outcomes between the two groups, except for a greater knee flexion in the early follow-up period in the PS group. Five adverse events occurred in the BCR group compared to none in the PS group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: BCR TKA yield similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes 5 years following the intervention compared with PS TKA. The BCR TKA had more complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I (Randomized Controlled Trial).

A prospective comparison of total knee arthroplasty using ultra-congruent, condylar-stabilizing, and posterior-stabilized devices implanted with kinematic alignment: better 2-year outcomes with ultra-congruent.

PURPOSE: This study compared the 5-year results of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-sacrificing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with either a post and cam posterior-stabilized (PS) device, a dished, congruent condylar-stabilizing (CS) device, or a deep-dished ultra-congruent (UC) device. The hypothesis was that the clinical and radiographic outcomes would be equivalent. CS and PS participants were part of a prospective, randomized trial, and UC participants were part of a separate prospective, non-randomized protocol that was otherwise identical. A kinematic alignment surgical technique was utilized. METHODS: Participants were assessed preoperatively, and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, and annually for 5 years by Knee Society Score (KSS), SF-36 v2, Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), and physical and radiographic evaluation. There were 116 CS/PS participants and 69 UC participants who participated in the study. RESULTS: Tourniquet (P = .02) and operative (P = .01) times for the CS and UC groups were significantly shorter than the PS group. KSS Function scores were better for the UC group than the CS and PS groups at 6 months (P = .04) and 1 year (P = .03), and better in the UC group vs. CS at 2 years (P = .04). The KSS Pain-only score was also better in the UC compared to PS at 6 months (P = .04). There were no significant differences for the KSS Pain/Motion scores, flexion, SF-36, and LEAS scores at any time. CONCLUSION: These data confirm the hypothesis that there are no clinically meaningful significant differences in outcomes between the three groups at a 5-year minimum follow-up, though there is a trend toward less pain and better function at earlier visits in the UC group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Clinical and Biomechanical Characteristics of Posterior-Stabilized Polyethylene Post Fractures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the polyethylene post are a rare but known complication after posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluated the polyethylene and patient characteristics for 33 primary PS polyethylene components that were revised with fractured posts. METHODS: We identified 33 PS inserts revised between 2015 and 2022. Patient characteristics collected included age at index TKA, sex, body mass index, length of implantation (LOI), and patient-reported details on events surrounding the post fracture. Implant characteristics recorded were manufacturer, cross-linking properties (highly cross-linked polyethylene [XLPE] versus ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene [UHMWPE]), wear characteristics based on subjective scoring of the articular surfaces and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of fracture surfaces. Mean age at index surgery was 55 years (range, 35 to 69), mean body mass index was 29.5 (range, 18.5 to 37.2), and mean LOI was 10.0 (range, 4 to 26). RESULTS: Total surface damage scores were significantly higher in the UHMWPE group versus the XLPE group (57.3 versus 44.2, P = .003). SEM demonstrated fracture initiation at the posterior edge of the post in 10 of 13 cases. UHMWPE fracture surfaces posts had more tufted, irregularly clamshell features, while XLPE posts had more precise clamshell marking and a diamond pattern in the region of acute, final fracture. CONCLUSION: Characteristics of PS post fracture differed between XLPE and UHMWPE implants, with fractures occurring in the XLPE with less generalized surface damage, after a shorter LOI, and with SEM evaluation indicative of a more brittle fracture pattern.

Coronal Laxity at Flexion is Larger After Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Than With Cruciate-Retaining Procedures.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether coronal stability differs between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare coronal laxity, radiological, and clinical outcomes between CR-TKA and PS-TKA. METHODS: Seventy five CR-TKAs and 72 PS-TKAs with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Coronal laxity was assessed at knee extension and 80° of flexion on varus and valgus stress radiographs. Radiological evaluation included femoral-tibial angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, and positions of femoral and tibial components. Clinical evaluation included the modified Hospital for Special Surgery score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, and range of motion. RESULTS: PS-TKA resulted in significantly larger varus, valgus, and total laxities at 80° flexion (P = .034, .031, and 0.001, respectively) compared with CR-TKA, while no significant difference was found at extension (P = .513, .964, and .658, respectively). No statistical difference was found in radiological and clinical outcomes between CR-TKA and PS-TKA, but the functional scores were slightly better in CR-TKA. There were adverse correlations between varus laxity at flexion and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, the modified Hospital for Special Surgery score, and range of motion (r = 0.933, -0.229, -0.472, respectively). CONCLUSION: Coronal laxity at 80° of flexion was larger after PS-TKA than CR-TKA. In addition, clinical outcomes were adversely affected by the larger varus laxity at flexion. Care should be taken to maintain the coronal stability, especially at flexion, during surgery to obtain better patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Ultracongruent Designs Compared to Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Tibial Inserts - What Does the Evidence Tell Us? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Posterior-stabilized (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) have been the most common tibial designs used in total knee arthroplasty. Ultra-congruent (UC) inserts are becoming popular because they preserve bone without relying on the posterior cruciate ligament balance and integrity. Despite increasing use, there is no consensus on how UC inserts perform versus PS and CR designs. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of 5 online databases was performed for articles from January 2000 to July 2022 comparing the kinematic and clinical outcomes of PS or CR tibial inserts to UC inserts. There were nineteen studies included. There were 5 studies comparing UC to CR and 14 comparing UC to PS. Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) was rated "good quality". RESULTS: For CR studies, pooled analyses showed no difference in knee flexion (n = 3, P = .33) or Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (n = 2, P = .58). For PS studies, meta-analyses showed better anteroposterior stability (n = 4, P < .001) and more femoral rollback (n = 2, P < .001) for PS but no difference in knee flexion (n = 9, P = .55) or medio-lateral stability (n = 2, P = .50). There was no difference with WOMAC (n = 5, P = .26), Knee Society Score (n = 3, P = .58), Knee Society Knee Score (n = 4, P = .76), or Knee Society Function Score (n = 5, P = .51). CONCLUSION: Available data demonstrates there are no clinical differences between CR or PS and UC inserts in small short-term studies ending around 2 years after surgery. More importantly, high-quality research comparing all inserts is lacking, demonstrating a need for more uniform and longer-term studies beyond 5 years after surgery to justify increased UC usage.

No difference in clinical outcomes between functionally aligned cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of subjects undergoing primary robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA), following functional alignment (FA) principles, with cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilized (PS) bearing designs, at a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. METHODS: This observational, retrospective study included 167 consecutive patients undergoing RA-TKA with cemented PS and cementless CR implants performed with a CT-base robotic-arm assisted system (Mako, Stryker), following FA principles, between 2017 and 2020. Patients were followed up with a clinical and radiographic assessment and were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), and the 5-level Likert scale (5-LLS). RESULTS: Three TKA revisions were performed (2 PS, 1 CR); therefore, a total of 164 knees with a mean age of 71.7 years (SD 8.9) were considered (80 cemented PS; 84 cementless CR). No statistically significant differences were recorded between study groups relative to FJS-12, KOOS-JR, and 5-LLS at a minimum of two year follow-up (FJS-12 89.3 ± 9.2 vs 87.5 ± 12.8, p-value 0.46; KOOS-JR 88.8 ± 10.0 vs 86.7 ± 14.0, p-value 0.31; 5-LLS 4.5 ± 0.7 vs 4.5 ± 0.8, p-value 0.34). CONCLUSION: No significant outcome differences were reported between patients undergoing PS and CR RA-TKA at a minimum of two year follow-up. RA-TKA achieves excellent clinical results and high satisfaction scores, regardless of the implant design used.

Novel morphogenic knee implant delivers comparable mid-term outcomes as compared to conventional non-morphogenic implants.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA) implants have well-established mid- and long-term outcomes. The novel TKA (N-TKA) implants provide morphogenic implant components with smaller size increments to facilitate anatomical replication. The aim of the study is to evaluate if these advantages provides better clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Registry data prospectively collected within a single institution from 2014 to 2018 was reviewed and propensity score matching was performed to match C-TKA to N-TKA. 70 pairs of cruciate retaining (CR) TKA and 116 pairs of posterior stabilized (PS) TKA were identified. Range of motion, SF-36, Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were assessed preoperatively, 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Satisfaction was assessed 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Independent T test was performed for parametric data, whereas Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis was performed for non-parametric data. RESULTS: Both C-TKA and N-TKA cohorts demonstrated statistically significant improvement for KSKS, KSFS, OKS and SF-36 at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. C-TKA CR patients had better flexion at 6 months as compared to N-TKA CR (108.7° versus 98.3°, respectively, p = 0.046). At 24 months, there was no difference between C-TKA and N-TKA for range of motion, KSKS, KSFS, OKS and SF-36 PCS, regardless of insert type (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both models showed great postoperative improvements in KSFS, KSKS, OKS and SF-36 and have comparable early and mid-term outcomes, suggesting that N-TKAs are suitable substitutes for C-TKA. Longer follow-up studies are required to evaluate the long-term outcomes of N-TKAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: lll.

The impact of posterior-stabilized vs. constrained polyethylene liners in revision total knee arthroplasty.

AIM: Posterior stabilized (PS) and varus valgus constrained (VVC) knee polyethylene liners have been shown to confer excellent long-term functional results following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent rTKA using either a PS or VVC liner. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of 314 rTKA with either PS or VVC liner and a minimum follow-up time of two years was conducted. Patient demographics, complications, readmissions, and re-revision etiology and rates were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed to estimate freedom from all-cause revision. RESULTS: Hospital LOS (3.41 ± 2.49 vs. 3.34 ± 1.93 days, p = 0.793) and discharge disposition (p = 0.418) did not significantly differ between groups. At a mean follow-up of 3.55 ± 1.60 years, the proportion of patients undergoing re-revision did not significantly differ (19.1% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.929). In subgroup analysis of re-revision causes, the VVC cohort had superior survival from re-revision due to instability compared to the PS cohort (97.8% vs. 89.4%, p = 0.003). Freedom from re-revision due to aseptic loosening did not significantly differ between groups (85.2% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.436). Improvements in range of motion (ROM) from preoperative to latest follow-up were similar as well. CONCLUSIONS: PS and VVC liners confer similar survivorship, complication rates, and overall knee ROM in rTKA. VVC liners were not associated with increased postoperative aseptic loosening and demonstrated superior freedom from re-revision due to instability. Future studies with longer follow-up are warranted to better determine significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two bearing options. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

No higher tibial post fracture rate with highly cross-linked polyethylene inserts in total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess tibial post fracture between highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXPE) and conventional polyethylene inserts in consecutive posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over a minimum 10-years follow-up period. METHODS: Between July 2008 and December 2011, a consecutive series of 3264 primary TKAs was performed in 2098 patients using a PS total knee prosthesis at a single institution. The final cohort was classified into the HXPE group (792 cases) and the conventional group (2113 cases) according to insert material used during the procedure. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 11.4 years in the HXPE group and 11.8 years in the conventional group. Both cases of tibial post fracture occurred in the HXPE group, a complication rate of 0.25%. These two cases required replacement with a thicker tibial insert with retention of the femoral and tibial components. There were no cases of tibial post fracture in the conventional group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in tibial post fracture rate between the HXPE group and the conventional group in PS TKA on long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Primary TKA in patients with major deformities and ligament laxities: promising results of an intermediate constrained implant at mid-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in major deformities with ligament insufficiency may require a higher constraint, with bone sacrifice and concerns about long-term survivorship. Mid-level constraint liners have been recently introduced, but few studies described their outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short to mid-term outcomes of a constrained postero-stabilized (CPS) insert for primary TKA in moderate to severe deformities. METHODS: All patients who underwent TKA using a CPS liner in two centers between 2015 and 2017 were included in the study. The indications were: (1) valgus deformity type 2-3 partially correctable; (2) severe varus deformity with varus thrust; (3) post-traumatic deformity with major ligamentous insufficiency and any case of intra-operative ligament insufficiency. Patients were evaluated according to the Knee Society Scoring System (KSS), the Hospital for Special Surgery score (HSS), the Western Ontario and Mc Master University (WOMAC) and the Oxford Knee score (OKS). X-rays were evaluated according to the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation System. RESULTS: Forty-seven TKA were included, with an average age of 66.1 ± 10.3 years and an average follow-up of 68.4 ± 6 months. All patients demonstrated a moderate to severe pre-operative mediolateral instability. All the scores significantly improved (p < 0.0001). In 71.4% of cases, the outcomes were excellent or very good. There were no failures due to aseptic loosening but one failure due to a traumatic ligament rupture. The cumulative survivorship was 97.9% ± 2.1% at 84 months. CONCLUSIONS: This mid-range constraint total knee replacement demonstrated promising outcomes and survival at mid-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (case series).