Outcomes of brachial artery transposition in hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: In hemodialysis patients with a difficult access extremity who are not suitable for an arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft creation, the concept of cannulating a superficialized artery for arterial outflow in dialysis sessions has been adopted as a tertiary alternative. However, its long-term patency and complications have not been recognized widely. We report our 16-year experience with hemodialysis access creation using the brachial artery transposition (BAT) technique. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent BAT for hemodialysis vascular access between June 1, 2006, and December 31, 2022. The patency of the whole access circuit and the transposed brachial artery itself was evaluated independently. RESULTS: In total, 193 surgical procedures were included. The success rate was 93.2%. The mean operative time was 128 minutes. The median interval from access placement to first cannulation was 21 days. The primary patency rates for BAT were 92.3%, 91.3%, 90.3%, 86.1%, and 71.9% at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The secondary patency rates for BAT were 96.3%, 96.3%, 95.0%, 90.1%, and 74.9% at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The primary patency rates for the whole access circuit were 61.4%, 49.2%, 45.8%, and 26.9% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The secondary patency rates for the whole access circuit were 85.1%, 83.3%, 82.0%, and 68.6% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The overall patient survival rates were 79.6%, 69.6%, 54.6%, 36.5%, and 13.4% at 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively. The abandonments of BAT were brachial artery thrombosis (n = 6), pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), aneurysmal change (n = 1), and other reasons (n = 1). The abandonments of the whole access circuit were exhaustion of venous return (n = 26), abandonment of BAT (n = 7), and other reasons (n = 2). Complications were exhaustion of venous return (n = 26), aneurysmal change (n = 12), pseudoaneurysm (n = 6), brachial artery thrombosis (n = 7), impaired wound healing (n = 19), lymphorrhea (n = 9), skin infection (n = 5), hematoma on cannulation (n = 3), and reduced peripheral blood flow (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: The patency of BAT was excellent, and that of the whole access circuit was adequate, with a few complications. BAT is an effective alternative from a long-term perspective for patients who are unsuitable for conventional hemodialysis access creation.

Management of depth to achieve timely arteriovenous fistula utilization.

OBJECTIVE: Failure to achieve timely arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) utilization due to excessive depth (>6 mm) remains an ongoing concern for dialysis access. This study evaluates the outcomes of radiocephalic (RCF) and brachiocephalic (BCF) fistula elevation required for access utilization. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing first-time autologous access over 10 years was undertaken. RCF and BCF were analyzed, and cases of initial access failure due to depth alone were selected for study. Primary and staged brachio-basilic AVF were excluded. Outcomes of early thrombosis, line placement, maturation (successful progression to hemodialysis [HD), reintervention, and functional dialysis (continuous HD for 3 consecutive months) were examined. RESULTS: From January 2012 to December 2022, 1733 patients (67% female; mean age, 61 ± 14 years) underwent autologous AVF placement. Of these, 298 patients (17%) had depth-related AVF access issues (BCF, 71% and RCF, 29%). Nineteen percent of these AVFs underwent a primary balloon-assisted maturation (BAM), and 2% had side branch coil embolization before consideration for elevation. The average time to intervention for depth was 11 ± 4 weeks after primary creation. During elevation, side branch ligation occurred in 38% of cases, and 15% underwent intraoperative BAM, The pre-elevation depth was 8.2 ± 3.1 mm, and the mean post-elevation depth was 4.7 ± 2.9 mm (P = .002). Early thrombosis (<18 days) occurred in 4% of cases. There was no mortality, and the 30-day major adverse cardiac event rate was 2%, with a 30-day morbidity of 5%, which was driven by wound issues. Six percent of the AVFs underwent follow-up BAM within 3 months. Mean maturation of the AVFs was 74% ± 3% vs 72% ± 3% (P = .58) for the elevation vs no-elevation groups at 24 weeks, respectively. However, there was an increase in tunneled central line placement in pre-emptive fistula patients due to the delay in maturation (elevation, 17% vs no-elevation, 8%; P = .008). There was a mean successful access time of 6 ± 3 weeks after elevation (16 ± 4 weeks after access creation). There was a median of 2.4 secondary interventions per year after elevation compared with a median of 2.7 secondary interventions per year without elevation. Mean access functionality was 68% ± 8% vs 75% ± 8% at 3 years for the elevation vs no-elevation groups, respectively (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of deep BCF and RCF occurs late after placement but can be successfully achieved with low morbidity and satisfactory long-term functionality. It results in an increase in tunneled central line placement in pre-emptive fistula patients. Elevation is a valuable adjunct to AVF maturation and enhances an autologous access policy.

Outcomes of prosthetic upper arm arteriovenous graft vs brachiobasilic fistula for hemodialysis access.

OBJECTIVE: Primary arteriovenous access such as radiocephalic and brachiocephalic fistulas are initial choices for creating vascular access in dialysis patients. When neither of these choices is an option, upper arm arteriovenous graft or brachiobasilic transposition is recommended. Although primary fistula is better than prosthetic graft for suitable patients, there is little data to guide the best treatment strategy in the absence of suitable vein for primary access creation. This study identifies factors that influence patency rates and compares outcomes of patients treated with brachiobasilic fistula vs upper arm graft in patients who have failed forearm access or are not candidates for primary access. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure from 2010 to 2022 was analyzed. Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were calculated. Incidence rates of complications and reinterventions were compared. RESULTS: There were 148 patients with brachiobasilic fistulas and 157 patients with upper arm grafts. The graft group was older (70.1 ± 14.7 vs 62.5 ± 14.6 years; P = .003) and had a higher incidence of pacemakers (11.9% vs 4.1%; P = .005). Brachiobasilic fistulas had higher 6-month (77.0% vs 64.3%; P = .02) and 1-year (68.2% vs 55.4%; P = .03) primary-assisted patency. Secondary patency rates were better for upper arm grafts at 1-year (82.2% vs 72.3%; P = .05). Access complications of non-maturation and aneurysm were higher in basilic vein transposition (21.6% vs 1.3%; P < .0001; 15.5% vs 6.4%; P = .017). Grafts had higher rates of occlusion (58.0% vs 25.7%; P < .0001). In terms of interventions, upper arm grafts had higher rates of thrombectomy (50.3% vs 18.9%; P < .0001), but there was no difference seen in angioplasty, stent, surgical revision, or steal procedures. Basilic vein transpositions had longer time to cannulation (104.6 ± 81.1 vs 32.5 ± 22.4 days; P < .0001), longer total catheter days (251.1 ± 181.7 vs 72.9 ± 56.3 days; P < .0001), and higher number of procedures to aid maturity (0.7 ± 0.7 vs 0.1 ± 0.3; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, when forearm access or primary arteriovenous access is not an option, basilic vein transposition and upper arm grafts have fairly equivalent primary patency. Primary assisted patency is slightly better in basilic vein fistulas, but secondary patency is better in upper arm grafts at 1 year. Basilic fistulas also had longer time to cannulation, longer total catheter days, and more procedures to aid maturity.

In-Hospital Risk Factors for Reintervention and Amputation in Brachial Arterial Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Brachial artery trauma is a rare but potentially devastating injury. There is little data regarding risk factors for reintervention and amputation prevention in this population, as well as anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) regimens and outcomes after discharge in trauma patients with vascular injuries requiring repair. This study aims to identify in-hospital risk factors for reintervention and amputation and stratify outcomes of follow-up by discharge AC or AP regimen. METHODS: The AAST Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Trial database was queried for all patients who underwent traumatic brachial arterial repair from 2013 to 2022. Patients were evaluated by need for reintervention, amputation, and outcomes at follow-up by AC or AP regimen. RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven patients required brachial repair, 28 (9%) required reoperation, and 8 (2.6%) required amputation. High injury severity score and an increased number of packed red blood cells and platelets showed a significant increase for reoperation and amputation. Damage control and shunt use were significant for the need to reoperate. Seventy-four percent (221/298) of patients were discharged with postoperative AC or AP regimens. There was no significant difference of short-term follow-up by type of AC or AP regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Damage control and temporary shunt may lead to additional operations but not an increase in amputations. However, anticoagulation intraoperatively and postoperatively does not appear to play a significant role in reducing reintervention. It also suggests that there is no increase in short-term follow-up complications with or without AC or AP therapy.

Two-Year Cumulative and Functional Patency after Creation of Endovascular Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Fistulae.

PURPOSE: To assess 2-year cumulative and functional patency of endovascular arteriovenous fistulae (endoAVF) created with the WavelinQ device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had fistulae created at a single center from December 2019 to December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Forty-three patients underwent endoAVF creation (22 females, 21 males). Data collected included patient demographics, location of fistula creation, interventions performed, and brachial artery flow before and after creation. Two-year cumulative and functional patency rates were assessed with Kaplan-Meier method, and variables that affected patency and maturation were examined using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Technical success was 95% (41/43), and in 4 patients, the fistula did not mature for dialysis use (9.7%). For the remaining 37 patients with endoAVF maturation, 25 had ulnar-ulnar fistulae, 10 had radial-radial fistulae, and 2 had interosseous artery-vein fistulae. Mean maturity time was 73 days, and brachial artery flow of >886 mL/min was predictive of maturation. Mean tunneled dialysis catheter removal time was 133 days. Number of interventions per patient-year was 0.38, where 8 were maturation procedures (5 vein elevations/transpositions and 3 coil embolizations) and 21 were maintenance angioplasties. Two-year cumulative/secondary and functional patency rates were 89.4% and 92.1%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 665.7 days. Examined variables did not impact cumulative or functional patency. One adverse event was migration of coil to the heart, which was successfully retrieved at time of procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Two-year patency of 89.4% and functional patency of 92.1% were observed after endoAVF creation with WavelinQ device.

Management of Arteriovenous Fistula After Successful Kidney Transplantation in Long-Term Follow-Up.

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the best method of vascular access for hemodialysis. This approach can lead to several complications, such as hyperkinetic heart failure due to a hyperfunctional AVF or dilatation of the feeding artery. These are late complications, especially in patients after a successful kidney transplantation. An observational study was performed focusing on patients more than 12 months after kidney transplantation. The AVF was evaluated by ultrasound and, if the outflow exceeded 1.5 L/min, an echocardiogram was performed. Surgical management was indicated if the cardiac index was higher than 3.9 L/min/m2 or upon finding a brachial artery aneurysm. A total of 208 post- kidney transplantation patients were examined over a 3-year period, of which 46 subjects (22.11%) had hyperfunctional AVF and 34 cases (16.34%) of feeding artery dilatation were determined. In total, 40 AVF flow reduction and 6 AVF ligation procedures were performed. The median AVF flow before and after the reduction was 2955 mL/min and 1060 mL/min, respectively. Primary patency after flow reduction was 88.3% at 12 months. Late AVF complications in patients following kidney transplantation are quite common. It is necessary to create a screening program to monitor AVFs in these patients.

Transbrachial Artery as Single or Combined Approach for Complex Interventions in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the transbrachial approach as a single or combined procedure for complex interventions in peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: Between March 2011 and April 2021, 169 patients with PAD underwent endovascular therapy via the transbrachial approach as a single or dual procedure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictors of adverse events at the brachial puncture site. All demographic, clinical, and perioperative data were acquired from electronic medical records and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Brachial artery access was used alone and in combination in 87 and 82 patients, respectively. Patients in the combined-approach group underwent more intraoperative stent implantations and had more vascular closure devices (VCD). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that hypertension was an independent factor for higher rates of brachial puncture site adverse events (odds ratio, 4.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-16.97; P = 0.016). Brachial artery access-site complications occurred in 26 patients, including 6 (23.1%) major and 20 (76.9%) minor entry-site complications. Entry-site complications were observed in 21 (16.8%) and 5 (11.4%) patients assigned to manual compression and VCD groups, respectively. There were no significant intergroup differences in the incidence of major or minor complications. Interestingly, patients assigned to the VCD group did not experience major entry-site complications. CONCLUSIONS: The transbrachial approach, as a single or combined procedure, is a safe alternative to complex interventions in patients with PAD. Complications of brachial access progressively decrease with improved blood pressure control.

Long-Term Patency Between Brachiocephalic and Brachiobasilic Fistulas: A Single Institution Review.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis access is a fundamental procedure performed by vascular surgeons. Commonly, upper extremity access is utilized via a brachiobasilic fistula (BBF) or brachiocephalic fistula (BCF). BCF is preferred due to ease compared to BBF without documented improved function. Few studies compare patency outcomes between BBF and BCF over time. Our goal was to evaluate the difference in outcomes between BBF and BCF. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with BCF or BBF between 2019 and 2022. Patients were split by procedure: BCF and BBF. Data collected included demographics, vein size, tunneled catheter, and previous access. Primary outcomes included primary patency (PP), primary assisted patency (PAP) and secondary patency (SP). Secondary outcomes included 30-day complications, access abandonment, interventions and mortality. Linear regression, Kaplan-Meier, and log-rank test were performed. RESULTS: Our study had 184 patients, 109 (59%) with BCF and 75 (41%) with BBF. There were no differences in demographics except for body mass index and vein size (BBF: 4 vs. BCF: 3.6 mm, P = 0.020). There was no difference in PP at 1 year (41% vs. 47%, P = 0.547) or SP at 2 years (73% vs. 84%, P = 0.058) in BBF versus BCF. However, PAP was significantly greater in BCF (80% vs. 67%, P = 0.030) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes revealed no difference in wound complications (1% vs. 0%, P = 0.408), access abandonment (35% vs. 28%, P = 0.260), or number of interventions (1 vs. 1, P = 0.712) in BBF versus BCF. Mortality was significantly greater in the BBF patients (19% vs. 6%, P = 0.005). On adjusted analysis, BBF had 43 min longer operative time (P < 0.001) and 22 cc greater blood loss (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this single center review comparing BBF and BCF, no difference was seen between BBF and BCF in terms of PP or SP. Even with larger vein size, BBF did not confer a benefit in long term patency or access abandonment. Additionally, BBF did not confer decreased procedures to maintain patency and BBF had greater operative length and blood loss, as well as mortality. We believe this study demonstrates that for patients who must use an upper extremity location, when the cephalic vein is satisfactory, using the cephalic vein is preferred as it does not negatively impact long-term patency.

True brachial artery aneurysm: A systematic review.

Objective: To identify and critically appraise literature on true brachial artery aneurysm, exploring its demographic characteristics, aetiologies, clinical manifestations and different methods of repair along with complication rates to determine future treatment strategies. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, from September 30, 2021, to November 30, 2022, in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Literature was searched on MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for relevant studies in English language or with English translation published till May 31, 2022. The key words used for the search were "brachial artery aneurysm". Data was noted on a proforma and was subjected to descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Of 113 articles, 6 (5.3%) were retrospective studies, 7 (6.1%) were case series and 100 (88.4%) were case reports. The total number of patients involved was 157 with mean age 43.1±23.4 years (range: 2 months to 84 years). The gender was mentioned for 152(96.8%) patients; 111(73%) males and 41(27%) females. The mean diameter of true brachial artery aneurysm was 36.2 ±17.5mm and 106(67.5%) patients presented with localised swelling, 65(41.4%) with pain, 41(26.1%) with distal ischaemic symptoms, and 28(17.8%) with median nerve compression. True brachial artery aneurysms were more common in renal failure patients having a history of arteriovenous fistula creation in the affected limb and were on immunosuppressant drugs due to renal transplant 81(51.5%). Less common causes included primary/idiopathic 27(17.1%), trauma 13(8.2%), connective tissue disorders 8(5%) and vasculitis 7(4.5%). The treatment of choice was aneurysmectomy in 142(90.4%) cases, with revascularisation of limb primarily with reversed great saphenous vein graft 79(50.3 %), followed by end-to-end anastomosis of brachial artery 17(10.8%) and synthetic grafting 17(10.8%). Endovascular intervention was performed in 6(3.8%) cases to exclude true brachial artery aneurysm, and to re-establish adequate blood flow to the associated limb. Conclusion: True brachial artery aneurysm, although a rarity, may lead to significant neurological and vascular problems if ignored. Arteriovenous fistula and immunosuppression are identified as two significant risk factors in the development of true brachial artery aneurysm. Therefore, an effective long-term follow up in renal failure patients is recommended to prevent its complications. Open surgical repair has been the most preferred mode of treatment, but further significant studies are needed to explore and compare different modes of surgical intervention, like open versus endovascular, to plan future treatment strategies.

Perioperative adverse events in percutaneous versus open brachial access.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to compare the incidence of complications at the access site after percutaneous brachial access (PBA) and open brachial access (OBA) in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: From November 2016 to November 2021, all patients who had undergone peripheral artery revascularization with brachial access were included. The primary outcome was the 30-day rate of postoperative complications at the access site. The complications included hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, and pseudoaneurysms that had resulted in prolonged hospitalization and/or reintervention. RESULTS: Overall, 259 procedures with brachial access had been performed (PBA, n = 101; OBA, n = 158). The baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The sheath size was larger for the OBA procedures. Complications had occurred in 11 of 101 patients (11.1%) in the PBA group and 5 of 158 patients (3.2%) in the OBA group (P = .01). The mean duration of the procedure was significantly shorter for the PBA group (73.5 ± 46.5 minutes vs 101.2 ± 60.8 minutes; P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients who had undergone brachial access for peripheral vascular disease, the rate of access site-related complications was significantly lower for the patients who had undergone open access compared with that for the patients who had undergone percutaneous access.

Radial arterial access is a safe alternative to brachial artery and femoral artery access for endovascular lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: Radial artery access is a well-described technique that has proven to be safe and efficacious in percutaneous cardiac intervention. This technique has been used with increased frequency in the treatment of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (LE-PAD); however, the overall safety has not yet been well described in the vascular surgery literature. We sought to evaluate the safety of this technique compared with retrograde femoral artery access and brachial artery access (BA) in the treatment of PAD. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database was used to identify all patients who underwent single site percutaneous access (retrograde femoral access [FA], BA, radial access [RA]) for treatment of LE-PAD from September 2016 through September 2019. Patients who underwent multiple access sites for intervention were excluded. Primary outcome was significant access site complications (ASCs), defined as those requiring treatment (blood transfusion, interventional treatment, or surgical treatment). Minor ASCs were also reported. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 61,203 patients (270 RA, 1210 BA, and 59,723 FA) with an average age of 68 years and who were 59.6% male. The RA and BA groups had higher rates of prior endarterectomy or bypass compared with the FA group (66.7% RA; 86.0% BA; 50.2% FA; P < .001). RA was more often used for single-segment treatments (82% vs 74% [P < .020] and more aortoiliac arterial segments (59.6% vs 21.0% [P < .001]). ASC occurred in 1329 patients (2.7%), including minor ASC (996 [1.6%]) and significant ASC (333 [0.54%]). Significant ASC were less common after FA and RA compared with BA (RA, 1 [0.37%]; FA, 307 [0.51%]; BA, 25 [2.1%]; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, BA was the strongest predictor of significant ASC (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-4.36; P < .001). Significant ASC was no different after RA compared with FA (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-4.33; P = .616). Other factors independently associated with significant ASC were sex, age, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dialysis, and closure device use. CONCLUSIONS: RA as the primary access vessel for endovascular treatment of LE-PAD is safe when compared with other traditional access sites. When FA is not possible or desirable, the radial approach may provide suitable access to treatment with a better safety profile than BA.

Staged autogenous to prosthetic hemodialysis access creation strategy to maximize forearm options.

OBJECTIVE: When an adequate cephalic vein is not available for fistula construction, surgeons often turn to basilic vein or prosthetic constructions. Single-stage forearm prosthetic hemodialysis accesses are associated with poor durability, and upper arm non-autogenous access options are often limited by axillary outflow failure, which inevitably drives transition to the contralateral arm or lower extremity. We hypothesized that initial creation of a modest flow proximal forearm arterial-venous anastomosis to dilate ("develop") inflow and outflow vessels, followed by a planned second-stage procedure to create a cannulation zone with a prosthetic graft in the forearm, would result in reliable and durable hemodialysis access in patients with limited options. METHODS: We performed an institutional cohort study from 2017 to 2021 using a prospectively maintained database supplemented with adjudicated chart review. Patients without traditional autogenous hemodialysis access options in the forearm underwent an initial non-wrist arterial-venous anastomosis creation in the forearm as a first stage, followed by a second-stage interposition graft sewn to the existing inflow and venous outflow segments to create a useable cannulation zone in the forearm while leveraging vascular development. Outcomes included time from second-stage access creation to loss of primary and secondary patency, frequency of subsequent interventions, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: The cohort included 23 patients; first-stage radial artery-based (74%) configurations were more common than brachial artery-based (26%). Mean age was 63 years (standard deviation, 14 years), and 65% were female. Median follow-up was 340 days (interquartile range [IQR], 169-701 days). Median time to cannulation from second-stage procedure was 28 days (IQR, 18-53 days). Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency at 1 year was 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3%-45.8%), 34.6% (95% CI, 15.2%-66.2%), and 95.7% (95% CI, 81.3%-99.7%), respectively. Subsequent interventions occurred at a rate of 3.02 (IQR, 1.0-4.97) per person-year, with endovascular thrombectomy with or without angioplasty/stenting (70.9%) being the most common. There were no cases of steal syndrome. Infection occurred in two cases and were managed with antibiotics alone. CONCLUSIONS: For patients without adequate distal autogenous access options, staged prosthetic graft placement in the forearm offers few short-term complications and excellent durability with active surveillance while strategically preserving the upper arm for future constructions.

The Use of Vascular Closure Devices for Brachial Artery Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To estimate the rates of technical success and adverse events of vascular closure devices (VCDs) in the brachial artery and compare the rates of adverse events with manual compression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase were searched for observational studies examining VCDs in the brachial artery. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects for the following outcomes: (a) technical success, (b) hematoma at the access site, (c) pseudoaneurysm, (d) local neurological adverse events, and (e) total number of adverse events. A pairwise meta-analysis compared VCD with manual compression for the outcomes of hematoma and the total number of adverse events. RESULTS: Of 1,761 eligible records, 16 studies including 510 access sites were included. Primary procedures performed were peripheral arterial disease interventions, percutaneous coronary intervention, and endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. The technical success rate was 93% (95% CI, 87%-96%; I2 = 47%). Data on the following adverse events were obtained via meta-analysis: (a) hematoma, 9% (5%-15%; I2 = 54%); (b) stenosis or occlusion at access site, 3% (1%-14%; I2 = 51%); (c) infection, 0% (0%-5%; I2 = 0%); (d) pseudoaneurysm, 4% (1%-13%; I2 = 61%); (e) local neurological adverse events, 5% (2%-13%; I2 = 54%); and (f) total number of adverse events, 15% (10%-22%; I2 = 51%). Angio-Seal success rate was 96% (93%-98%; I2 = 0%), whereas the ExoSeal success rate was 93% (69%-99%; I2 = 61%). When comparing VCD and manual compression, there was no difference in hematoma formation (relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35-1.63; I2 = 0%; P = .47) or the total number of adverse events (relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35-1.58; I2 = 76%; P = .45). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being off-label, studies suggest that VCDs in the brachial artery have a high technical success rate. There was no significant difference in adverse events between VCDs and manual compression in the brachial artery.

Inflow Artery Aneurysmal Degeneration After Long Term Native Arteriovenous Fistula for Haemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Inflow arterial aneurysms are a rare but serious complication after long term arteriovenous fistulae (AVF), probably due to arterial wall remodelling after an increase in flow and shear stress, and kidney transplantation with immunosuppressive therapy. This study aimed to describe the outcomes of surgical treatment and long term follow up in a large cohort. METHODS: This prospective cohort study collected data from patients with a true inflow artery aneurysm after AVF creation that was surgically repaired between 2010 and 2022. Anastomotic and infected aneurysms or post-puncture pseudoaneurysms were excluded. Demographic data, access characteristics, symptoms, treatment strategies, and long term follow up were recorded; patency was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 28 patients (64% men, mean age 60.1 years) were treated surgically for aneurysmal degeneration of the axillary or brachial (n = 23) or radial (n = 5) artery after an AVF (10 distal, 18 proximal) performed a mean of 18.3 ± SD 7.9 years previously. Most AVFs were ligated or thrombosed, while all patients except one had previously received kidney transplants. Most of the cases (n = 18) were symptomatic: 13 with pain or swelling, four with distal embolisation, and one rupture. They were repaired by aneurysm partial excision and graft interposition (11 great saphenous vein, six ipsilateral basilic vein, three cephalic vein, and two PTFE graft), ligation (n = 3), or direct end to end anastomosis (n = 3). No major complications occurred before discharge, after a mean hospital stay of 2.4 days. After a mean follow up of 4.8 ± 3.3 years, three cases presented complications: two recurrent proximal brachial aneurysms were repaired with an additional proximal interposition graft (one with further late infected pseudoaneurysm) and an asymptomatic post-traumatic graft thrombosis. Five year primary and secondary patency was 84% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Aneurysmal degeneration of the inflow artery is an unusual complication during long term follow up of AVFs. Aneurysm excision and, in general, autogenous graft interposition using the saphenous or ipsilateral arm vein is a safe and effective strategy.

Association of Pre and Perioperative Vein Mapping with Hemodialysis Access Characteristics and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the utility of both pre and perioperative vein mapping for evaluating vessel suitability for both arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) creation. In our practice, we used both mapping methods to detect arterial issues and to maximize AVF creation. We hypothesized that the patients whose operative plan changed based on their perioperative mapping would ultimately benefit from more optimal access placement with maintained rates of maturation and functional patency. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review evaluating patients who received initial hemodialysis (HD) access from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021, at the Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound in Seattle, Washington. Patients were separated by whether their final procedure was congruent with the best access predicted from the preoperative vein mapping or noncongruent. The primary outcome was fistula maturation. Secondary outcomes were functional patency and number of procedures required to achieve maturation or to maintain functional patency. Results were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared, Moods median, Student's t-tests, and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Preoperative vein mapping uncovered arterial issues in 42% of the patient population. Initial HD access was created in 130 patients (n = 69 congruent, n = 61 noncongruent). Perioperative ultrasound led to a change in the created access in 47% of patients. Within the noncongruent group, 74% received access creation at a more anatomically favorable site compared to their predicted access, 47% were changed to forearm fistula, 20% to brachiocephalic (BC) from previously planned brachiobasilic (BB) or graft, and 7% to BB from previously planned graft. Maturation rates were similar in both groups (congruent 86% and noncongruent 82%), and there were no significant differences in the duration of functional patency or the number of procedures needed to achieve maturation or maintain functional patency. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of pre and perioperative ultrasound for all patients resulted in higher rates of native AVF, forearm placement, and one-stage operations, with maintained maturation rates and functional patency in patients who were otherwise unsuitable candidates based on preoperative vein mapping alone.

Arterial Diameter and Percentage of Monocytes are Sex-Dependent Predictors of Early Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistulae mature less frequently in women than in men, leading to inferior patency and decreased fistula utilization in women. We hypothesized that both anatomic and physiologic sex differences explain reduced maturation. METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients who had a primary arteriovenous fistula created from 2016 to 2021 at a single center were reviewed; sample size was determined using a power calculation. Postoperative ultrasound and laboratory tests were obtained at least 4 weeks after fistula creation. Primary unassisted fistula maturation was determined up to 4 years postprocedure. RESULTS: A total of 28 women and 28 men with a brachial-cephalic fistula were analyzed. The inflow brachial artery diameter was smaller in women than in men, both preoperatively (4.2 ± 0.9 vs. 4.9 ± 1.0 mm, P = 0.008) and postoperatively (4.8 ± 0.8 vs. 5.3 ± 0.9 mm, P = 0.039). Despite similar preoperative brachial artery peak systolic velocity, women had significantly lower postoperative arterial velocity (P = 0.027). Fistula flow was reduced in women, particularly in the midhumerus (747.0 ± 570.4 vs. 1,117.1 ± 471.3 cc/min, P = 0.003). Percentages of neutrophils and lymphocytes were similar among women and men 6 weeks after fistula creation. However, women had reduced monocytes (8.5 ± 2.0 vs. 10.0 ± 2.6%, P = 0.0168). Among 28 men, 24 of 28 (85.7%) achieved unassisted maturation, whereas only 15 of 28 (53.6%) women had fistulae that matured without intervention. Secondary analysis using logistic regression suggested that postoperative arterial diameter was associated with maturation in men, while postoperative monocyte percentage was associated with maturation in women. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences during arteriovenous fistula maturation are present in arterial diameter and velocity, suggesting that both anatomic and physiologic differences in arterial inflow contribute to sex differences in fistula maturation. In men, postoperative arterial diameter is correlated with maturation, whereas in women, the significantly lower proportion of circulating monocytes suggests a role for the immune response in fistula maturation.

Pseudoaneurysm of the brachial artery in an infant due to vaccination: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoaneurysm is a known complication of penetrating arterial injuries such as catheterization, gunshot wounds, and open fractures. Vaccination is an effective method for preventing multiple, serious, infectious diseases in children. Common adverse reactions related to vaccination include fever, swelling, redness, and pain. Brachial pseudoaneurysm after vaccination has not been previously reported. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein we describe a novel case of brachial pseudoaneurysm after vaccination in a child aged 1 year and 3 months. A pulsatile mass was formed in the medial left arm of the infant 10 days after vaccination at a community hospital and gradually grew larger. Preoperative images depicted an eccentric aneurysm in the brachial artery and a swirling flow pattern in the mass. The pseudoaneurysm was excised, and vein graft interpositioning was successfully performed. There were no short-term or long-term complications during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Brachial pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of vaccination via intramuscular injection. Medical staff should avoid puncture wounds to the brachial artery during vaccination, especially in infants.

An ultrasound-guided no incision banding method for the treatment of arteriovenous fistula high-flow in hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: High-flow vascular access is one of the serious complications in the maturation and subsequent use of arteriovenous fistula (AVF). We adopted a novel surgical approach named no incision limited ligation indwelling needle assisted- revision (NILLINR) to treat high-flow of the hemodialysis vascular access and ascertained the outcomes by regular follow-up visits. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. 26 hemodialysis patients with symptomatic high-flow access (access flow > 1500 mL/min) were treated with the novel banding method without incision between June 2018 and October 2020. The flow of the brachial artery before and after the restriction was measured by experienced clinicians by using the duplex Doppler ultrasound (DUS). All 26 patients were followed up for up to 1 year. Meanwhile, the brachial artery flow was recorded at 6 months and 1 year after restriction. RESULTS: Of all 26 patients included in this study, the mean access flow volume decreased from 2196.2 ± 416.9 mL/min (mean ± SD) to 679.2 ± 67.1 mL/min immediately after the operation. During the follow-up, the volume flow of the brachial artery was still within the restricted range at 6 months (mean ± SD, 720.2 ± 164.7 mL/min) and 1 year (mean ± SD, 713.9 ± 173.8 mL/min) after the operation. Meanwhile, the mean duration of the operation is 8.5 ± 3.3 min, and there is no bleeding or rupture. CONCLUSION: This novel no-incision limited ligation indwelling needle-assisted revision is a safe, effective, and time-saving option to treat high-flow access.

Comparison of wound complications between one-stage and two-stage brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula: A meta-analysis.

Research assessing the outcome of brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas (BB-AVF) after a one- and two-stage technique was conducted. A strict review of the comprehensive literature up to May 2023 was carried out using four databases-PubMed，Embase, Cochrane Library and web of science. Inclusion and exclusion criteria developed for the study were then applied to assess the quality of the literature, it was decided to review 12 interrelated studies.95% confidence intervals (Cl) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated using fixed effects models. The data were meta-analysed using RevMan 5.3 software. The results showed that two-stage technique with BB-AVF reduced surgical site haematoma (SSH) formation, (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.24-4.17, p = 0.008), and also reduced surgical site wound infection (SSWI) (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.17-2.94, p = 0.008). There are, however, several small sample sizes in the selected studies for this meta-analysis, so caution should be used when processing their values. There are more high-quality studies with large sample sizes that should be considered for future meta-analyses.

Application of the free-style brachial artery perforator based propellar flap in the management of axillary hidradenitis suppurativa.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory disease often requiring surgical intervention in extensive lesions. Total of seven axillary lesion with HS was treated with free-style perforator based propeller flaps (innominate perforator originating from the brachial artery) after complete excision. The flap design mimicked the axis and design of the brachioplasty surgery. The flaps were elevated and after obliterating the defect, the remnant flap was discarded and donor site was primarily closed. All flaps were performed successfully and HS did not recur in any of the patients. In addition, the operated limb also showed a reduction of arm circumference of more than 5 cm. This is the first report using the free-style perforator based propeller flap to reconstruct the axillary HS. It is a simple and a reliable approach yielding good functional and aesthetic outcome with additional advantages of providing a brachioplasty.