Reporting Sacroiliac Joint Imaging Performed for Known or Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Recommendations.

Whereas previous projects attempted to standardize imaging in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), few studies have been published about the need for specific details regarding the image acquisition and lesions that may be less familiar to general radiologists. This work reports consensus recommendations developed by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) that aim to standardize the imaging reports in patients suspected of having or with known axSpA. A task force consisting of radiologists and rheumatologists from ASAS and one patient representative formulated two surveys that were completed by ASAS members. The results of these surveys led to the development of 10 recommendations that were endorsed by 73% (43 of 59) of ASAS members. The recommendations are targeted to the radiologist and include best practices for the inclusion of clinical information, technical details, image quality, and imaging findings in radiology reports. These recommendations also emphasize that imaging findings that indicate differential diagnoses and referral suggestions should be included in the concluding section of the radiology report. With these recommendations, ASAS aims to improve the diagnostic process and care for patients suspected of having or with known axSpA.

Sacroiliac radiographic progression over 10 years in axSpA: data from the DESIR inception cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate sacroiliac radiographic progression over a 10-year follow-up and determine the baseline factors associated with such progression in patients with recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, <3 years). METHODS: This analysis was performed in the DESIR cohort (NCT01648907). The radiographic status of the patients (radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) vs non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA)) was based on the modified New York (mNY) criteria. Information on mNY criteria on the pelvic radiographs was obtained in four reading waves over a 10-year period. Images were blinded and centrally read by 3 trained readers. The % of mNY net progressors (ie, number of 'progressors' minus number of 'regressors' divided by the total number of patients) was assessed in completers (ie, pelvic radiographs at baseline and 10 years). The yearly likelihood of mNY+ was estimated using an integrated analysis (ie, including all patients with at least one available mNY score ('intention-to-follow' population) using a generalised estimating equations model and time-varying tumour necrosis factor (TNF) use as a confounder. Baseline predictors of mNY+ during 10 years were evaluated. RESULTS: Completers included 294 patients, while intention-to-follow included 659 participants. In the completers, the net % progression (from nr-axSpA to r-axSpA) was 5.8%. In the intention-to-follow population, the probability of being mNY+ was estimated to increase 0.87% (95% CI 0.56 to 1.19) per year (ie, 8.7% after 10 years) while when introducing TNF inhibitors (TNFi) as a time-varying covariate, the probability was 0.45% (95% CI 0.09 to 0.81) (ie, 4.5% after 10 years). Baseline bone marrow oedema (BME) on MRI of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) was associated with being mNY+ over time OR 6.2 (95% CI 5.3 to 7.2) and OR 3.1 (95% CI 2.4 to 3.9) in HLA-B27+ and HLA-B27-, respectively). Male sex, symptom duration >1.5 years, Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score ≥2.1 and smoking (only in HLA-B27 positives) were also associated with being mNY+ over 10 years. BME was not found to be a mediator of the HLA-B27 effect on mNY+ at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The yearly likelihood of switching from nr-axSpA to r-axSpA in patients after 10 years of follow-up was low, and even lower when considering TNFi use.

Goodbye to the term 'ankylosing spondylitis', hello 'axial spondyloarthritis': time to embrace the ASAS-defined nomenclature.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is the historic term used for decades for the HLA-B27-associated inflammatory disease affecting mainly the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) and spine. Classification criteria for AS have radiographic sacroiliitis as a dominant characteristic. However, with the availability of MRI of SIJ, it could be demonstrated that the disease starts long before definite SIJ changes become visible on radiographs. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society, representing a worldwide group of experts reached consensus on changes in the nomenclature pertaining to axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), such as the terminology of diagnosis and of assessment of disease activity tools. These are important changes in the field, as experts in axSpA are now in agreement that the term axSpA is the overall term for the disease. A further differentiation, of which radiographic versus non-radiographic is only one aspect, may be relevant for research purposes. Another important decision was that the terms AS and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) can be used interchangeably, but that the preferred term is r-axSpA. Based on the decision that axSpA is the correct terminology, a proposal was made to officially change the meaning of the ASDAS acronym to 'Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score'. In addition, for simplification it was proposed that the term ASDAS (instead of ASDAS-CRP) should be preferred and applied to the ASDAS calculated with C reactive protein (CRP). It is hoped that these changes will be used consequently for education, in textbooks, manuscripts and presentations.

Erosions on T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Radiography of Sacroiliac Joints in Recent-Onset Axial Spondyloarthritis: 2-Year Data (EMBARK Trial and DESIR Cohort).

OBJECTIVE: (1) To compare the capacity to detect sacroiliac joint (SIJ) erosions and baseline-to-week 104 change in erosions between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographs in recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); and (2) to compare treatment-discriminatory capacities of MRI and radiographic scores for erosion detection in patients receiving etanercept in the Effect of Etanercept on Symptoms and Objective Inflammation in Nonradiographic axSpA (EMBARK) trial vs controls in the DESIR (Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifférenciées Récentes) cohort. METHODS: Anonymized SIJ MRI and radiographs were assessed at patient and joint surface levels. Three readers evaluated MRI; 3 different readers evaluated radiographs. Final scores for comparison of radiographs and MRI for detection of erosions were assigned based on agreement of ≥ 2 of 3 readers' assessments. RESULTS: At baseline, discordance in erosion detection between imaging methods was more frequent for MRI erosions in the absence of radiographic erosions (48/224 [21.4%] patients) than for radiographic erosions in the absence of MRI erosions (14/224 [6.3%] patients; P < 0.001). After 104 weeks, a decrease in erosions was observed on MRI but not radiographs in 49/221 (22.2%) patients, and on radiographs but not MRI in 6/221 (2.7%) patients (P < 0.001). In the treatment-discriminant capacity analysis, the largest standardized differences between etanercept and control cohorts at week 104 were changes in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI erosion discrete score, changes in erosion average score, and meeting the modified New York criteria on radiographs, with unadjusted/adjusted Hedges G effect sizes of 0.40/0.50, 0.40/0.56, and 0.40/0.43, respectively. CONCLUSION: In recent-onset axSpA, SIJ erosions and erosion change were observed more frequently on MRI than radiography. The significance of interval improvement of MRI erosions warrants further research. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01258738, NCT01648907].

Sacroiliitis in inflammatory bowel disease on abdominal computed tomography: prevalence, misses, and associated factors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and rate of a missed diagnosis of sacroiliitis on abdominal computed tomography (CT) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Factors associated with sacroiliitis were also assessed. METHOD: This retrospective study included 210 patients with IBD (mean age 31.1 years) who underwent abdominal CT. Based on a validated abdominal CT scoring tool, bilateral sacroiliac (SI) joints on abdominal CT in the whole study population were retrospectively reviewed. Subsequently, patients were classified into the 'patients with sacroiliitis' group and the 'patients without sacroiliitis' group. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to clarify the factors associated with sacroiliitis. RESULTS: Sacroiliitis was identified in 26 out of 210 patients (12.4%). However, sacroiliitis was recognized on the primary reading in only five of these 26 patients (19.2%) and was missed on the initial report in the remaining 21 patients (80.8%). Among the 21 patients, 20 (95.2%) were finally diagnosed with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). There was a higher prevalence of female sex (p = 0.04), upper gastrointestinal involvement (p = 0.04), and back pain (p < 0.01) in patients with sacroiliitis than in those without sacroiliitis. However, on multivariate analysis, back pain was the only factor associated with sacroiliitis (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Physicians should carefully evaluate SI joints on abdominal CT in patients with IBD to enable early detection of sacroiliitis, potentially leading to an early diagnosis of axSpA. In addition, if patients with IBD present with back pain, the possibility of sacroiliitis should be considered.

Evaluation of the current use of MRI to aid the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis in the UK: results from a freedom of information request.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of recommendations from the 2019 consensus exercise conducted by radiologists and rheumatologists on the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A freedom of information (FOI) request was used to assess the use of MRI in the diagnosis of axSpA and radiologists' awareness of the 2019 guidance across all NHS Trusts and Health Boards in the UK, including England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales. RESULTS: The FOI request was sent to 150 Trusts/Health Boards, and 93 full responses were received. Of the 93 respondents (97%), 90 reported familiarity with the term axSpA and 70/93 (75%) reported familiarity with the 2019 recommendations. Awareness of recommendations regarding specific MRI features supportive of the diagnosis of axSpA was 74/93 (80%) for the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) and 66/93 (71%) for the spine. The median wait for MRI acquisition was 2-3 months. Fifty-two of the 93 (56%) reported at least some outsourcing of axSpA MRI (33%/29% for specialist/non-specialist outsourcing respectively); 32/93 (34%) reported some scans being reported in-house by non-musculoskeletal radiologists. CONCLUSION: There have been several positive developments in the understanding and use of MRI for the diagnosis of axSpA in the UK since the 2017 survey, although substantial scope for further improvement remains. Several new challenges have also emerged, including the increase in waiting times, reliance on outsourcing, and the reporting of MRI by non-musculoskeletal radiologists.

The bright Easter bunny sign: a useful aide-memoire on MRI for costotransverse joint inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis.

AIM: To assess the significance of the "bright Easter bunny" sign on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to indicate inflammatory costotransverse joint (CtJ) lesions to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of patients with ax-SpA from a specialist rheumatology clinic were analysed retrospectively over two cohorts, between 2012-2014 and 2018-2020, to determine newly diagnosed patients under the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria. Biological naive adult patients who underwent spine MRI and sacroiliac imaging with full immunological work-up and a C-reactive protein reading within 3 months of the scan were included. Blinded images were reviewed by experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. RESULT: From the 1,284 cases that were identified, 40 cases met the inclusion criteria for this study. Seven out of the 40 cases (17.5%) identified inflammatory lesions at the CtJ with five (70%) showing concordance with the bright Easter bunny sign. CONCLUSION: The bright Easter bunny sign is concordant with inflammatory costotransverse enthesitis. This aide-memoire radiological sign is often on overlooked edge-of-field sections and this emphasises the need to ensure adequate coverage of the CtJ on spine MRI protocols as an important anatomical site of inflammatory change in ax-SpA assessment.

The value of a repeat MRI examination of the sacroiliac joints following an inconclusive initial examination.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the diagnostic utility of repeat sacroiliac joint (SIJ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations following an inconclusive initial examination performed for suspected sacroiliitis. METHOD: Subjects with > 1 SIJ MRI examinations, an inconclusive first scan and at least 6 months interval between scans, were included. All scans were evaluated for the presence of structural/active SIJ lesions as well as any other pathology. Clinical data was extracted from the patients' clinical files, and any missing data was obtained by a telephone interview. Diagnosis and active/structural scores were compared between first and follow-up examinations (t test). RESULTS: Seventy-one subjects were included in the study, 77.4% females, mean age 41.0 ± 15 years, mean time interval between exams 30.4 ± 25.24 months. Twelve subjects performed > 2 scans. In only two subjects (2.81%), both females, MRI diagnosis changed from inconclusive to definite sacroiliitis. None of the subjects with > 2 scans had evidence of sacroiliitis in any of the following MRI examinations. Significant differences were observed between the scores of active SIJ lesion of the first and follow-up MRI (1.51/1.62, p = 0.02) but not for scores of structural lesions (1.22/1.68, p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat SIJ MRI when the first MRI is inconclusive for sacroiliitis is more valuable in ruling out than in securing diagnosis of sacroiliitis. We suggest that when MRI findings are inconclusive, decision-making should be based on clinical data.

Association of anatomical variants of the sacroiliac joint with bone marrow edema in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of sacroiliac joint variants in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) using MRI-based synthetic CT images and to evaluate their relationships with the presence of bone marrow edema, as this may potentially complicate diagnosing active sacroiliitis on MRI in patients with suspected axSpA. METHODS: 172 patients were retrospectively included. All patients underwent MRI because of clinical suspicion of sacroiliitis. The diagnosis of axSpA was made by a tertiary hospital rheumatologist. Two readers independently determined the presence of bone marrow edema and the presence of one or more of the nine known sacroiliac joint (SIJ) variants. RESULTS: SIJ variants were common in axSpA patients (82.9%) and the non-SpA group (85.4%); there were no significant differences in prevalence. Bone marrow edema was frequently found in axSpA (86.8%) and non-SpA patients (34%). AxSpA patients with SIJ variants (except for accessory joint) demonstrated 4 to 10 times higher odds for bone marrow edema, however not statistically significant. The more variants were present in this group, the higher the chance of bone marrow edema. However, some multicollinearity cannot be excluded, since bone marrow edema is very frequent in the axSpA group by definition. CONCLUSION: SIJ variants are common in axSpA and non-SpA patients. SIJ variants were associated with higher prevalence of bone marrow edema in axSpA patients, potentially due to altered biomechanics, except for accessory joint which may act as a stabilizer.

Characterization of bone marrow lesions in axial spondyloarthritis using quantitative T1 mapping MRI.

OBJECTIVE: Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) uses T1-weighted and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences to characterize bone marrow in axial spondyloarthritis. However, quantification is restricted to estimating the extent of lesions because signal intensities are highly variable both within individuals and across patients and MRI scanners. This study evaluates the performance of quantitative T1 mapping for distinguishing different types of bone marrow lesions of the sacroiliac joints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 62 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) and MRI of the sacroiliac joints including T1, STIR, and T1 mapping. Bone marrow lesions were characterized by three readers and assigned to one of four groups: sclerosis, osteitis, fat lesions, and mixed marrow lesions. Relaxation times on T1 maps were compared using generalized estimating equations and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 119 lesions were selected (sclerosis: 38, osteitis: 27, fat lesions: 40; mixed lesions: 14). T1 maps showed highly significant differences between the lesions with the lowest values for sclerosis (1516±220 ms), followed by osteitis (1909±75 ms), and fat lesions (2391±200 ms); p<0.001. T1 mapping differentiated lesions with areas under the ROC curve of 99% (sclerosis vs. osteitis) and 100% (other comparisons). CONCLUSION: T1 mapping allows accurate characterization of sclerosis, osteitis, and fat lesions at the sacroiliac joint but only for homogeneous, non-mixed lesions. Thus, further sequence development is needed before implementation in clinical routine.

Assessment of the sacroiliac joint with computed tomography motion analysis: a diagnostic study of 12 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pain in the sacroiliac joint may be caused by abnormal joint motion. Diagnosis is mainly based on clinical tests. The aims of this study were to examine whether low-dose computed tomography with provocation of the hip could detect sacroiliac joint motion, and to study whether provocation of the hip results in greater sacroiliac joint motion in the ipsilateral than in the contralateral sacroiliac joint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 12 patients with sacroiliac joint pain were examined with low-dose computed tomography scans of the sacroiliac joint, one with the hips in the neutral position, and one each in provocation with the left or the right hip in a figure-of-4 position. Accuracy was tested by comparing internal rotation of the sacrum with internal rotation in the sacroiliac joint. Motion in the sacroiliac joint was assessed by comparing the position of each of the ilia with the reference, the sacrum. Data is shown as mean with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: We observed greater motion in the sacroiliac joint than internally in the sacrum, i.e., 0.57° (CI 0.43-0.71) vs. 0.20° (CI 0.11-0.28). The motion of the geometric center of the moving object for the sacroiliac joint was larger on the provoked side; mean difference 0.17 mm (CI 0.01-0.33), P = 0.04. Corresponding figures for rotation were mean difference 0.19° (CI 0.10-0.28), P < 0.001. Compared with the sacrum, the largest motion was seen at the anterior superior iliac spine; mean difference 0.38 mm (CI 0.10-0.66), P = 0.001. CONCLUSION: Provocation in the figure-of-4 position of the hip results in sacroiliac joint motion measurable with computed tomography motion analysis. Provocation of the hip induces larger motion on the ipsilateral than on the contralateral sacroiliac joint.

Axial Spondyloarthritis: Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Classification Improve Report Interpretation.

OBJECTIVE: The interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports is crucial for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis, but the subjective nature of narrative reports can lead to varying interpretations. This study presents a validation of a novel MRI reporting system for the sacroiliac joint in clinical practice. METHODS: A historical review was conducted on 130 consecutive patients referred by 2 rheumatologists for initial MRI assessment of possible axial spondyloarthritis. The original MRI reports were interpreted by the rheumatologists and the radiologist who originally read the images and then categorized according to the novel system. Two musculoskeletal radiologists then reinterpreted the original MRI scans using the new system, and the resulting reports were interpreted and categorized by the same rheumatologists. The quality of the new framework was assessed by comparing the interpretations of both reports. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients met the study criteria. The rheumatologists disagreed on the categorization of the original MRI reports in 12% of cases. The rheumatologists and original radiologists disagreed on the categorization of the initial report in 23.4% of cases. In contrast, there was 100% agreement between the rheumatologists and radiologists on the categorization of the new MRI report. CONCLUSION: The new MRI categorization system significantly improved the agreement between the clinician and radiologist in report interpretation. The system provided a standard vocabulary for reporting, reduced variability in report interpretation, and may therefore improve clinical decision-making.

Clinical, Laboratory, and Imaging Features Between Men and Women With Axial Spondyloarthritis in a Specialized Center in Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: The aims were to estimate the frequency of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in women and to analyze the clinical, laboratory, and imaging differences with respect to men at the time of diagnosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of axSpA admitted to the "Reumacheck" SpA program were included between 2017 and 2022. At baseline, all patients underwent clinical assessment, laboratory tests including C-reactive protein and human leukocyte antigen B27, and imaging (plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliac joints, and ultrasound of heel entheses). All evaluators were blinded to the results of the other evaluations. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients with a diagnosis of axSpA were included. The frequency at diagnosis in women was 61.55%. In the univariate analysis, the significant differences between women and men at diagnosis of axSpA were good response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, elevated C-reactive protein, New York Criteria (+), enthesis ultrasound (+), years of education, number of swollen joints, erythrosedimentation rate, and the very low frequency of bone bridges in the magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints. In the logistic regression analysis, the dependent variable was "men," and the only feature that was independently associated was having radiographic compromise according to the New York criteria (odds ratio, 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of axSpA in women was 61.55%; clinical, laboratory, and imaging differences were observed. Women experienced less radiographic compromise.

Is it time to move on from pelvic radiography as the first-line imaging modality for suspected sacroiliitis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pelvic radiography in which structural lesions characteristic of sacroiliitis can be detected, is recommended as the first imaging modality when axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is suspected clinically. However, cross-sectional modalities like computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are superior to radiographs for diagnosing sacroiliitis. Thus, we currently debate the role of radiography as first imaging modality in the diagnostic workup of axSpA. RECENT FINDINGS: Diagnosing sacroiliitis on pelvic radiographs is challenging with large interobserver and intraobserver variation. Low-dose CT (ldCT) of the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) was proved to be more sensitive and reliable than radiographs with comparable ionizing radiation exposure. MRI is the preferred modality for detecting early SIJ inflammation, well before structural lesions evolve. New, promising MRI sequences sensitive to cortical bone improve erosion detection, making MRI a one-stop shop for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis. SUMMARY: Given the debatable additive value of pelvic radiographs for the detection of sacroiliitis, and the presence of excellent alternatives for imaging the bony cortex of the SIJs such as ldCT and MRI with state-of-the-art sequences sensitive to cortical bone, it is high time to discuss the use of these more accurate modalities instead of radiographs.

Imaging in pediatric spondyloarthritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Imaging is used in the diagnosis of peripheral and axial disease in juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA). Imaging of the joints and entheses in children and adolescents can be challenging for those unfamiliar with the appearance of the maturing skeleton. These differences are key for rheumatologists and radiologists to be aware of. RECENT FINDINGS: In youth, skeletal variation during maturation makes the identification of arthritis, enthesitis, and sacroiliitis difficult. A great effort has been put forward to define imaging characteristics seen in healthy children in order to more accurately identify disease. Additionally, there are novel imaging modalities on the horizon that are promising to further differentiate normal physiologic changes versus disease. SUMMARY: This review describes the current state of imaging, limitations, and future imaging modalities in youth, with key attention to differences in imaging interpretation of the peripheral joints, entheses, and sacroiliac joint in youth and adults.

The influence of age on the prevalence of inflammatory and structural MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joints of patients with and without axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the influence of age on inflammatory (bone marrow oedema [BME]) and structural (fat lesions [FL], erosions and ankylosis) MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) of patients with and without axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: In a retrospective study, SIJ MRI (STIR/T1 sequences) of consecutive patients with chronic back pain diagnosed with axSpA or non-SpA were evaluated based on SIJ quadrants (SIJ-Q). Two blinded readers evaluated BME and structural lesions. Reader agreement was evaluated for prevalence of MRI lesions related to age. RESULTS: MRIs of 309 (175 axSpA, 134 non-SpA) patients were evaluated. Their mean age was 38.5 (11.4) and 43.4 (13.8) years, 67% and 36% were male, CRP was 1.6 (2.4) and 1.1 (2.1) mg/dl and median symptom duration was 48 and 60 months for axSpA and non-SpA, respectively. SIJ-Q with BME and erosions were significantly more frequent in axSpA vs non-SpA patients independent of age, while this difference was seen for FL only in patients ≥50 years. The proportion of patients with ≥1 or ≥3 BME or chronic lesions except for FL increased with age in both groups, and was constantly higher in axSpA vs non-SpA. In univariate analyses, only female sex was significantly associated with more FL. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with MRI lesions was high in both axSpA and non-SpA patients. However, the prevalence of BME and erosions was significantly more frequent in patients with axSpA, was independent of age and also allowed for discrimination. FL occurred more frequently only in older age groups and were less reliable for discrimination vs non-SpA patients.

Comparing MRI and conventional radiography for the detection of structural changes indicative of axial spondyloarthritis in the ASAS cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To compare MRI and conventional radiography of SI joints for detection of structural lesions typical for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Adult patients from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) cohort with symptoms suggestive of axSpA and both SI joint MRI and radiographs available for central reading were included. Radiographs were evaluated by three readers according to the modified New York (mNY) criteria grading system. The presence of structural damage on radiographs was defined as fulfilment of the radiographic mNY criterion and, additionally, a lower threshold for sacroiliitis of at least grade 2 unilaterally. MRI scans were assessed for the presence of structural changes indicative of axSpA by seven readers. Diagnostic performance [sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-)] of MRI and radiographs (vs rheumatologist's diagnosis of axSpA) were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 183 patients were included and 135 (73.7%) were diagnosed with axSpA. Structural lesions indicative of axSpA on MRI had sensitivity 38.5%, specificity 91.7%, PPV 92.9%, NPV 34.6%, LR+ 4.62 and LR- 0.67. Sacroiliitis according to the mNY criteria had sensitivity 54.8%, specificity 70.8%, PPV 84.1%, NPV 35.8%, LR+ 1.88 and LR- 0.64. Radiographic sacroiliitis of at least grade 2 unilaterally had sensitivity 65.2%, specificity 50.0%, PPV 78.6%, NPV 33.8%, LR+ 1.30 and LR- 0.69. CONCLUSION: Structural lesions of the SI joint detected by MRI demonstrated better diagnostic performance and better interreader reliability compared with conventional radiography.

New bone formation at the sacroiliac joint in axial spondyloarthritis: characterization of backfill in MRI and CT.

OBJECTIVE: MRI findings of the SI joint space in axial SpA (axSpA) include inflammation and fat metaplasia inside an erosion; the latter is also termed 'backfill'. We compared such lesions with CT to better characterize whether they represent new bone formation. METHODS: We identified patients with axSpA who underwent both CT and MRI of the SI joints in two prospective studies. MRI datasets were jointly screened by three readers for joint space-related findings and grouped into three categories: type A-high short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and low T1 signal; type B-high signal in both sequences; type C-low STIR and high T1 signal. Image fusion was used to identify MRI lesions in CT before we measured Hounsfield units (HU) in each lesion and surrounding cartilage and bone. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients with axSpA were identified and we included 48 type A, 88 type B, and 84 type C lesions (maximum 1 lesion per type and joint). The HU values were 73.6 (s.d. 15.0) for cartilage, 188.0 (s.d. 69.9) for spongious bone, 1086.0 (s.d. 100.3) for cortical bone, 341.2 (s.d. 96.7) for type A, 359.3 (s.d. 153.5) for type B and 446.8 (s.d. 123.0) for type C lesions. Lesion HU values were significantly higher than those for cartilage and spongious bone, but lower than those for cortical bone (P < 0.001). Type A and B lesions showed similar HU values (P = 0.93), whereas type C lesions were denser (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All joint space lesions show increased density and might contain calcified matrix, suggesting new bone formation, with a gradual increase in the proportion of calcified matrix towards type C lesions (backfill).

Influence of size and shape of the auricular surfaces on subchondral bone density distribution in the sacroiliac joint.

The sacroiliac auricular surface has a variable morphology and size. The impact of such variations on subchondral mineralization distribution has not been investigated. Sixty-nine datasets were subjected to CT-osteoabsorptiometry for the qualitative visualization of chronic loading conditions of the subchondral bone plate using color-mapped densitograms based on Hounsfield Units in CT. Auricular surface morphologies were classified into three types based on posterior angle size: Type 1: >160°, Type 2: 130-160° and Type 3: <130°. Auricular surface size was categorized based on the mean value (15.4 cm2 ) separating the group into 'small' and 'large' joint surfaces. Subchondral bone density patterns were qualitatively classified into four color patterns: two marginal patterns (M1 and M2) and two non-marginal patterns (N1 and N2) and each iliac and sacral surface was subsequently categorized. 'Marginal' meant that 60-70% of the surface was less mineralized compared with the highly dense regions and vice versa for the 'non-marginal' patterns. M1 had anterior border mineralization and M2 had mineralization scattered around the borders. N1 had mineralization spread over the whole superior region, N2 had mineralization spread over the superior and anterior regions. Auricular surface area averaged 15.4 ± 3.6 cm2 , with a tendency for males to have larger joint surfaces. Type 2 was the most common (75%) and type 3 the least common morphology (9%). M1 was the most common pattern (62% of surfaces) by sex (males 60%, females 64%) with the anterior border as the densest region in all three morphologies. Sacra have a majority of surfaces with patterns from the marginal group (98%). Ilia have mineralization concentrated at the anterior border (patterns M1 and N2 combined: 83%). Load distribution differences related to auricular surface morphology seems to have little effect on long-term stress-related bone adaptation visualized with CT-osteoabsorptiometry. Higher iliac side mineralization was observed in larger joint surfaces and age-related morphomechanical size alterations were seen in males.

Sacroiliac joint MRI for diagnosis of ax-SpA: algorithm to improve the specificity of the current ASAS MRI criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To compare sacroiliac joint (SIJ) lesions on MRI in women with versus without axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) and establish an algorithm to determine whether such lesions are due to ax-SpA. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study assessed bone marrow edema (BME), sclerosis, erosions, osteophytes, and ankylosis at the SIJ in two groups of women, one with and another without ax-SpA. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for combinations/characteristics of lesions, using rheumatologists' assessment with assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) criteria as the gold standard for diagnosis of ax-SpA. RESULTS: Compared to women without ax-SpA, women with ax-SpA had more BME (61% vs 17%, p < 0.001), sclerosis (40% vs 22%, p < 0.001), erosions (35% vs 5%, p < 0.001), and ankylosis (2% vs 0%, p = 0.007), but less osteophytes (5% vs 33%, p < 0.001). The ASAS MRI criteria yielded 59% sensitivity and 88% specificity, while a new algorithm achieved 56% sensitivity and 95% specificity using the following criteria: no osteophytes at the SIJ and either (i) BME at the SIJ with at least one dimension ≥ 8 mm or (ii) at least one erosion at the SIJ. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the following pragmatic algorithm for MRI diagnosis of ax-SpA in women: no osteophytes at the SIJ and either (i) BME at the SIJ with at least one dimension ≥ 8 mm or (ii) at least one erosion at the SIJ. The false positive rate when using the new algorithm (3.3%) is less than half than when using the ASAS MRI criteria (7.7%); thus, its application in clinical practice could reduce overdiagnosis and prevent overtreatment of ax-SpA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The developed algorithm has a false-positive rate that is less than half than when using the ASAS MRI criteria (3.3% vs 7.7%), thus its application in clinical practice could reduce overdiagnosis and prevent overtreatment of axial spondyloarthritis. KEY POINTS: • Compared to women without axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA), women with ax-SpA had a significantly higher prevalence of bone marrow edema (BME), sclerosis, erosions, and ankylosis, but a significantly lower prevalence of osteophytes. • A new algorithm for positive ax-SpA based on sacroiliac joint MRI was developed: no osteophytes at the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and either (i) BME at the SIJ with at least one dimension ≥ 8 mm or (ii) at least one erosion at the SIJ. • We recommend this new algorithm for diagnosis of ax-SpA in women, as it has a significantly better specificity than the assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) MRI criteria and less than half the false positive rate; thus, its application in clinical practice could reduce overdiagnosis and prevent overtreatment of ax-SpA.