Sound the Alarm: The Sonographer Shortage Is Echoing Across Healthcare.

OBJECTIVES: The growth in ultrasound usage necessitates concurrent growth in the number of sonographers. Despite the increasing importance of ultrasound, there is a shortage of sonographers in the United States that has never been specifically quantified. This study examines recent trends in the number of ultrasound exams, sonography graduates, open sonographer positions, and wages. METHODS: This retrospective study uses public databases and surveys including the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), and Zippia, a human resources platform to determine metrics. These metrics include the number of ultrasound exams conducted in the United States (excluding inpatient setting), number of sonographers and sonographer wages, sonography graduates, and open sonographer positions. RESULTS: Ultrasound exams in the United States from 2011 to 2021 increased from 38.6 million to 59.8 million (+55.1%,) while the number of sonographers (2011-2021) increased from 54,760 to 78,640 (+43.6%). There was a significant difference between supply and demand of sonographers with the number of sonography graduates (2011-2021) increasing from 4,386 to 5,393 (+23.0%) while the number of open sonographer positions (2012-2021) increased from 18,462 to 25,162 (+36.3%). CONCLUSIONS: From 2011 to 2021, the increase in the number of ultrasound exams has significantly outpaced the increase in the number of sonographers. Furthermore, the increase in demand for sonographers has grown significantly faster than the supply, leading to a shortage and consequent strain on the healthcare system. To address the shortage, the number of sonography school openings should be increased, and the attendant challenges addressed.

Qualitative and quantitative gastric ultrasound assessment in highly skilled regional anesthesiologists.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary aspiration is a major complication in anesthesia, and various studies have shown that gastric sonography can reliably provide valuable information relative to both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of gastric content. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of ultrasound assessment of gastric content compared between two novice anesthesiologist gastric sonographers. METHODS: This prospective cohort study of two anesthesiologists learning to perform qualitative and quantitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content on healthy volunteers was conducted at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (reg. no. NCT04760106). RESULTS: Of the 50 enrolled participants, three were excluded due to study protocol violation. Each anesthesiologist performed a qualitative assessment on 47 participants for an overall total of 94 scans. There were 15 males and 32 females (age 42 ± 11.7 years, weight 61.2 ± 13.1 kg, height 160.7 ± 7.3 cm, and BMI 23.6 ± 4.3 kg/m2). The overall success rate for all gastric content categories was approximately 96%. From antral cross-sectional area measurement, as the ingested volume increased, there was a tendency toward increased deviation from the actual ingested volume. Interrater agreement between anesthesiologists was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). A larger fluid volume was found to be associated with a lower level of agreement between the two anesthesiologists. The ICCs were 0.706 (95% CI: -0.125 to 0.931), 0.669 (95% CI: -0.254 to 0.920), 0.362 (95% CI: -0.498 to 0.807) for the 100 ml, 200 ml, and 300 ml fluid volumes, respectively. The mean duration to perform an ultrasound examination for each gastric content category and for the entire examination did not differ significantly between anesthesiologists (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content is highly accurate and can be easily learned. In contrast, quantification of gastric volume by novice gastric sonographers is more complex and requires more training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04760106 Date registered on Feb 11, 2021. Prospectively registered.

Implementing a Universal Cervical Length Screening Program in a Large Hospital System: It Takes Some Time to Achieve Consistent Results.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to describe changes in the acceptance of transvaginal (TV) cervical length (CL) assessment and in the variance of CL measurements among operators, after implementation of universal TV-CL screening at 18+0 - to 23+6 weeks/days of gestation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This study was performed after universal TV-CL screening was implemented at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston, TX, USA, for all women undergoing an anatomy ultrasound (US) between 18 0/6 and 23 6/7 weeks/days of gestation. Pregnant women carrying singletons without prior history of preterm delivery who underwent anatomy US evaluation between September 2017 and March 2020 (30 months) were included. The complete study period was divided into five epochs of 6 months each. Changes in patient's acceptance for the TV scan, in CL distribution, in the prevalence of short cervix defined as ≤15, ≤20, or ≤25 mm, and in the performance of US operators across the five epochs were evaluated. Success rate was defined as the percentage of TV-CL measurements obtained in relation to the number of second-trimester anatomy scans. RESULTS: A total of 22,207 low-risk pregnant women evaluated by 36 trained sonographers (operators) were analyzed. Overall, the acceptance for TV-CL measurement was 82.3% (18,289/22,207), increasing from 76.7% in the first epoch to 82.8% (p < 0.0001) in the last epoch. The mean CL did not significantly change from 38.6 mm in the first epoch to 38.5 mm in the last epoch (p = 0.7); however, the standard deviation decreased from 7.9 mm in the first epoch to 7.04 mm in the last epoch (p = <0.01). The prevalence of a short cervix ≤25 mm was 2.2% (n = 399/18,289), ≤20 mm was 1.2% (224/18,289), and ≤15 mm was 0.9% (162/18,289). This prevalence varied only for CL ≤25 mm from 3.02% (88/2,907) in the first epoch to 1.77% (64/3,615) in the last epoch (p = 0.0009). There was a variation in CL measurements among operators (mean 3.3 mm). Sonographers with less than 1 year of experience had a lower success rate for completing TV-CL examinations than more experienced sonographers (80.8% vs. 85.8%; p < 0.03). In general, 77% (27/35) of operators had a success rate ≥80% for completing TV-CL scans. LIMITATIONS: Characteristics of individuals who accepted versus those who declined TV-CL were not compared; CL values were not correlated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 6 months after implementation of a universal CL screening program, there was greater variation in CL measurements, lower acceptance for TV US, and a higher number of women diagnosed with a CL ≤25 mm, as compared to subsequent epochs. After the first 6 months, these metrics improved and remained stable. Most operators improved their performance over time; however, there were a few with a low success rate for TV-CL and others who systematically over- or underestimate CL measurements.

The 21st Century Echocardiography Laboratory in Australia and New Zealand: Rapid Evolution of Training and Workforce, Practice and Technology.

Echocardiography is a common and increasingly used noninvasive imaging tool in medicine. In this paper, we imagine the echocardiography laboratory of the future and consider the challenges we face currently, and may face in the future, and how these might be overcome; challenges such as training enough sonographers to meet the increasing demands of the ageing population living with chronic cardiovascular disease and the need for surveillance in other clinical scenarios. We consider the changing qualification framework and the requirements for accreditation and registration in Australia and New Zealand and the potential for migrant sonographers to meet some of the increasing demand. Advanced scopes of practice are likely to be a feature of the future workforce and we consider some of the ways these may evolve. Lastly, we consider how the evolving clinical landscape and technology may change the way echocardiography is delivered.

Ultrasound education across European Federation of Radiographers Societies (EFRS) countries: Similarities and differences.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound education varies greatly across European healthcare systems. This paper focuses on ultrasound academic education as a part of wider suite of surveys on radiographers working in ultrasound. The aim was to investigate sonography educational levels, methods of training, course duration and other factors in European Federation of Radiographers Societies (EFRS) member countries. METHOD: In 2019 an online survey was sent to the 38 EFRS member societies to distribute to higher education institutions within their own country. The survey was in English and contained different types of questions such as closed questions, free text options, and scale responses, to investigate sonography education including academic course types and duration, curriculum content, learning and teaching methods. RESULTS: A total of 45 responses were received, showing wide variation in the duration of training between the respective countries. Academic level 7 (part-time) ultrasound education was most frequently reported (n = 13), followed by direct entry ultrasound courses (n = 9) and bachelor's degree programmes at EQF level 6 (n = 7). The duration of part-time courses ranged from nine months up to four years. CONCLUSION: Sonography training and education varies among EFRS member countries ranging from short focused courses to postgraduate awards. Few countries offer sonography education leading to an award. The majority of clinical teaching and learning takes place in the learner's workplace. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: High quality academic and clinical education for radiographers extending their role into ultrasound is important to ensure safe, effective sonography practice and good patient care.

Renal screening sonography-A comparative study in a Portuguese basic emergency service.

INTRODUCTION: Renal Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is a screening modality that aids in clinical decision-making for patients with suspected renal colic. This study intends to compare the accuracy and pertinence of sonographic findings obtained by a sonographer in a Basic Emergency Service (BES) with the imaging findings at the Referral Hospital (RH). METHODS: Thirty-one patients suspected of having renal pathology underwent initial sonography screening with POCUS at the BES and were subsequently referred to the RH for additional imaging examinations. The results of both examinations were compared to verify whether the findings from the BES were confirmed by the radiologist in the RH and to ensure that the patient referrals from BES to RH were appropriate. RESULTS: In our sample, the majority of patients (80%) exhibited varying degrees of pyelocaliceal distension, with nearly half (48%) patients presenting obstructions. A strong association between the sonographic findings in the BES and the RH was found in the variables 'Dilatation of pyelocaliceal system' (V = 0.895; P = 0.00), 'Simple cystic formation' (V = 0.878; P = 0.000), respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation between BES and RH findings, indicating a strong association between these two variables, respectively (k = 0.890; P = 0.000) and (k = 0.870; P = 0.000). There was also a strong statistically significant correlation in the ultrasonographic findings between BES and RH performers (k = 0.890; P = 0.000 and k = 0.870; P = 0.000). In this research, an achieved sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 85% were demonstrated in the identification of pyelocaliceal dilatation. CONCLUSION: Renal POCUS screening successfully detected abnormalities in the urinary system of patients suspected of having renal colic. The sonographic findings at the BES had a good correlation with the complementary imaging results obtained at the RH in Portugal. These results suggest that Radiographers/Sonographers can have an important role in the preliminary assessment of urgent renal pathology in remote areas, contributing to a correct referral and early treatment.

Voices from the field: A qualitative exploration of sonography professionals in the United Arab Emirates through focus group discussions.

INTRODUCTION: The practice of sonography in the United Arab Emirates is evolving rapidly. This study explores the professional landscape and challenges of sonography practice in the United Arab Emirates, focusing on identifying areas for improvement in education, practice scope, and professional development. METHODS: Employing qualitative methodologies, using focus group discussions and thematic analysis, this research gathers insights from practicing sonographers across various healthcare settings in the UAE to assess current practices, educational needs, and workplace challenges. RESULTS: Findings reveal a consensus among sonographers on the need for a structured professional framework, standardized education pathways, and clear career progression routes. Additionally, the study highlights a desire among sonographers for an expanded scope of practice, particularly in specialized areas, amidst challenges such as workload and equipment quality. CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that enhancing the sonography profession in the UAE requires a comprehensive approach that includes developing a regulatory framework, improving access to specialized training, and recognizing sonographers' advanced practice roles. IMPLICATIONS OF PRACTICE: Recommendations include establishing accredited educational programs, developing a formal competency framework, and advocating for role expansion and professional recognition. These steps are essential for meeting the evolving needs of the healthcare system and improving patient care outcomes.

Survey results: status report on problems caused by sexual mismatch between sonographer and patient during echocardiography-a 2020 report of the Japanese Society of Echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasonography is an essential examination performed in various clinical fields. The number of clinical sonographers has been increasing. However, the working environments and conditions at each facility are different, leading to diverse problems. Among them, the emerging issue is the sexual disagreement between the sonographer and patient at the time of echocardiography. Since the patient must expose their breast during echocardiography, female patients may refuse to undergo the examination when conducted by a male sonographer. This study aimed to conduct a questionnaire survey to understand the measures for sonographer-patient gender mismatch at different facilities. METHODS: A questionnaire on the implementation of echocardiography by male sonographers for female patients was answered by representatives and specialist technicians of the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. RESULTS: Questionnaire responses were obtained from 50 facilities (59 participants). A total of 70% of the facilities restricted male sonographers from conducting echocardiography examinations for female patients. Among them, 81% of the facilities serviced female patients aged 60 years or younger. CONCLUSIONS: It has become clear that the gender selection of echocardiographic examiners varies from facility to facility, and providing a sufficient explanation before echocardiographic examination is necessary to avoid causing uncomfortable situations for female patients.

Effectiveness of ultrasound screening in right upper quadrant pain: A comparative study in a basic emergency service.

Background and Aims: The use of ultrasound screening is primarily facilitated by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and its integration into healthcare systems is a result of the versatility of this imaging technique. This study intends to compare the accuracy and pertinence of sonographic findings obtained by a sonographer in a Basic Emergency Service (BES) with that of radiologists at referral hospital (RH) in Portugal. Methods: Twenty patients with right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain and suspected cholecystitis or biliary pathology underwent sonography screening using POCUS in the BES. They were then forwarded to the RH where a radiologist performed a conventional ultrasound exam on the same patients. The results of both exams were compared to determine if the findings obtained in the BES were confirmed by the radiologist in the RH. Results: In our sample, 60% of cases were related to biliary pathology, 20% were liver-related, 10% had hepatopancreatic biliary etiology, and 10% had unknown etiology. A strong association between the sonographic findings in the BES and the RH was found in the variables "Sonographic Murphy sign" (V = 0.859; p = 0.001), "Cholelithiasis/Gallbladder sludge" (V = 0.840; p = 0.001), and "Intrahepatic biliary tract dilatation" (V = 0.717; p = 0.006). Adequate measures of agreement between the findings of the radiographer and radiologist were obtained for the "Sonographic Murphy sign" (k = 0.664; p = 0.001) and the presence of "Cholelithiasis/Gallbladder sludge" (k = 0.712; p = 0.000). Conclusion: Major biliary abnormalities were detected in patients with RUQ pain in BES using sonography. The correlation between the sonographic findings obtained by the sonographers at BES and those obtained by radiologists at the RH in Portugal was strong, showing that POCUS screening could be extended to other similar settings; however, more studies are needed.

Discrepancies between Screening Sonography and Ultrasound in Emergency Department - A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: This case report presents a discrepancy in sonographic findings between a screening sonography performed by a Sonographer in the Basic Emergency Service (BES) and a subsequent ultrasound performed by a Radiologist physician in a Referral Hospital (RH). The aim of this report is to discuss the possible reasons for the discrepancy and its implications for patient care. CASE PRESENTATION: A patient with a history of epigastric pain and vomiting underwent screening sonography in a BES, which suggested Intrahepatic Biliary Dilatation Duct (IHBD) and main pancreatic duct dilatation. The patient was subsequently referred to the RH for further evaluation. However, the Radiologist in the RH did not confirm any of the initial suspicions from BES through a normal ultrasound procedure. The discrepancy raises questions regarding the quality of the screening ultrasound, misinterpretation of the BES images, or the potential for ambiguity in the point of care ultrasound (POCUS) exam. CONCLUSION: The differences in sonographic findings between BES and RH, in this case, suggest that the improvement of the patient's clinical condition and therapeutic interventions may have contributed to the discrepancy. Further investigation and standardization of POCUS training and interpretation may improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

Role extension in advanced ultrasound practice: A framework approach and case study.

Introduction: Role extension into novel areas of ultrasound practice can be challenging for health care professionals. Expansion into existing areas of advanced practice typically occurs using established processes and accredited training; however, in areas where there is no formal training, there can be a lack of support for how to develop new and progressive clinical roles. Topic Description: This article presents how the use of a framework approach for establishing areas of advanced practice can support individuals and departments with safely and successfully developing new roles in ultrasound. The authors illustrate this via the example of a gastrointestinal ultrasound role, developed in an NHS department. Discussion: The framework approach comprises three elements, each interdependent upon and inform each other: (A) Scope of practice, (B) Education and competency and (C) Governance. (A) Defines (and communicates) the role extension and area(s) of subsequent ultrasound imaging, interpretation and reporting. By identifying the why, how and what is required this informs (B) the education and assessment of competency for those taking on new roles or areas of expertise. (C) Is informed by (A) and is an ongoing process of quality assurance to safeguard high standards in clinical care. In supporting role extension, this approach can facilitate new workforce configurations, skill expansion and enable increasing service demands to be met. Summary: By defining and aligning the components of scope of practice, education/competency and governance, role development in ultrasound can be initiated and sustained. Role extension utilising this approach brings benefits for patients, clinicians and departments.

Musculoskeletal disorders among sonographers in secondary care hospitals in the city of Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) among sonographers have raised significant concerns in recent years. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of WMSDs and identify risk factors for WMSDs among sonographers. To date, there is little research on WMSDs among sonographers in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study aimed to contribute to the Saudi literature by filling this gap. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among sonographers (n = 98) working in four major governmental hospitals in the city of Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. The participants completed a validated, self-administered questionnaire that focused on the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms among sonographers. RESULTS: The mean age of the respondents was 35.5±9 years. The majority of the participants were female (71.4%), non-Saudi (51%), and working as technicians (49%). The prevalence rates of shoulder and neck disorders among the participants were 65.3% and 57.1%, respectively. Gender (female), job title (sonography technicians), and years of experience (seasoned sonographers) were identified as risk factors for WMSDs. CONCLUSIONS: Among the studied sonographers, WMSDs were a significant, common problem. Being female, being a sonography technician, and being a seasoned sonographer were identified as risk factors for these disorders. Preventive measures should be implemented to reduce the risk of WMSDs in this occupational setting.

Radiographers' individual perspectives on sonography - A survey of European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS).

INTRODUCTION: Radiographers can elect to work within many different modalities, one being ultrasound. Within Europe there are differing opinions about how much of a role radiographers should take in relation to the ultrasound examination, particularly report writing. This paper provides findings exploring the radiographer's views on working within sonography. METHODS: In 2019 an electronic survey was disseminated to radiographer members by European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) national radiographer societies, following a pilot study. A mix of closed questions, free text, and scale responses aimed to investigate radiographers' practice, legal responsibilities, report writing, educational level and experiences of support and mentoring. RESULTS: Of 561 radiographers participating, most (92%) reported performing ultrasound scans. Challenges with legislation, medical protectionism and lack of high-quality education restricted other radiographers. On average, the respondents have practiced ultrasound for 13.5 years. A total of 60% had postgraduate education and carried out a wide range of examinations. A full interpretative report, including advice on further investigations is performed by 52%, whilst 22% provide a checklist or descriptive report. Over 55% of radiographers took legal responsibility for the examination and the majority had clear protocols, good mentoring and support in the workplace. Peer review of their work was less common. CONCLUSION: The result shows that in 21 (n = 25) countries radiographers perform ultrasound, however not without challenges. Educational levels range from no formal education or short courses to an MSc in ultrasound. Report writing practice differs across the EFRS countries responding to the survey, as does peer review to enhance skills and clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: National Radiographer societies could review findings to support campaigning for a change in legislation and improvements to educational offerings in ultrasound.

Evaluation of quality of renal tract ultrasound scans and reports performed in children with first urinary tract infection.

PURPOSE: To determine the quality of renal tract ultrasound (US) imaging records performed in children for evaluation of urinary tract infection (UTI) by multiple professionals with different levels of experience in a dedicated academic children's hospital. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of US images and reports for children ≤ 13-years with first presentation of a UTI. 9 Operators (6 consultant radiologists and 3 sonographers) were anonymised and the adequacy of their US images and reports were evaluated for the following categories; Image acquisition, Image labelling, Metric labelling, and Final reporting. The frequency of the reporting quality of the elements assessed was compared between radiologists and sonographers using Chi-square or fisher exact test. RESULTS: Renal tract US studies for 100 children (20 males, 80 females) with first UTI episode were assessed. Mean age was 4.5 ± 3.4 years. 54% of the studies were performed by sonographers and 46% by radiologists. Kidneys and pre-micturition bladder scans were acquired in more than 96% of exams by both sonographers and radiologists. Kidney image and metric labelling was adequate in almost all exams (98-100%) with the exception of plane labelling which was not routinely done by US operators (less than 3%). Sonographers performed consistently better than radiologists in post-micturition bladder scanning, pre- and post-micturition bladder labelling and renal length reporting (p<0.05). Least to be recorded by US operators (both radiologists and sonographers) were doppler scan acquisitions (less than 3%), bladder wall thickness labelling (less than 3%), and renal calculi reporting (less than 1%). CONCLUSION: The inconsistency of the reporting quality between the different elements assessed highlights the difference in US training and experience received by sonographers and radiologists. A pro-forma structured reporting template may ensure US operators provide consistent, thorough and good quality ultrasound images and reports.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical guidance and risk assessments, and the importance of effective leadership to support UK obstetric sonographers.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on the provision of obstetric ultrasound services, leading to the publication of new guidance and requirement for individual departmental risk assessments in the UK. The impact of these changes on clinical practice for UK obstetric sonographers is not currently well reported in published literature. METHODS: Obstetric sonographers working in the UK (n = 138) used the Qualtrics XMTM platform to complete an anonymous, online questionnaire about their experiences during the pandemic. Participants responded to closed-type questions about national guidance, risk assessment and their perception of support, and provided additional detail about their experiences in these areas through free-text response options. RESULTS: Over 90% of respondents were aware of or had read guidance issued by professional organisations, although challenges for its implementation in departments were identified. These were commonly related to the clinical working environment and included limitations on physical space (76.3%), time constraints (67.5%) and ventilation (61.3%). Sonographers felt most supported by their ultrasound colleagues (83.5%) and line managers (41.2%). They felt least supported by senior management and leadership personnel (60.8%), other antenatal colleagues (51.5%) and professional organisations (41.2%). CONCLUSION: Obstetric sonographers will need support from the wider service team and professional organisations to facilitate post-pandemic recovery of the workforce. Formal clinical supervision programmes may be beneficial in facilitating a more holistic approach to peer-support, although there is currently limited evidence of their use in sonographic practice.

Organization of Pediatric Echocardiography Laboratories: Impact of Sonographers on Clinical, Academic, and Financial Performance.

Echocardiography has evolved the first-line imaging for diagnosis and management of pediatric and congenital heart disease all over the world. While it recognized as essential component of pediatric cardiac care delivery, organization of pediatric echocardiography services is very heterogeneous across the world, mainly related to significant differences in material and human resources in heterogeneous health care systems. In this paper, we focus on the role of pediatric sonographers, defined as expert technicians in pediatric echocardiography. While in some services sonographers are an essential part of the organizational structure, other laboratories operate only with physicians trained in echocardiography. The impact of sonographers on clinical, academic and financial performance will be discussed. Two organizational models (with and without sonographers) will be compared, and the advantages and disadvantages of each model will be evaluated. Different models of care provision are possible and decisions on organizational models need to be adjusted to the demands and available resources.

The experiences of sonographers with regard to report writing and communicating their findings.

Background: Sonographers in South Africa are legally allowed to write their own reports; however, they often lack adequate training in providing a well-structured and coherent formal written report. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore and describe how sonographers in the Gauteng province experience the responsibility of report writing and to develop recommendations that could assist sonographers in the execution of their duty. Setting: Focus group discussions (FGDs) with sonographers from private and public hospitals located in Gauteng province were conducted at neutral locations that were convenient for the sonographers. Methods: A qualitative phenomenological research design was used for this study. A two-stage sampling approach was employed to recruit information-rich sonographers to partake in this study. Purposeful sampling was used to select sonographers based on their first-hand experience of report writing, followed by snowball sampling which allowed the researcher access to new participants on the recommendation of previous sonographers. Thirteen female sonographers voluntarily participated in the study, and the FGDs continued until data saturation was reached. The views and opinions of the sonographers were analysed using content analysis. Results: Key findings of this study indicated that sonographers felt unprepared to describe ultrasound findings correctly in order to provide a coherent and well-structured formal written report. Conclusion: Sonographers suggested the use of workshops or further training at higher educational institutions (HEIs) to support sonographers in their report-writing role. Contribution: The experiences identified by sonographers can assist HEIs to provide further training or workshops to support sonographers in communicating their findings effectively.

The initial impact of COVID-19 on Australasian Sonographers Part 1: Changes in scan numbers and sonographer work hours.

Introduction: COVID-19 has seen a series of lockdowns and suspension on non-urgent elective surgeries. Subsequently, there was a drop in the number of diagnostic imaging services billed in April, May, 2020. A survey was undertaken from March to June 2020 to determine the initial impact of COVID-19 on Australasian Sonographers. This article, the first in a 3-part series presents and discusses the results of this survey pertaining to changes in the number of scans performed, and changes in the working hours of sonographers. The remaining two articles in this series address other initial COVID-19 impacts on Australasian Sonographers. Methods: An online survey was conducted containing questions regarding changes to work hours and examination numbers. Results: 444 participants answered the survey. Seventy eight percent of sonographers reported a decrease in the number of examinations being performed in their department A decrease in work hours was reported by 68% of sonographers with almost a quarter of these reporting that they had lost all their hours. A higher percentage of work hours changes were seenin private practices. Many reductions in work hours were reported to be voluntary. Conclusion: Scan numbers in ultrasound departments were affected by COVID-19, as were sonographers' work hours.

The initial impact of COVID-19 on Australasian sonographers part 2: Changes to sonographic examination protocols and access to personal protective equipment.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 brought with it the requirement for healthcare workers to limit community transmission of the virus as much as possible by limiting patient contact and wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This study aimed to capture the initial adaptations to sonographic examination protocols within ultrasound departments and sonographer access to PPE. METHODS: An online survey was used to gather data on sonographer reflections of sonographic examination protocol changes seen in their departments and access to PPE between the 11th of March 2020 and the 14th of June 2020. RESULTS: To reduce the time sonographers spent with the patients and hence reduce the risk of exposure to COVID-19, sonographers reported adjustments to sonographic examination protocols including their duration and scheduling. Access to PPE was reported as poor. CONCLUSION: Numerous sonographic examination protocol changes were observed within ultrasound departments in Australasia in the initial response to COVID-19. Access to PPE was varied along with sonographer feelings around the impact of these changes.

Evaluation of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among sonographers in general hospitals in Guangdong province, China.

Introduction. Research on the prevalence of and potential risk factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) among sonographers in China is scarce. More evidence is required to mitigate WMSDs among sonographers in Guangdong province, China. Objective. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of and potential associated factors for WMSDs among sonographers in general hospitals in Guangdong province, China. Methods. A self-reported questionnaire was distributed to sonographers from 14 general hospitals selected by convenience sampling in Guangdong province. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze associations between potential factors and WMSDs in the most affected body areas. Results. In this study, 249 sonographers completed the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 75.5%. The 12-month period prevalence of WMSDs was 95.2%, and the four most affected regions were the right shoulder (81.1%) followed by the neck (74.7%), right wrist/hand (59.4%) and lower back (57.0%). Among symptomatic sonographers, 31.2% were absent from work. Gender, years of experience, number of patients per day, shift type and lumbar support were associated with WMSDs in the most affected regions. Conclusion. Lower workload, more regular rest breaks and good ergonomics of working conditions are encouraged to alleviate WMSDs among sonographers in Guangdong province.