TURALIO® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program (tREMS): 3-year retrospective hepatic safety assessment.

Aim: Hepatic safety data assessment from the TURALIO® (pexidartinib) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (tREMS) Program. Methods: Retrospective 3-year assessment (August 2019 to June 2022) of hepatic events from the TURALIO® (pexidartinib) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program. Results: A total of 451 patients, 369 prescribers, 2 wholesalers/distributors and 2 pharmacies were enrolled and certified. Twenty-one (4.7%) patients met the criteria for a hepatic adverse event or laboratory abnormality suggestive of serious and potentially fatal liver injury, all with onset within 2 months of therapy. No new hepatic safety signals were identified. Conclusion: Results are consistent with the phase 3 ENLIVEN trial data. Liver enzyme monitoring, combined with early intervention, including dose modification and discontinuation, conducted in patients treated with pexidartinib mitigate the risk of potential hepatotoxicity.

Safety findings from the 3-year data collected in the TURALIO^® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy ProgramPexidartinib (TURALIO^®) is an oral drug that is used to treat adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) that cannot be fixed with surgery. TGCTs are rare, noncancerous tumors that cause pain, stiffness and difficulty moving. Pexidartinib works by blocking a protein that helps these tumors grow. Before pexidartinib, there were no good treatments for TGCT and surgery often could not remove all the tumors, so they would frequently grow back.Pexidartinib was approved in 2019 after a clinical trial showed it worked well in adults with TGCT. However, pexidartinib can sometimes cause serious liver harm for some patients. To handle this risk, a program called the tREMS (TURALIO^® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy) was established to ensure that pexidartinib is used safely.The tREMS Program teaches doctors, pharmacists and patients about the safe use of pexidartinib and potential liver risks and enrolls patients in a registry to watch their health. Doctors and pharmacies must be certified, and patients need regular liver tests. In the first 3 years, 451 patients and 369 doctors joined the program. Unintended liver issues were found in around 5% of patients, a rate that is about the same as that seen in pexidartinib clinical trials, and no new safety concerns were found. About half of patients with liver issues could reverse them by stopping pexidartinib. No patient had permanent liver damage, needed a transplant or died from liver problems. These results show that the tREMS Program is working well to keep patients with TGCT safe while taking pexidartinib.

Are drug safety measures harmonized? A real-world evidence from three regulatory authorities.

Background: Risk minimization measures (RMMs) are interventions intended to mitigate or prevent the occurrence of adverse reactions associated with medications. Having consistent measures across regulatory bodies (i.e., the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), and the European Medicines Agency (EMA)) benefits medication use and safety and ultimately the patient. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether there is variability in these published RMMs between the three regulatory bodies. Methods: A specific data collection form was created to extract information from the SFDA's RMM list, US FDA's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) list, and EMA's Risk Management Plan (RMP) list, as of February 2022 all RMMs that were available on the websites were reviewed. Medications with the same trade name were matched across regulators, and unmatched medications were checked for approval status. For medication groups such as NSAIDs in the SFDA's RMM list, they were matched by searching for the groups individually in the regulatory websites. All risks and types of minimizing measures were compared. Results: A total of 317 medications were retrieved from the SFDA's RMM list. The majority of medication classes were immunosuppressants (n = 60), antihypertensive (n = 33), and oncology medication (n = 29). There were only 62 medications with REMS from the US FDA website, a total of 14 medications were approved by the SFDA, and only nine medications were matched with the SFDA's RMM list. Also, there were 828 medications with RMP from the EMA website, a total of 334 has RMM, 128 are approved by the SFDA, and 71 matched with the SFDA's RMM list. Furthermore, seven medications were matched between SFDA, US FDA and EMA. After content review, four medications had similar risks and measures across the regulators and three medications had different risks and measures across the regulators. For the medication groups, a total of 36 groups were in the SFDA's list, 18 groups were matched with the US FDA, and 14 were matched with the EMA. Conclusions: Our study showed substantial differences among the regulatory authorities regarding RMMs. Harmony in published risk measures can have a significant impact on medication safety.

Emerging Evidence on Coronary Heart Disease Screening in Kidney and Liver Transplantation Candidates: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation.

Coronary heart disease is an important source of mortality and morbidity among kidney transplantation and liver transplantation candidates and recipients and is driven by traditional and nontraditional risk factors related to end-stage organ disease. In this scientific statement, we review evidence from the past decade related to coronary heart disease screening and management for kidney and liver transplantation candidates. Coronary heart disease screening in asymptomatic kidney and liver transplantation candidates has not been demonstrated to improve outcomes but is common in practice. Risk stratification algorithms based on the presence or absence of clinical risk factors and physical performance have been proposed, but a high proportion of candidates still meet criteria for screening tests. We suggest new approaches to pretransplantation evaluation grounded on the presence or absence of known coronary heart disease and cardiac symptoms and emphasize multidisciplinary engagement, including involvement of a dedicated cardiologist. Noninvasive functional screening methods such as stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy have limited accuracy, and newer noninvasive modalities, especially cardiac computed tomography-based tests, are promising alternatives. Emerging evidence such as results of the 2020 International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease trial emphasizes the vital importance of guideline-directed medical therapy in managing diagnosed coronary heart disease and further questions the value of revascularization among asymptomatic kidney transplantation candidates. Optimizing strategies to disseminate and implement best practices for medical management in the broader end-stage organ disease population should be prioritized to improve cardiovascular outcomes in these populations.

Accuracy and applicability of periodontitis risk assessment tools: A critical appraisal.

Currently, periodontal risk assessment finds application at first visit (to identify individuals at high risk of either disease incidence, if still healthy, or disease progression, if already diseased) as well as at patient monitoring after active treatment and enrolment in a supportive periodontal care program. Although the current case definition of periodontitis embeds a prognostic determination (ie, periodontitis grade) that showed a predictive value for periodontitis-related tooth loss, some limitations of periodontitis grade call for the implementation of different risk assessment tools in clinical practice. For some of these, significantly higher accuracy in predicting tooth loss during supportive periodontal care was reported compared with periodontitis grade. Validated periodontal risk assessment tools may be functional to obtain greater adherence to the suggested preventive and treatment protocols, improve oral hygiene performance, and tailor supportive periodontal care. Interestingly, periodontal risk can also be informative of the risk of peri-implantitis in patients programmed for implant placement or rehabilitated with dental implants. A critical appraisal on the rationale behind risk assessment and the balance between the advantages and limitations of exercising risk assessment in periodontology is presented.

Lung cancer incidence attributable to residential radon exposure in Finland.

This study aimed to estimate (1) the number of avoidable lung cancer cases attributable to residential radon in Finland in 2017, separately by age, sex, dwelling type and smoking status, (2) the impact of residential radon alone and the joint effect of residential radon and smoking on the number of lung cancers and (3) the potential decrease in the number of radon-attributable lung cancers if radon concentrations exceeding specified action levels (100, 200 and 300 Bq m-3) would have been mitigated to those levels. Population-based surveys of radon concentrations and smoking patterns were used. Observed radon levels were contrasted with 25 Bq m-3 representing a realistic minimum level of exposure. Lung cancer risk estimates for radon and smoking were derived from literature. Lastly, the uncertainty due to the estimation of exposure and risk was quantified using a computationally derived uncertainty interval. At least 3% and at most 8% of all lung cancers were estimated as being attributable to residential radon. For small cell carcinoma, the proportion of cases attributable to radon was 8-13%. Among smokers, the majority of the radon-related cases were attributable to the joint effect of radon and smoking. Reduction of radon exposure to 100 Bq m-3 action level would eliminate approximately 30% of radon-attributable cases. Estimates were low compared with the literature, given the (relatively high) radon levels in Finland. This was mainly due to the lower radon levels and higher smoking prevalence in flats than in houses and a more realistic point of comparison, factors which have been ignored in previous studies. The results can guide actions in radon protection and in prevention of lung cancers.

Caring for COVID-19 patients: Nurses' perceptions of the most critical issues and their impact on their well-being and performance.

AIMS: (1) Exploring nurses' perceptions of issues that impacted the quality of patient care and their own performance on COVID-19 wards; (2) examining nurses' perceptions of how these issues impacted their psychological state and level of performance; and (3) presenting recommendations for improving healthcare policies. BACKGROUND: Nurses played a critical role in caring for hospitalized COVID-19 patients and managing the disease. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 50 nurses (32 females), aged 31-58 years, 6-37 years' tenure, from eight hospitals across Israel. Prior to working in COVID-19 wards, they worked in internal medicine, emergency rooms, or intensive care units. Based on the COREQ checklist, these interviews were recorded and transcribed, and categorized into themes and subthemes. FINDINGS: The findings indicate that the unpreparedness of healthcare systems for the pandemic outbreak rendered nurses paying a high price at the personal and professional levels, which in turn may have impacted the levels of care that they provided. CONCLUSION: The rich, qualitative data source revealed important interactions between clinical, personal, social, and familial factors in determining distress levels and performance impairment. A nuanced understanding of the link between these stressors is key to developing and implementing policies that could mitigate deficiencies in the management of epidemics and pandemics in the future. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICIES: Changes should be made to government directives and healthcare policies, with an emphasis on increasing the nursing workforce, providing emotional support, ensuring availability of equipment and beds, optimizing work practices, developing transparent means of communication within teams, and clearly defining the areas of responsibility of nurses-in times of routine and crises.

Evaluation of marketing authorization and clinical implementation of ulipristal acetate for uterine fibroids.

Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a medical treatment for uterine fibroids and was authorized for surgical pre-treatment in 2012 after the conduct of the PEARL I and II randomized controlled trials and for intermittent treatment after the observational PEARL III and IV trials. However, UPA came into disrepute due to its temporary suspension in 2017 and 2020 because of an apparent association with liver injury. This clinical opinion paper aims to review the process of marketing authorization and implementation of UPA, in order to provide all involved stakeholders with recommendations for the introduction of future drugs. Before marketing authorization, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) states that Phase III registration trials should evaluate relevant outcomes in a representative population, while comparing to gold-standard treatment. This review shows that the representativeness of the study populations in all PEARL trials was limited, surgical outcomes were not evaluated and intermittent treatment was assessed without comparative groups. Implementation into clinical practice was extensive, with 900 000 prescribed treatment cycles in 5 years in Europe and Canada combined. Extremely high costs are involved in developing and evaluating pre-marketing studies in new drugs, influencing trial design and relevance of chosen outcomes, thereby impeding clinical applicability. It is vitally important that the marketing implementation after authorization is regulated in such way that necessary evidence is generated before widespread prescription of a new drug. All stakeholders, from pharmaceutical companies to authorizing bodies, governmental funding bodies and medical professionals should be aware of their role and take responsibility for their part in this process.

Turalio risk evaluation and mitigation strategy for treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumor: framework and experience.

For drugs with enhanced serious safety risks, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) may be required. Pexidartinib is approved for treatment of adult symptomatic tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. Its approval was conditional on its prescription via a mandatory REMS due to serious and potentially fatal liver injury seen in clinical trials. Turalio® REMS aims to mitigate this risk by ensuring provider education on pexidartinib use and required REMS components, prescriber adherence to baseline and periodic monitoring, and enrolling patients in a registry to further assess safe use and acute, chronic and irreversible hepatotoxicity. Through Turalio REMS, benefits of treating patients with pexidartinib may be preserved.

For drugs with serious side effects, specific safety measures may be put in place to manage these serious side effects in the form of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) programs. Pexidartinib (Turalio^®) is approved for treatment of adults who have symptoms of severe tenosynovial giant cell tumor or have limitations in function that do not improve with surgery. Turalio^® has an REMS program because liver injuries that can be serious or fatal were seen in Pexidartinib clinical trials. This program aims to decrease the seriousness of the liver injuries by assuring doctors and pharmacists are educated on how to use the drug, patients are advised of this potential risk and that baseline and periodic monitoring of patients are conducted.

The hidden curve behind COVID-19 outbreak: the impact of delay in treatment initiation in cancer patients and how to mitigate the additional risk of dying-the head and neck cancer model.

PURPOSE: The rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic around the world caused most healthcare services to turn substantial attention to treatment of these patients and also to alter the structure of healthcare systems to address an infectious disease. As a result, many cancer patients had their treatment deferred during the pandemic, increasing the time-to-treatment initiation, the number of untreated patients (which will alter the dynamics of healthcare delivery in the post-pandemic era) and increasing their risk of death. Hence, we analyzed the impact on global cancer mortality considering the decline in oncology care during the COVID-19 outbreak using head and neck cancer, a known time-dependent disease, as a model. METHODS: An online practical tool capable of predicting the risk of cancer patients dying due to the COVID-19 outbreak and also useful for mitigation strategies after the peak of the pandemic has been developed, based on a mathematical model. The scenarios were estimated by information of 15 oncological services worldwide, given a perspective from the five continents and also some simulations were conducted at world demographic data. RESULTS: The model demonstrates that the more that cancer care was maintained during the outbreak and also the more it is increased during the mitigation period, the shorter will be the recovery, lessening the additional risk of dying due to time-to-treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: This impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients is inevitable, but it is possible to minimize it with an effort measured by the proposed model.

Trends in Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use and blood transfusions for chemotherapy-induced anemia throughout FDA's risk evaluation and mitigation strategy lifecycle.

PURPOSE: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), indicated for treating some patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA), may increase the risk of tumor progression and mortality. FDA required a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to mitigate these risks. We assessed REMS impact on ESA administration and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion as surrogate metrics for REMS effectiveness. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including data from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2018 for beneficiaries ≥65 years enrolled in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Parts A/B with a cancer diagnosis; patients with other indications for ESA use were excluded. Study time was divided into five periods demarcated by issuance of CMS National Coverage Determination (NCD) (Pre-NCD, Pre-REMS) and REMS milestones (Grace Period, REMS, post-REMS). Study outcomes were monthly proportion of chemotherapy episodes (CTEs) with concomitant ESA administration, with post-CTE ESA administration, and with RBC transfusions. RESULTS: Of 1 778 855 beneficiaries treated with CT, 308742 received concomitant ESA for CIA. The proportion of CTEs with concomitant and post-CTE ESA administration decreased Pre-REMS (9.0 percentage points [pp] and 3.5 pp, respectively). There were no significant post-REMS changes in the proportion of CTEs with concomitant (0.0 pp) and post-CTE ESA administration (0.1 pp). Fluctuation in RBC transfusions was <4 pp throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries showed a substantive decrease in ESA administration after NCD, with minimal impact by the REMS and its removal. Small changes in RBC transfusion over the study period were likely due to a national secular trend.

Pragmatic applications of implementation science frameworks to regulatory science: an assessment of FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) (2014-2018).

BACKGROUND: A Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) is a drug safety program for certain medications with serious safety concerns required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of manufacturers to implement to help ensure the benefits of the medication outweigh its risks. FDA is encouraging "the research community to develop novel methods for assessing REMS," conveying the unmet need for a standardized evaluation method of these regulatory-mandated healthcare programs. The objective of this research is to evaluate FDA REMS assessment plans using established implementation science frameworks and identify opportunities for strengthening REMS evaluation. METHODS: A content analysis was conducted of publicly available assessment plans for all REMS programs (N = 23) approved 1/1/2014-12/31/2018 for new drug applications (NDAs) and biologics license applications (BLAs) requiring FDA-mandated Elements to Assure Safe Use (ETASU). Blinded reviewers critically appraised REMS assessment measures (n = 674) using three established implementation science frameworks: RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance); PRECEDE-PROCEED (Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling Constructs in Educational/Environmental Diagnosis and Evaluation - Policy, Regulatory, and Organizational Constructs in Educational and Environmental Development); and CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research). Framework constructs were mapped to REMS Assessment categories as defined by FDA Guidance for Industry to evaluate congruence. RESULTS: REMS assessment measures demonstrated strong congruence (> 90% mapping rate) with the evaluative constructs of RE-AIM, PRECEDE-PROCEED, and CFIR. Application of the frameworks revealed that REMS assessment measures heavily emphasize implementation and operations, focus less on health outcomes, and do not evaluate program context and design assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation science frameworks have utility for evaluating FDA-mandated drug safety programs including the selection of primary measures to determine whether REMS goals are being met and of secondary measures to evaluate contextual factors affecting REMS effectiveness in varying organizational settings.

Areas of Improvement in Suicide Risk Identification, Assessment, and Risk Mitigation Documentation by Mental Health Prescribers at a Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

PURPOSE: Veterans have a suicide rate 1.5 times higher than the non-veteran population. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented suicide risk screening recommendations in 2018. This project assessed the impact of mental health (MH) prescribers on these recommendations and identified areas of improvement. METHODS: Seventy MH Clinical Pharmacy Specialists (CPS) and 52 other MH prescribers were included. Patients with a positive question nine (from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and a same-day Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) between 11/01/18 and 11/01/19 at a VA system were reviewed. Completion of same-day Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE), same-day Suicide Prevention Safety Plan (SPSP), number of patients who were not offered naloxone despite access to opioids, and number of patients who were not offered a gunlock despite access to firearms were compared between groups. Time from C-SSRS to suicidal behavior was compared between those who did and did not receive a same-day CSRE. RESULTS: MH CPS were significantly more likely to complete a same-day CSRE (p = 0.0201) and SPSP (p < 0.001) when recommended. Naloxone outcomes were not assessed due to availability of only one data point. Rates of gunlock offers did not differ significantly between groups (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.3189) however there was no documentation stating why they were not offered when appropriate 40% of the time. Time to suicidal behavior did not vary across patients based on CSRE completion (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: MH CPS play an important role in suicide risk screening for veterans. There is a need for improvement regarding the offering and documentation of firearm risk mitigation strategies.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: Foundational science and clinical knowledge for pharmacy practice.

The Food and Drug Administration has recently approved two autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapies tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah™) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta™) for patients with advanced lymphocytic malignancies. Both immunotherapies target the CD19-positive B-cell neoplasms. Kymriah™ is indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B-cell lymphoma. Yescarta™ is indicated for lymphoma only. Although the new therapy offers a promise for patients with advanced disease, it is associated with adverse events including neurotoxicity and cytokine release syndrome, which can be fatal and may require a high level of multidisciplinary supportive care. Due to the risks, both Kymriah™ and Yescarta™ are subject to Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) protocols. As active members of multidisciplinary clinical teams, pharmacists are likely to be responsible for the execution of Kymriah™ and Yescarta™ REMS programs. This manuscript describes foundational science and clinical knowledge of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapies, common therapy-specific toxicities and REMS requirements for Kymriah™ and Yescarta™ in relation to practice of pharmacy.

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake by advanced practice nurses: Interplay of agency, community and attitudinal factors.

AIMS: To identify associations among agency, community, personal and attitudinal factors that affect advanced practice nurses' uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, an intervention consists of emtricitabine/tenofovir once-daily pill, along with sexual risk reduction education. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: During March-May 2017, randomly selected Indiana advanced practice nurses were invited to complete an online survey, consisted of several validated self-rating measures (N = 1,358; response = 32.3%). Final sample (N = 369) was predominantly White, non-Hispanic, female advanced practice nurses in urban practices (mean age = 46). Conceptual model for structural equation model included 29 original/composite variables and five latent factors. RESULTS: Final model consisted of 11 variables and four factors: agency, community, HIV prevention practices (including screening) and motivation to adopt evidence-based practices overall. Community had direct effects on HIV prevention practices (estimate = 0.28) and agency (estimate = 0.29). Agency had direct effects on HIV prevention practices (estimate = 0.74) and motivation to adopt evidence-based practices (estimate = 0.24). Community had indirect effects, through agency, on the two remaining factors. CONCLUSION: Barriers exist against pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation, although practice guidelines are available. HIV prevention practices must be integrated across organizational structures, especially in high-risk communities, whereas practice change is more effective when focused on changing providers' attitudes towards intervention. When planning a pre-exposure prophylaxis intervention, advancing inputs from healthcare professionals, organizational leadership and community members, is crucial to success. IMPACT: In settings where advanced practice nurses are primary contact points for health care, they may be best positioned to have an impact on implementation of HIV risk reduction strategies. Further research is needed to optimize their contributions to pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation.

What is the quality of drug safety information for patients: An analysis of REMS educational materials.

BACKGROUND: Poor-quality patient drug information has been identified as a major cause of preventable medication errors in the United States. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has the authority to require marketing authorization holders of medicinal products to implement risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) to ensure that the benefits of a drug or biological product outweigh its risks. Aside from medication guides, no research has been conducted to assess the quality of patient-targeted REMS materials, including whether, and to what extent, patients find these materials understandable and actionable. PURPOSE: To describe the readability, understandability, and actionability of patient educational materials in currently approved REMS programs, and to highlight opportunities for improving both the quality and effectiveness of these important drug safety tools. METHODS: Seventy-seven REMS programs were identified from the FDA REMS database. We excluded medication guides (MGs) from our analysis because of the fact that there is a mandatory MG template. Based on this, we identified a total of 27 (non-MG) REMS patient materials on the FDA REMS website for analysis purposes. The materials were tested for readability using the Lexile Measure, the Gunning Fog Index, and Flesch Kincaid and then assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for printable materials, for understandability and actionability. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 77 (30%) REMS programs used educational materials to communicate serious risks to patients, yielding a total of 27 REMS patient materials for analysis. The median readability score for these materials was at a ninth-grade reading level or higher. While most (89%) of these patient education materials met established criteria for being understandable, less than half (49%) were deemed actionable. DISCUSSION: Currently approved REMS patient materials fell short in terms of recommended reading level, and over half did not meet recommended standards for actionability. Developers of these materials should apply plain language principles when design these materials to improve their readability and to assess both understandability and actionability in order to increase the effectiveness when distributed to patients.

Post-approval Studies for Rare Disease Treatments and Orphan Drugs.

Drug development involves a multi-stage process of drug discovery, animal studies and human clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of new medications. Rare disease drug development involves a much smaller number of affected patients, a predominance of pediatric patients and more complicated disease presentation. Post-approval studies are designed to address several limitations associated with the rare disease clinical trials.National and international regulatory agencies in the US and Europe have adopted similar approaches to requirements post-approval data for rare diseases and orphan drug indications. The US FDA published guidance in 2011 and the European Medicines Agency in 2015.Post-approval studies for rare diseases include observational studies, pragmatic trials and randomized controlled studies. Observational studies include both original data collection studies and the use of secondary data (retrospective studies). Original data collection can address limitations of retrospective studies resulting from incomplete information in secondary data sources. Disease registries focus on detail about a broad range of patients with a rare disease while product-related registries focus on specific health care outcomes associated with a single product and may incorporate a comparator of an alternative therapy or therapies.Rare disease patients can be difficult to find and enroll in a registry using conventional physician based driven recruitment. The study process also needs to recognize changes in the patient's disease and lifestyle and adapt both the study design and methods over time. Many rare diseases have strong patient advocacy groups that can in aid the design and execution of rare disease registries.

[Characterization and risk prediction of cardiovascular surgeries with cardiopulmonary bypass: a cross-sectional study] / Caracterización y predicción del riesgo de cirugías cardiovasculares con uso de bomba de circulación extracorpórea.

Introduction: Cardiovascular surgery risk prediction models are widely applied in medical practice. However, they have been criticized for their low methodological quality and scarce external validation. An additional limitation added in Latin America is that most of these models have been developed in the United States or Europe, which present marked geographical differences. The objective of this study is to characterize the postoperative clinical events of cardiovascular surgeries with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass pump in a local setting and to evaluate the prediction of postoperative mortality using the EuroSCORE II predictive model. Methods: Cross-sectional study in an urban university hospital in Buenos Aires. Patients ≥21 years of age were included, with a clinical indication for on-pump cardiovascular surgery. Patients with incomplete clinical data regarding EuroSCORE II variables or in-hospital survival, ≥95 years of age, or undergoing heart transplantation were excluded. Results: 195 patients were enrolled. Postoperative mortality estimated by EuroSCORE II presented a clear underestimation of risk (3.0% vs 7.7%). Discrimination (AUC = 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.92) and goodness of fit of the model were adequate (χ2 = 7.91; p = 0.4418). The most frequent postoperative complications were postoperative heart failure (35.9%), vasoplegic shock (13.3%), and cardiogenic shock (10.26%). Conclusion: The EuroSCORE II is an appropriate tool to discriminate between different risk categories in patients undergoing on-pump cardiovascular surgery, although it underestimates the risk.

Introducción: Los modelos de predicción de riesgo de cirugías cardiovasculares se aplican ampliamente a la práctica médica. Sin embargo, han sido criticados por su baja calidad metodológica y escasa validación externa. En América Latina se agrega la limitación de que la mayoría de estos modelos fueron desarrollados en Estados Unidos o Europa, existiendo diferencias geográficas marcadas. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es caracterizar los eventos clínicos postoperatorios de cirugías cardiovasculares con uso de bomba de circulación extracorpórea en un escenario local y evaluar la predicción de mortalidad postoperatoria del modelo predictivo EuroSCORE II. Métodos: Corte transversal en un hospital universitario urbano de Buenos Aires. Se incluyeron a pacientes ≥21 años de edad, con indicación de cirugía cardiovascular con uso de bomba. Se excluyeron a pacientes con datos clínicos incompletos respecto a las variables del EuroSCORE II o respecto a la sobrevida intrahospitalaria, con ≥95 años de edad o sometidos a trasplante cardíaco. Resultados: Se enrolaron 195 pacientes. La mortalidad postoperatoria estimada por el EuroSCORE II presentó una clara subestimación del riesgo (3,0% vs 7,7%). La discriminación (AUC = 0,82; IC95% 0,74-0,92) y la bondad del ajuste del modelo fueron adecuadas (χ2 = 7,91; p = 0,4418). Las complicaciones postoperatorias más frecuentes fueron insuficiencia cardíaca postoperatoria (35,9%), shock vasopléjico (13,3%) y shock cardiogénico (10,26%). Conclusión: El EuroSCORE II es una herramienta apropiada para discriminar entre diferentes categorías de riesgo en pacientes sometidos a cirugías cardiovasculares con uso de bomba, si bien subestima el riesgo.

Mifepristone and misoprostol in California pharmacies after modifications to the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program.

In January 2023, the Food & Drug Administration modified the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program regulating mifepristone to allow direct dispensation from retail pharmacies. In June 2023, we conducted a random, distributive survey of pharmacies in California using secret shopper methodology to investigate the feasibility of accessing mifepristone. One pharmacy had mifepristone immediately available (<24 hours), and misoprostol availability was limited. Accessibility to misoprostol varied by type of pharmacy (p < 0.01), but not by region. Even in a reproductive freedom state, access to mifepristone and misoprostol from outpatient retail pharmacies remains limited.